Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Right Hepatic Vein (right + hepatic_vein)
Selected AbstractsChanges in hepatic venous morphology with cirrhosis on MRIJOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Issue 5 2009Yang Zhang MD Abstract Purpose To identify changes in vascular morphology on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cirrhosis and to compare these findings to liver donors. Materials and Methods Patients undergoing liver transplantation with biopsy-proven cirrhosis (n = 74) and liver donor candidates (n = 85) underwent dynamic gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR at 1.5T. Vessel diameters were measured independently by three radiologists and features of cirrhosis were identified and correlated with cirrhosis. Results Hepatic veins were smaller in patients with cirrhosis (4.9, 4.5, and 5.0 mm for right, middle, and left vs. 9.9, 7.6, and 8.9 mm in donors, P , 0.001) and were negatively correlated with cirrhosis (P < 0.001). Right hepatic vein (RHV) <5 mm diagnosed cirrhosis with 59% sensitivity and 99% specificity; the sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 85% for RHV <7 mm. Main portal vein was minimally larger in cirrhosis, 14 versus 12 mm (P < 0.001) in donors. Right portal veins were smaller in cirrhotic patients, 6.5 and 6.2 mm compared to 8.4 and 7.6 mm (P , 0.001), respectively, in donors. Conclusion Vascular features of cirrhosis include small hepatic veins, minimally enlarged main portal vein, and small intrahepatic portal veins; these features may facilitate identification of cirrhosis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:1085,1092. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Does middle hepatic vein omission in a right split graft affect the outcome of liver transplantation?LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2007A comparative study of right split livers with, without the middle hepatic vein Preservation of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) for a right split liver transplantation (SLT) in an adult recipient is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the graft and patient outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) using a right split graft, according to the type of venous drainage. From February 2000 to May 2006, 33 patients received 34 cadaveric right split liver grafts. According to the type of recipient pairs (adult/adult or adult/child), the right liver graft was deprived of the MHV or not. The first group (GI, n = 15) included grafts with only the right hepatic vein (RHV) outflow, the second (GII, n = 18) included grafts with both right and MHV outflows. The 2 groups were similar for patient demographics, initial liver disease, and donor characteristics. In GI and GII, graft-to-recipient-weight ratio (GRWR) was 1.2 ± 0% and 1.6 ± 0.3% (P < 0.05), and cold ischemia time was 10 hours 55 minutes ± 2 hours 49 minutes and 10 hours 47 minutes ± 3 hours 32 minutes, respectively (P = not significant). Postoperative death occurred in 1 patient in each group. Vascular complications included anastomotic strictures: 2 portal vein (PV), 1 hepatic artery (HA), and 1 RHV anastomotic strictures; all in GI. Biliary complications occurred in 20% and 22% of the patients, in GI and GII, respectively (P = not significant). There were no differences between both groups regarding postoperative outcome and blood tests at day 1-15 except for a significantly higher cholestasis in GI. At 1 and 3 yr, patient survival was 94% for both groups and graft survival was 93% for GI and 90% for GII (P = not significant). In conclusion, our results suggest that adult right SLT without the MHV is safe and associated with similar long-term results as compared with those of the right graft including the MHV, despite that early liver function recovered more slowly. Technical refinements in outflow drainage should be evaluated in selected cases. Liver Transpl 13:829,837, 2007. © 2007 AASLD. [source] Isolated right hepatic vein obstruction after piggyback liver transplantationLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2006Federico Aucejo The "piggyback" technique for liver transplantation has gained worldwide acceptance. Still, complications such as outflow obstruction have been observed, usually attributable to technical errors such as small-caliber anastomosis of the suprahepatic vena cava, twisting, or kinking. Iatrogenic Budd-Chiari syndrome after piggyback liver transplantation has been reported as a consequence of obstruction involving the entire anastomosis (usually the 3 hepatic veins). Here we describe technical issues, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of 3 cases in which outflow obstruction affected only the right hepatic vein. In conclusion, all 3 patients developed recurrent ascites requiring angioplasty and/or stent placement across the right hepatic vein to alleviate the symptoms. Liver Transpl 12:808,812, 2006. © 2006 AASLD. [source] Simplified standardized technique for living donor liver transplantation using left liver graft plus caudate lobeLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2004Shin Hwang Concomitant resection of the caudate lobe (CL) would increase the liver mass in the left liver graft. We tried to define a simplified standardized technique for adult living donor liver transplantation using the extended left lobe (ELL) plus CL (ELLC) through a prospective study of 27 consecutive ELLC graft cases in 2003. Donor CL was dissected toward the 10 o'clock direction and transected at the midpoint between the trunks of the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the middle hepatic vein (MHV). This orthodox transection was performed in 18 cases, but the transection plane was moved left in 9 cases. Compared with conventional left liver implantation, there was no additional reconstruction except for single revascularization of the largest short hepatic vein of the CL (V1) in 21 cases. On 1-week computed tomography (CT) images, the perfusion states of the CL portion were good in 15 cases, fair in 7 cases, and poor in 5 cases. Regeneration of the CL portion during the 1st week was +43%, +18%, and ,10% in the good, fair, and poor perfusion groups, respectively. There were positive correlations among the perfusion state of the CL, the location of the CL transection plane, and the width of the CL portion that was attached to the left liver graft. CL implantation resulted in a mean gain of graft mass by 5.9% in the left liver at the time of operation and by 3.9% after 1 week. There were no donor complications, and 25 recipients (93%) survive to date. In conclusion, this simplified standardized technique was feasible for most of the living donor livers and required only 1 additional reconstruction of the V1. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:1398,1405.) [source] Outflow block secondary to stenosis of the inferior vena cava following living-donor liver transplantation?CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2005Shugo Mizuno Abstract:, Although it is well known that outflow block is caused by stenosis or occlusion of hepatic vein anastomoses following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there have been few reports on inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis following LDLT. In this paper, we report two cases of IVC stenosis and hepatic vein outflow block following right hepatic LDLT in the absence of stenosis of any of the anastomoses. Both patients presented with liver dysfunction, an ascitic fluid volume of approximately 2000 mL, and congestion in their biopsy specimens, and venocavography demonstrated IVC stenosis with gradients of more than 10 mmHg in patients with a dominant inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) anastomosis. After a Gianturco expandable metallic stent successfully implanted in the IVC, the patient's liver function recovered and the volume of ascitic fluid decreased. The pathogenesis of hepatic vein outflow block secondary to IVC stenosis following LDLT may involve the anastomosis with the IRHV, which is the dominant draining vein of the graft and larger than the RHV, caudal to the IVC stenosis and a significant IVC pressure gradient that results in increased IRHV pressure. In conclusion, it is important to include hepatic vein outflow block in the differential diagnosis when patients who have undergone right hepatic LDLT in which anastomosis of the large IRHV has been performed develop manifestations of liver dysfunction. [source] | ||||||||||