Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Rigorous Application (rigorous + application)
Selected AbstractsSeismic reliability of V-braced frames: Influence of design methodologiesEARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, Issue 14 2009Alessandra Longo Abstract According to the most modern trend, performance-based seismic design is aimed at the evaluation of the seismic structural reliability defined as the mean annual frequency (MAF) of exceeding a threshold level of damage, i.e. a limit state. The methodology for the evaluation of the MAF of exceeding a limit state is herein applied with reference to concentrically ,V'-braced steel frames designed according to different criteria. In particular, two design approaches are examined. The first approach corresponds to the provisions suggested by Eurocode 8 (prEN 1998,Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings), while the second approach is based on a rigorous application of capacity design criteria aiming at the control of the failure mode (J. Earthquake Eng. 2008; 12:1246,1266; J. Earthquake Eng. 2008; 12:728,759). The aim of the presented work is to focus on the seismic reliability obtained through these design methodologies. The probabilistic performance evaluation is based on an appropriate combination of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, probabilistic seismic demand analysis (PSDA) and probabilistic seismic capacity analysis. Regarding PSDA, nonlinear dynamic analyses have been carried out in order to obtain the parameters describing the probability distribution laws of demand, conditioned to given values of the earthquake intensity measure. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Estuarine eutrophication in the UK: current incidence and future trendsAQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, Issue 1 2009Gerald Maier Abstract 1.Increased inputs of nutrients to estuaries can lead to undesirable effects associated with eutrophication, including algal blooms, changes in species composition and bottom anoxia. Several estuaries and coastal areas around the UK have increased nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, elevated concentrations of chlorophyll a and changes in algal community composition and abundance. This paper reviews the pressures that lead to high nutrient concentrations in estuaries and considers the likely effectiveness of current and proposed regulatory actions. 2.The main sources of nutrients to estuaries are river runoff, sewage discharges, atmospheric inputs and possibly submarine groundwater discharges, although little is known about the latter. Significant reductions in N and P inputs have been realized following application of the EU's Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. Atmospheric NOx and NHx emissions have also decreased and are expected to decrease further in the next decade as implementation of existing legislation continues, and new controls are introduced for activities such as shipping. 3.Agricultural inputs reach estuaries principally through diffuse sources, either in surface water (and in some areas possibly groundwater) or, for N, via the atmosphere. Over 10 years ago the Nitrates Directive was introduced to tackle the problem of N discharges from agriculture but little change in N loads to estuaries has been recorded. 4.To meet the aims of the EU Water Framework Directive, for at least ,good' ecological status, more rigorous application and implementation of the Nitrates Directive, together with changes in the Common Agriculture Policy and farming practice are likely to be needed. Even then, the slow response of the natural environment to change and the inherent variability of estuaries means that their responses may not be as predicted. Research is needed into the relationship between policy drivers and environmental responses to ensure actions taken will achieve the planned results. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Individual Ministerial Responsibility During the Howard Years: 1996,2007AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND HISTORY, Issue 2 2008Luke Raffin Upon winning the 1996 election, John Howard became the first Australian prime minister to codify his understanding of individual ministerial responsibility by publishing A Guide on Key Elements of Ministerial Responsibility. This article examines how this ministerial code of conduct was applied to significant allegations of ministerial impropriety that occurred during the 1996,2007 Howard era, and highlights the relationship between the media, the Prime Minister's response and the ultimate outcome. It finds that Howard's early rigorous application of the Guide to allegations of conflicts of interest involved political pain and instigated its decline. Howard retreated, redefined ministerial responsibility as requiring deliberate wrongdoing and raised the threshold required for a minister's dismissal. His inability to firmly apply the Guide to instances of ministerial misconduct betrays the traditional view that ministers are responsible for their own actions. The contemporary practice is that ministers do not resign for departmental failures for which they are not personally responsible, irrespective of the gravity of that wrongdoing. [source] Application of modeling and simulation tools for the evaluation of biocatalytic processes: A future perspectiveBIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, Issue 6 2009Gürkan Sin Abstract Modeling and simulation techniques have for some time been an important feature of biocatalysis research, often applied as a complement to experimental studies. In this short review, we report on the state-of-the-art process and kinetic modeling for biocatalysis with the aim of identifying future research needs. We have particularly focused on four aspects of modeling: (i) the model purpose, (ii) the process model boundary, (iii) the model structure, and (iv) the model identification procedure. First, one finds that most of the existing models describe biocatalyst behavior in terms of enzyme selectivity, mechanism, and reaction kinetics. More recently, work has focused on extending these models to obtain process flowsheet descriptions. Second, biocatalysis models remain at a relatively low level of complexity compared with the trends observed in other engineering disciplines. Hence, there is certainly room for additional development, i.e., detailed mixing and hydrodynamics, more process units (e.g., biorefinery). Third, biocatalysis models have been only partially subjected to formal statistical analysis. In particular, uncertainty analysis is needed to ascertain reliability of the predictions of the process model, which is necessary to make sound engineering decisions (e.g., the optimal process flowsheet, control strategy, etc). In summary, for modeling studies to be more mature and successful, one needs to introduce Good Modeling Practice and that asks for (i) a standardized and systematic guideline for model development, (ii) formal identifiability analysis, and (iii) uncertainty analysis. This will advance the utility of models in biocatalysis for more rigorous application within process design, optimization, and control strategy evaluation. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2009 [source] Microbial biodiversity in groundwater ecosystemsFRESHWATER BIOLOGY, Issue 4 2009C. GRIEBLER Summary 1. Groundwater ecosystems offer vast and complex habitats for diverse microbial communities. Here we review the current status of groundwater microbial biodiversity research with a focus on Bacteria and Archaea and on the prospects of modern techniques for enhancing our understanding of microbial biodiversity patterns and their relation to environmental conditions. 2. The enormous volume of the saturated terrestrial underground forms the largest habitat for microorganisms on earth. Up to 40% of prokaryotic biomass on earth is hidden within this terrestrial subsurface. Besides representing a globally important pool of carbon and nutrients in organisms, these communities harbour a degree of microbial diversity only marginally explored to date. 3. Although first observations of groundwater microbiota date back to Antonie van Leeuwenhoek in 1677, the systematic investigation of groundwater microbial biodiversity has gained momentum only within the last few decades. These investigations were initiated by an increasing awareness of the importance of aquifer microbiota for ecosystem services and functioning, including the provision of drinking water and the degradation of contaminants. 4. The development of sampling techniques suitable for microbiological investigations as well as the application of both cultivation-based and molecular methods has yielded substantial insights into microbial communities in contaminated aquifers, whereas knowledge of microbial biodiversity in pristine habitats is still poor at present. 5. Several novel phylogenetic lineages have been described from groundwater habitats, but to date no clearly ,endemic' subsurface microbial phyla have been identified. The future will show if the rather low diversity generally found in pristine oligotrophic aquifers is a fact or just a result of low abundances and insufficient resolution of today's methods. Refined approaches complemented by statistically rigorous applications of biodiversity estimates are urgently needed. 6. Factors identified to control microbial diversity in aquifers include spatial heterogeneity, temporal variability and disturbances such as pollution with chemical anthropogenic contaminants. Although first insights into the importance of individual biogeochemical processes may be obtained from surveys of microbial diversity within functional groups, direct links to groundwater ecosystem functioning have rarely been established so far. [source] | ||||||||||