			Home About us Contact

Reverse Trendelenburg Position (reverse + trendelenburg_position)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Body positions and esophageal sphincter pressures in obese patients during anesthesia

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 4 2010
A. DE LEON
Background: The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) play a central role in preventing regurgitation and aspiration. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the UES, LES and barrier pressures (BP) in obese patients before and during anesthesia in different body positions. Methods: Using high-resolution solid-state manometry, we studied 17 patients (27,63 years) with a BMI,35 kg/m2 who were undergoing a laparoscopic bariatric surgery before and after anesthesia induction. Before anesthesia, the subjects were placed in the supine position, in the reverse Trendelenburg position (+20°) and in the Trendelenburg position (,20°). Thereafter, anesthesia was induced with remifentanil and propofol and maintained with remifentanil and sevoflurane, and the recordings in the different positions were repeated. Results: Before anesthesia, there were no differences in UES pressure in the different positions but compared with the other positions, it increased during the reverse Trendelenburg during anesthesia. LES pressure decreased in all body positions during anesthesia. The LES pressure increased during the Trendelenburg position before but not during anesthesia. The BP remained positive in all body positions both before and during anesthesia. Conclusion: LES pressure increased during the Trendelenburg position before anesthesia. This effect was abolished during anesthesia. LES and BPs decreased during anesthesia but remained positive in all patients regardless of the body position. [source]

Effects of reverse Trendelenburg position and inguinal compression on femoral vein cross-sectional area in infants and young children

ANAESTHESIA, Issue 4 2009
E. H. Suk
Summary This study evaluated the effects of the reverse Trendelenburg position and additional inguinal compression on the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein in paediatric patients. Seventy subjects were allocated to two groups: the infants group and the children group. Cross-sectional area of the femoral vein was measured just below the inguinal ligament using ultrasound. Three measurements were obtained for each patient: (i) supine, (ii) reverse Trendelenburg position and (iii) reverse Trendelenburg position with inguinal compression. In the infants group, femoral vein cross-sectional area increased by a mean (SD) of 21.1 (15.2) % in the reverse Trendelenburg position and by 60.7 (30.8) % in the reverse Trendelenburg position with inguinal compression; whereas in the children group, femoral vein cross-sectional area increased by 24.7 (15.8) % in the reverse Trendelenburg position and by 100.3 (50.7) % in the reverse Trendelenburg position with inguinal compression. Inguinal compression in the reverse Trendelenburg position offers a useful means of increasing femoral vein cross-sectional area in paediatric patients. [source]

Ultrasonographic Investigation of the Effect of Inguinal Compression on the Cross-sectional Area of the Femoral Vein

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 1 2008
Jin-Tae Kim MD
Abstract Objectives:, The reverse Trendelenburg position increases the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the femoral vein, making it easier to cannulate, although this position is potentially harmful in hypovolemic patients. The authors hypothesized that compression above the femoral vein increases the CSA of the femoral vein during emergency cannulation. Methods:, Ultrasound was used to measure the CSA of the femoral vein of 20 healthy volunteers. The following five measurements were made inferior to the inguinal crease: 1) in the horizontal supine position (control), 2) with inguinal compression 2 cm above the inguinal crease (at the point of arterial pulsation and its medial side), 3) in the Trendelenburg position 15°, 4) in the Trendelenburg position 15° plus inguinal compression, and 5) in the reverse Trendelenburg position 15°. Results:, Femoral vein CSA was increased by 35% by inguinal compression in the horizontal supine position (p < 0.001) and was decreased by the Trendelenburg position (p < 0.001). However, inguinal compression increased the CSA by 66% in the Trendelenburg position (p < 0.001). The reverse Trendelenburg position also increased the CSA of the femoral vein by 50% (p < 0.001). Conclusions:, Inguinal compression presents an alternative method for increasing the CSA of the femoral vein for venous catheterization in normal patients. [source]