Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Auditor's Report (auditor + report)
Selected AbstractsThe Evolution of the Standard Unqualified Auditor's Report in Canada / L'ÉVOLUTION DU RAPPORT TYPE DU VÉRIFICATEUR AU CANADAACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, Issue 1 2006MICHAEL MAINGOT ABSTRACT This study examines the historical development of the auditor's report in Canada. The auditor's report has been significantly influenced by British and U.S. legislation and practices. The English Joint Stock Companies Act of 1844 required compulsory audits and the British audit report was introduced in North America shortly after the introduction of this Act. The legislature prescribed an audit but it did not determine the form and content of the auditor's report; these were left to the individual practitioner. The British influence was strong in Canada up to the 1930s. However, from this time onward, the U.S. influence began to grow. The impact of the landmark case of Ultramares v. Touche on third-party liability and consequent change in the auditor's report is analyzed. The paper uses institutional theory to explore reasons for the similarities of the auditor's report under British influence and under American influence. Specifically, the paper examines how the mechanisms of mimetic, coercive, and normative isomorphism led to institutional change in the accounting profession as organizations adapted their auditors' reports to achieve greater legitimacy. [source] Board access to the internal auditorBOARD LEADERSHIP: POLICY GOVERNANCE IN ACTION, Issue 68 2003John Carver More and more organizations are beginning to create a position for an ethics officer or internal auditor. Such a position can be a great asset to an organization, but it is fraught with ambiguity. To whom does this auditor report? Is it a staff position under CEO authority? Or is it a staff position intended to report to the board? If the latter, how can the integrity of the CEO's position be maintained? In this brief article, John Carver clarifies how such a position can function effectively in a Policy Governance board. [source] Financial Reporting Regulation: The Case of Converging Canadian and International Accounting and Auditing Standards,/LA RÉGLEMENTATION DE L'INFORMATION FINANCIÈRE: LA CONVERGENCE DES NORMES CANADIENNES ET INTERNATIONALES DE COMPTABILITÉ ET DE VÉRIFICATIONACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, Issue 1 2008Kathryn Bewley ABSTRACT This paper provides a descriptive analysis of the differences between existing Canadian accounting and auditing standards and the corresponding international standards that Canadian standard-setters have decided to converge them with, at the time of the decisions to converge. The descriptive analysis is based on two reconciliation documents published by the standard-setting boards of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. The main contributions of the paper are to outline and analyze the differences systematically in the context of prior research on financial reporting regulation and the impact of internationalization of accounting and auditing standards, and to identify key areas of difference that are likely to have the greatest impact on preparers, auditors, and users of Canadian financial statements. The results do not indicate that Canada is moving to a significantly more or less restrictive accounting measurement regime, but it appears that there will be greater disclosure detail required under international accounting standards than under existing Canadian standards. The key accounting difference relates to appraisal values for tangible and intangible assets that are permitted in international standards but not currently in their Canadian counterparts. The findings for auditing standards suggest that international and Canadian auditing standards impose a similar set of requirements on the audit function, and provide a similar degree of detailed application guidance. Differences in standards for the auditor's report and for management's written representations to the auditor are the most significant changes for audit practice in Canada. RÉSUMÉ L'auteure présente une analyse descriptive des éléments qui différencient les normes canadiennes de comptabilité et de vérification existantes et les normes internationales correspondantes vers lesquelles les normes canadiennes devraient converger, selon la position adoptée par les normalisateurs canadiens au moment de trancher la question. L'analyse descriptive se fonde sur deux documents de conciliation publiés par les conseils de normalisation de l'Institut Canadien des Comptables Agréés. Le principal apport de la présente étude est double: elle propose une description et une analyse systématiques des différences entre les normes dans le contexte des recherches précédentes sur la réglementation de l'information financière et l'incidence de l'internationalisation des normes de comptabilité et de vérification, et elle recense les principales sphères dans lesquelles les normes présentent des différences susceptibles d'avoir les conséquences les plus importantes pour les auteurs de l'information, les vérificateurs et les utilisateurs des états financiers canadiens. Selon les résultats de l'étude, le régime de mesure comptable vers lequel s'oriente le Canada ne présente pas un caractère qui serait plus ou moins restrictif, mais tout indique que les exigences en ce qui a trait au détail de l'information à fournir seront plus grandes sous le régime des normes comptables internationales que sous celui des normes canadiennes existantes. La principale différence relevée au chapitre de la comptabilité se rapporte aux valeurs d'expertise des actifs corporels et incorporels qui sont permises dans les normes internationales mais ne le sont pas dans les normes canadiennes actuelles. Quant à la vérification, il semble que les normes internationales et canadiennes imposent à la fonction de vérification un ensemble d'exigences similaires et contiennent des directives d'application d'une précision analogue. Les différences dans les normes relatives au rapport du vérificateur et aux déclarations écrites de la direction sont les changements les plus importants pour l'exercice de la vérification au Canada. [source] The Evolution of the Standard Unqualified Auditor's Report in Canada / L'ÉVOLUTION DU RAPPORT TYPE DU VÉRIFICATEUR AU CANADAACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, Issue 1 2006MICHAEL MAINGOT ABSTRACT This study examines the historical development of the auditor's report in Canada. The auditor's report has been significantly influenced by British and U.S. legislation and practices. The English Joint Stock Companies Act of 1844 required compulsory audits and the British audit report was introduced in North America shortly after the introduction of this Act. The legislature prescribed an audit but it did not determine the form and content of the auditor's report; these were left to the individual practitioner. The British influence was strong in Canada up to the 1930s. However, from this time onward, the U.S. influence began to grow. The impact of the landmark case of Ultramares v. Touche on third-party liability and consequent change in the auditor's report is analyzed. The paper uses institutional theory to explore reasons for the similarities of the auditor's report under British influence and under American influence. Specifically, the paper examines how the mechanisms of mimetic, coercive, and normative isomorphism led to institutional change in the accounting profession as organizations adapted their auditors' reports to achieve greater legitimacy. [source] Measuring the impact of value-for-money audits: a model for surveying audited managersCANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION/ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, Issue 2 2004Danielle Morin To what extent have auditors general achieved this objective in the past twenty-five years since the inception of the value-for-money audit (VFMA)? The literature on VFMA has been silent on its actual impact on public administrations. This article examines the impact VFMAS have had on the management of organizations in the government of Quebec based on a new survey model of inquiry. Of the variables measured were the value VFMAS bring to the organizations audited; the relevance of the recommendations formulated by the auditors; the deterrent of potential audits on public-sector managers; the changes that occurred in the audited organization's management practices and in its relations with its stakeholders; the ways in which the auditors' report has been useful to the auditees; the concrete actions taken following VFMAS; and, finally, the organizational and personal consequences of the audits. Sommaire: La vérification législative de l'optimisation des ressources (VOR) est une pratique qui a été conçue pour améliorer la gestion des programmes publics en la rendant plus économique, plus efficace et plus efficiente. Dans quelle mesure les Vérificateurs généraux ont-ils atteint cet objectif au cours des vingt-cinq années qui ont suivi l'avènement de cette pratique? La recherche sur la VOR a passé sous silence l'impact réel de cette pratique sur les administrations publiques. Le présent article examine l'impact des VOR sur le managerisme des organismes du gouvernement du Québec d'après un nouveau modèle d'enquête. Les variables mesurées étaient les suivantes:la valeur que les VOR apportent aux organismes vérifiés; la pertinence des recommandations formulées par les vérificateurs; l'effet dissuasif de vérifications potentielles sur les gestionnaires du secteur public; les changements intervenus dans les pratiques de gestion de l'organisme vérifié et dans ses relations avec ses parties prenantes; la manière dont le rapport des vérificateurs a été utile aux entités vérifiécs; les mesures concrètes prises à la suite des VOK; et enfin, Ics conséquences organisationnelles et personnelles des vérifications. [source] The Evolution of the Standard Unqualified Auditor's Report in Canada / L'ÉVOLUTION DU RAPPORT TYPE DU VÉRIFICATEUR AU CANADAACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, Issue 1 2006MICHAEL MAINGOT ABSTRACT This study examines the historical development of the auditor's report in Canada. The auditor's report has been significantly influenced by British and U.S. legislation and practices. The English Joint Stock Companies Act of 1844 required compulsory audits and the British audit report was introduced in North America shortly after the introduction of this Act. The legislature prescribed an audit but it did not determine the form and content of the auditor's report; these were left to the individual practitioner. The British influence was strong in Canada up to the 1930s. However, from this time onward, the U.S. influence began to grow. The impact of the landmark case of Ultramares v. Touche on third-party liability and consequent change in the auditor's report is analyzed. The paper uses institutional theory to explore reasons for the similarities of the auditor's report under British influence and under American influence. Specifically, the paper examines how the mechanisms of mimetic, coercive, and normative isomorphism led to institutional change in the accounting profession as organizations adapted their auditors' reports to achieve greater legitimacy. [source] | ||||||||||