Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Related Organisms (relate + organism)
Selected AbstractsWhich are the polyphosphate accumulating organisms in full-scale activated sludge enhanced biological phosphate removal systems in Australia?JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 2 2006M. Beer Abstract Aims:, To see if the compositions of the microbial communities in full scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal activated sludge systems were the same as those from laboratory scale sequencing batch reactors fed a synthetic sewage. Methods:, Biomass samples taken from nine full scale enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR) activated sludge plants in the eastern states of Australia were analysed for their populations of polyphosphate (polyP)-accumulating organisms (PAO) using semi-quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in combination with DAPI (4,-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining for polyP. Results:, Very few betaproteobacterial Rhodocyclus related organisms could be detected by FISH in most of the plants examined, and even where present, not all these cells even within a single cluster, stained positively for polyP with DAPI. In some plants in samples from aerobic reactors the Actinobacteria dominated populations containing polyP. Conclusions:, The PAO populations in full-scale EBPR systems often differ to those seen in laboratory scale reactors fed artificial sewage, and Rhodocyclus related organisms, dominating these latter communities may not be as important in full-scale systems. Instead Actinobacteria may be the major PAO. Significance and Impact of the Study:, These findings illustrate how little is still known about the microbial ecology of EBPR processes and that more emphasis should now be placed on analysis of full-scale plants if microbiological methods are to be applied to monitoring their performances. [source] Poultry as a source of Campylobacter and related organismsJOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, Issue S6 2001J.E.L. Corry [source] Survival and retention of the probiotic Lactobacillus casei LAFTIŽ L26 in the gastrointestinal tract of the mouseLETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 2 2007P. Su Abstract Aims:, This study aimed to develop methods for the detection of the probiotic Lactobacillus casei LAFTIŽ L26 (L26) from mouse faeces, and to determine the survival and retention time of L26 in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Methods and Results:, A selective medium, de Man Rogosa Sharpe (MRS) + bromocresol green + vancomycin (MGV), was designed for the isolation and enumeration of L26 from faecal samples of mice. PCR primers were designed to confirm the identity of L26-like colonies on MGV. These primers did not produce PCR products from related organisms that grew on MGV. Following the administration of L26 to BALB/c mice, faecal samples were collected and analysed using the designed methods. Survival studies showed viable L26 cells to be present in the faeces of mice for >48 h. Conclusions:, Our results suggest that L26 is able to survive and be retained within the digestive tract of mice for at least 48 h following oral administration. Significance and Impact of the Study:, MGV allows effective recovery of L26 from the background microbiota, including lactobacilli of mice. PCR was used to confirm that L26-like colonies were correctly identified as L26. Given the long retention time of L26 in the gastrointestinal tract of mice, it would appear that this probiotic strain may survive in the human gastrointestinal tract. [source] Inferring the evolutionary history of Drosophila americana and Drosophila novamexicana using a multilocus approach and the influence of chromosomal rearrangements in single gene analysesMOLECULAR ECOLOGY, Issue 12 2008RAMIRO MORALES-HOJAS Abstract The evolutionary history of closely related organisms can prove sometimes difficult to infer. Hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting are the main concerns; however, genome rearrangements can also influence the outcome of analyses based on nuclear sequences. In the present study, DNA sequences from 12 nuclear genes, for which the approximate chromosomal locations are known, have been used to estimate the evolutionary history of two forms of Drosophila americana (Drosophila americana americana and Drosophila americana texana) and Drosophila novamexicana (virilis group of species). The phylogenetic analysis of the combined data set resulted in a phylogeny showing reciprocal monophyly for D. novamexicana and D. americana. Single gene analyses, however, resulted in incongruent phylogenies influenced by chromosomal rearrangements. Genetic differentiation estimates indicated a significant differentiation between the two species for all genes. Within D. americana, however, there is no evidence for differentiation between the chromosomal forms except at genes located near the X/4 fusion and Xc inversion breakpoint. Thus, the specific status of D. americana and D. novamexicana is confirmed, but there is no overall evidence for genetic differentiation between D. a. americana and D. a. texana, not supporting a subspecific status. Based on levels of allele and nucleotide diversity found in the strains used, it is proposed that D. americana has had a stable, large population during the recent past while D. novamexicana has speciated from a peripheral southwestern population having had an ancestral small effective population size. The influence of chromosomal rearrangements in single gene analyses is also examined. [source] | ||||||||||