Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Regional Blocks (regional + block)
Selected AbstractsAre peripheral and neuraxial blocks with ultrasound guidance more effective and safe in children?PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 2 2009KASIA RUBIN MD Summary Background and aims:, The efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided (USG) pediatric peripheral nerve and neuraxial blocks in children have not been evaluated. In this review, we have looked at the success rate, efficacy and complications with USG peripheral nerve blocks and compared with nerve stimulation or anatomical landmark based techniques in children. Methods:, All suitable studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE Drugs and Cochrane Evidence Based Medicine Reviews: Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews databases were identified. In addition, citation review and hand search of recent pediatric anesthesia and surgical journals were done. All three authors read all selected articles independently and a consensus was achieved. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing USG peripheral and neuraxial blocks with other techniques in children were included. Results:, Ultrasound guidance has been demonstrated to improve block characteristics in children including shorter block performance time, higher success rates, shorter onset time, longer block duration, less volume of local anesthetic agents and visibility of neuraxial structures. Conclusion:, Clinical studies in children suggest that US guidance has some advantages over more traditional nerve stimulation,based techniques for regional block. However, the advantage of US guidance on safety over traditional has not been adequately demonstrated in children except ilio-inguinal blocks. [source] Ultrasonographic guidance in pediatric regional anesthesia.PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 11 2006Part 2: techniques Summary The benefits of regional anesthesia are well documented. The downsides of such techniques have been a significant failure rate and a potential for serious complications. Nearly, all regional blocks were first described as essentially ,blind' techniques. The development of high-resolution portable ultrasound (US) has made the use of US for regional anesthesia possible. Improved understanding of sonographic anatomy should lessen both the failure rate and the possibility of incurring serious complications. Natural caution has dictated that only a selection of blocks used in adults has been commonly used in pediatric practice, but with the aid of US, the repertoire of blocks for infants and children may be widened. The second part of this review will concentrate on the practice of both peripheral and central blocks. [source] Pre-audit survey of documentation of invasive procedures in paediatric anaesthesiaPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 9 2002A. Patil Introduction Consent of patients for any medical procedure is an essential part of good practice (1). Verbal consent is increasingly sought for invasive anaesthetic procedures and documentation of this is an important feature of risk management. Paediatric consent is a complex issue and although it is common practice to explain things to the child, written consent is generally still sought from the parent (2). Recent guidelines from the Royal College (3) are quite specific about having a ,child centred approach'. They clearly state that ,where special techniques (e.g. epidurals, other regional blocks including caudal, and invasive monitoring or blood transfusion) are used there should generally be written evidence that these have been discussed with the child (when appropriate) and the parents'. Our aim was to discover the current amount of documentation on invasive procedures in our paediatric anaesthetic notes and to subsequently agree on a local standard. Method We looked retrospectively at anaesthetic records of children aged 10, 11 and 12 years undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery over a 2-month period. We specifically looked for documentation of who was present at the pre-operative discussion and where an invasive anaesthetic technique was planned. written evidence that it had been discussed. Results 73 anaesthetic records were examined. The case mix was as follows: 37% ENT, 28% Plastic Surgery, 24% General Surgery, 11 % Orthopaedic and Oral Surgery. A Consultant was present for 98% of the anaesthetics and was accompanied by a trainee in half of those cases. In 82% (60 patients) there was no documentation of who was present at the pre-operative discussion. In 2 cases (3%) the child was seen alone, in 8 cases (11 %) both a parent and child were documented to have been involved in the discussion and in 3 cases (4%) only the parents appeared to have been involved. Of the 73 anaesthetic records, 11 did not have invasive procedures planned or performed and the following data is from the remaining 62 anaesthetic records ,,83.5% of invasive procedures were documented pre-operatively ,,12 patients (19%) had more than one procedure. ,,Only 7 notes (11 %) had a record of the procedure being specifically discussed with the child. ,,2 out of the 4 caudal (50%) were done without documentatior, of discussion about the procedure ,,7 out of 48 suppositories (14%) were given without record of verbal consent ,,5 out of 16 (31 %) of the local anaesthetic techniques were performed without documentation of discussion. Discussion This pre-audit survey demonstrates that in 82% of cases there was no record of exactly who was present at the preoperative discussion and that some invasive procedures were carried out without any record of a discussion having taken place. We feel that this level of documentation is insufficient. We looked at the age range 10,12 years as this might be regarded as approximately the age at which agreement should be sought for relatively simple procedures such as those chosen in this survey. This is not to imply that children below this age should not be involved in a plan of management or that all children of this age will be fully competent to participate in decisions. We deliberately chose to look at elective surgery, as there should be better documentation in these cases. One reason for such poor results may be that most anaesthetists do not realise the importance of documentation. Our current chart provides no means of prompting the anaesthetist to record who was present at pre-operative discussions. There is also a lack of a clear standard as to an age when invasive procedures should generally be discussed. We feel that this is probably a common problem and hope this surveys increases awareness on this important topic. Conclusions The results of this survey are to be brought to the attention of the local department. Having identified the problem we hope to agree on a local standard and audit against these standards. [source] Survey of combined regional blocks and general anaesthesiaANAESTHESIA, Issue 2 2009K. Jarvi No abstract is available for this article. [source] Regional anaesthesia for limb surgery: a review of anaesthetists' beliefs and practice in the Oxford region*ANAESTHESIA, Issue 6 2008N. M. Feely Summary We conducted a postal survey of 210 anaesthetists in the Oxford region to determine their views and practice regarding the timing of regional anaesthesia when combined with general anaesthesia for adults undergoing limb surgery and to compare the results with those obtained in a similar survey conducted in 2001. Of the 151 respondents (72% response rate), 102 (68%) regularly combined regional and general anaesthesia for adult limb surgery. Over 80% believed that central neuraxial blocks should be performed before general anaesthesia. This matched their current practice, marking a change from 2001. Significantly fewer anaesthetists believed it necessary to perform peripheral nerve blocks before general anaesthesia than in 2001, marking another significant change in practice. Overall, the results indicate an increased popularity of regional blocks in combination with general anaesthesia when compared with 2001 practice, which we believe is related to high quality advanced training modules now on offer to senior trainees in the Oxford region. [source] | ||||||||||