Receiving Chemotherapy (receiving + chemotherapy)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Outcomes and predicting response in anaemic chemotherapy patients treated with epoetin alfa.

INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, Issue 10 2008
4-month, A multicentre, New Zealand, open-label study in Australia
Abstract Background:, The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and clinical outcomes of erythropoietin therapy in the treatment of anaemic cancer subjects receiving chemotherapy and to examine hypochromic red blood cell measurement as an indicator of functional iron sufficiency and as a predictor of responsiveness or non-responsiveness to erythropoietin therapy. Methods:, Patients who had a non-myeloid malignancy, had Hb , 11.0 g/dL, had a life expectancy of more than 6 months, were 18 years or older, were receiving chemotherapy and would continue to be treated for at least 2 months were given s.c. epoetin alfa three times a week. Results:, Haemoglobin levels increased significantly at all time periods compared with baseline and the number of transfusions received decreased significantly at all time periods compared with baseline. Quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anaemia showed significant increases at months 2 and 4 and there were significant improvements in the fatigue subscale at both time points (P < 0.05). Significant improvements at end-point were observed for the physical, emotional and functional well-being, and additional concern subscales (all P < 0.05). Haematocrit and reticulocytes increased significantly at end-point compared with at baseline (haematocrit 33.4 vs 28.3%, P < 0.001; reticulocytes 105.8 vs 78.6 × 109/dL, P = 0.005). The percentage of hypochromic red blood cells did not show predictive value for response to treatment status. Conclusion:, Epoetin alfa improved haemoglobin levels and quality of life in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. [source]


Prospective cytomegalovirus monitoring during first-line chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, Issue 7 2010
Saveria Capria
Abstract Little is known about the incidence and clinical impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at the time of diagnosis and during chemotherapy. The aims of the present study were to assess prospectively the incidence of active CMV infection in 69 consecutive patients with acute myeloid leukemia and to describe the outcomes of treatment. pp65 antigenemia was monitored at diagnosis, post-induction and post-consolidation chemotherapy, and whenever CMV reactivation was suspected. Patients with pp65 antigenemia received pre-emptive anti-CMV treatment. Fifty-nine patients achieved complete remission. Baseline CMV serology results were available for 56 of the 59 patients: 52 patients (93%) were IgG positive. The overall incidence of pp65 antigenemia in patients in complete remission after chemotherapy was 35% (21/59): 9 patients after induction and 12 post-consolidation. Sixteen of the 21 pp65-positive patients received anti-CMV treatment: 15 as pre-emptive therapy and 1 for interstitial CMV pneumonitis. Five patients received no anti-CMV treatment and did not develop CMV disease. Patients with pp65 antigenemia had more hospital admissions (2.57 vs. 2.16; P,=,0.009), while patients with >10 pp65-positive cells had more clinical complications (8/9 vs. 2/12; P,=,0.002). In conclusion, patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving chemotherapy should be monitored for active CMV infection. CMV reactivation in these patients was associated with an increased number of hospital admissions, and high levels of pp65 antigenemia were associated with more clinical complications. Controlled studies are needed to assess the relevance of pre-emptive anti-CMV therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving chemotherapy. J. Med. Virol. 82: 1201,1207, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Analysis of risk factors for recurrence and effective adjuvant therapy in patients with endometrial cancer

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 2 2002
Tomoko Goto
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for recurrence and effective adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer. Methods: Between 1985 and 1999, 170 patients with uterine endometrial cancer received initial therapy at the National Defense Medical College Hospital. We retrospectively analyzed risk factors including; histopathological features, operative procedures, adjuvant therapies and surgical staging. Results: Although the prognosis in stage I and II patients was fairly good, recurrences were observed in patients with stage Ib or worse. Vagina walls were the frequent site of recurrence. About a half of relapses which occurred within seven months after surgery were observed during adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that myometrial invasion (P = 0.0231) was the only risk factor for recurrence. Although the prognosis in stage III and IV patients was generally poor, serosal invasion in stage III disease seemed to be an im-portant risk factor. With regard to adjuvant therapy in stage I,III patients who could receive optimal cytoreductive surgery; the risk of recurrence was significantly (P = 0.0127) lower in patients receiving radiation therapy than in those receiving chemotherapy including platinum agents. Conclusion: The data suggested that in stage I,III patients with optimal cytoreductive surgery, myometrial invasion is an independent risk factor for recurrence and radiation therapy is more effective than chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy. [source]


The Clinical Oncological Society of Australia (COSA) guidelines for the safe prescribing, dispensing and administration of cancer chemotherapy

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 3 2010
Christine CARRINGTON
Abstract The issue of medication safety is highly significant when anti-cancer therapy is used as a treatment modality due to the high potential for harm from these agents and the disease context in which they are being used. These guidelines provide recommendations on the safe prescribing, dispensing and administration of chemotherapy and related agents used in the treatment of cancer. The guidelines represent a multidisciplinary collaboration to standardise the complex process of providing chemotherapy for cancer and to enhance patient safety. These are consensus guidelines based on the best available evidence and expert opinion of professionals working in cancer care. The aim of these guidelines is to assist in the prevention of medication errors and to improve patient safety with respect to the treatment of cancer. This guidance is intended for a multi-disciplinary audience and will have most relevance for medical, nursing and pharmacy staff involved in the complex processes of delivering chemotherapy and associated treatment. The scope of the guidelines includes; all patients and age groups receiving chemotherapy and targeted therapy for the treatment of cancer and cancer therapy administered by any route in both the hospital and home setting. These guidelines should be seen as point of reference for practitioners providing cancer chemotherapy services. [source]


Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients

CANCER, Issue 10 2007
Alok A. Khorana MD
Abstract BACKGROUND. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) contributes to morbidity and mortality in cancer patients and is a frequent complication of anticancer therapy. In the current study, the frequency, risk factors, and trends associated with VTE were examined among hospitalized cancer patients. METHODS. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the discharge database of the University HealthSystem Consortium. This included 1,824,316 hospitalizations between 1995 and 2003 at 133 U.S. medical centers. RESULTS. Among 1,015,598 cancer patients, 34,357 (3.4%) were diagnosed with deep venous thrombosis and 11,515 with pulmonary embolism (PE) (1.1%) for an overall VTE rate of 4.1%. Subgroups of cancer patients with the highest rates included black ethnicity (5.1% per hospitalization) and those receiving chemotherapy (4.9%). Sites of cancer with the highest rates of VTE included pancreas (8.1%), kidney (5.6%), ovary (5.6%), lung (5.1%), and stomach (4.9%). Among hematologic malignancies, myeloma (5%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (4.8%), and Hodgkin disease (4.6%) had the highest rates of VTE. The rate of VTE increased by 28%, secondary to a near-doubling of PE rates from 0.8% to 1.5% (P < .0001). Among patients receiving chemotherapy, the rates of VTE rose from 3.9% to 5.7%, an increase of 47% (P < .0001). In multivariate analysis, risk factors associated with VTE included age ,65 years, female sex, black ethnicity, use of chemotherapy, primary site of cancer, presence of comorbidities, and year of admission. CONCLUSIONS. VTE, particularly PE, is an increasingly frequent complication of hospitalization in cancer patients. Patients with black ethnicity, specific sites of cancer, or those receiving chemotherapy are disproportionately at risk. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society. [source]


Radioimmunotherapy of small-volume disease of metastatic colorectal cancer

CANCER, Issue S4 2002
Results of a phase II trial with the iodine-13, carcinoembryonic antigen antibody hMN-1, labeled humanized anti
Abstract BACKGROUND Whereas radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has shown disappointing results in bulky, solid tumors, preclinical results in small-volume disease and in an adjuvant setting are promising. In a previous Phase I study, the authors had encouraging results with the iodine-131 (131I),labeled humanized anti,carcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) antibody (MAb) hMN-14 in small-volume disease of colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a subsequent Phase II trial, the therapeutic efficacy of this 131I-labeled humanized anti-CEA antibody in colorectal cancer patients with small-volume disease or in an adjuvant setting. METHODS Thirty colorectal cancer patients, with small-volume metastatic disease (n = 21; all lesions , 3.0 cm, and chemorefractory to 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid) or in an adjuvant setting (n = 9), 4,6 weeks after surgical resection of liver metastases with curative intention, were studied. The patients were given a single injection of 131I-hMN-14 immunoglobulin G at a 60 mCi/m2 dose level, which was shown to be the maximum tolerated dose in the previous Phase I study. Follow-up was obtained at 3-month intervals for as long as 36 months. RESULTS At a mean blood-based red marrow dose of 1.8 ± 0.8 Gy, myelotoxicity was the only toxicity observed, but only 1 of 28 assessable patients developed transient Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Of the 21 patients with radiologically documented lesions, 19 were assessable. Three experienced partial remission and eight showed minor responses up to 15 months in duration (corresponding to an objective response rate of 16% and an overall response rate of 58%; the mean duration of response was 9 months). At the time this article was written, seven of nine patients in the adjuvant setting had remained free of disease for up to 36 months (one patient relapsed after 6 months and another after 30 months), whereas the relapse rate in a historical control group receiving chemotherapy was 67% over the same time period. Five patients with radiologically documented lesions, having experienced at least disease stabilization as a consequence of RIT, were retreated at the same 60-mCi/m2 dose level at 8,16 months after the first therapy. No evidence of increased toxicity was observed (no hematologic toxicity was higher than Grade 3). Two of four assessable retreated patients experienced partial remissions; one of these four again experienced disease stabilization as a consequence of the second radioantibody therapy injection. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that RIT is a safe and effective form of therapy for small-volume colorectal cancer and has potential as treatment for colorectal cancer in an adjuvant setting. Toxicity is restricted to mild and transient leuko- and thrombocytopenia. Retreatment seems to be a feasible option. A prospective randomized comparison with standard chemotherapy is indicated. Cancer 2002;94:1373,81. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10308 [source]