			Home About us Contact

Recurrent Reflux (recurrent + reflux)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Recurrent gastroesophageal reflux in neurologically impaired patients after fundoplication

ACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 1 2007
A Goessler
Abstract Goessler A, Huber-Zeyringer A, Hoellwarth M.E. "Recurrent gastroesophageal reflux in neurologically impaired patients after fundoplication." Acta Paediatr 00, Stockholm. ISSN 0803-5253. Aim: To evaluate the outcome and analyse the main causes of complications and failures of antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in neurologically impaired patients (NIP). Methods: From 1985 to 1999 44 NIP (mean age 12 years) underwent surgery for GERD. Type of surgery, complications and recurrent reflux were analysed. Results: Twenty-seven patients (61%) showed preoperatively severe failure to thrive. All patients showed pathologic results in 24-h pH monitoring. Surgical treatment consisted of ventral (n = 25, Thal) or dorsal (n = 4, Toupet) semifundoplication or a Nissen fundoplication (n = 15). Postoperatively, all patients showed an impressive growth, regress of symptoms and improvement of results of diagnostic investigations. Late complications and recurrence of reflux were significantly related to preoperative extreme dystrophy (p < 0.0025). In six patients (15%) severity of symptoms related to recurrent reflux required a reoperation 17.8 month postoperatively (range 8,35 month). Recurrent reflux was found in 40% after ventral semifundoplication and in 46% after Nissen fundoplication (8 and 47 months postoperatively, respectively). Conclusion: Symptoms improved impressively after fundoplication in mentally retarded children. The incidence of recurrent reflux is not related to the type of surgery, however, it occurs significantly earlier with ventral semifundoplication when compared with Nissen fundoplication. Both late complications as well as recurrent reflux are related significantly to preoperative dystrophy. [source]

Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic anterior versus posterior fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 7-8 2010
Mansoor Khan
Abstract Background:, The aim of the study was to compare the effect of laparoscopic anterior and posterior fundoplication on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease by means of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Methods:, One hundred and three patients were randomised to undergo either anterior (53) or posterior (50) fundoplication. Initial enrolment and subsequent clinical appointments were undertaken 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure using a standardized questionnaire. Ambulatory pH monitoring and manometry were undertaken both preoperatively and at approximately 3 months post-procedure. Results:, The mean operating time was similar in both groups (48 versus 52 min). Two operations in each group were converted to open surgery. Post-operative dysphagia in the first month was higher in the posterior fundoplication group compared with the anterior group (at 1 month, P= 0.002; and at 3 months, P= 0.014). The number of individuals suffering from post-operative heartburn was greater in the anterior fundoplication group (at 1 month, P= 0.008; at 3 months, P < 0.001; and at 6 months, P= 0.002). Eight individuals required reoperation in the anterior group and two individuals in the posterior group (P= 0.057). Conclusion:, Anterior and posterior fundoplication each have their advantages and disadvantages. There is an increased risk of early post-operative dysphagia after posterior fundoplication. Anterior fundoplication carries a greater risk of persistent or recurrent reflux. Overall, a posterior fundoplication produces a better management option for controlling gastro-oesophageal reflux disease when compared with an anterior fundoplication technique which utilizes unilateral fixation of the gastric fundus. [source]

Long-term outcomes of revisional surgery following laparoscopic fundoplication

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2009
P. J. Lamb
Background: A small proportion of patients who have laparoscopic antireflux procedures require revisional surgery. This study investigated long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients requiring late revisional surgery following laparoscopic fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux were identified from a prospective database. Long-term outcomes were determined using a questionnaire evaluating symptom scores for heartburn, dysphagia and satisfaction. Results: The database search found 109 patients, including 98 (5·6 per cent) of 1751 patients who had primary surgery in the authors' unit. Indications for surgical revision were dysphagia (52 patients), recurrent reflux (36), mechanical symptoms related to paraoesophageal herniation (16) and atypical symptoms (five). The median time to revision was 26 months. Outcome data were available for 104 patients (median follow-up 66 months) and satisfaction data for 102, 88 of whom were highly satisfied (62·7 per cent) or satisfied (23·5 per cent) with the outcome. Patients who had revision for dysphagia had a higher incidence of poorly controlled heartburn (20 versus 2 per cent; P = 0·004), troublesome dysphagia (16 versus 6 per cent; P = 0·118) and a lower satisfaction score (P = 0·023) than those with recurrent reflux or paraoesophageal herniation. Conclusion: Revisional surgery following laparoscopic fundoplication can produce good long-term results, but revision for dysphagia has less satisfactory outcomes. Copyright © 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Five-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total versus anterior 180° fundoplication

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 2 2005
R. Ludemann
Background: Total fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease may be followed by unwanted side-effects. A randomized trial demonstrated that an anterior 180° partial fundoplication achieved effective reflux control and was associated with fewer side-effects in the short term than total fundoplication. This paper reports longer-term (5 year) outcomes from that trial. Methods: Between December 1995 and June 1997, 107 patients were randomized to undergo either laparoscopic total fundoplication or a laparoscopic anterior 180° fundoplication. After 5 years, 101 of 103 eligible patients (51 total, 50 anterior) were available for follow-up. Each patient was interviewed by a single blinded investigator and a standardized questionnaire was completed. The questionnaire focused on symptoms and overall satisfaction with the results of fundoplication. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to control of heartburn or patient satisfaction with the overall outcome. Dysphagia, measured by a visual analogue score for solid food and a composite dysphagia score, was worse at 5 years after total fundoplication. Symptoms of bloating, inability to belch and flatulence were also more common after total fundoplication. Reoperation was required for dysphagia in three patients after total fundoplication and for recurrent reflux in three patients after anterior fundoplication. Conclusion: Anterior 180° partial fundoplication was as effective as total fundoplication for managing the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the longer term. It was associated with a lower incidence of side-effects, although this was offset by a slightly higher risk of recurrent reflux symptoms. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]