Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Rectal Resection (rectal + resection)
Selected AbstractsSexual Dysfunction after Rectal Surgery: A Retrospective Study of Men without Disease RecurrenceTHE JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, Issue 9 2010Vahudin Zugor MD ABSTRACT Introduction., Sexual dysfunction is a frequent complication of visceral surgery after rectal resections as a result of carcinoma of the rectum. Aim., The purpose of our study is to assess the incidence and form of sexual dysfunction in our own population of patients. Methods., The study comprised all patients who had undergone surgery for carcinoma of the rectum at the Erlangen Surgery University Hospital, Germany, in the period 2000,04. All male patients were retrospectively surveyed and asked to complete standardized (International Index of Erectile Function 15) questionnaires regarding their pre- and postsurgical sexual function. One hundred and forty-five questionnaires could be analyzed. The statistical evaluation was conducted with aid of the SPSS statistics program. The univariate analysis was carried out with the chi-square test and the U -test (Mann,Whitney Test). Main Outcome Measures., Erectile dysfunction, libido, and ability to have and sustain ejaculation and orgasm (both before and after surgery in each case) were among the dependent variables when compiling the data. The impact various surgical procedures and radiochemotherapy had on the severity of the sexual dysfunctions was analyzed. The scope of the postoperative urological care given was also assessed. Results., Erectile dysfunction was confirmed in N = 112 patients (77.3%) after surgery (P -value < 0.001). Other parameters such as orgasm capacity (4.1% vs. 16.5%), ejaculation ability (1.4% vs. 12.4%) and libido (3.4% vs. 22%) also showed a marked deterioration postoperatively. Postoperative erectile dysfunction was present in 77% of the patients with a colostomy and in 88.5% of the patients who had received neoadjuvant radiation. Conclusions., Male erectile dysfunction is a frequent complication after rectal resection as a result of carcinoma of the rectum. The high incidence of sexual dysfunctions results from the radical nature of the procedure and from additional radiation or colostomy therapy. These patients need accompanying urological care for treatment of their sexual dysfunction. Zugor V, Miskovic I, Lausen B, Matzel K, Hohenberger W, Schreiber M, Labanaris AP, Neuhuber W, Witt J, and Schott GE. Sexual dysfunction after rectal surgery: A retrospective study of men without disease recurrence. J Sex Med 2010;7:3199,3205. [source] GS13P OUTCOME OF TRANS-ANAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCERANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 2007S. Banerjee Aims The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of trans-anal excision of rectal cancer in a single Surgeon's practice and determine possible selection criteria for this procedure. Methods Retrospective review of hospital records, specimen histopathology and imaging of consecutive patients with rectal cancer undergoing trans-anal excision as the primary treatment. Results 25 patients had trans-anal excision of rectal cancer including 3 cases of carcinoid tumour and 1 case of gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST). 5/25 proceeded to radical rectal resection because of the presence of adverse features including lympho-vascular and peri-neural invasion and poorly differentiated cell type; residual tumour was present in 4/5 cases, nodal metastases in 3/5 patients each of whom received pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy. 2/25 patients developed recurrence at 12 and 48 months from excision. One of these patients had distant recurrence at 12 months having proceeded to radical rectal resection and the other patient (aged 99), managed with trans-anal excision alone, recurred locally at 48 months. Both cases of recurrence were T3 tumours. Overall, 19/20 cases managed with trans-anal excision alone had no recurrence with a follow-up period of 12,48 months. 16 of these patients had T1 malignancy. Conclusion T1 tumours may be treated with trans-excision alone in the absence of adverse pathological features. It is unclear from our study whether T2 should be managed in this way due to their small number in this study and T3 tumours are clearly at high risk of recurrence with this treatment alone. [source] Natural orifice surgery: applications in colonic surgeryASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, Issue 2 2010J. Leroy Abstract Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic abdominal surgery, or NOTES, allows invasive operations to be performed through a single or multiple natural-orifice approach either in isolation ("pure") or in combination with a transparietal ("hybrid") access format. Therefore, to facilitate a colonic or rectal resection, the transgastric, transrectal or transcolonic routes, as well as the transvaginal route in women, can all be used either alone or in combination. We are now performing resectional colonic techniques on our patients that have been inspired by this revolutionary concept, carefully planned with storyboarding and validated in porcine models with survival analysis. Adaptation of existing equipment along with the use of new instruments and some simple ideas, such as magnetic fields to retract and mobilize the colon, have allowed us to simplify and standardize the operative technique (the first steps to ensuring procedural reproducibility). Initial potential applications can easily be imagined for partial colonic resections for voluminous benign polyps and for small early cancers, but these applications may extend to incorporate inflammatory bowel diseases such as diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. For these techniques to further improve and the concept to become a concrete reality, a change in current surgical practice is required, and conventional laparoscopic techniques must be understood to represent a point along the evolutional development of surgery and not considered the final destination. However, as important as technical capacity is, due consideration and assurance of oncological and immunological propriety is essential, as is the issue of clarifying precise patient harm:benefit risk ratios. [source] Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2003E. Rullier Background: The feasibility of laparoscopic rectal resection in patients with mid or low rectal cancer was studied prospectively with regard to quality of mesorectal excision, autonomic pelvic nerve preservation and anal sphincter preservation. Methods: Laparoscopic rectal excision was performed in 32 patients (21 men) with rectal carcinoma located 5 cm from the anal verge. Most patients had T3 disease and received preoperative radiotherapy. The surgical procedure was performed 6 weeks after radiotherapy and included total mesorectal excision, intersphincteric resection, transanal coloanal anastomosis with coloplasty and loop ileostomy. Results: Three patients needed conversion to a laparotomy. Postoperative morbidity occurred in ten patients, related mainly to coloplasty. Macroscopic evaluation showed an intact mesorectal excision in 29 of 32 excised specimens; microscopically, 30 of the 32 resections were R0. Sphincter preservation was achieved in 31 patients. The hypogastric nerves and pelvic plexuses were identified and preserved in 24 of the 32 patients. Sexual function was preserved in ten of 18 evaluable men. Conclusion: A laparoscopic approach can be considered in most patients with mid or low rectal cancer. Copyright © 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Differences in ano-neorectal physiology of ileoanal and coloanal reconstructions for restorative proctectomyCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 4 2010A. D. Rink Abstract Objective, Restorative proctectomy with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) and restorative proctocolectomy with ilealpouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are options for maintaining bowel integrity after rectal resection. The aim of this study was to compare clinical function and anorectal physiology in patients treated with CAA and IPAA. Method, Three-dimensional vector-manometry and neorectal volumetry were performed in straight CAA [53 patients (34 male)] and IPAA [61 patients (39 male)] for ulcerative colitis. Function was assessed using a 14 day incontinence diary. Results, Function was similar in both groups, but neorectal compliance and threshold volumes for sensation, urge and maximum tolerated volume (MTV) were significantly higher after IPAA than after CAA. Mean pressure, vector volume and sphincter symmetry at rest were significant determinants of continence in both groups but squeeze pressure did not correlate significantly with function in either group. Threshold volume, MTV, and compliance were significantly correlated with frequency of defecation in patients with IPAA but not with CAA. Conclusion, A strong consistent resting anal sphincter pressure is one determinant of continence after both IPAA and CAA. Squeeze pressures do not influence the functional result. In IPAA but not CAA, the neorectum has a reservoir function which correlates with the postoperative frequency of defaecation. [source] Preoperative conditioning with oral carbohydrate loading and oral nutritional supplements can be combined with mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective colorectal resectionCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 9 2008P. O. Hendry Abstract Objective, Preoperative conditioning with oral fluid and carbohydrate (CHO) loading allows the patient to undergo surgery in the fed state and is associated with reduced postoperative insulin resistance. Further benefit may accrue from oral nutritional supplements (ONS) to counteract the fasting associated with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP). In this study we assess the ability to prescribe, dispense and have patients comply with a protocol combining preoperative ONS and CHO/fluid loading during MBP. Method, One hundred and forty-seven patients undergoing elective left colonic or rectal resection were recruited to an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programme. All patients were prescribed MBP (2 sachets Picolax). On the daytime prior to surgery, eligible patients were prescribed 2 × 200 ml of ONS (Fortijuice®, Nutricia) and in the evening 800 ml oral CHO/fluid loading (Preop®, Nutricia,). Patients were prescribed a further 400 ml of oral/CHO/fluid on the morning of surgery 2 h prior to induction of anaesthesia. Protocol compliance was audited prospectively. Results, One hundred and forty-seven patients received MBP. Twenty-three patients were ineligible for oral CHO/fluid loading [diabetes (n = 22), allergy to lemon flavoured drinks (n = 1)]. Fourteen patients did not receive the preoperative CHO drinks due to failure to prescribe (n = 8) or dispense (n = 6). One hundred and ten patients were dispensed the combined ONS and CHO/fluid loading regimen, compliance rates were 83% with ONS, 80% with CHO/fluid loading and 74% with both. Conclusion, Approximately 74% of patients undergoing MBP can comply with preoperative conditioning with ONS and CHO/fluid loading. Prescription and dispensing requires close attention to detail. [source] Analysis of national database for TEM resected rectal cancerCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 9 2006S. Bach Objective:, Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive alternative to rectal resection for cancer. Patients benefit from rapid recovery, excellent function and stoma avoidance. Method:, The national TEM database has prospectively collated data from 21 centres since 1993. Details of preoperative evaluation, neoadjuvant therapy, technical aspects of surgery, postoperative complications, pathological staging, salvage, recurrence and survival have been recorded for 454 patients with rectal cancer, median follow-up 35 months. Results:, Intention was curative in 69%, for compromise in 22% and palliative in 5%. The morbidity and mortality of TEM was 17.2% and 1.5%. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was administered in 8% of cases. Pathological staging: pT0 (1.8%), pT1 (52.9%), pT2 (32.8%), pT3 (9.9%) and pTx (3.1%). Margin positivity (< 1 mm) occurred in 20%; this was markedly stage dependent. 18 per cent received adjuvant radiotherapy while 13% progressed to major surgery. 5-year disease free survival was 77% pT1, 74% pT2 and 35% pT3 with local recurrence rates of 20%, 25% and 59% respectively. Age (P = 0.01), tumour area (P = 0.02) and pT stage (P = 0.07) predicted for relapse (Cox regression model). Conclusion:, TEM offers a safe alternative to major surgery curing three quarters of patients with pT1 disease. Although classical surgery must remain the standard of care we envisage future studies of TEM combined with adjuvant therapy. [source] Sexual Dysfunction after Rectal Surgery: A Retrospective Study of Men without Disease RecurrenceTHE JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, Issue 9 2010Vahudin Zugor MD ABSTRACT Introduction., Sexual dysfunction is a frequent complication of visceral surgery after rectal resections as a result of carcinoma of the rectum. Aim., The purpose of our study is to assess the incidence and form of sexual dysfunction in our own population of patients. Methods., The study comprised all patients who had undergone surgery for carcinoma of the rectum at the Erlangen Surgery University Hospital, Germany, in the period 2000,04. All male patients were retrospectively surveyed and asked to complete standardized (International Index of Erectile Function 15) questionnaires regarding their pre- and postsurgical sexual function. One hundred and forty-five questionnaires could be analyzed. The statistical evaluation was conducted with aid of the SPSS statistics program. The univariate analysis was carried out with the chi-square test and the U -test (Mann,Whitney Test). Main Outcome Measures., Erectile dysfunction, libido, and ability to have and sustain ejaculation and orgasm (both before and after surgery in each case) were among the dependent variables when compiling the data. The impact various surgical procedures and radiochemotherapy had on the severity of the sexual dysfunctions was analyzed. The scope of the postoperative urological care given was also assessed. Results., Erectile dysfunction was confirmed in N = 112 patients (77.3%) after surgery (P -value < 0.001). Other parameters such as orgasm capacity (4.1% vs. 16.5%), ejaculation ability (1.4% vs. 12.4%) and libido (3.4% vs. 22%) also showed a marked deterioration postoperatively. Postoperative erectile dysfunction was present in 77% of the patients with a colostomy and in 88.5% of the patients who had received neoadjuvant radiation. Conclusions., Male erectile dysfunction is a frequent complication after rectal resection as a result of carcinoma of the rectum. The high incidence of sexual dysfunctions results from the radical nature of the procedure and from additional radiation or colostomy therapy. These patients need accompanying urological care for treatment of their sexual dysfunction. Zugor V, Miskovic I, Lausen B, Matzel K, Hohenberger W, Schreiber M, Labanaris AP, Neuhuber W, Witt J, and Schott GE. Sexual dysfunction after rectal surgery: A retrospective study of men without disease recurrence. J Sex Med 2010;7:3199,3205. [source] Surgical management of colorectal cancer in south-western Sydney 1997,2001: a prospective series of 1293 unselected cases from six public hospitalsANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 9 2005S. K. Cyril Wong Background: The aim of the present study is to provide local data for the management of colorectal cancers in the south-western Sydney health area from 1997 to 2001. Methods: The data were collected prospectively. Follow up was conducted in late 2001 and early 2002. Data were cross-validated with hospital and area databases and with data from the New South Wales Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages. Results: This was an unselected series of 1293 patients from 36 surgeons; 16.5% of patients presented as emergencies. Only 3% presented as a result of bowel cancer screening. Of the 1293 patients, 1270 received an operation. There were 598 elective colonic resections with the mortality rate of 1.2%, reoperation rate of 2.7% and anastomotic leak rate of 0.8%. For the 410 elective rectal resections, the rates were 2.9%, 2.7% and 1.2%, respectively. For the 290 emergency operations, the rates were much worse at 7.7%, 6.6% and 4.8%, respectively. The corrected overall 3-year survival rate was 64%. For Dukes' A, B, C and D, the figures were 94%, 87%, 61% and 7%, respectively. Conclusions: Colorectal cancer is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in our community. Very few bowel cancers were discovered at the asymptomatic stage. This paper strongly supports community bowel cancer screening and early diagnosis. The local database has provided a rich source of information to benchmark management and outcomes of bowel cancer patients treated in the South Western Sydney Area Health Service. An area-wide computer network with online data input facilities at individual workplaces will improve data integrity and data collection efficiency. [source] | ||||||||||