Home About us Contact | |||
Reinforced Concrete (reinforced + concrete)
Terms modified by Reinforced Concrete Selected AbstractsFundamentplatten aus Stahlbeton und Stahlfaserbeton.BETON- UND STAHLBETONBAU, Issue 9 2006Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Gebrauchstauglichkeit und Tragfähigkeit Ein- und Mehrfamilienhäuser werden zunehmend statt auf Streifenfundamenten auf Fundamentplatten gegründet. Vorteile ergeben sich neben der wirtschaftlicheren Ausführung der Aushubarbeiten durch die einfachere Herstellung der Platte. Bei der Ausführung als Stahlfaserbetonplatte ergeben sich besonders wirtschaftliche Lösungen dann, wenn an die Gebrauchstauglichkeit keine besonderen Anforderungen wie Wasserdichtheit oder Rißbreitenbeschränkung gestellt werden. An der Fachhochschule Aachen wurden vergleichende experimentelle Untersuchungen an Bodenplatten aus Beton, Stahlbeton und Stahlfaserbeton unter Lastbeanspruchung durchgeführt. Es konnte nachgewiesen werden, daß Stahlfaserbeton für Fundamentplatten ein geeigneter Werkstoff ist, wenn Mindestanforderungen an die Steifigkeit des Bodens eingehalten werden. Bei erhöhten Anforderungen an die Gebrauchstauglichkeit werden Stahlbeton oder Kombinationen aus Stahlfaserbeton und Stahlbeton als sinnvoll erachtet, wenn diese auf Basis einer elastischen Schnittgrößenermittlung bemessen werden. Reinforced Concrete and Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Rafts Experimental tests on serviceability and ultimate loading performance Houses and residential buildings are increasingly built on rafts instead of strip foundations. The main advantages of rafts are more efficient excavation works and easy concreting of the rafts itself. The use of steel fibre reinforced concrete slabs offers economic advantages if there are no special requirements on service ability such as water tightness or crack limitations. At Aachen University of Applied Sciences a comparative experimental study on the load carrying behaviour of rafts made of concrete, reinforced concrete and steel fibre reinforced concrete was carried out. The tests have proven steel fibre concrete as suitable material for rafts in case of sufficient stiffness of the subbase. In case of special requirements on service ability, reinforced concrete or combined fibre and bar reinforced concrete should be used. In that case stresses should be calculated based on the elastic theory. [source] Initial stiffness of reinforced concrete structural walls with irregular openingsEARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, Issue 4 2010Bing Li Abstract Reinforced concrete (RC) structural walls with openings are the primary lateral-load-carrying elements utilized in many structures designed to resist earthquakes. A review of the technical literature shows that there is a considerable amount of uncertainty with regards to the elastic stiffness of these structures when subjected to seismic excitations. Current design practices often employ a stiffness reduction factor to deal with this uncertainty. In an attempt to develop additional information regarding the stiffness of these structures, this paper discusses an approach to determine the initial stiffness of RC structural walls with irregular openings and low aspect ratios. This approach would consider the effect of both flexural and shear deformations. As a part of this study, an analytical approach to determine stiffness was also developed and validated by comparing theoretical and experimental results obtained from six RC shear walls with irregular openings. Simple equations for assessing initial stiffness of RC structural walls with irregular openings are then proposed, based on these parametric case studies. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Numerical simulation of reinforcement strengthening for high-arch dams to resist strong earthquakesEARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, Issue 15 2008Yuchuan Long Abstract This paper focuses on analyzing the nonlinear seismic response of high-arch dams with cantilever reinforcement strengthening. A modified embedded-steel model is presented to evaluate the effects of the strengthening measure on alleviating the extension and opening of cracks under strong earthquakes. By stiffening reinforced steel, this model can easily consider the steel,concrete interaction for lightly reinforced concrete (RC) members without the need of dividing them into RC and plain concrete zones. The new tensile constitutive relations of reinforced steel are derived from the load,deformation relationship of RC members in direct tension. This model has been implemented in the finite element code and its applicability is verified by two numerical simulations for RC tests. Subsequently, numerical analyses for a 210-m high-arch dam (Dagangshan arch dam) are conducted with and without the presence of cantilever reinforcement. Numerical results show that reinforcement strengthening can reduce the nonlinear response of the arch dam, e.g. joint opening and crest displacement, and limit the extension and opening width of concrete cracks. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Shaking table model test on Shanghai World Financial Center TowerEARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, Issue 4 2007Xilin Lu Abstract The height of 101-storey Shanghai World Financial Center Tower is 492m above ground making it possible the tallest building in the world when completed. Three parallel structural systems including mega-frame structure, reinforced concrete and braced steel services core and outrigger trusses, are combined to resist vertical and lateral loads. The building could be classified as a vertically irregular structure due to a number of stiffened and transfer stories in the building. Complexities related to structural system layout are mainly exhibited in the design of services core, mega-diagonals and outrigger trusses. According to Chinese Code, the height 190 m of the building clearly exceeds the stipulated maximum height of for a composite frame/reinforced concrete core building. The aspect ratio of height to width also exceeds the stipulated limit of 7 for seismic design intensity 7. A 1/50 scaled model is made and tested on shaking table under a series of one and two-dimensional base excitations with gradually increasing acceleration amplitudes. This paper presents the dynamic characteristics, the seismic responses and the failure mechanism of the structure. The test results demonstrate that the structural system is a good solution to withstand earthquakes. The inter-storey drift and the overall behaviour meet the requirements of Chinese Design Code. Furthermore, weak positions under seldom-occurred earthquakes of seismic design intensity 8 are found based on the visible damages on the testing model, and some corresponding suggestions are proposed for the engineering design of the structure under extremely strong earthquake. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes.EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, Issue 14 2004Part 1: dynamic analysis approach Abstract In this study the inelastic behavior of steel arch bridges subjected to strong ground motions from major earthquakes is investigated by dynamic analyses of a typical steel arch bridge using a three-dimensional (3D) analytical model, since checking seismic performance against severe earthquakes is not usually performed when designing such kinds of bridge. The bridge considered is an upper-deck steel arch bridge having a reinforced concrete (RC) deck, steel I-section girders and steel arch ribs. The input ground motions are accelerograms which are modified ground motions based on the records from the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Both the longitudinal and transverse dynamic characteristics of the bridge are studied by investigation of time-history responses of the main parameters. It is found that seismic responses are small when subjected to the longitudinal excitation, but significantly large under the transverse ground motion due to plasticization formed in some segments such as arch rib ends and side pier bases where axial force levels are very high. Finally, a seismic performance evaluation method based on the response strain index is proposed for such steel bridge structures. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Comparison of displacement coefficient method and capacity spectrum method with experimental results of RC columnsEARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, Issue 1 2004Yu-Yuan Lin Abstract For the performance-based seismic design of buildings, both the displacement coefficient method used by FEMA-273 and the capacity spectrum method adopted by ATC-40 are non-linear static procedures. The pushover curves of structures need to be established during processing of these two methods. They are applied to evaluation and rehabilitation of existing structures. This paper is concerned with experimental studies on the accuracy of both methods. Through carrying out the pseudo-dynamic tests, cyclic loading tests and pushover tests on three reinforced concrete (RC) columns, the maximum inelastic deformation demands (target displacements) determined by the coefficient method of FEMA-273 and the capacity spectrum method of ATC-40 are compared. In addition, a modified capacity spectrum method which is based on the use of inelastic design response spectra is also included in this study. It is shown from the test specimens that the coefficient method overestimates the peak test displacements with an average error of +28% while the capacity spectrum method underestimates them with an average error of -20%. If the Kowalsky hysteretic damping model is used in the capacity spectrum method instead of the original damping model, the average errors become -11% by ignoring the effect of stiffness degrading and -1.2% by slightly including the effect of stiffness degrading. Furthermore, if the Newmark,Hall inelastic design spectrum is implemented in the capacity spectrum method instead of the elastic design spectrum, the average error decreases to -6.6% which undervalues, but is close to, the experimental results. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Fundamentplatten aus Stahlbeton und Stahlfaserbeton.BETON- UND STAHLBETONBAU, Issue 9 2006Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Gebrauchstauglichkeit und Tragfähigkeit Ein- und Mehrfamilienhäuser werden zunehmend statt auf Streifenfundamenten auf Fundamentplatten gegründet. Vorteile ergeben sich neben der wirtschaftlicheren Ausführung der Aushubarbeiten durch die einfachere Herstellung der Platte. Bei der Ausführung als Stahlfaserbetonplatte ergeben sich besonders wirtschaftliche Lösungen dann, wenn an die Gebrauchstauglichkeit keine besonderen Anforderungen wie Wasserdichtheit oder Rißbreitenbeschränkung gestellt werden. An der Fachhochschule Aachen wurden vergleichende experimentelle Untersuchungen an Bodenplatten aus Beton, Stahlbeton und Stahlfaserbeton unter Lastbeanspruchung durchgeführt. Es konnte nachgewiesen werden, daß Stahlfaserbeton für Fundamentplatten ein geeigneter Werkstoff ist, wenn Mindestanforderungen an die Steifigkeit des Bodens eingehalten werden. Bei erhöhten Anforderungen an die Gebrauchstauglichkeit werden Stahlbeton oder Kombinationen aus Stahlfaserbeton und Stahlbeton als sinnvoll erachtet, wenn diese auf Basis einer elastischen Schnittgrößenermittlung bemessen werden. Reinforced Concrete and Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Rafts Experimental tests on serviceability and ultimate loading performance Houses and residential buildings are increasingly built on rafts instead of strip foundations. The main advantages of rafts are more efficient excavation works and easy concreting of the rafts itself. The use of steel fibre reinforced concrete slabs offers economic advantages if there are no special requirements on service ability such as water tightness or crack limitations. At Aachen University of Applied Sciences a comparative experimental study on the load carrying behaviour of rafts made of concrete, reinforced concrete and steel fibre reinforced concrete was carried out. The tests have proven steel fibre concrete as suitable material for rafts in case of sufficient stiffness of the subbase. In case of special requirements on service ability, reinforced concrete or combined fibre and bar reinforced concrete should be used. In that case stresses should be calculated based on the elastic theory. [source] |