Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Randomized Subjects (randomized + subject)
Selected AbstractsMulticenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator and placebo-controlled trial of a corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-1 antagonist in generalized anxiety disorder,DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, Issue 5 2010Vladimir Coric M.D. Abstract Background: Antagonism of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors has been hypothesized as a potential target for the development of novel anxiolytics. This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of pexacerfont, a selective CRF-1 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Method: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active comparator trial. Two hundred and sixty patients were randomly assigned to pexacerfont 100,mg/day (after a 1 week loading dose of 300,mg/day), placebo or escitalopram 20,mg/day in a 2:2:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to end point (week 8) in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score. Results: Pexacerfont 100,mg/day did not separate from placebo on the primary outcome measure. The half-powered active comparator arm, escitalopram 20,mg/day, demonstrated efficacy with significant separation from placebo at weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8 (P<.02). Response rates for pexacerfont, placebo, and escitalopram were 42, 42, and 53%, respectively. Genetic and psychometric rating scale data was obtained in 175 randomized subjects. There was a significant association between a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the gene encoding plexin A2 (PLXNA2-2016) with the HAM-A psychic subscale score for the entire cohort at baseline (FDR-adjusted P=.015). Conclusions: Pexacerfont did not demonstrate efficacy compared to placebo for the treatment of GAD. Whether these findings are generalizable to this class of agents remains to be determined. Our preliminary genetic finding of an association between a SNP for the gene encoding plexin A2 and an anxiety phenotype in this study merits further exploration. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00481325) before enrollment. Depression and Anxiety, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Novel tobramycin inhalation powder in cystic fibrosis subjects: Pharmacokinetics and safetyPEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, Issue 4 2007David E. Geller MD Abstract Aerosolized antibiotics are associated with a high treatment burden that can result in non-adherence to chronic therapy. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP), a novel dry-powder formulation designed to deliver a high payload of tobramycin topically to the lungs for management of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. This was a multi-center, open-label, sequential-cohort, single-dose, dose-escalation study using the standard 300 mg dose of tobramycin solution for inhalation (TSI) as an active control. Subjects were randomized to TIP or TSI in a 3:1 ratio in each of five cohorts. Measurements included serum and sputum tobramycin concentrations, administration time, serum chemistries, acute change in lung function, and adverse events (AEs). Out of 90 randomized subjects, 86 had data for safety analysis; and 84 had data for PK analysis. Serum tobramycin PK profiles were similar for TIP and TSI. Four capsules of 28 mg TIP (total tobramycin dose 112 mg) produced comparable systemic exposure to 300 mg TSI, in less than one-third the administration time. The most common AEs associated with TIP were cough (20%) and dysgeusia (17%). TIP allows for faster and more efficient pulmonary delivery of tobramycin than TSI and has a safety profile that supports continued clinical investigation. The increased rate of local respiratory tract irritation noted with TIP is not unexpected with a high-payload powder formulation. The development of dry powder inhaled antibiotics may represent an important advance in the treatment of chronic lung infections. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007; 42:307,313. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] High-Dose Naltrexone Therapy for Cocaine-Alcohol DependenceTHE AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, Issue 5 2009Joy M. Schmitz PhD This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the effects of high-dose (100 mg/d) naltrexone versus placebo in a sample of 87 randomized subjects with both cocaine and alcohol dependence. Medication conditions were crossed with two behavioral therapy platforms that examined whether adding contingency management (CM) that targeted cocaine abstinence would enhance naltrexone effects compared to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) without CM. Primary outcome measures for cocaine (urine screens) and alcohol use (timeline followback) were collected thrice-weekly during 12 weeks of treatment. Retention in treatment and medication compliance rates were low. Rates of cocaine use and drinks per day did not differ between treatment groups; however naltrexone did reduce frequency of heavy drinking days, as did CBT without CM. Notably, adding CM to CBT did not enhance treatment outcomes. These weak findings suggest that pharmacological and behavioral interventions that have shown efficacy in the treatment of a single drug dependence disorder may not provide the coverage needed when targeting dual drug dependence. [source] A multicentre, open-label, randomized comparative study of tigecycline versus ceftriaxone sodium plus metronidazole for the treatment of hospitalized subjects with complicated intra-abdominal infectionsCLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, Issue 8 2010S. Towfigh Clin Microbiol Infect 2010; 16: 1274,1281 Abstract Tigecycline (TGC) has demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety, in comparison with imipenem/cilastatin in phase 3 clinical trials, for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI). The present study comprised a multicentre, open-label, randomized study of TGC vs. ceftriaxone plus metronidazole (CTX/MET) for the treatment of patients with cIAI. Eligible subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive either an initial dose of TGC (100 mg) followed by 50 mg every 12 h or CTX (2 g once daily) plus MET (1,2 g daily), for 4,14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) population at the test of cure (TOC) assessment. Of 473 randomized subjects, 376 were CE. Among these, clinical cure rates were 70.4% (133/189) with TGC vs. 74.3% (139/187) with CTX/MET (95% CI ,13.1 to 5.1; p 0.009 for non-inferiority). Clinical cure rates for subjects with Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores ,10 were 56.8% (21/37) with TGC vs. 58.3% (21/36) with CTX/MET. The microbiologic response was similar between the two treatment arms, with microbiological eradication at TOC achieved in 68.1% (94/138) of TGC-treated subjects and 71.5% (98/137) of CTX/MET-treated subjects. ( The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) for both treatment arms were nausea (TGC, 38.6% vs CTX/MET, 27.7%) and vomiting (TGC, 23.3% vs CTX/MET, 17.7%). Overall discontinuation rates as a result of an AE were 8.9% and 4.8% in TGC- and comparator-treated subjects, respectively. The results obtaned in the present study demonstrate that TGC monotherapy is non-inferior to a combination regimen of CTX/MET with respect to treating subjects with cIAI. [source] | ||||||||||