Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Random Glucose (random + glucose)
Selected AbstractsImpaired glucose regulation, elevated glycated haemoglobin and cardiac ischaemic events in vascular surgery patientsDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 3 2008H. H. H. Feringa Abstract Aims Cardiac morbidity and mortality is high in patients undergoing high-risk surgery. This study investigated whether impaired glucose regulation and elevated glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are associated with increased cardiac ischaemic events in vascular surgery patients. Methods Baseline glucose and HbA1c were measured in 401 vascular surgery patients. Glucose < 5.6 mmol/l was defined as normal. Fasting glucose 5.6,7.0 mmol/l or random glucose 5.6,11.1 mmol/l was defined as impaired glucose regulation. Fasting glucose , 7.0 or random glucose , 11.1 mmol/l was defined as diabetes. Perioperative ischaemia was identified by 72-h Holter monitoring. Troponin T was measured on days 1, 3 and 7 and before discharge. Cardiac death or Q-wave myocardial infarction was noted at 30-day and longer-term follow-up (mean 2.5 years). Results Mean (± sd) level for glucose was 6.3 ± 2.3 mmol/l and for HbA1c 6.2 ± 1.3%. Ischaemia, troponin release, 30-day and long-term cardiac events occurred in 27, 22, 6 and 17%, respectively. Using subjects with normal glucose levels as the reference category, multivariate analysis revealed that patients with impaired glucose regulation and diabetes were at 2.2- and 2.6-fold increased risk of ischaemia, 3.8- and 3.9-fold for troponin release, 4.3- and 4.8-fold for 30-day cardiac events and 1.9- and 3.1-fold for long-term cardiac events. Patients with HbA1c > 7.0% (n = 63, 16%) were at 2.8-fold, 2.1-fold, 5.3-fold and 5.6-fold increased risk for ischaemia, troponin release, 30-day and long-term cardiac events, respectively. Conclusions Impaired glucose regulation and elevated HbA1c are risk factors for cardiac ischaemic events in vascular surgery patients. [source] Screening for gestational diabetes; past, present and futureDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 5 2002F. W. F. Hanna Abstract Gestational diabetes is carbohydrate intolerance, with onset or first recognition of hyperglycaemia during pregnancy. Several studies have suggested that gestational hyperglycaemia is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, promoting the case for screening. Conversely, others argue that screening for gestational diabetes may colour the clinical judgement, influencing further management, e.g. more ,unjustified' caesarean sections. Additionally, the lack of definitive data either on a clear-cut glycaemic threshold for the development of adverse outcomes or on the impact of intervention is emphasized by opponents of screening. This review attempts to evaluate the available data on screening for gestational diabetes. Oral glucose tolerance test is promoted on the basis that the diabetogenic stress of pregnancy is encountered during late gestation and is best recognized in the fed state. There are different tests, including the 1 h/50-g, 2 h/75-g and 3 h/100-g tests, with practical limitations, including the time and cost involved and the unpleasant supra-physiological glucose load that is unrelated to body weight, and issues of reproducibility and sensitivity/specificity profiles. Despite its convenience, the poor sensitivity of random glucose has precluded its routine use for screening. Fasting glucose appears to be promising but further testing is required to ensure satisfactory sensitivity/specificity in different populations. Despite its limitations, the oral glucose tolerance test has become established as the ,most acceptable' diagnostic test for gestational diabetes. More convenient methods, e.g. fasting or random or post-load glucose, have to be validated therefore against the oral glucose tolerance test to gain acceptance for routine screening. Diabet. Med 19, 351,358 (2002) [source] Detection of Undiagnosed Diabetes and Prediabetic States in High-risk Emergency Department PatientsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 5 2009Michelle A. Charfen MD Abstract Background:, Diabetes is often not diagnosed until complications appear, and one-third of those with diabetes may be undiagnosed. Prediabetes and diabetes are conditions in which early detection would be appropriate, because the duration of hyperglycemia is a predictor of adverse outcomes, and there are effective interventions to prevent disease progression and to reduce complications. Objectives:, The objectives were to determine the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and prediabetes in emergency department (ED) patients with an elevated random glucose or risk factors for diabetes but without previously diagnosed diabetes and to identify which at-risk ED patients should be considered for referral for confirmatory diagnostic testing. Methods:, This two-part study was composed of a prospective 2-year cohort study, and a 1-week cross-sectional survey substudy, set in an urban ED in Los Angeles County, California. A convenience sample was enrolled of 528 ED patients without previously diagnosed diabetes with either 1) a random serum glucose , 140 mg/dL regardless of the time of last food intake or a random serum glucose , 126 mg/dL if more than 2 hours since last food intake or 2) at least two predefined diabetes risk factors. Measurements included presence of diabetes risk factors, ED glucose, cortisol, insulin and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test results, administered at 6-week follow-up. Results:, Glycemic status was confirmed at follow-up in 256 (48%) of the 528 patients. Twenty-seven (11%) were found to have diabetes, 141 (55%) had prediabetes, and 88 (34%) had normal results. Age, ED glucose, HbA1c, cortisol, and random serum glucose , 140 mg/dL were associated with both diabetes and prediabetes on univariate analysis. A random serum glucose , 126 mg/dL after 2 hours of fasting was associated with diabetes but not prediabetes; ED cortisol, insulin, age , 45 years, race, and calculated body mass index (BMI) were associated with prediabetes but not diabetes. In multivariable models, among factors measurable in the ED, the only independent predictor of diabetes was ED glucose, while ED glucose, age , 45 years, and symptoms of polyuria and polydipsia were independent predictors of prediabetes. All at-risk subjects with a random ED blood glucose > 155 mg/dL had either prediabetes or diabetes on follow-up testing. Conclusions:, A substantial fraction of this urban ED study population was at risk for undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes, and among the at-risk patients referred for follow-up, the majority demonstrated diabetes or prediabetes. Notably, all patients with two risk factors and a random serum glucose > 155 mg/dL were later diagnosed with prediabetes or diabetes. Consideration should be given to referring ED patients with risk factors and a random glucose > 155 mg/dL for follow-up testing. [source] Point-of-care Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c in Emergency Department Patients without Known Diabetes: Implications for Opportunistic ScreeningACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 12 2008Adit A. Ginde MD Abstract Objectives:, The objectives were to evaluate the correlation between random glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in emergency department (ED) patients without known diabetes and to determine the ability of diabetes screening in the ED to predict outpatient diabetes. Methods:, This was a cross-sectional study at an urban academic ED. The authors enrolled consecutive adult patients without known diabetes during eight 24-hour periods. Point-of-care (POC) random capillary glucose and HbA1c levels were tested, as well as laboratory HbA1c in a subset of patients. Participants with HbA1c , 6.1% were scheduled for oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Results:, The 265 enrolled patients were 47% female and 80% white, with a median age of 42 years. Median glucose and HbA1c levels were 93 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR] = 82,108) and 5.8% (IQR = 5.5,6.2), respectively. The correlation between POC and laboratory HbA1c was r = 0.96, with mean difference 0.33% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27% to 0.39%). Glucose threshold , 120 mg/dL had 89% specificity and 26% sensitivity for predicting the 76 (29%) patients with abnormal HbA1c; , 140 mg/dL had 98% specificity and 14% sensitivity. The correlation between random glucose and HbA1c was moderate (r = 0.60) and was affected by age, gender, prandial status, corticosteroid use, and current injury. Only 38% of participants with abnormal HbA1c returned for OGTTs; 38% had diabetes, 34% had impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance, and 28% had normal glucose tolerance. Conclusions:, ED patients have a high prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes. Although screening with POC random glucose and HbA1c is promising, improvement in follow-up with confirmatory testing and initiation of treatment is needed before opportunistic ED screening can be recommended. [source] | ||||||||||