Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Radiation Technique (radiation + technique)
Selected AbstractsDiffuse In-Stent RestenosisJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 6 2001HANS STÖRGER M.D. Stent restenosis, especially the diffuse pattern, has developed into a significant clinical and economical problem. It has been estimated that up to 250,000 patients developed in-stent restenosis in 2,000 alone, two thirds of them can be expected to have diffuse in-stent restenosis, which is difficult to treat because of high recurrence rates. None of the conventionally available interventional treatment modalities provides optimal long-term results. Intravascular radiation therapy is currently the only effective percutaneous therapy, for combating in-stent restenosis. Late thrombotic complications have largely been eliminated by extended antiplatelet regimens. Geographical miss, a major reason for recurrence of in-stent restenosis after brachytherapy, can be reduced by an improved radiation technique. The first preliminary data on drug-eluting stents, showing only minimal neointimal proliferation at 6-month postimplantation, could represent a major breakthrough in the quest to solve restenosis. [source] Accrediting radiation technique in a multicentre trial of chemoradiation for pancreatic cancerJOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, Issue 6 2008N Spry Summary Before a multicentre trial of 3-D conformal radiotherapy to treat cancer of the pancreas, participating clinicians were asked to complete an accreditation exercise. This involved planning two test cases according to the study protocol, then returning hard copies of the plans and dosimetric data for review. Any radiation technique that achieved the specified constraints was allowed. Eighteen treatment plans were assessed. Seven plans were prescribed incorrect doses and two of the planning target volumes did not comply with protocol guidelines. All plans met predefined normal tissue dose constraints. The identified errors were attributable to unforeseen ambiguities in protocol documentation. They were addressed by feedback and corresponding amendments to protocol documentation. Summary radiobiological measures including total weighted normal tissue equivalent uniform dose varied significantly between centres. This accreditation exercise successfully identified significant potential sources of protocol violations, which were then easily corrected. We believe that this process should be applied to all clinical trials involving radiotherapy. Due to the limitations of data analysis with hard-copy information only, it is recommended that complete planning datasets from treatment-planning systems be collected through a digital submission process. [source] ,Boomerang' technique: An improved method for conformal treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancerJOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, Issue 2 2004June Corry Summary The primary aim of the present study was to assess radiation dosimetry and subsequent clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer using a novel radiation technique termed the ,Boomerang'. Dosimetric comparisons were made with both conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. This is a study of 22 patients treated with this technique from June 1995 to October 1998. The technique used entailed delivery of 36 Gy in 18 fractions via parallel opposed fields, then 24 Gy in 12 fractions via asymmetric rotating arc fields for a total of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Patients also received induction and concurrent chemotherapy. The radiation dosimetry was excellent. Dose,volume histograms showed that with the arc fields, 90% of the planning target volume received 94% of the prescribed dose. Relative to other conventional radiation therapy off-cord techniques, the Boomerang technique results in a 27% greater proportion of the prescribed dose being received by 90% of the planning target volume. This translates into an overall 10% greater dose received for the same prescribed dose. At 3 years, the actuarial loco-regional control rate, the failure-free survival rate and the overall survival rate were 91, 75 and 91%, respectively. At 5 years, the actuarial loco-regional control rate, the failure-free survival rate and the overall survival rate were 74, 62 and 71%, respectively. The Boomerang technique provided excellent radiation dosimetry with correspondingly good loco-regional control rates (in conjunction with chemotherapy) and very acceptable acute and late toxicity profiles. Because treatment can be delivered with conventional standard treatment planning and delivery systems, it is a validated treatment option for centres that do not have the capability or capacity for IMRT. A derivative of the Boomerang technique, excluding the parallel opposed component, is now our standard for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer when IMRT is not available. [source] | ||||||||||