Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Rabeprazole
Kinds of Rabeprazole Selected AbstractsRabeprazole- versus Esomeprazole-Based Eradication Regimens for H. pylori InfectionHELICOBACTER, Issue 6 2007I-Chen Wu Abstract Background: Different kinds of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies could result in different Helicobacter pylori eradication rates. Aim: The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole- and esomeprazole-based triple therapy in primary treatment of H. pylori infection in Taiwan. Patients and Methods: From June 2005 to March 2007, 420 H. pylori -infected patients were randomly assigned to receive a 7-day eradication therapy with either esomeprazole 40 mg daily (EAC group, n = 209) or rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. (RAC group, n = 211) in combination with amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.. Follow-up endoscopy with biopsy was done 12,16 weeks after completion of eradication therapy. Those who refused endoscopic exams underwent 13C-urea breath test to assess the treatment response. Results: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that the eradication rate was 89.4% in the EAC group and 90.5% in RAC groups (p -value = .72). All of the subjects returned for assessment of compliance (100% in EAC group vs. 99.5% in RAC group, p -value = .32) and adverse events (3.83% in EAC group vs. 6.16% in RAC group, p -value = .27). Sixty (28.7%) and 37 (17.6%) patients in EAC and RAC group, respectively, refused endoscopy and underwent a 13C-urea breath test to determine the treatment effect. Conclusion: In conclusion, rabeprazole- and esomeprazole-based primary therapies for H. pylori infection are comparable in efficacy and safety. [source] Effects of a single dose of rabeprazole 20 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric acidity and oesophageal acid exposure: a randomized study in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients with a history of nocturnal heartburnALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 9 2010P. MINER Aliment Pharmacol Ther,31, 991,1000 Summary Background, Nocturnal heartburn is common in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Aim, To compare the effects of single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric acidity and oesophageal acid exposure (OAE). Methods, A total of 52 subjects with GERD and a ,6-month history of heartburn were randomized into a blinded, 2 × 2 crossover trial. Subjects' intragastric pH was monitored in two 48-h study periods with 6- to 13-day washout between periods. Patients received placebo on day 1, a single dose of rabeprazole 20 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg on day 2, and standardized meals throughout. Results, The mean percentage time with intragastric pH >4 was significantly greater with rabeprazole vs. pantoprazole for the 24-h postdose interval (44.0% vs. 32.8%; P < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in the daytime (51.0% vs. 42.2%; P < 0.001) and nighttime (32.0% vs. 16.9%; P < 0.001). Rabeprazole was also significantly superior in other intragastric pH parameters. There was no statistical difference for OAE between treatments. Conclusions, In GERD patients with nocturnal heartburn, rabeprazole 20 mg was significantly more effective than pantoprazole 40 mg in percentage time with intragastric pH >4 during the nighttime, daytime, and 24-h periods. Differences between treatments in OAE were not demonstrated. This trial is registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00237367. [source] Clinical trial: the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care , prospective randomized comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg with esomeprazole 20 and 40 mgALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 9 2009A. EGGLESTON Summary Background, A trial of empirical PPI therapy is usual practice for most patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in primary care. Aim, To determine if the 4-week efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg for resolving heartburn and regurgitation symptoms is non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg or 20 mg. Methods, In all, 1392 patients were randomized to rabeprazole 20 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg or 40 mg once daily. Patients, doctors and assessors were blinded. Symptom resolution data were collected on days 0,7 and day-28 using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index with a shortened version used on days 8,27. Results, Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete resolution of regurgitation and satisfactory resolution of heartburn and regurgitation. For complete heartburn resolution, the efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg was statistically indistinguishable, although the non-inferiority test was inconclusive. Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 20 mg for all outcomes. Conclusions, In uninvestigated GERD patients, rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete and satisfactory relief of regurgitation and satisfactory relief of heartburn, and not different for complete resolution of heartburn. [source] Efficacy of rabeprazole on heartburn symptom resolution in patients with non-erosive and erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter study from JapanALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 1 2007H. MIWA Summary Background, Few studies have compared the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in resolving the symptoms of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Japan. Aim, To investigate and compare the efficacy of 4-week course of rabeprazole 10 mg/day on symptom resolution in NERD and erosive GERD in Japan. Methods, The modified Los Angeles classification was used to grade endoscopically GERD in patients with heartburn (Grades N and M: NERD, Grades A and B: mild reflux oesophagitis (RO), and Grades C and D: severe RO). Rabeprazole 10 mg/day was administered for 4 weeks to 180 patients who kept symptom diaries. Results, Complete relief of the symptoms was achieved in 35.8% of the NERD group and 55.4% of the erosive GERD group (mild RO: 51.1% and severe RO: 77.8%). Rabeprazole was significantly more effective in erosive GERD than in NERD patients. Among the NERD subgroups (Grades N and M), no difference in symptom improvement was observed. Conclusions, Four-week, rabeprazole 10 mg/day acid suppression therapy was effective in resolving symptoms in Japanese GERD patients. This therapy was more effective in erosive GERD than in NERD patients, and in those with severe RO than in those with mild RO. [source] The effect of acid suppression on sleep patterns and sleep-related gastro-oesophageal refluxALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2005W. C. Orr Summary Background :,Several studies have demonstrated that night-time gastro-oesophageal reflux affects sleep quality, and thereby impairs daytime functioning. Aim :,To determine whether treatment with a proton-pump inhibitor (rabeprazole) would improve both objective and subjective measures of sleep. Methods :,Individuals with complaints of significant gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were studied by polysomnography and 24-h pH monitoring on two separate nights. On one occasion, participants received 20 mg rabeprazole b.d., and on another they received placebo. Both study conditions were preceded by a week of treatment with either rabeprazole or placebo. The order of treatments was randomized. Results :,Rabeprazole significantly reduced overall acid reflux, but it did not significantly reduce night-time acid contact. Rabeprazole treatment significantly improved subjective indices of sleep quality. There were no significant differences on objective measures of sleep between placebo and rabeprazole treatment. Conclusions :,Consistent with other studies of pharmacological treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux, subjective measures of sleep improved with heartburn medication but objective measures were not affected. [source] Effect of low-dose rabeprazole and omeprazole on gastric acidity: results of a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study in healthy subjectsALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 8 2004S. Bruley des Varannes Summary Background :,The treatment of acid-related symptoms requires rapid and consistent acid suppression, especially with on-demand regimens. Aim :,To compare the antisecretory activity of low-dose rabeprazole and omeprazole in healthy, Helicobacter pylori -negative subjects. Methods :,In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study, 27 volunteers were given rabeprazole 10 mg, omeprazole 10 mg, or placebo once daily for 7 days with a 10,14-day washout between treatments. Intragastric pH was monitored for 24-h on days 1 and 7 of each treatment. Results :,Median gastric pH was significantly higher with rabeprazole than with omeprazole or placebo: day 1: 2.3, 1.4 and 1.3, respectively (P = 0.0056, rabeprazole vs. omeprazole; P < 0.0001, rabeprazole vs. placebo); day 7: 3.7, 2.2 and 1.3, respectively (P = 0.0016 rabeprazole vs. omeprazole; P < 0.0001, rabeprazole vs. placebo). Time with gastric pH above 4 was significantly higher with rabeprazole than with omeprazole: day 1, 5.8 h vs. 3.7 h, respectively (P < 0.02); day 7, 10.5 h vs. 4.6 h, respectively (P = 0.0008). Conclusions :,Rabeprazole 10 mg provides more rapid acid inhibition compared with omeprazole 10 mg. After 7 days, the time with pH above 4 is more than doubled with rabeprazole 10 mg vs. omeprazole 10 mg. [source] The Choice of Proton Pump Inhibitor: Does it matter?BASIC AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, Issue 3 2004Per M. Hellström Comparisons of four different proton pump inhibitors: lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole show that they all have similar potency and efficacy. Rabeprazole, however, displays a slightly more rapid onset of acid inhibition than the others; the clinical advantage of this seems limited. The S-isomer of omeprazole, esomeprazole, exhibits a somewhat higher potency than the other proton pump inhibitors. Reports supporting a clinical advantage of this property are not convincing. To conclude, all inhibitors seem comparable as regards inhibition of gastric acid secretion. [source] Liquid chromatographic,mass spectrometry analysis and pharmacokinetic studies of a novel rabeprazole formulation, sterile powder for injection, in dogs and ratsBIOPHARMACEUTICS AND DRUG DISPOSITION, Issue 4 2007Feng Shao Abstract Rabeprazole is among the most potent proton pump inhibitors (PPI) identified to date and it has been demonstrated that it is effective in such diseases as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer. There is currently interest in developing a new formulation: rabeprazole sterile powder for injection (RSPI). This investigation was conducted to evaluate the preclinical pharmacokinetics of RSPI in rats and at the same time a comparative study was carried out in dogs between RSPI and Pariet® tablets using liquid chromatographic,mass spectrometry analysis. The liquid chromatographic,mass spectrometry method was first conducted and validated as being specific, and having accuracy, precision, sensitivity and a satisfactory recovery. After intravenous administration of RSPI (i.v.: 2, 6 and 18 mg/kg) to rats, no significant dose-dependency was found in the CL (4.20,5.72 l/h/kg), Varead (0.94,1.32 l/kg), dose-normalized AUC (197.20,245.82 µg/l*h based on 1 mg/kg) and t1/2 (p>0.05). In the dog, a randomized, open-label, crossover experiment was carried out to show that the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0,,) after i.v. administration of RSPI was at least four times larger than that following oral administration of Pariet® tablet at an equivalent dose but the elimination half-life of these two formulation was similar (p>0.05). The results showed that the pharmacokinetics of RSPI was linear (r2 = 0.98) in the dose range 2,18 mg/kg and the RSPI had a much higher AUC0,, and similar t1/2 values compared with the enteric-coated tablet. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Failure of Helicobacter pylori Treatment After Regimes Containing Clarithromycin: New Practical Therapeutic OptionsHELICOBACTER, Issue 6 2008Bruno Sanches Abstract Failure of Helicobacter pylori treatment is a growing problem in daily practice. Aim:, To evaluate the efficacy of two new regimes as second-line options in a randomized and prospective study. Methods:, Patients in whom a first eradication regime containing clarithromycin had failed were included. After performing gastroscopy and a 13C-urea breath test (UBT), the patients were randomized to receive a combination of 20 mg of rabeprazole, 500 mg of levofloxacin, and 200 mg (two tablets) of furazolidone administered once daily for 10 days (RLF) or the combination of 20 mg of rabeprazole, 120 mg (two tablets) of bismuth subcitrate, 100 mg of doxycycline, and 200 mg of furazolidone, administered twice daily for 10 days (RBDF). Clinical examinations and new UBT were performed 60 days after therapy. Results:, Sixty patients were included (mean age, 46 years, 57% females). Two patients were excluded: one because of adverse effects and another as a result of protocol violation. Compliance was similar in both groups (90% took all medications correctly). Side-effects (96% mild) were observed in 87% of the patients and were comparable between groups, except diarrhea, which was more frequent in group RLF (p= .025). Intention-to-treat cure rates were 77% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62,93%) in the RLF group and 83% (95% CI: 68,97%) in the RBDF group (p= .750). Per-protocol cure rates were 80% (95% CI: 65,95%) in the RLF group and 82% (95% CI: 67,96%) in the RBDF group (p= 1.0). Conclusions:, Both once-daily triple (rabeprazole, levofloxacin, and furazolidone) and twice-daily quadruple therapy (rabeprazole, bismuth subcitrate, doxycycline, and furazolidone) for 10 days achieved encouraging results. Subsequent studies should be performed to evaluate antibiotic resistance, doses, dosing intervals, duration of treatment, and safety of these two regimes. [source] Rabeprazole- versus Esomeprazole-Based Eradication Regimens for H. pylori InfectionHELICOBACTER, Issue 6 2007I-Chen Wu Abstract Background: Different kinds of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies could result in different Helicobacter pylori eradication rates. Aim: The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole- and esomeprazole-based triple therapy in primary treatment of H. pylori infection in Taiwan. Patients and Methods: From June 2005 to March 2007, 420 H. pylori -infected patients were randomly assigned to receive a 7-day eradication therapy with either esomeprazole 40 mg daily (EAC group, n = 209) or rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. (RAC group, n = 211) in combination with amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.. Follow-up endoscopy with biopsy was done 12,16 weeks after completion of eradication therapy. Those who refused endoscopic exams underwent 13C-urea breath test to assess the treatment response. Results: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that the eradication rate was 89.4% in the EAC group and 90.5% in RAC groups (p -value = .72). All of the subjects returned for assessment of compliance (100% in EAC group vs. 99.5% in RAC group, p -value = .32) and adverse events (3.83% in EAC group vs. 6.16% in RAC group, p -value = .27). Sixty (28.7%) and 37 (17.6%) patients in EAC and RAC group, respectively, refused endoscopy and underwent a 13C-urea breath test to determine the treatment effect. Conclusion: In conclusion, rabeprazole- and esomeprazole-based primary therapies for H. pylori infection are comparable in efficacy and safety. [source] Double-Dose, New-Generation Proton Pump Inhibitors Do Not Improve Helicobacter pylori Eradication RateHELICOBACTER, Issue 6 2007Hyo Sun Choi Abstract Background: Up to present, omeprazole plus two antibiotics are used for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy . Few studies have compared double-dose new-generation, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) with omeprazole. Therefore, we conducted a randomized, prospective study to evaluate differences in H. pylori eradication rates by PPI type. Material and Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2006, 576 consecutive patients with proven H. pylori infection were enrolled prospectively. Four different PPIs [omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. (old generation), or pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d., rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. (new generation)] were added to clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) for 1 week. Results: By intention-to-treat analysis, no difference was found between the eradication rates of these four PPIs: 64.9% (omeprazole, n = 148), 69.3% (pantoprazole, n = 140), 69.3% (rabeprazole, n = 140), and 72.9% (esomoprazole, n = 148). When eradication rates were analyzed according to whether patients had an ulcer or not on a per-protocol basis, no difference was found between the eradication rates of the four PPIs. However, side-effects were more common in the esomeprazole-based triple therapy group than in the other groups (p < .05). Conclusions: No convincing evidence was obtained that double-dose new-generation PPIs have better H. pylori eradication rates and tolerability than omeprazole. [source] Effect of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease on quality of life of patients with chronic liver diseaseHEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, Issue 4 2008Kazutomo Suzuki Aim:, Reflux esophagitis is becoming increasingly more prevalent in Japan. It has been noted that symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic liver disease may adversely affect patients' quality of life. Methods:, In the present study, 238 chronic liver disease patients (151 patients with chronic hepatitis and 87 patients with liver cirrhosis) were enrolled. The diagnosis of GERD was made based on the Quality-of-Life and Utility Evaluation Survey Technology questionnaire. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Short Forum 36 questionnaire. Results:, Symptomatic GERD was present in 31.8% (48/151) of patients with chronic hepatitis and 36.8% (32/87) of patients with liver cirrhosis. Among the chronic hepatitis group, compared to the GERD-negative group, the GERD-positive group had significantly lower scores in six domains, including "rolelimitation due to physical problem", "bodily pain", "general health perception", "vitality", "role limitation due to emotional problem", and "mental health". Among the cirrhotic group, compared to the GERD-negative group, the GERD-positive group had significantly lower scores in the "role limitation due to emotional problem" domain. Significant improvement in the "physical functioning", "bodily pain", and "general health perception" domain scores was noted in chronic hepatitis patients treated with rabeprazole. Conclusion:, The QOL of chronic liver disease patients with symptomatic GERD was impaired. [source] Comparison of one-week and two-week empirical trial with a high-dose rabeprazole in non-cardiac chest pain patientsJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 9 2009Jeong Hwan Kim Abstract Background:, In patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP), the optimal duration of an empirical trial with a high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy of one-week and two-week PPI trial in patients with weekly or more than weekly NCCP and to determine its optimal duration for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related NCCP. Methods:, Forty-two patients with at least weekly NCCP were enrolled. The baseline symptoms were assessed using a daily symptom diary for seven days. Also, esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring were performed for the diagnosis of GERD. Then, patients were treated with rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 14 days. To assess NCCP improvement during the PPI trial, the first week and the second week symptom diary were kept for 1,7 and 8,14 days. The PPI test was considered positive if a symptom score improved (50% compared to the baseline. Results:, There was no significant difference for a positive PPI test between GERD-related NCCP group (n = 8, 50%) and non GERD-related NCCP group (n = 6, 23%) during the first week of the PPI test. However, during the second week, GERD-related NCCP had a higher positive PPI test (n = 13, 81%) than non GERD-related NCCP (n = 7, 27%) (P = 0.001) with a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 62%, respectively. Conclusions:, The rabeprazole empirical trial was diagnostic for patients with GERD-related NCCP, and its optimal duration was determined to be at least two weeks. [source] Immediate acid-suppressing effects of ranitidine hydrochloride and rabeprazole sodium following initial administration and reintroduction: A randomized, cross-over study using wireless pH monitoring capsulesJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 4 2009Shouko Ono Abstract Background and Aim:, Histamine 2 receptor antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors, drugs that are widely used for the treatment of acid-related diseases, have different clinical characteristics. The objective of this study was to compare the acid-suppressing effects of ranitidine hydrochloride and those of rabeprazole sodium at the first administration and re-administration after withdrawal. Methods:, The study was designed as an open-label, randomized, two-way cross-over trial. Seven Helicobacter pylori -negative healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. Ranitidine hydrochloride (300 mg/day) or rabeprazole sodium (20 mg/day) was administered from days 1 to 7 and from days 11 to 13. The percentage of time with gastric pH < 4 and the median gastric pH were evaluated for 15 consecutive days by a Bravo capsule fixed to the stomach. Results:, On day 1, there was no significant difference between the acid-suppressing effects of the two drugs (ranitidine vs rabeprazole: not significant). Although rabeprazole sodium maintained a potent and stable effect from days 2 to 7 (ranitidine vs rabeprazole: P < 0.05), the effect of ranitidine hydrochloride was attenuated after day 4. In addition, the effect of ranitidine hydrochloride at re-administration was attenuated (days 11, 12, and 13 vs pre-administration: not significant). Conclusion:, In view of our observations, we expect symptoms associated with gastric acidity to be more adequately controlled with rabeprazole sodium in the short term when compared to ranitidine hydrochloride. [source] Non-cardiac chest pain: Prevalence of reflux disease and response to acid suppression in an Asian populationJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 2 2009Hanizam Mohd Abstract Background:, Gastroesophageal reflux disease is thought to be the commonest cause of ,non-cardiac chest pain'. The use of proton-pump inhibitors resulting in improvement in the chest pain symptom would support this causal association. Objectives:, To determine the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in non-cardiac chest pain and the response of chest pain to proton-pump inhibitor therapy. Methods:, Patients with recurrent angina-like chest pain and normal coronary angiogram were recruited. The frequency and severity of chest pain were recorded. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 48-h Bravo ambulatory pH monitoring before receiving rabeprazole 20 mg bd for 2 weeks. Results:, The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease was 66.7% (18/27). The improvement in chest pain score was significantly higher in reflux compared to non-reflux patients (P = 0.006). The proportion of patients with complete or marked/moderate improvement in chest pain symptoms were significantly higher in patients with reflux (15/18, 83.3%) compared to those without (1/9, 11.1%) (P < 0.001). Conclusion:, The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with ,non-cardiac chest pain' was high. The response to treatment with proton-pump inhibitors in patients with reflux disease, but not in those without, underlined the critical role of acid reflux in a subset of patients with ,non-cardiac chest pain'. [source] Rabeprazole treatment attenuated Helicobacter pylori -associated gastric mucosal lesion formation in Mongolian gerbilsJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 7 2003HIDEKAZU SUZUKI Abstract Background and Aim: Although rabeprazole (RPZ), a proton pump inhibitor, has been reported to have a bactericidal effect on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), no studies have been conducted regarding the effect of RPZ on gastric mucosal lesion formation caused by this bacterium. In the present study, we investigated the effect of RPZ on H. pylori -associated gastric mucosal lesion formation. Methods: Sixty-two male Mongolian gerbils were inoculated with H. pylori (ATCC43504) (Hp group) and 60 gerbils with the culture media alone (control group). Some gerbils in the Hp group and in the control group were injected with RPZ (1 mg/kg/day, for 7 days) at the 5th week. Gerbils were evaluated at the 12th, 24th and 48th weeks. Results: In the Hp group, all gerbils were persistently infected for 24 weeks, but 36% became negative for H. pylori at the 48th week. In the Hp + RPZ group, 18% of gerbils at the 12th week, 40% at the 24th week, and 80% at the 48th week, became negative for H. pylori. The level of neutrophil infiltration was significantly decreased in the Hp + RPZ group in comparison to the Hp group, possibly through the effects of RPZ on initial bacterial colonization and resultant inflammation. Even in the gerbils that became H. pylori -negative, the level of neutrophil infiltration was lower in the Hp + RPZ group than in the Hp group. RPZ treatment significantly increased the level of the reduced form of glutathione (GSH) at the 48th week. The elevated levels of the reduced form of GSH may have been reduced by an antioxidation process in the H. pylori -positive Hp + RPZ group. Conclusion: Administration of RPZ not only inhibited gastric H. pylori colonization, but also reduced gastric mucosal inflammation in gerbils, possibly through its antibacterial action as well as pharmacological recruitment of the reduced form of GSH. © 2003 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd [source] Effect of lansoprazole and rabeprazole on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers with CYP2C19 mutationsJOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY: AN INTERNATI ONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE, Issue 8 2004Fumio Itagaki The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), lansoprazole and rabeprazole, on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers with mutations in the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 gene (CYP2C19). An open-label crossover study was performed with 19 healthy subjects. Tacrolimus (2 mg) was administered orally with and without lansoprazole (30 mg per day for 4 days) or rabeprazole (10 mg per day for 4 days). Blood concentrations of tacrolimus were determined before and 1, 2, 4 and 8 h after dosing. Genotyping for CYP2C19 was conducted by a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Coadministration of lansoprazole significantly decreased the oral tacrolimus clearance, resulting in an increase in the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC0,8) (control vs with lansoprazole: 29.7 ± 3.5 vs 44.1 ± 5.0 ng h mL,1, P<0.05). Large individual variation was observed in the effects of lansorazole on tacrolimus AUC0,8 owing to CYP2C19 genotype status. The percent change for tacrolimus AUC0,8 in subjects with and without CYP2C19 mutant alleles was 81% and 29%, respectively. Coadministration of rabeprazole also increased the mean AUC0,8 of tacrolimus, but the difference was not statistically significant. These observations suggest that drug interaction between tacrolimus and lansoprazole occurs in subjects with higher lansoprazole blood concentrations corresponding to CYP2C19 genetic status. In contrast, rabeprazole has minimal effect on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics regardless of CYP2C19 genotype status. [source] Semipreparative chiral supercritical fluid chromatography in the fractionation of lansoprazole and two related antiulcer drugs enantiomersJOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, JSS, Issue 8 2008Laura Toribio Abstract The semipreparative chiral separation of lansoprazole and two related compounds (pantoprazole and rabeprazole) using supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) is presented in this work. Different loads were evaluated in order to obtain high enantiomeric purities and production rates. The volumes injected were 1, 2 and 4 mL. The concentrations of the racemic mixtures were 3 and 6 g/L for lansoprazole and 1.5 g/L for pantoprazole and rabeprazole. In all the cases, the recoveries, for a purity higher than 99.9%, were better for the second eluted enantiomer than for the first one. This fact conditioned the production rate of the first eluted enantiomer that, considering a fixed purity, was always lower than that obtained for the other one. In the case of lansoprazole it was possible to obtain 0.025 and 0.090 mg/min of the first and second eluted enantiomer, respectively, with an enantiomeric purity of 99.9%. For rabeprazole enantiomers 0.037 and 0.062 mg/min, and in the case of pantoprazole the results were better (0.062 and 0.122 mg/min) due to the higher resolution. [source] Patients vote with their feet for ,On demand' rabeprazole in the maintenance treatment phase of reflux oesophagitisALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2010V. P. Y. Tan No abstract is available for this article. [source] Patients vote with their feet for ,On demand' rabeprazole in the maintenance treatment phase of reflux oesophagitis: author's replyALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2010R. Fass No abstract is available for this article. [source] Clinical trial: maintenance intermittent therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease , a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studyALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 9 2010R. FASS Aliment Pharmacol Ther,31, 950,960 Summary Background, Optimal long-term management of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (sGERD) patients has not been established. Aim, To determine the clinical value of maintenance intermittent treatment with rabeprazole 20 mg vs. placebo in patients with sGERD. Methods, This multicentre, US study enrolled patients with sGERD (,3-month history of GERD symptoms and ,4 days/week of heartburn during a 2-week placebo run-in) without oesophageal erosions. Patients with complete heartburn control after 4 weeks of open-label rabeprazole 20 mg daily treatment were randomized to 6-month, double-blind, maintenance intermittent treatment (7- to 14-day courses when heartburn recurred) with rabeprazole 20 mg or placebo. Results, The primary efficacy end point, mean percentage of heartburn-free days, was significantly greater with rabeprazole vs. placebo: 82.58% and 62.17% (ITT; P < 0.0001) [per protocol 86.74% rabeprazole vs. 74.93% placebo (P < 0.0254)]. Compared with placebo group, the rabeprazole group also experienced a significantly higher percentage of heartburn-free daytime (84.06% vs. 63.39%; P < 0.0001) and nighttime (95.41% vs. 90.25%; P = 0.0021) periods, had significantly fewer discontinuations because of insufficient heartburn control (6.3% vs. 36.3%; P < 0.0001) and took fewer antacid tablets daily (0.58 vs. 1.16; P = 0.0021). Conclusion, Intermittent use of rabeprazole may be an effective maintenance treatment strategy for patients with sGERD and warrants further investigation. This trial was registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT00165841. [source] Effects of a single dose of rabeprazole 20 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric acidity and oesophageal acid exposure: a randomized study in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients with a history of nocturnal heartburnALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 9 2010P. MINER Aliment Pharmacol Ther,31, 991,1000 Summary Background, Nocturnal heartburn is common in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Aim, To compare the effects of single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric acidity and oesophageal acid exposure (OAE). Methods, A total of 52 subjects with GERD and a ,6-month history of heartburn were randomized into a blinded, 2 × 2 crossover trial. Subjects' intragastric pH was monitored in two 48-h study periods with 6- to 13-day washout between periods. Patients received placebo on day 1, a single dose of rabeprazole 20 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg on day 2, and standardized meals throughout. Results, The mean percentage time with intragastric pH >4 was significantly greater with rabeprazole vs. pantoprazole for the 24-h postdose interval (44.0% vs. 32.8%; P < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in the daytime (51.0% vs. 42.2%; P < 0.001) and nighttime (32.0% vs. 16.9%; P < 0.001). Rabeprazole was also significantly superior in other intragastric pH parameters. There was no statistical difference for OAE between treatments. Conclusions, In GERD patients with nocturnal heartburn, rabeprazole 20 mg was significantly more effective than pantoprazole 40 mg in percentage time with intragastric pH >4 during the nighttime, daytime, and 24-h periods. Differences between treatments in OAE were not demonstrated. This trial is registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00237367. [source] Systematic review: standard- and double-dose proton pump inhibitors for the healing of severe erosive oesophagitis , a mixed treatment comparison of randomized controlled trialsALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 6 2009S. J. EDWARDS Summary Background, No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared all European-licensed standard- and double-dose PPIs for the healing of severe erosive oesophagitis. Aim, To compare the effectiveness of licensed doses of PPIs for healing severe erosive oesophagitis (i.e. esomeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg). Methods, Systematic review of CENTRAL, EMBASE and MEDLINE for RCTs in patients with erosive oesophagitis (completed October 2008). Endoscopically verified healing rates at 4 and 8 weeks were extracted and re-calculated if not analysed by intention-to-treat. A mixed treatment comparison was used to combine direct treatment comparisons with indirect trial evidence while maintaining randomization. Odds ratios (OR) are reported compared to omeprazole 20 mg. Results, A total of 3021 papers were identified in the literature search; 12 were of sufficient quality to be included in the analysis. Insufficient data were available to included rabeprazole. Esomeprazole 40 mg was found to provide significantly higher healing rates at 4 weeks [OR 1.84, 95% Credible Interval (95% CrI): 1.50 to 2.22] and 8 weeks (OR 1.91, 95% CrI: 1.13 to 2.88). No other PPI investigated had significantly higher healing rates than omeprazole 20 mg. Conclusion, Esomeprazole 40 mg consistently demonstrates higher healing rates compared with licensed standard- and double-dose PPIs. [source] Clinical trial: the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care , prospective randomized comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg with esomeprazole 20 and 40 mgALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 9 2009A. EGGLESTON Summary Background, A trial of empirical PPI therapy is usual practice for most patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in primary care. Aim, To determine if the 4-week efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg for resolving heartburn and regurgitation symptoms is non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg or 20 mg. Methods, In all, 1392 patients were randomized to rabeprazole 20 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg or 40 mg once daily. Patients, doctors and assessors were blinded. Symptom resolution data were collected on days 0,7 and day-28 using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index with a shortened version used on days 8,27. Results, Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete resolution of regurgitation and satisfactory resolution of heartburn and regurgitation. For complete heartburn resolution, the efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg was statistically indistinguishable, although the non-inferiority test was inconclusive. Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 20 mg for all outcomes. Conclusions, In uninvestigated GERD patients, rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete and satisfactory relief of regurgitation and satisfactory relief of heartburn, and not different for complete resolution of heartburn. [source] Response rate and predictors of response in a short-term empirical trial of high-dose rabeprazole in patients with globusALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 12 2008D. H. SINN Summary Background, Although the aetiology of globus (the sensation of a lump in the throat) remains unclear, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is associated with globus. A short-term trial with a high-dose proton pump inhibitor has been shown to be a sensitive tool for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aim, To see whether patients with globus symptom responded to short-term high-dose rabeprazole trial and assess predictors of symptom response. Methods, Sixty-four patients with globus symptom were analysed. Patients received rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 14 days. Patients completed a daily diary assessing the severity and frequency of globus. Results, Forty-one patients (64%) were diagnosed clinically with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Based on the pH testing and endoscopy, the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was 22% (14 of 64). The globus symptom score was significantly higher in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease compared with patients without gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (P = 0.004). Two patients (3%) had complete resolution and 22 (34%) had more than a 50% improvement in the globus symptom score. Endoscopic findings (P = 0.714), pathological acid exposure on pH testing (P = 0.741) or baseline gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms (P = 0.606) were not associated with improvement of globus symptom. Conclusion, While gastro-oesophageal reflux disease may be an aggravating factor in patients with globus, it does not appear to be the sole cause of globus symptom. [source] Efficacy of rabeprazole on heartburn symptom resolution in patients with non-erosive and erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter study from JapanALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 1 2007H. MIWA Summary Background, Few studies have compared the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in resolving the symptoms of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Japan. Aim, To investigate and compare the efficacy of 4-week course of rabeprazole 10 mg/day on symptom resolution in NERD and erosive GERD in Japan. Methods, The modified Los Angeles classification was used to grade endoscopically GERD in patients with heartburn (Grades N and M: NERD, Grades A and B: mild reflux oesophagitis (RO), and Grades C and D: severe RO). Rabeprazole 10 mg/day was administered for 4 weeks to 180 patients who kept symptom diaries. Results, Complete relief of the symptoms was achieved in 35.8% of the NERD group and 55.4% of the erosive GERD group (mild RO: 51.1% and severe RO: 77.8%). Rabeprazole was significantly more effective in erosive GERD than in NERD patients. Among the NERD subgroups (Grades N and M), no difference in symptom improvement was observed. Conclusions, Four-week, rabeprazole 10 mg/day acid suppression therapy was effective in resolving symptoms in Japanese GERD patients. This therapy was more effective in erosive GERD than in NERD patients, and in those with severe RO than in those with mild RO. [source] Combined analysis of three crossover clinical pharmacology studies of effects of rabeprazole and esomeprazole on 24-h intragastric pH in healthy volunteersALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 4 2007V. NORRIS Summary Aim To compare antisecretory effects of rabeprazole and esomeprazole after single and repeat dosing in Helicobacter pylori -negative healthy volunteers. Methods Results were pooled from three smaller, open, crossover, randomized studies to obtain data from 80 subjects. The studies compared: (a) 5 days' dosing of 20 mg rabeprazole and esomeprazole (n = 24); (b) single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 27) and (c) 5 days' dosing of rabeprazole 10 mg and esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 29). Washout periods were ,14 days. Intragastric pH was recorded continuously for 24 h on days 0, 1 and 5. Results Single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg maintained 24-h intragastric pH >4 for longer than esomeprazole 20 mg (45% vs. 32%; P < 0.001); rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg were equivalent in their effects. After 5 days' dosing, rabeprazole 20 mg maintained pH >4 for longer than esomeprazole 20 mg (62% vs. 56%; P = 0.046); the reverse was true for esomeprazole 20 mg vs. rabeprazole 10 mg (56% vs. 48%; P = 0.035). In general, intragastric pH AUC during 0,5 h after dosing was higher after esomeprazole than rabeprazole, whereas the reverse was true during the night. Conclusions The order of effects on 24-h pH was: rabeprazole 10 mg , esomeprazole 20 mg < rabeprazole 20 mg = esomeprazole 40 mg. Esomeprazole acts faster, whereas rabeprazole's effect lasts longer. [source] Oral rabeprazole vs. intravenous pantoprazole: a comparison of the effect on intragastric pH in healthy subjectsALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2007D. ARMSTRONG Summary Background Intravenous pantoprazole is often administered inappropriately to hospitalized patients who can take oral medications. Aim To compare the antisecretory effects of oral rabeprazole and intravenous pantoprazole in healthy subjects. Methods In a double-blind, double-dummy, two-way crossover study, 38 Helicobacter pylori -negative volunteers were randomized to oral rabeprazole 20 mg or intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg daily for 3 days followed, after a 14-day washout period by the comparator treatment. Intragastric pH was recorded continuously for 24 h at baseline and on days 1 and 3 of each treatment period. Results The mean (95% CI) percentage of the 24-h recording with gastric pH >4 was higher with rabeprazole than with pantoprazole on day 1: 37.7% (30.6,44.8%) vs. 23.9% (20.0,27.8). The mean percentage times with pH >3 and >4 for all intervals assessed were greater and the median 24-h intragastric pH values were higher with rabeprazole than with pantoprazole on days 1 and 3. The mean acidity index was lower with rabeprazole on days 1 and 3. Conclusions Oral rabeprazole 20 mg produced greater acid suppression than intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg. Therefore, it may be an appropriate and effective alternative in patients who can take oral medication. [source] Comparison of efficacies of dual therapy and triple therapy using rabeprazole in second-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori in JapanALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2006T. KAWAI Summary Background The only authorized second-line Helicobacter pylori regimen in Japan is proton pump inhibitor + amoxycillin + clarithromycin. However, it has been reported that this second-line regimen is not effective. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of dual and triple eradication therapies using rabeprazole as second-line H. pylori eradication regimens. Aim To evaluate the efficacy of dual and triple eradication therapies using rabeprazole as second-line H. pylori eradication therapy. Methods Sixty-two H. pylori -positive patients with first-line eradication failure were randomly assigned to two groups. The RAM group was administered rabeprazole 20 mg + amoxycillin 1500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg daily for 1 week. The RA group was administered rabeprazole 40 mg + amoxycillin 2000 mg daily for 2 weeks. Eradication of H. pylori infection was determined by 13C-urea breath testing at 8 weeks after completion of treatment. Prior to treatment, amoxycillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole susceptibility, and CYP2C19 phenotype status were determined. Results Eradication rates for the RAM and RA groups were 97% and 74%, respectively. Eradication rates were not influenced by CYP2C19 phenotype in either group. Eradication rates for clarithromycin-resistant patients were 100% in the RAM group and 77% in the RA group. Conclusions One week with RAM therapy and 2 weeks with RA therapy were effective as second-line eradication therapy for H. pylori infection; moreover, RAM was more effective than RA therapy. [source] New once-daily, highly effective rescue triple therapy after multiple Helicobacter pylori treatment failures: a pilot studyALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 6 2005L. G. V. Coelho Summary Background:,Helicobacter pylori treatment failure is a growing problem in daily practice. Aim:, To determine the efficacy of the combination of rabeprazole, levofloxacin and furazolidone as a rescue therapy. Methods:, Duodenal ulcer patients previously submitted, without success, to at least two H. pylori treatment regimens were included. Gastroscopy (urease test, histological examination and culture) and 13C-urea breath test were performed. All patients received a combination of rabeprazole 20 mg, levofloxacin 500 mg and furazolidone 200 mg (two tablets) administered in a single dose in the morning for 10 days. Clinical examination and a new 13C-urea breath test were performed 90 days after therapy. Results:, Twelve patients (eight females and four males), mean age 43 (30,58) years were included. Two patients failed to complete the treatment because of nausea and vomiting. Ten patients completed the study and took all the medications as advised. Culture was obtained in six patients: 100 and 83% of the samples were sensitive to furazolidone and levofloxacin, respectively. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 100 and 83% (P = 0.019). Conclusions:, the combination of rabeprazole, levofloxacin and furazolidone in a single daily dose for 10 days constitutes a highly-effective and low-cost alternative as a third-line therapy in patients infected with H. pylori. [source] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||