Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
RV Pacing (rv + pacing)
Selected AbstractsImplantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Do Women Fare Worse Than Men?JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2009Gender Comparison in the INTRINSIC RV Trial Introduction: Due to limited enrollment of women in previous trials, there is a paucity of data comparing outcome and arrhythmic events in men versus women with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Methods and Results: We analyzed outcome of patients in the INTRINSIC RV (Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing with AV Search Hysteresis in ICDs) trial based on gender. Women comprised 19% (293/1530) of the INTRINSIC RV population. Compared with men, women were less likely to have coronary disease, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and hyperlipidemia, and were more likely to have congestive heart failure and diabetes. Women were less likely to receive beta blockers and ACE inhibitors, and more likely to receive diuretics. Over 10.8 ± 3.5 months of follow-up, unadjusted mortality was higher in women than men (6.8% vs 4.1%, P = 0.04). Heart failure hospitalizations occurred in 7.9% of women versus 5.7% of men (P = 0.13). After adjustment for baseline differences and drug therapy, there was no significant difference in mortality between men and women. Adverse events were observed more often in women. There were no gender differences in the percentage of patients receiving appropriate or inappropriate ICD shocks. Conclusions: In INTRINSIC RV, women receiving ICDs differed from men regarding baseline characteristics and drug therapy. After adjusting for baseline differences and medical therapy, there were no differences in heart failure hospitalization, survival, or ICD shock therapy during follow-up. Apparent undertreatment of heart failure and greater frequency of adverse advents in women receiving ICDs warrant further investigation. [source] Reduction of RV Pacing by Continuous Optimization of the AV IntervalPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2006GORAN MILASINOVIC Background: In patients requiring permanent pacing, preservation of intrinsic ventricular activation is preferred whenever possible. The Search AV+ (SAV+) algorithm in Medtronic EnPulseÔ dual-chamber pacemakers can increase atrioventricular (AV) intervals to 320 ms in patients with intact or intermittent AV conduction. This prospective, multicenter study compared the percentage of ventricular pacing with and without AV interval extension. Methods: Among 197 patients enrolled in the study, the percentage of ventricular-paced beats was evaluated via device diagnostics at the 1-month follow-up. Patient cohorts were defined by clinician assessment of conduction via a 1:1 AV conduction test at the 2-week follow-up. The observed percentage of ventricular pacing with SAV + ON and the predicted percentage of ventricular pacing with SAV + OFF were determined from the SAV + histogram data for the period between the 2-week and 1-month follow-up visits. Results: Of 197 patients, 110 (55.8%) had intact 1:1 AV conduction, of which 109 had 1-month data. SAV + remained ON in 99/109 patients; 10 patients had intrinsic A-V conduction intervals beyond SAV + nominal and therefore SAV + disabled. The mean percentage of ventricular pacing in the 109 patients was SAV+ ON = 23.1% (median 3.7%) versus SAV + OFF = 97.2% (median 99.7%). In 87 patients without 1:1 AV conduction, SAV + was programmed OFF in 6, automatically disabled in 52, and remained ON in 29. In 8 of these patients, 80,100% reduction in ventricular pacing was observed with SAV + ON. Conclusion: The Search AV+ algorithm in the EnPulse pacemaker effectively promotes intrinsic ventricular activation and substantially reduces unnecessary ventricular pacing. [source] Short-Term Effects of Right Ventricular Pacing on Cardiorespiratory Function in Patients With a Biventricular PacemakerCONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, Issue 6 2008Stefan Toggweiler MD The intention of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of right ventricular (RV) pacing on cardiorespiratory function in patients with a biventricular pacemaker. A group of 26 patients with a biventricular pacemaker was enrolled in this cross-over, single-blind study. All patients underwent spiroergometry and electrocardiography in RV and biventricular pacing mode. Peak work capacity (102±32 W and 107±34 W for RV and biventricular pacing mode, respectively; P<.01) and peak oxygen consumption (21.4±6.7 mL/min/kg and 22.6±7.0 mL/min/kg for RV and biventricular pacing mode, respectively; P<.01) were significantly lower in the RV pacing mode. Heart rate at rest was significantly higher with active RV pacing. Short-term RV pacing in patients with a biventricular pacemaker resulted in a higher heart rate at rest, a lower peak work capacity, and a lower peak oxygen consumption compared with that in the biventricular pacing mode. [source] Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with AV Block (BLOCK HF): Clinical Study Design and RationaleJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2007ANNE B. CURTIS M.D. Background: Right ventricular (RV) pacing restores ventricular systole in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block, yet recent studies have suggested that in patients with AV block and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, RV pacing may exacerbate the progression to heart failure (HF). BLOCK HF is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial designed to determine whether patients with AV block, LV dysfunction (EF , 50%), and mild to moderate HF (NYHA I-III) who require pacing benefit from biventricular (BiV) pacing, compared with RV pacing alone. Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether the time to first event (all-cause mortality, heart failure-related urgent care, or a , 15% increase in left ventricular end systolic volume index [LVESVI]) for patients with BiV pacing is superior to that of patients with RV pacing. Methods: Patients with AV block and LV dysfunction who require permanent pacing and undergo successful implantation of a commercial Medtronic CRT device, with or without an ICD, will be randomized to BiV or RV pacing. Patients are followed at least every 6 months until study closure. Up to 1,636 patients may be enrolled in 150 centers worldwide. Conclusion: BLOCK HF is a large, randomized, clinical study in pacing-indicated patients with AV block, mild to moderate HF symptoms, and LV dysfunction to determine whether BiV pacing is superior to RV pacing in slowing the progression of HF. [source] The Clinical Implications of Cumulative Right Ventricular Pacing in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial IIJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2005JONATHAN S. STEINBERG M.D. Introduction: This study was designed to assess whether right ventricular pacing in the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) arm of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II was associated with an unfavorable outcome. Methods and Results: Data on the number of ventricular paced beats were available in 567 (76%) of 742 MADIT II patients with ICDs. The number of ventricular paced beats over the total number of beats showed a bimodal distribution with patients being predominantly paced or nonpaced. Therefore, patients were dichotomized at 0,50% and 51,100% of cumulative pacing with median pacing rate 0.2% and 95.6%, respectively. Endpoints included new or worsening heart failure, appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF, and the combined endpoint of heart failure or death. Clinical features associated with frequent ventricular pacing included age ,65 years, advanced NYHA heart failure class, LVEF < 0.25, first degree AV and bundle branch block, and amiodarone use. During follow-up, 119 patients (21%) had new or worsened heart failure, 130 (23%) had new or worsened heart failure or death, and 142 (25%) had appropriate therapy for VT/VF. In comparison to patients with infrequent pacing, those with frequent pacing had significantly higher risk of new or worsened heart failure (hazard ratio = 1.93; P = 0.002) and VT/VF requiring ICD therapy (HR = 1.50; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Patients in MADIT II who were predominantly paced had a higher rate of new or worsened heart failure and were more likely to receive therapy for VT/VF. These results suggest the deleterious consequences of RV pacing, particularly in the setting of severe LV dysfunction. [source] Right Ventricular Septal Pacing: A Comparative Study of Outflow Tract and Mid Ventricular SitesPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2010RAPHAEL ROSSO M.D. Background: Prolonged right ventricle (RV) apical pacing is associated with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction due to dysynchronous ventricular activation and contraction. Alternative RV pacing sites with a narrower QRS compared to RV pacing might reflect a more physiological and synchronous LV activation. The purpose of this study was to compare the QRS morphology, duration, and suitability of RV outflow tract (RVOT) septal and mid-RV septal pacing. Methods: Seventeen consecutive patients with indication for dual-chamber pacing were enrolled in the study. Two standard 58-cm active fixation leads were passed to the RV and positioned in the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum using a commercially available septal stylet (model 4140, St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). QRS duration, morphology, and pacing parameters were compared at the two sites. The RV lead with less-satisfactory electrical parameters was withdrawn and deployed in the right atrium. Results: Successful positioning of the pacing leads at the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum was achieved in 15 patients (88.2%). There were no significant differences in the mean stimulation threshold, R-wave sensing, and lead impedance between the two sites. The QRS duration in the RVOT septum was 151 ± 14 ms and in the mid-RV septum 145 ± 13 ms (P = 0.150). Conclusions: This prospective observational study shows that septal pacing can be reliably achieved both in the RVOT and mid-RV with active fixation leads using a specifically shaped stylet. There are no preferences in regard to acute lead performance or paced QRS duration with either position. (PACE 2010; 33:1169,1173) [source] Impact of Temporary Interruption of Right Ventricular Pacing for Heart Block on Left Ventricular Function and DyssynchronyPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2010WEN-JING HONG M.D. Background:The increasing data suggest an association between chronic right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. We sought to determine the effect of temporary interruption of long-term RV pacing on LV function and mechanical dyssynchrony in children and young adults with complete heart block. Methods:Twelve patients aged 20.0 ± 7.4 years with congenital heart block (group I) and six patients aged 22.7 ± 11.0 years with surgically acquired heart block (group II) with RV pacing were studied. The pacing rate was reduced to less than patient's intrinsic heart rate and maintained for 5 minutes. The LV ejection fraction (EF), three-dimensional systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI), two-dimensional global longitudinal strain and strain rate, and Doppler-derived isovolumic acceleration before and after interruption of RV pacing were compared. Results:The LVEF and GLS increased while QRS duration decreased after the pacing interruption in both the groups (all P < 0.05). While SDI decreased in both groups I (6.8 ± 2.3%, 3.8 ± 0.8%, P = 0.001) and II (9.2 ± 4.1%,5.0 ± 1.6%, P = 0.032), it remained higher in group II than in group I (P = 0.046) after the pacing interruption. The prevalence of LV dyssynchrony (SDI > 4.7%) decreased in group I (83%,25%, P = 0.006) but not in group II (67%,50%, P = 0.50). The %increase in LVEF correlated positively with %reduction of LV SDI (r = 0.80, P = 0.001). Conclusions:Temporary interruption of chronic RV pacing acutely improves LV dyssynchrony and systolic function in children and young adults, the magnitude of which is greater in patients with congenital than those with surgically acquired heart block. (PACE 2010; 41,48) [source] Addition of a Left Ventricular Lead to Conventional Pacing Systems in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Feasibility, Safety, and Early Results in 60 Consecutive PatientsPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2002CINDY M. BAKER BAKER, C.M., et al.: Addition of a Left Ventricular Lead to Conventional Pacing Systems in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Feasibility, Safety, and Early Results in 60 Consecutive Patients. Left bundle branch block worsens congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients with LV dysfunction. Asynchronous LV activation produced by RV apical pacing leads to paradoxical septal motion and inefficient ventricular contraction. Recent studies show improvement in LV function and patient symptoms with biventricular pacing in patients with CHF. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, acute efficacy, and early effect on symptoms of the upgrade of a chronically implanted RV pacing system to a biventricular system. Sixty patients with NYHA Class III and IV underwent the upgrade procedure using commercially available leads and adapters. The procedure succeeded in 54 (90%) of 60 patients. Acute LV stimulation thresholds obtained from leads placed along the lateral LV wall via the coronary sinus compare favorably to those reported in current biventricular pacing trials. The complication rate was low (5/60, 8.3%): lead dislodgement (n = 1), pocket hematoma (n = 1), and wound infections (n = 3). During 18 months of follow-up (16.7%) of 60 patients died. Two patients that died failed the initial upgrade attempt. At 3-month follow-up, quality of life scores improved 31 ± 28 points (n = 29), P < 0.0001). NYHA Class improved from 3.4 ± 0.5 to 2.4 ± 0.7 (P = < 0.0001) and ejection fraction increased from 0.23 ± 0.8 to 0.29 ± 0.11 (P = 0.0003). Modification of RV pacing to a biventricular system using commercially available leads and adapters can be performed effectively and safely. The early results of this study suggest patients may benefit from this procedure with improved functional status and quality of life. [source] Impact of Right Ventricular Pacing Sites on Exercise Capacity during Ventricular Rate Regularization in Patients with Permanent Atrial FibrillationPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2009HUNG-FAT TSE M.D., Ph.D. Background:The deleterious effects of right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing may offset the potential benefit of ventricular rate (VR) regularization and rate adaptation during an exercise in patient's atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods:We studied 30 patients with permanent AF and symptomatic bradycardia who receive pacemaker implantation with RVA (n = 15) or right ventricular septal (RVS, n = 15) pacing. All the patients underwent an acute cardiopulmonary exercise testing using VVI-mode (VVI-OFF) and VVI-mode with VR regularization (VRR) algorithm on (VVI-ON). Results:There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups, except pacing QRS duration was significantly shorter during RVS pacing than RVA pacing (138.9 ± 5 vs 158.4 ± 6.1 ms, P = 0.035). Overall, VVI-ON mode increased the peak exercise VR, exercise time, metabolic equivalents (METs), and peak oxygen consumption (VO2max), and decreased the VR variability compared with VVI-OFF mode during exercise (P < 0.05), suggesting that VRR pacing improved exercise capacity during exercise. However, further analysis on the impact of VRR pacing with different pacing sites revealed that only patients with RVS pacing but not patients with RVA pacing had significant increased exercise time, METs, and VO2max during VVI-ON compared with VVI-OFF, despite similar changes in peaked exercise VR and VR variability. Conclusion:In patients with permanent AF, VRR pacing at RVS, but not at RVA, improved exercise capacity during exercise. [source] | ||||||||||