Home  About us  Contact
 

Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation (pulmonary + vein_antrum_isolation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Impact of Systematic Isolation of Superior Vena Cava in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation on the Outcome of Paroxysmal, Persistent, and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results from a Randomized Study

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2010
ANDREA CORRADO M.D.
Impact of the Systematic Isolation of the Superior Vena Cava.,Background: Pulmonary veins (PVs) have been shown to represent the most frequent sites of ectopic beats initiating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, additional non-PV triggers, arising from different areas, have been reported as well. One of the most common non-PV sites described is the superior vena cava. Aims: The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact resulting from the systematic isolation of the superior vena cava (SVCI) in addition to pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) on the outcome of paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF ablation. Methods: A total of 320 consecutive patients who had been referred to our center in order to undergo a first attempt of AF ablation were randomized into 2 groups. Group I (160 patients) underwent PVAI only; Group II (160 patients) underwent PVAI and SVCI. Results: AF was paroxysmal in 134 (46%), persistent in 75 (23%), and permanent in 111 (31%) of said patients. SVCI was performed on 134 of the 160 patients (84%) in Group II. SVC isolation was not performed on the remaining 26 patients either because of phrenic nerve capture or the lack of SVC potentials. Comparison of the outcome data between the 2 groups, after a follow-up of 12 months, revealed a significant difference in total procedural success solely with patients manifesting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (56/73 [77%] Group I vs. 55/61 [90%] Group II; P = 0.04; OR 2.78). Conclusions: In our study, the strategy of the empiric SVCI in addition to PVAI has improved the outcome of AF ablation solely in patients manifesting paroxysmal AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1,5, January 2010) [source]

Randomized Comparison Between Open Irrigation Technology and Intracardiac-Echo-Guided Energy Delivery for Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation: Procedural Parameters, Outcomes, and the Effect on Esophageal Injury

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2007
NASSIR F. MARROUCHE M.D.
Introduction: We performed a prospective study to compare efficacy and safety of both open irrigation tip (OIT) technology with intracardiac echo (ICE)-guided energy delivery in patients presenting for PVAI. Methods and Results: Fifty-three patients presenting for PVAI were randomized to ablation using an OIT catheter (Group 1, 26 patients; temperature and power were set at 50° and 50 W, respectively, with a saline pump flow rate of 30 mL/min) or radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery under ICE guidance (Group 2, 27 patients; energy was titrated based on microbubbles formation). The mean procedure time and fluoroscopy exposure were lower in Group 1 (164 ± 42 min and 7,560 ± 2,298 ,Graym2 vs 204 ± 47 min and 12,240 ± 4,356 ,Graym2; P = 0.005 and 0.008, respectively). Moreover, the durations of RF lesions applied per PV antrum was lower in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (5.1 ± 2.2 min vs 9.2 ± 3.2 min, P = 0.03, respectively). Within 24 hours after PVAI in 35.7% (all erythema) of Group 1 and 57.1% (21.4% erythema and 35.7% necrosis) of Group 2, patients' esophageal wall changes were documented. After 14 ± 2 months of follow up, recurrences were documented in 19.2% of Group 1 and 22.2% of Group 2 patients. Conclusion: Although both OIT and ICE-guided energy delivery possess a similar effect in treating AF, OIT seems to be superior in terms of achieving isolation and shortening fluoroscopy exposure. Moreover, a lower incidence of esophageal wall injury was observed utilizing OIT for PVAI. [source]

Esophageal Acid Levels after Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2009
GEORG NÖLKER M.D.
Background: Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) is a potentially curative, nonpharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Several procedural complications have been described, including esophageal wall lesions ranging from erythema and esophagitis, necrosis and ulcer, to atrio-esophageal fistula. We prospectively studied changes in esophageal acid levels before and after PVAI. Methods: We performed 24-hour pH-metry before and 1.3 ± 1.6 days after PVAI, in 25 patients (mean age = 62 ± 12 years, 17 men) with symptomatic AF. A 2-mm transnasal probe was inserted into the inferior part of the esophagus and into the stomach to measure pH levels at fixed intervals. DeMeester scores, indicating acidic gastro-esophageal reflux, were calculated. Results: The mean number of reflux episodes increased from 89 ± 80 before to 107 ± 94 after PVAI. The mean percentage of time with esophageal pH < 4 was shorter after (108 ± 193 minutes) than before PVAI (159 ± 245 minutes). The mean DeMeester score decreased from 49 ± 68 before to 31 ± 41 after PVAI (P < 0.05). We observed erythema or esophagitis in five patients, necrosis or ulcer in seven, and atrio-esophageal fistula in no patient. Conclusions: Our hypothesis of increased acid levels caused by stimulation of the right vagal nerve during isolation of the right upper pulmonary vein was not verified. [source]

Impact of Systematic Isolation of Superior Vena Cava in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation on the Outcome of Paroxysmal, Persistent, and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results from a Randomized Study

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2010
ANDREA CORRADO M.D.
Impact of the Systematic Isolation of the Superior Vena Cava.,Background: Pulmonary veins (PVs) have been shown to represent the most frequent sites of ectopic beats initiating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, additional non-PV triggers, arising from different areas, have been reported as well. One of the most common non-PV sites described is the superior vena cava. Aims: The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact resulting from the systematic isolation of the superior vena cava (SVCI) in addition to pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) on the outcome of paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF ablation. Methods: A total of 320 consecutive patients who had been referred to our center in order to undergo a first attempt of AF ablation were randomized into 2 groups. Group I (160 patients) underwent PVAI only; Group II (160 patients) underwent PVAI and SVCI. Results: AF was paroxysmal in 134 (46%), persistent in 75 (23%), and permanent in 111 (31%) of said patients. SVCI was performed on 134 of the 160 patients (84%) in Group II. SVC isolation was not performed on the remaining 26 patients either because of phrenic nerve capture or the lack of SVC potentials. Comparison of the outcome data between the 2 groups, after a follow-up of 12 months, revealed a significant difference in total procedural success solely with patients manifesting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (56/73 [77%] Group I vs. 55/61 [90%] Group II; P = 0.04; OR 2.78). Conclusions: In our study, the strategy of the empiric SVCI in addition to PVAI has improved the outcome of AF ablation solely in patients manifesting paroxysmal AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1,5, January 2010) [source]