Pulmonary Carcinomas (pulmonary + carcinoma)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


The diagnostic utility of D2-40 for malignant mesothelioma versus pulmonary carcinoma with pleural involvement

DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 12 2006
Ph.D., Reda S. Saad M.D.
Abstract Differentiating malignant mesothelioma (MM) from pulmonary carcinoma in pleural fluid cytology can be challenging. Recent studies have suggested that D2-40, a novel lymphatic marker, may be a useful marker for mesothelial differentiation in surgical specimens. However, there are no available data regarding its utility in effusion cytology specimens. We investigated the utility of D2-40 in pleural fluid cytology in differentiating MM from pulmonary carcinomas. Twenty cases of pleural effusion smears of surgically confirmed MM with their corresponding cell blocks were retrieved from the database of the hospital computer system. We also included 10 cases of metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma (PA) and 10 cases metastatic pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) involving the pleural fluid. Cell blocks were formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded, and immunostained for TTF1, p63, calretinin, CK5/6, WT-1, and D2-40. Cases were scored as negative (<5% positivity) or positive (>5% moderate/strong positivity). The positive rates for TTF1, p63, calretinin, CK5/6, WT-1, and D2-40 were as follows: MM (0/20), (0/20), (17/20), (18/20), (19/20), (17/20), for PA (8/10), (0/10), (3/10), (0/10), (0/10), (0/10), and for PSCC (1/10), (10/10), (6/10), (10/10), (0/15), (0/10). The staining pattern for D2-40 was characterized by thick membranous staining. Diffuse cytoplasmic staining by D2-40 was seen in 2 cases of pulmonary carcinoma, counted as negative. Our study showed that in differentiating MM from PA, CK5/6, WT-1, and D2-40 have high specificity and sensitivity for MM. Although calretinin is a sensitive IHC marker for MM, it is not specific since it stained 30% of PA. Conversely, to differentiate between MM and PSCC, p63 and WT-1 are the best available markers. We recommend a panel of CK5/6, p63, D2-40, and WT-1 to differentiate MM from pulmonary carcinomas in effusion cytology specimens. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2006; 34:801,806. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Studies on the Physicochemical Properties, Structure and Antitumor Activity of Polysaccharide YhPS-1 from the Root of Cordalis yanhusuo Wang

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, Issue 2 2006
Yi-Wen Tao
Abstract A polysaccharide named YhPS-1 was isolated from the root of Cordalis yanhusuo Wang and purified by means of gel-permeation chromatography and ionexchange chromatography. Its physicochemical properties, including monosaccharide composition, carbohydrate content, molecular weight and elemental composition, were determined. The structure of YhPS-1 was elucidated by chemical methods along with 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy ways, such as including two-dimensional HMQC and HMBC experiments. These results show that YhPS-1 possesses a backbone consisting of terminal , -Glcp -(1,, , -Glcp -(1,6), , -Glcp -(1,4) and , -Glcp -(1,4,6). The bioactive assay showed that it could inhibit the growth of Sarcoma 180 and Lewis pulmonary carcinoma implanted in mice. [source]


The diagnostic utility of D2-40 for malignant mesothelioma versus pulmonary carcinoma with pleural involvement

DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 12 2006
Ph.D., Reda S. Saad M.D.
Abstract Differentiating malignant mesothelioma (MM) from pulmonary carcinoma in pleural fluid cytology can be challenging. Recent studies have suggested that D2-40, a novel lymphatic marker, may be a useful marker for mesothelial differentiation in surgical specimens. However, there are no available data regarding its utility in effusion cytology specimens. We investigated the utility of D2-40 in pleural fluid cytology in differentiating MM from pulmonary carcinomas. Twenty cases of pleural effusion smears of surgically confirmed MM with their corresponding cell blocks were retrieved from the database of the hospital computer system. We also included 10 cases of metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma (PA) and 10 cases metastatic pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) involving the pleural fluid. Cell blocks were formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded, and immunostained for TTF1, p63, calretinin, CK5/6, WT-1, and D2-40. Cases were scored as negative (<5% positivity) or positive (>5% moderate/strong positivity). The positive rates for TTF1, p63, calretinin, CK5/6, WT-1, and D2-40 were as follows: MM (0/20), (0/20), (17/20), (18/20), (19/20), (17/20), for PA (8/10), (0/10), (3/10), (0/10), (0/10), (0/10), and for PSCC (1/10), (10/10), (6/10), (10/10), (0/15), (0/10). The staining pattern for D2-40 was characterized by thick membranous staining. Diffuse cytoplasmic staining by D2-40 was seen in 2 cases of pulmonary carcinoma, counted as negative. Our study showed that in differentiating MM from PA, CK5/6, WT-1, and D2-40 have high specificity and sensitivity for MM. Although calretinin is a sensitive IHC marker for MM, it is not specific since it stained 30% of PA. Conversely, to differentiate between MM and PSCC, p63 and WT-1 are the best available markers. We recommend a panel of CK5/6, p63, D2-40, and WT-1 to differentiate MM from pulmonary carcinomas in effusion cytology specimens. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2006; 34:801,806. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Significant high expression of cytokeratins 7, 8, 18, 19 in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, compared to small cell lung carcinomas

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2 2010
Ryo Nagashio
The aim of the present study was to clarify protein profiling in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). The proteomic approach was used, and involved cell lysate from two cell lines (N231 derived from SCLC and LCN1 derived from LCNEC), with 2-D gel electrophoresis (2-DE). In the present study, 25 protein spots with greater than twofold quantitative differences between LCN1 and N231 cells on 2-DE gels were confirmed. Within the 25 identified proteins, cytokeratins (CK) 7, 8, 18 and 19 were upregulated in LCN1 cells compared with N231 cells. The expression of CK7, 8, 18, and 19 was further studied on immunohistochemistry with 81 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded pulmonary carcinomas, which included 27 SCLC, 30 LCNEC, 14 adenocarcinomas, and 10 squamous cell carcinomas. Although the expression of CK7, 8, 18, and 19 was observed in all histological types, the mean immunostaining scores of CK7, 8, 18, and 19 were significantly higher in LCNEC than in SCLC (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). These data suggest that the biological characteristics of LCNEC and SCLC may be different and the expression of CK may serve as differential diagnostic markers. [source]


Lung adenocarcinoma associated with atypical adenomatous hyperplasia.

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 12 2003
A clinicopathological study with special reference to smoking, cancer multiplicity
Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the lung has been proposed as a possible precursor lesion of adenocarcinoma of the lung. In the present study, we sought to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of lung adenocarcinoma cases associated with AAH, with special reference to tobacco smoking and the presence of multiple primary carcinomas of pulmonary and extrapulmonary organs. We examined 123 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas and conducted histopathological diagnoses for AAH and multiple primary pulmonary carcinomas. Clinicopathological characteristics such as age, sex, smoking index, survival, and the presence of extrapulmonary primary carcinomas were obtained from clinical records, and the associations among these factors were examined statistically. Sixteen lung adenocarcinoma patients had accompanying AAH (the AAH group) and 107 cases did not (the NAAH group). The incidence of primary carcinomas in extrapulmonary organs was higher in the AAH group (37.5%; 6/16) than in the NAAH group (12.5%; 13/107) (P = 0.01). Multiple primary lung cancers tended to be more frequent in the AAH group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). Although there was no difference in tobacco smoking between the two groups, all eight cases with multiple primary lung carcinomas were smokers. Furthermore, multiple primary lung carcinomas were found more frequently in smokers of the AAH group (37.5%; 3/8) than in the smokers of the NAAH group (7.2%; 5/69) (P = 0.04). The results suggested that constitutional or genetic factors might predispose patients to the development of AAH together with extrapulmonary primary carcinomas, and that smoking might contribute to the development of multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas, especially in patients with pre-existing AAH. [source]


Secondary breast cancer: a 5-year population-based study with review of the literature

APMIS, Issue 10 2009
TOR AUDUN KLINGEN
Secondary tumours in the breast are rare. Based on literature, an incidence of 0.4,2% is reported. In this population-based study, secondary breast tumours from a 5-year period (2001,2005), not including metastasis from contralateral breast carcinoma, were reviewed (Vestfold County, Norway). A total of 722 patients with breast malignancies were found in this population (89.3% from Vestfold County Hospital). Ten of these, approximately 1.4%, were metastatic tumours, representing four cutaneous melanomas, three pulmonary carcinomas and three malignant lymphomas. The tumours were often solitary, palpable and close to the skin. Radiologically, the lesions mostly resembled primary carcinomas by mammography and ultrasound, which differs from other studies. Comparison with a known primary tumour and use of immunohistochemical profiling is of crucial importance. Melanoma markers (Melan-A, HMB-45, S-100 protein), lung cancer markers (Cytokeratins, TTF1, Chromogranin, Synapthophysin) and lymphoid markers (CD3, CD20) usually help to confirm a secondary breast tumour diagnosis. This approach is especially indicated in diffusely growing tumours with lack of glandular structure and high-grade cytological features, and staining for ER and GCDFP15 may be helpful. Thus, the diagnosis of a breast metastasis may be suspected by careful mammography and ultrasound imaging, although some cases have atypical radiological features, and histological examination might be necessary to ensure a correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment. [source]