Proton Beam Radiotherapy (proton + beam_radiotherapy)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Chordoma and chondrosarcoma: Similar, but quite different, skull base tumors

CANCER, Issue 11 2007
Kaith Almefty BBA
Abstract BACKGROUND Chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base are frequently amalgamated because of similar anatomic location, clinical presentation, and radiologic findings. The chondroid chordoma variant has been reported to carry a better prognosis. The objective of the current study was to investigate the distinctions between these 3 entities. METHODS The data concerning 109 patients with chordoma, chondroid chordoma, and chondrosarcoma who were treated by a single surgeon with maximum surgical resection and frequently by adjunct proton beam radiotherapy between 1990 and 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Pathologic distinction was established by cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen staining. Clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and cytogenetic studies were analyzed in relation to disease recurrence and death. RESULTS The average follow-up was 48 ± 37.5 months (range, 1,191 months). There were no reliable distinguishing clinical or radiologic features noted between the groups. Chondrosarcoma patients had a significantly better outcome compared with chordoma patients with regard to survival and recurrence-free survival (P = .028 and P < .001, respectively), whereas patients with chondroid chordoma had a poor outcome similar to chordoma patients with regard to survival and recurrence-free survival (P = .337 and P = .906, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Chordoma and chondrosarcoma differ with regard to their origin and histology, and differ markedly with regard to outcome. Chondroid chordomas behave in a manner that is clinically similar to chordomas, with the same prognosis. Both chordoma types demonstrate an aggressive clinical course and poor outcome after disease recurrence. The optimal treatment for all groups of patients involves radical surgical resection followed by high-dose radiotherapy in patients with chordomas. Radiotherapy may not be necessary in patients with low-grade chondrosarcoma. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society. [source]


4261: FNA biopsies for genomic analysis and adjuvant therapy for uveal melanoma

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 2010
L DESJARDINS
Purpose Recent changes in the management of uveal melanoma include the use of biopsies for genomic analysis and the identification of patients with a high risk of metastasis. We wish to describe our first experience with fine needle aspiration (FNA), genome profiling and adjuvant therapy protocol for high risk patients Methods we have started a multicentric adjuvant phase III trial of intravenous fotemustine (FOTEADJ) for high risk uveal melanoma patients. Patients with tumor of 15 mm or more in diameter with retinal detachment or extrascleral extension, patients with tumors of 18 mm or more in diameter and patients with loss of chromosome 3 and gain of entire 8q were considered high risk and eligible. Tumour genome profiling was achieved by array-CGH on a NimbleGen 72K microarray, after whole genome amplification (WGA) in cases of FNAs Local treatment consisted in enucleation or proton beam radiotherapy. FNA was offered to patients treated by radiotherapy for a tumor of 5 mm of thickness or more. Results Between May 2009 and May 2010, 74 patients were offered to participate. Only 16 patients were included because of various reasons: technical problems with the biopsy (13 samples evaluable out of 26 FNA), refusal of the biopsy or the protocol or non inclusion criteria. There has been some improvement in our results since the introduction of WGA for FNA specimens Conclusion Proposing fine needle aspiration biopsy and obtaining sufficient material is not always easy. Including patients in randomized protocols is always a challenge. During the first year for FOTEADJ, only 22% of the eligible patients were enrolled but this percentage is greatly improving with time and experience . [source]


Management of uveal tumours

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 2009
B DAMATO
Purpose The purpose of this presentation is to describe the management of uveal melanomas and the other most common uveal tumours. Methods Choroidal melanomas are treated with plaque radiotherapy if possible, with proton beam radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, trans-scleral local resection, trans-retinal endoresection, phototherapy and enucleation being reserved for patients who cannot be managed with a plaque. Increasingly, tumour biopsy is performed for histological grading of malignancy and for cytogenetic studies aimed at determining the genomic tumour type so that risk of metastatic disease can be determined. Choroidal metastases usually respond to external beam radiotherapy. Biopsy may be needed to confirm the diagnosis. Choroidal haemangiomas are treated by photodynamic therapy, with good response in most patients. Results In the large majority of patients, it is possible to conserve the eye and vision. Patients need life-long follow-up in case tumour recurrence occurs. After radiotherapy of choroidal and ciliary body melanomas some patients develop exudative and neovascular complications needing treatment. Conclusion Successful management of uveal tumours is based on a firm diagnosis, accurate staging of disease, reliable prognostication and adequate aftercare. [source]


An audit of eccentrically-positioned ruthenium plaque radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma in Liverpool

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 2009
A RUSSO
Purpose Brachytherapy is usually administered with the plaque overlapping the entire tumour margin by at least 1-2mm. With posterior tumours, our practice is to position the plaque with its posterior edge aligned with the posterior tumour margin. We audited ocular outcomes after eccentrically-placed ruthenium plaque radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma. Methods Patients were included if receiving primary ruthenium brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma during the three years up to the 31st July 2007. A perforated template was used to facilitate plaque positioning. For posterior tumors, the template was positioned so that trans-illumination produced a glow at the posterior tumour margin (,sunset sign'). Minimum doses of 300-350 Gy and 80-90 Gy were prescribed to the sclera and apex, respectively. Results The cohort comprised 162 patients (93 female and 69 male). The time to the last known visual acuity had a median of 23 months. The initial visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 94.6%, 20/60 to 20/200 in 13.0% and worse than 20/200 in 1.9% of patients. The tumours had a mean basal diameter of 11.7mm. Ten tumours exceeded 5.4 mm in height. Tumour extension to within 5mm of optic disc, fovea or both occurred in 18 (11.1%), 28 (17.3%) and 27 (16.7%) cases respectively. Risk factors for visual loss were proximity to optic disc or fovea, initial visual acuity worse than 20/40 and tumour height exceeding 5.4 mm. In 66 patients with none of these risk factors, 92% retained 20/40 or better and 5 had vision of 20/60 , 20/200. In 72 with one risk factor, 74.3% retained 20/16 , 20/40 and 95.7% had vision of 20/200 or better. In 12 patients with 2 risk factors, these percentages were 25.0% and 91.7%. Only 3 patients had 3 risk factors and one retained vision of 20/200 or better. Tumours distanced < 5 mm to fovea were divided in 3 groups, and visual acuity analysed. Three patients had local tumour recurrence and were treated respectively by proton beam radiotherapy, plaque radiotherapy and enucleation (the only eye lost in this series). Conclusion Eccentric plaque radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma achieves good rates of local tumour control, ocular retention and preservation of vision. [source]


Primary photodynamic therapy of choroidal melanoma

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 2009
H HEIMANN
Purpose To review our initial experience with photodynamic therapy of choroidal melanoma at the Ocular Oncology Service in Liverpool. Methods Patients were included in the study if they underwent primary photodynamic therapy for choroidal melanoma. The treatment was administered using the same protocol as for choroidal neovascularization. Results The patients (12 male and 5 female) had a mean age of 62.2 years. The melanomas were located in the right eye in 11 patients and the left eye in 6 patients. The tumour margin extended anteriorly to pre-equatorial choroid in one patient and posteriorly to include optic disc in 7 patients. The melanomas had a mean diameter of 7.6 mm and a mean thickness of 2.0mm. The initial visual acuity was 6/12 or better in 13 patients and 6/18-6/60 in 4 patients. Biopsy showed the tumour to be of spindle cell type in two patients and to contain epithelioid cells in three patients. One patient was found to have monosomy 3 so that the tumour was treated with proton beam radiotherapy. The follow-up ranged to 622 days with a median of 101 days. Four patients subsequently underwent proton beam radiotherapy and one patient was treated by endoresection. The last known visual acuity was 6/12 or better in 11 patients, 6/18 to 6/60 in 4 patients and 3/60 to Counting Fingers in 2 patients. Conclusion Photodynamic therapy may be worth attempting in patients with a small choroidal melanoma when other methods are likely to cause visual loss. Many patients subsequently require more aggressive treatment to achieve local tumour control. [source]