Home  About us  Contact
 

Atrioventricular Delay (atrioventricular + delay)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Programming Optimal Atrioventricular Delay in Dual Chamber Pacing Using Peak Endocardial Acceleration: Comparison with a Standard Echocardiographic Procedure

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1p2 2003
JEAN-MARC DUPUIS
DUPUIS, J.-M.,et al.: Programming Optimal Atrioventricular Delay in Dual Chamber Pacing Using Peak Endocardial Acceleration: Comparison with a Standard Echocardiographic Procedure.Optimization of programmed atrioventricular delay in dual chamber pacing is essential to the hemodynamic efficiency of the heart. Automatic AV delay optimization in an implanted pacemaker is highly desirable. Variations of peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) with AV delay at rest correlate well with echocardiography derived observations, particularly with end-diastolic filling and mitral valve closure timings. This suggests the possibility of devising a procedure for the automatic determination of the optimal AV delay. The aim of this study was to compare a proposed algorithm for optimal AV delay determination with an accepted echocardiographic method. Fifteen patients with high degree AV block received BEST-Living pacing systems. Automatic AV delay scans were performed at rest (60,300 ms in 20-ms steps with 60 beats per step) in DDD at 90 ppm, while simultaneously recording cycle-by-cycle PEA values, which were averaged for each AV delay to obtain a PEA versus AV delay curve. Nonlinear regression analysis based on a Boltzmann sigmoid curve was performed, and the optimal AV delay (OAVD) was chosen as the sigmoid inflection point of the regression curve. The OAVD was also evaluated for each patient using the Ritter echocardiographic method. Good sigmoid fit was obtained in 13 of 15 patients. The mean OAVD obtained by the PEA sigmoid algorithm was146.9 ± 32.1 ms, and the corresponding result obtained by echocardiography was156.4 ± 34.3 ms(range 31.8,39.7 ms). Correlation analysis yielded r = 0.79, P = 0.0012. In conclusion, OAVD estimates obtained by PEA analysis during automatic AV delay scanning are consistent with those obtained by echocardiography. The proposed algorithm can be used for automatic OAVD determination in an implanted pacemaker pulse generator. (PACE 2003; 26:[Pt. II]:210,213) [source]

Acute Blood Pressure Changes After the Onset of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: A Time-Course Analysis

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2005
MEHDI RAZAVI M.D.
Introduction: We aimed to characterize blood pressure (BP) response at the beginning of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and its relationship to orthostatic challenge and variable atrioventricular interval. Methods and Results: In this prospective study of 17 consecutive patients with documented AVNRT, mean BP was analyzed in the supine and upright positions during sinus rhythm, AVNRT, and pacing with atrioventricular delay of 150 msec (AV150) and 0 msec (AV0). Mean BPs were compared at 3,5 seconds, 8,10 seconds, and 28,30 seconds after the onset of AVNRT or pacing. BP decreased immediately after AVNRT initiation, with gradual recovery during the first 30 seconds from 71.9 ± 16.5 mmHg to 86 ± 13.8 mmHg, P < 0.01. A similar pattern was observed during AV0, but not during AV150, pacing. While supine, mean BP decrease was more pronounced during AVNRT and AV0 pacing (,26.1% and ,32.1%, respectively) than during AV150 pacing (,8%, P = 0.02 and P = 0.07, respectively). This difference subsided 30 seconds after the onset of AVNRT or pacing. When upright, the mean BP time course was similar, but mean BP recovery during AVNRT was slower, and the difference between mean BP during AVNRT and AV150 persisted at 30 seconds. Conclusions: The initial mean BP decrease during AVNRT recovered gradually within 30 seconds. A short atrioventricular interval is associated with a greater mean BP decrease at the onset of tachycardia. These observations may explain clinical symptoms immediately after the onset of AVNRT. [source]

Programming Optimal Atrioventricular Delay in Dual Chamber Pacing Using Peak Endocardial Acceleration: Comparison with a Standard Echocardiographic Procedure

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1p2 2003
JEAN-MARC DUPUIS
DUPUIS, J.-M.,et al.: Programming Optimal Atrioventricular Delay in Dual Chamber Pacing Using Peak Endocardial Acceleration: Comparison with a Standard Echocardiographic Procedure.Optimization of programmed atrioventricular delay in dual chamber pacing is essential to the hemodynamic efficiency of the heart. Automatic AV delay optimization in an implanted pacemaker is highly desirable. Variations of peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) with AV delay at rest correlate well with echocardiography derived observations, particularly with end-diastolic filling and mitral valve closure timings. This suggests the possibility of devising a procedure for the automatic determination of the optimal AV delay. The aim of this study was to compare a proposed algorithm for optimal AV delay determination with an accepted echocardiographic method. Fifteen patients with high degree AV block received BEST-Living pacing systems. Automatic AV delay scans were performed at rest (60,300 ms in 20-ms steps with 60 beats per step) in DDD at 90 ppm, while simultaneously recording cycle-by-cycle PEA values, which were averaged for each AV delay to obtain a PEA versus AV delay curve. Nonlinear regression analysis based on a Boltzmann sigmoid curve was performed, and the optimal AV delay (OAVD) was chosen as the sigmoid inflection point of the regression curve. The OAVD was also evaluated for each patient using the Ritter echocardiographic method. Good sigmoid fit was obtained in 13 of 15 patients. The mean OAVD obtained by the PEA sigmoid algorithm was146.9 ± 32.1 ms, and the corresponding result obtained by echocardiography was156.4 ± 34.3 ms(range 31.8,39.7 ms). Correlation analysis yielded r = 0.79, P = 0.0012. In conclusion, OAVD estimates obtained by PEA analysis during automatic AV delay scanning are consistent with those obtained by echocardiography. The proposed algorithm can be used for automatic OAVD determination in an implanted pacemaker pulse generator. (PACE 2003; 26:[Pt. II]:210,213) [source]