Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Productivity Relationships (productivity + relationships)
Selected AbstractsCommunity maturity, species saturation and the variant diversity,productivity relationships in grasslandsECOLOGY LETTERS, Issue 12 2006Qinfeng Guo Abstract Detailed knowledge of the relationship between plant diversity and productivity is critical for advancing our understanding of ecosystem functioning and for achieving success in habitat restoration efforts. However, effects and interactions of diversity, succession and biotic invasions on productivity remain elusive. We studied newly established communities in relation to preexisting homogeneous vegetation invaded by exotic plants in the northern Great Plains, USA, at four study sites for 3 years. We observed variant diversity,productivity relationships for the seeded communities (generally positive monotonic at three sites and non-monotonic at the other site) but no relationships for the resident community or the seeded and resident communities combined at all sites and all years. Community richness was enhanced by seeding additional species but productivity was not. The optimal diversity (as indicated by maximum productivity) changed among sites and as the community developed. The findings shed new light on ecosystem functioning of biodiversity under different conditions and have important implications for restoration. [source] Unanticipated impacts of spatial variance of biodiversity on plant productivityECOLOGY LETTERS, Issue 8 2005Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi Abstract Experiments on biodiversity have shown that productivity is often a decelerating monotonic function of biodiversity. A property of nonlinear functions, known as Jensen's inequality, predicts negative effects of the variance of predictor variables on the mean of response variables. One implication of this relationship is that an increase in spatial variability of biodiversity can cause dramatic decreases in the mean productivity of the system. Here I quantify these effects by conducting a meta-analysis of experimental data on biodiversity,productivity relationships in grasslands and using the empirically derived estimates of parameters to simulate various scenarios of levels of spatial variance and mean values of biodiversity. Jensen's inequality was estimated independently using Monte Carlo simulations and quadratic approximations. The median values of Jensen's inequality estimated with the first method ranged from 3.2 to 26.7%, whilst values obtained with the second method ranged from 5.0 to 45.0%. Meta-analyses conducted separately for each combination of simulated values of mean and spatial variance of biodiversity indicated that effect sizes were significantly larger than zero in all cases. Because patterns of biodiversity are becoming increasingly variable under intense anthropogenic pressure, the impact of loss of biodiversity on productivity may be larger than current estimates indicate. [source] What determines the relationship between plant diversity and habitat productivity?GLOBAL ECOLOGY, Issue 6 2008Martin Zobel ABSTRACT The relationship between biodiversity and habitat productivity has been a fundamental topic in ecology. Although the relationship between these parameters may exhibit different shapes, the unimodal shape has been frequently encountered. The decrease in diversity at high productivity has usually been attributed to competitive exclusion. We suggest that evolutionary history and dispersal limitation may be even more important in shaping the diversity,productivity relationship. On a global scale, unimodal diversity,productivity relationships dominate in temperate regions, whereas positive relationships are more common in the tropics. This difference can be accounted for by contrasting evolutionary history. Temperate regions have smaller species pools for productive habitats since these habitats have been scarce historically for speciation, while the opposite is true for the tropics. In addition, dispersal within a region may limit diversity either due to the lack of dispersal syndromes at low productivity or the low number of diaspores at high productivity. Thereafter, biotic interactions (competition and facilitation) can shape the relationship. All these processes can act independently or concurrently. We recommend that the common approach to examining empirical diversity,environmental relationships should start with the role of large-scale processes such as evolutionary history and dispersal limitation, followed by influences associated with ecological interactions. [source] Why does the unimodal species richness,productivity relationship not apply to woody species: a lack of clonality or a legacy of tropical evolutionary history?GLOBAL ECOLOGY, Issue 3 2008Lauri Laanisto ABSTRACT Aim, To study how differences in species richness patterns of woody and herbaceous plants may be influenced by ecological and evolutionary factors. Unimodal species richness,productivity relationships (SRPRs) have been of interest to ecologists since they were first described three decades ago for British herbaceous vegetation by J. P. Grime. The decrease in richness at high productivity may be due to competitive exclusion of subordinate species, or diverse factors related to evolution and dispersal. Unimodal SRPRs are most often reported for plants, but there are exceptions. For example, unimodal SRPRs are common in the temperate zone but not in the tropics. Similarly, woody species and forest communities in the Northern Hemisphere do not tend to show unimodal SRPRs. Location, Global. Methods, We used data from the literature to test whether a unimodal SRPR applies to woody species and forest communities on a global scale. We explored whether the shape of SRPRs may be related to the lack of clonality in woody species (which may prevent their being competitively superior), or the legacy of evolutionary history (most temperate woody species originate from tropical lineages, and due to niche conservatism they may still demonstrate ,tropical patterns'). We used case studies that reported the names of the dominant or most abundant species for productive sites. Results, Woody species were indeed less clonal than herbaceous species. Both clonality and the temperate evolutionary background of dominating species were associated with unimodality in SRPRs, with woodiness modifying the clonality effect. Main conclusions, The unimodal SRPR has been common in the ecological literature because most such studies originate from temperate herbaceous communities with many clonal species. Consequently, both evolutionary and ecological factors may influence species richness patterns. [source] Long-term enhancement of agricultural production by restoration of biodiversityJOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2007JAMES M. BULLOCK Summary 1Experimental manipulations have shown positive impacts of increased species richness on ecosystem productivity, but there remain some questions about this relationship. First, most studies last < 4 years, which raises issues about whether diversity,productivity relationships are maintained in mature communities. Secondly, the conservation relevance of many studies is debatable. We addressed both issues using long-term experimental studies of the agriculturally relevant hay yield of recreated species-rich grasslands. 2Grasslands were recreated within replicated experiments in ex-arable fields at two sites in southern England by using either species-poor or species-rich seed mixtures. The species-poor mixture comprised seven grasses as recommended for grassland creation in English agri-environment schemes. The species-rich mixture comprised 11 grasses and 28 forbs and was designed to recreate a typical southern English hay meadow. 3After 8 years the plots sown with species-rich mixtures resembled target diverse community types. The plots sown with species-poor mixtures had been colonized by a number of forbs but had lower numbers of grasses, legumes and other forbs than the species-rich plots. Increased hay yield of the species-rich plots in the first years of the experiments have been described in an earlier paper, and these differences were maintained after 8 years. 4In the eighth year the species-rich plots had an average 43% higher hay yield than the species-poor plots. Regression analysis showed that the variation in hay yield was related to differences in the number of non-leguminous forbs and showed no relation to grass or legume numbers. This suggests increased hay yield is an effect of the greater range of life forms exhibited by forbs rather than a simple fertilizing effect of legumes. 5The nitrogen content and phosphorus content of the hay showed complex treatment effects over time. However, the nutritional value of the hay was above the minimum requirements for livestock. 6Synthesis and applications. The aims of conservationists and farmers can often be in conflict. This study has shown that the recreation of diverse grasslands of conservation value can have a positive impact on hay yield, which benefits the farm business, and this is repeated across differing sites. Because the effect is maintained over time, farm income will be increased in the long term. [source] | ||||||||||