Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Primary Immunosuppression (primary + immunosuppression)
Selected AbstractsRecurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation in JapanHEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, Issue 2007Satoshi Yamagiwa Although there was some initial controversy, there is now a consensus that primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) does indeed recur in both cadaveric and living donated allografts. Recurrence rate after deceased donor liver transplantation (LT) was reported to be 10.9,23% at 5 years. In the present study, we reviewed 221 PBC patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Japan. The 5-year overall survival rate was 79%, and the rate of recurrence based on histological findings was 10% (7/70) after a median time of 36 months. Primary immunosuppression, withdrawal of corticosteroids and human leukocyte antigen matches were not associated with the recurrence. Recurrent PBC appears to have little impact on graft function and survival, but this may become a greater problem with longer follow up. It is noteworthy that the 10-year survival of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients who underwent LDLT wasfound to be only 39.1% in Japan, whereas that of PBC was 72.9%. Factors associated with the poor prognosis include biliary strictures, hepatobiliary and colorectal malignancies, and recurrence of PSC. In our study, we reviewed 66 patients with PSC who underwent LDLT in Japan. The 5-year survival rate was 72%, and the rate of recurrence diagnosed on histological and cholangiographic findings was 25% (11/44). Well-defined diagnostic criteria and longer studies are required to characterize the nature of recurrent PSC and its impact on graft survival in more detail. [source] Recurrence of autoimmune liver disease after liver transplantation: A systematic reviewLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2006Manjushree Gautam Recurrence of autoimmune liver disease in allografts has long been a topic of debate. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine the reported incidence of recurrence after liver transplantation of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane electronic databases were used to identify articles. The inclusion criteria used were articles on patients with at least 90 days of posttransplantation follow-up, histologic criteria for diagnosis of PBC and AIH recurrence, radiologic or histologic criteria or both for diagnosis of PSC recurrence, and exclusion of other causes of liver disease causing similar histologic findings. Incidence in individual studies was combined to calculate the overall recurrence. Risk factors were analyzed whenever crude data were available. Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. Out of 90 articles identified, 43 met criteria for systematic review (PBC, 16; PSC, 14; AIH, 13). The calculated weighted recurrence rate was 18% for PBC, 11% for PSC, and 22% for AIH. No difference was found in PBC and AIH recurrence by type of primary immunosuppression. There were not enough data to assess this issue in PSC studies. There was evidence of publication bias among PSC and AIH studies but not among PBC studies. In conclusion, recurrence of autoimmune liver disease after liver transplantation appears to be a real concern. As these patients are followed long-term, recurrence of disease may become the primary cause of morbidity. Liver Transpl 12:1813-1824, 2006. © 2006 AASLD. [source] Steroid avoidance using sirolimus and cyclosporine in pediatric renal transplantation: One year analysisPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2010Franca M. Iorember Iorember FM, Patel HP, Ohana A, Hayes JR, Mahan JD, Baker PB, Rajab A. Steroid avoidance using sirolimus and cyclosporine in pediatric renal transplantation: One year analysis. Pediatr Transplantation 2010: 14: 93,99. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract:, Steroids are commonly used in pediatric renal transplantation, but have numerous adverse effects. This retrospective study compares one-yr outcomes in 22 pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving SRL and CSA as primary immunosuppression (steroid-avoidance group) to age- and gender-matched historical controls receiving CSA, MMF, and prednisone (steroid group). At one yr, both groups had similar graft survival, acute rejection, and estimated GFR. Subjects in the steroid-avoidance group had better linear growth, less excessive weight gain and were less likely to have an increase in antihypertensive medication use. Subjects in the steroid-avoidance group were more likely to be started on lipid lowering medications and erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Despite having a greater proportion of living donors, the steroid-avoidance group had a similar GFR compared to the steroid group at one month. The steroid-avoidance group was also more likely to have a biopsy for elevated Cr that was not because of rejection and had more interstitial fibrosis noted. We conclude that using a steroid-avoidance immunosuppression regimen of SRL and CSA results in comparable rejection rates and short-term graft function with less steroid-associated morbidity. However, early findings also suggest possible potentiation of CSA nephrotoxicity by SRL in some children. [source] Management of hepatitis C-infected liver transplant recipients at large North American centres: changes in recent yearsCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2006Mandana Khalili Abstract:, Large (,45 transplants per year) North American liver transplant centres were surveyed regarding management of hepatitis C virus (HCV). A total of 25/41 (59%) and 28/48 (58%) of centres responded to the surveys in 1998 and 2003, respectively, with 17 centres participating in both surveys. HCV was the most common indication for transplantation. Use of protocol liver biopsies was higher in 2003 and 60% used them to monitor HCV disease. Fewer centres reported modifying primary immunosuppression (IMS) for HCV-positive (vs. non-HCV) patients in 2003 (26%) vs. 1998 (56%). IMS was most frequently tacrolimus-based, but mycophenolate mofetil use increased in 2003 (52% vs. 23% in 1998). In both years, approximately 40% treated allograft rejection differently in HCV-positive recipients, with less use of OKT3 in 2003. Combination anti-HCV therapy for 12 months or more was the treatment of choice and growth factor use was common (68%). HCV-positive recipients were considered candidates for retransplantation but HCV-specific criteria were used in decision-making. Practice of centres changed over time with an increase in HCV transplantation and use of protocol liver biopsies, and a trend towards lesser modification of IMS in HCV-positive recipients. We conclude that there is considerable variability in the management of HCV among transplant programs and over time. [source] | ||||||||||