Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Prescribed Drugs (prescribed + drug)
Selected AbstractsDrug-related problems in elderly general practice patients receiving pharmaceutical careINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, Issue 3 2005Elaine Lau Research fellow Objective To describe the types of drug-related problems identified by pharmacists providing pharmaceutical care to elderly patients in the primary care or general medicine setting, and the impact of their recommendations on drug-related outcomes. Methods Searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts electronic databases from 1990 to 2002 were conducted and a manual search of references from retrieved articles and references on file was performed. Large (n> 100) randomised, controlled studies comparing the provision of pharmaceutical care to usual care in seniors in primary care or general medicine settings were included. Two reviewers evaluated articles based on inclusion criteria and extracted data from the intervention arm of each study, resolving discrepancies by consensus. Nine original articles were included for analysis. Key findings The mean number of drug-related problems (DRPs) identified per patient was 3.2 and the mean number of recommendations made per patient was 3.3. The most common DRP identified was not taking/receiving a prescribed drug appropriately (35.2%, range 4.7,49.3%). The most common recommendations made involved patient education (37.2%, range 4.6,48.2%). Implementation rates were generally high for all types of recommendations, with the highest being for provision of patient education (81.6%). The small number of studies available examining measures of drug utilisation and costs, health services utilisation, and patient outcomes produced inconsistent results, making it difficult to draw conclusions. Conclusions Substantial numbers and a wide range of DRPs were identified by pharmacists who provided pharmaceutical care to seniors in the primary care and general medicine setting. Pharmacists' drug-therapy recommendations were well accepted; however, further study is needed to determine the impact of these recommendations on health-related outcomes. [source] Reducing delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture: a multi-factorial intervention studyACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 6 2010K. B. BJÖRKELUND Background: There is an evident need for improved management of elderly patients with trauma in order to avoid common and troublesome complications such as delirium. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an implementation of a multi-factorial program including intensified pre-hospital and perioperative treatment and care could reduce the incidence of delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture, cognitively intact at admission to the hospital. In addition, we explored the factors that characterize patients who developed delirium. Methods: A prospective, quasi-experimental design was used. A total of 263 patients with hip fracture (,65 years), cognitively intact at admission, were consecutively included between April 2003 and April 2004. On 1 October 2003, a new program was introduced. All patients were screened for cognitive impairment within 30 min after admission to the emergency department using The Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). To screen for delirium, patients were tested within 4 h of admission and thereafter daily, using the Organic Brain Syndrome scale. Results: The number of patients who developed delirium during hospitalization was 74 (28.1%), with a decrease from 34% (45 of 132) in the control group to 22% (29 of 131) in the intervention group (P=0.031). Patients who developed delirium were statistically older, more often had >4 prescribed drugs at admission and scored less well in the SPMSQ test. Conclusion: The use of a multi-factorial intervention program in elderly hip fracture patients, lucid at admission, reduced the incidence of delirium during hospitalization by 35%. [source] Community pharmacists' identification of natural health product/drug interactions in older personsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, Issue 4 2003Ruby E. Grymonpre professor ABSTRACT Objective To document the prevalence and significance of potential natural health products (NHPs)/prescribed drug interactions in a sample of older adults; to determine whether community pharmacists detected these drug interactions; and to characterise users and non-users of NHPs. Setting The project involved 15 community pharmacists providing pharmaceutical care to 213 non-institutionalised older adults. Method The study was a subanalysis of a prospective, non-randomised, before-and-after trial of the provision of pharmaceutical care. Pharmacists documented each time medication-specific information or advice was provided to subjects. The numbers and types of NHPs that clients reported taking and the number of potentially significant NHP/prescribed drug interactions were determined. Whether pharmacists identified such drug interactions and made the necessary interventions were also documented. Results Forty-two NHPs were reported 96 times by 49 (23%) clients, most commonly glucosamine (n = 10), garlic (n = 10), prune juice (n = 9), and Ginkgo biloba (n = 6). There was a total of 446 possible NHP/prescribed drug combinations in the 49 clients, of which 53 (12%) were considered to be of potential clinical significance. Of these 53 combinations, three pharmacists identified four (8%) potential interactions in three different patients. Although gender, mean age and number of reported medical conditions did not differ between users and non-users of NHPs, users reported taking fewer prescribed drugs compared with non-users (5.0 ± 3.2 vs 6.0 ± 2.9, respectively, P = 0.043) and more non-prescribed drugs (4.2 ± 2.5 vs 2.1 ± 2.0, respectively, P < 0.0001). Conclusion The reported prevalence of NHP and the potential for NHP/prescribed drug interactions in our sample of older adults were high. Pharmacists providing pharmaceutical care did not commonly identify potentially significant NHP/prescribed drug interactions. [source] Potentially severe drug interactions in elderly outpatients: results of an observational study of an administrative prescription databaseJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 4 2009A. Nobili MD Summary Purpose:, To estimate the prevalence of potentially severe drug,drug interactions (DDIs) and their relationship with age, sex and number of prescribed drugs. Methods:, We analysed all prescriptions dispensed from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003 to individuals aged 65 or more registered under the Local Health Authority of Lecco, a northern Italian province with a population of almost 330 000 persons. Elderly who received at least two co-administered prescriptions were selected to assess the presence of DDIs. Results:, The prevalence of potentially severe DDIs was 16%, and rose with increasing patient's age and number of drugs prescribed. At multivariate analysis, the adjusted odds ratios rose from 1·07 (95% CI 1·03,1·11) in patients aged 70,74 to 1·52 (95% CI 1·46,1·60) in those aged 85 or older. Elderly taking more than five drugs on a chronic basis had a statistically significant higher risk of sever DDIs than those receiving less than 3 or 3,5 such drugs. Conclusions:, The elderly constitutes a population at high risk of DDIs. As physicians still have some difficulty in managing this problem, it is essential to highlight for them, which factors raise the risk of DDIs. [source] Refill adherence and polypharmacy among patients with type 2 diabetes in general practicePHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 11 2009Rykel van Bruggen PhD Abstract Background and Aims Non-adherence is considered a major barrier to better outcomes of diabetes care. A relationship has been established between polypharmacy and patients' adherence. This study aims to investigate the occurrence of polypharmacy and non-adherence in general practice, their mutual relationship and the association between adherence and the intermediate outcomes of diabetes care. Materials and Methods We used the baseline and follow-up data of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that compared usual care with care in accordance with a locally adapted national guideline. This study took place in the Netherlands and involved 30 general practices and 1283 patients. We obtained a complete medication profile of all participants and calculated the number of prescribed drugs and the adherence indices (AI) for oral blood glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol lowering drugs. Patients with an adherence index <,0.8 were considered non-adherent. Clustering at practice level and case-mix were taken into account. Results Approximately 80% of the participating patients demonstrated an adherence index ,,0.8 for oral blood glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol lowering drugs. In the intervention group, increase of drug prescriptions exceeded that of controls (1.1,±,2.0 vs. 0.6,±,1.5, p,<,0.001, adjusted p,<,0.05). There was evidence of an inverse relationship between the number of drugs that had been prescribed during the last 6 months of the study and patients' adherence to blood pressure lowering medications (adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI 0.78,0.91). After one year, HbA1c and total cholesterol levels were significantly lower in adherent patients. Conclusion During the intervention the mean number of drug prescriptions increased in both the study groups. This did not result in a lower adherence to blood glucose and cholesterol lowering medications. Given the relationship between the number of medications and patients' adherence to blood pressure lowering drugs, it may be wise to discuss adherence before prescribing multiple drug regimens. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register,Opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months,PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 7 2007Björn Wettermark M.Sc.Pharm Abstract Purpose To describe the content and potentials of the new Swedish national register on prescribed and dispensed medicines. Methods The Swedish Prescribed Drug Register contains information about age, sex and unique identifier of the patient as well as the prescriber's profession and practice. Information regarding drug utilization and expenditures for prescribed drugs in the entire Swedish population was extracted from the first six months July,December 2005 and compared with total drug sales in the country including OTC and hospital use. Results The total quantity of drugs sold in Sweden was 2666 million DDDs, corresponding to 1608 DDD/1000 inhabitants daily. The total expenditures were 1.6 billion Euro. The prescribed drugs, included in the register, accounted for 84% of the total utilization and 77% of the total expenditures. About half of all men and two-thirds of all women in the country purchased drugs. The proportion increased by age. The most common drugs for chronic treatment were diuretics among women (8.8% of the population) and antithrombotic agents among men (7.6%). Psychotropic drugs, corticosteroids and analgesics were more common among women, while men used antithrombotic agents, antidiabetic drugs, lipid lowering agents and ACE inhibitors to a greater extent. Conclusions The new register provides valuable data on exposure to drugs and is useful to study patterns of drug utilization. The possibilities for record linkage to other health registers gives from an international perspective good opportunities to explore drug and disease associations and the risks, benefits, effectiveness and health economical effects of drug use. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Ask about medicines: helping patients to ask questionsPRESCRIBER, Issue 20 2006Joanne Shaw Encouraging medicine users to ask questions about their prescribed drugs is one of the aims of the Ask About Medicines coalition. This year the focus is on polypharmacy in older people and the Ask About Medicines campaign runs from 6-10 November. Copyright © 2006 Wiley Interface Ltd [source] Can rational prescribing be improved by an outcome-based educational approach?THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, Issue 1 2010A randomized trial completed in Iran Abstract Introduction: An outcome-based education approach has been proposed to develop more effective continuing medical education (CME) programs. We have used this approach in developing an outcome-based educational intervention for general physicians working in primary care (GPs) and evaluated its effectiveness compared with a concurrent CME program in the field of rational prescribing. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled design was used. All 159 GPs working in 6 cities, in 2 regions in East Azerbaijan province in Iran, were invited to participate. The cities were matched and randomly divided into an intervention arm, for an outcome-based education on rational prescribing, and a control arm for a traditional CME program on the same topic. GPs' prescribing behavior was assessed 9 months before, and 3 months after the CME programs. Results: In total, 112 GPs participated. The GPs in the intervention arm significantly reduced the total number of prescribed drugs and the number of injections per prescription. The GPs in the intervention arm also increased their compliance with specific requirements for a correct prescription, such as explanation of specific time and manner of intake and precautions necessary when using drugs, with significant intervention effects of 13, 36, and 42 percentage units, respectively. Compared with the control arm, there was no significant improvement when prescribing antibiotics and anti-inflammatory agents. Discussion: Rational prescribing improved in some of the important outcome-based indicators, but several indicators were still suboptimal. The introduction of an outcome-based approach in CME seems promising when creating programs to improve GPs' prescribing behavior. [source] The impact of sildenafil citrate on sexual satisfaction profiles in men with a penile prosthesis in situBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 1 2004J.P. Mulhall This section includes three papers, two of which describe the use of drug treatment for erectile dysfunction in special situations. The authors from New York and Chicago write about sildenafil in patients with a penile prosthesis in situ. Authors from Zurich have used apomorphine in patients with spinal cord injury and erectile dysfunction. It is often helpful to readers with an interest in the area of erectile problems to explore the use of commonly prescribed drugs in somewhat less common situations. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of sildenafil in increasing penile glans tumescence and improving patient satisfaction in men with a penile prosthesis, as this remains a major treatment for erectile dysfunction but a common complaint is the lack of glans engorgement. PATIENTS AND METHODS To determine whether sildenafil combined with a penile prosthesis improves satisfaction, patients used an implant alone for at least 1 month, after which they completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. The same patients were then given sildenafil citrate and completed the IIEF questionnaire after using the sildenafil/implant combination. RESULTS Patients who responded to sildenafil with glans engorgement reported significantly greater satisfaction scores than with an implant alone. CONCLUSION We currently offer sildenafil citrate after implantation to all men who have a penile prosthesis placed. [source] | ||||||||||