			Home About us Contact

Pretreatment Viral Load (pretreatment + viral_load)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Retreatment with interferon and ribavirin vs interferon alone according to viraemia in interferon responder-relapser hepatitis C patients: a prospective multicentre randomized controlled study

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, Issue 3 2003
I. Portal
Summary., Low pretreatment viral load has consistently been shown to be an independent predictor of sustained response (SR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin vs IFN alone in low viraemic patients (<2 millions copies/mL) who had relapsed to a previous course of IFN and the efficacy of 24 vs 48 week combination therapy in high viraemic patients. Two hundred and ninety-seven patients were randomly assigned to one of the four regimens after stratification on pretreatment viral load. All patients received IFN- ,2b (6 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks and 3 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks). Patients with low viraemia received either IFN- ,2b alone for 48 weeks (R1: 42 patients) or IFN- ,2b plus ribavirin (600 mg/day) for 24 weeks and IFN- ,2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R2: 48 patients). Patients with high viral load received either IFN- ,2b plus ribavirin for 24 weeks and then IFN- ,2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R3: 104 patients) or IFN- ,2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks (R4: 103 patients). In low viraemic patients the rate of SR was 37.7% in group R1 and 59.6% in group R2 (P < 0.05). In high viraemic patients, the rate of SR was 44.7% in group R3 and 51.4% in group R4 (P: NS). Thirty-one patients discontinued treatment (10.4%) without difference regarding treatment regimen. In the regimen using ribavirin we found no difference in terms of SR between patients receiving a dose of ribavirin below 10.6 mg/kg/day (55%) or over 10.6 mg/kg/day (58%). Histological improvement occurred in 70.2% of patients regardless of the regimen. Logistic regression showed that genotype 2 and 3, Knodell score <6 and alanine aminotransferase pretreatment level >3 × upper limit of normal were significantly and independently correlated with SR. In low viraemic patients who relapsed to a previous IFN treatment, combination therapy using high-dose IFN and low-dose ribavirin is better than high-dose IFN alone. In high viraemic patients there was no benefit in increasing the duration of combination therapy from 24 to 48 weeks. In this study, it was found that low dose of ribavirin can be used safely and there is no effect of ribavirin dose on SR. [source]

A prospective study of interferon therapy modified by pre-treatment viral load in cirrhotic patients

LIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2000
Yasushi Shiratori
Abstract:Background/Aims: The relative role of hepatitis C virus (HCV) load and subtype as predictors of the efficacy of interferon therapy has been clarified in patients with chronic hepatitis C, but the effectiveness of interferon therapy in cirrhotic patients is still unclear. Methods: To resolve this issue, we undertook a multicenter, randomized, and prospective study of 114 cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C virus infection. The patients were selected to undergo two different periods (6 or 12 months) of IFN therapy according to viral load. Patients with "low" viral load (,105.8 copies/ml serum) were randomly divided into three groups, receiving 6 or 9 million units (MU) interferon three times a week for 6 months (total dose: 468 or 702 MU), or of a modified regimen using 6MU of IFN over 6 months (total dose 564 MU), while patients with "high" viral load (,106.3 copies/ml serum) were also randomly divided into two groups of 6 or 9 MU of IFN three times a week for 12 months (total dose: 936 or 1404 MU). Results: HCV-RNA negativity rate at the completion of treatment with 6 or 9 MU IFN was 65% in patients with "low" viral load, in contrast to 14% in patients with "high" viral load. Sustained virological response was found in 40% of patients with "low" viral load irrespective of the three different regimens, in contrast to only 1 out of 35 patients (3%) with "high" viral load. Viral eradication was found in approximately 50% of patients having a low virus load (,104.3 copies/ml) and with HCV subtype 2a. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that pretreatment viral load was a significant factor contributing to efficacy of IFN therapy. Conclusions: Sustained response was scarcely achieved in cirrhotic patients with high viral loads even after a 12-month course of intensive IFN therapy. This result indicates that there is a certain cut-off level of HCV RNA load which can not be eradicated. [source]

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: On-treatment prediction of response to peginterferon/ribavirin therapy

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2008
Ibrahim A. Hanouneh
Sustained virologic response (SVR) in the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) remains suboptimal. We evaluated efficacy of pegylated interferon alfa (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV) (PEG/RBV) combination therapy in LT recipients with recurrent HCV and predictive values of rapid virological response (RVR) and early virologic response (EVR). Between January 2001 and October 2005, LT recipients with recurrent HCV were intended to be treated for 48 weeks with PEG/RBV combination therapy independent of genotype or virologic response [53 patients (79% genotype 1)]. On-treatment predictor of response at week 4 (RVR) was defined as undetectable HCV RNA, and at week 12 (EVR) as undetectable HCV RNA or a >2 log10 drop from pretreatment viral load. SVR was seen in 19 (35%) patients. Patients with genotype 2/3 were more likely to achieve SVR than those with genotype 1 (87% versus 23%; P = 0.001). The highest rate of SVR was seen in patients with RVR [specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) = 100%] while the highest rate of treatment failure was seen in those who did not have EVR [sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) = 100%]. The NPV of RVR to identify those who will not achieve SVR was also very high (88%). EVR had low PPV (63%) to identify those with SVR. In conclusion, PEG/RBV combination therapy is effective in the treatment of post-LT recurrent HCV. On-treatment virologic monitoring is highly predictive of SVR and may optimize the virologic response and minimize toxicity. Given its high PPV and NPV, RVR appears to be the most appropriate decision time point for continuation of therapy. Liver Transpl 14:53,58, 2008. © 2007 AASLD. [source]