			Home About us Contact

Preoperative Risk Assessment (preoperative + risk_assessment)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Preoperative risk assessment for gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients

HEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 5 2001
John M. Schweinfurth MD
Abstract Background The presentation and definitive surgical treatment of head and neck malignancies have varying impact on postoperative recovery and return of swallowing function, which heretofore has not been well defined. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of 142 patients who underwent extirpative surgery for head and neck cancer. Results Factors significantly associated with the need for long-term postoperative nutritional support (p < .05) included heavy alcohol use, tongue base involvement and surgery, pharyngectomy, composite resection, reconstruction with a myocutaneous flap, radiation therapy, tumor size, and moderately-to-poorly differentiated histology. Heavy alcohol users were at an absolute risk for gastrostomy tube dependence; patients who underwent radiation therapy, flap reconstruction, tongue base resection, and pharyngectomy were at a two to sevenfold increased risk for gastrostomy tube dependence, respectively. Conclusions High-risk patients based on these criteria should receive a feeding gastrostomy at the time of their initial surgical therapy. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 23: 376,382, 2001. [source]

Preoperative risk assessment and prevention of complications in patients with esophageal cancer

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 3 2010
Brechtje A. Grotenhuis MD
Abstract In this review the preoperative risk assessment and prevention of complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer is discussed. Age, pulmonary and cardiovascular condition, nutritional status, and neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy are known predictive factors. None of these factors is a valid exclusion criterion for esophagectomy, but may help in careful patient selection. Both anesthetists and surgeons play an important role in intraoperative risk reduction by means of appropriate fluid management and application of optimal surgical techniques. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010; 101:270,278. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Characteristics of patients with abnormal stress technetium Tc 99m sestamibi SPECT studies without significant coronary artery diameter stenoses

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 11 2003
Peter Ammann M.D.
Abstract Background: Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) sestamibi (MIBI) is an excellent tool for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), preoperative risk assessment, and follow-up management after coronary revas-cularization. While the sensitivity of MIBI SPECT for detecting CAD has been reported to exceed 90%, the specificity ranges between 53,100%. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to assess characteristics of patients with abnormal stress technetium Tc 99m sestamibi SPECT (MIBI) studies without significant coronary artery diameter stenoses (< 50%). Methods: Between January 1999 and November 2000, 270 consecutive patients were referred for coronary angiography due to reversible MIBI uptake defects during exercise. In 41 patients (15%; 39% women, mean age 59 ± 9 years), reversible MIBI uptake defects were assessed although coronary angiography showed no significant CAD. These patients were compared with age- and gender-matched patients with perfusion abnormalities (39% women, mean age 60 ± 9 years), due to significant CAD (coronary artery stenosis > 50%). Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding body mass index, left bundle-branch block (LBBB), or method of stress test (dipyridamole in patients with LBBB or physical inactivity [n= 11] and exercise in all the others [n= 30]). Left ventricular hypertrophy (44 vs. 23%, p = 0.05) and left anterior fascicularblock (LAFB) (17 vs. 0%, p = 0.005) were more common in patients with perfusion abnormalities with no significant CAD, whereas ST-segment depression during exercise (17 vs. 37% p = 0.05) and angina during exercise (15 vs. 29%, p = 0.02) were significantly less common than in patients with abnormal MIBI perfusion studies and angiographically significant CAD. Sestamibi uptake defects during exercise were significantly smaller in patients without significant CAD than in matched controls with significant CAD (p < 0.0004). Conclusion: Of 270 consecutive patients, 41 (15%) referred to coronary angiography due to reversible MIBI uptake defects showed coronary artery stenoses <50%. Twenty-six (10%) of these presented angiographically normal coronary arteries. The significantly higher proportion of left ventricular hypertrophy and LAFB in patients with reversible MIBI uptake defects without significant CAD suggest microvascular disease, angiographically underestimated CAD, and conduction abnormalities as underlying mechanisms. [source]