Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Postoperative Symptoms (postoperative + symptom)
Selected AbstractsPostoperative discomfort associated with surgical and nonsurgical endodontic retreatmentDENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, Issue 2 2000T. Kvist Abstract , Endodontic retreatment decision-making must include an appraisal of the costs of the different strategies proposed. In addition to direct costs, postoperative discomfort may have other consequences in terms of time off work, unscheduled visits and suffering. To establish a foundation for the appraisal of such indirect and intangible costs the present study was set up in which patients' assessments of pain and swelling after surgical and nonsurgical retreatment procedures were recorded. Ninety-two patients with 95 root-filled incisors and canine teeth exhibiting apical periodontitis were included in the study. The mode of retreatment was randomly assigned. Each day during the first post-treatment week patients assessed their degree of swelling and pain on horizontal 100-mm visual analog scales (VAS). The scales ranged from "no swelling" to "very severe swelling" and "no pain" to "intolerable pain", respectively. Consumption of self-prescribed analgesics and time off work were also recorded. Significantly more patients reported discomfort after surgical retreatment than after nonsurgical procedures. High pain scores were most frequent on the operative day while swelling reached its maximum on the first postoperative day followed by progressive decrease both in frequency and magnitude. Postoperative symptoms associated with nonsurgical retreatment were less frequent but reached high VAS values in single cases. Analgesics were significantly more often consumed after periapical surgery. Patients reported absence from work mainly due to swelling and discoloration of the skin. This was found to occur only after surgical retreatment. Conclusively, surgical retreatment resulted in more discomfort and tended to bring about greater indirect costs than nonsurgical retreatment. [source] Similar excitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia in young children given rectal morphine or midazolam as premedicationACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 10 2004W. Malmgren Background:, Sevoflurane is a rapid-acting volatile anaesthetic agent frequently used in paediatric anaesthesia despite transient postoperative symptoms of cerebral excitation, particularly in preschool children. This randomised and investigator-blinded study was designed to evaluate whether premedication with an opioid might reduce non-divertible postoperative excitation more than premedication with a benzodiazepine in preschool children anaesthetized with sevoflurane. Methods:, Ninety-two healthy two to six year-old children scheduled for nasal adenoidectomy were randomised to be given rectal atropine 0.02 mg kg,1 together with either morphine 0.15 mg kg,1 or midazolam 0.30 mg kg,1 approximately 30 min before induction and maintenance of sevoflurane anaesthesia. The patient groups were compared pre- and postoperatively by repeated clinical assessments of cerebral excitation according to a modified Objective Pain Discomfort Scale, OPDS. Results:, There were no statistically significant postoperative differences in incidence, extent or duration of excitation between children given morphine or midazolam for premedication, whereas morphine was associated with more preoperative excitation than was midazolam. The study groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, weight, duration of surgery and anaesthesia, and time from tracheal extubation to arrival in and discharge from the postoperative ward. Conclusion:, In this study morphine for premedication in young children anaesthetized with sevoflurane was associated with similar postoperative and higher preoperative OPDS scores compared with midazolam. These findings indicate that substitution of morphine for midazolam is no useful way of reducing clinical excitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia. [source] Impact of Perioperative Systemic Steroids on Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyposis: Evaluation With the Novel Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) Scoring System,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue S115 2007Erin D. Wright MDCM Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: The objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to assess the effect of perioperative systemic steroids on subjective and objective surgical outcomes for patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis (CRSwP). The secondary objective was to begin validation of the newly developed Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scoring system. Methods: Patients who had failed maximal medical therapy and were scheduled to undergo ESS were eligible for the study. Participants were randomized to receive either 30 mg of prednisone or placebo for 5 days preoperatively and 9 days postoperatively. Operative and baseline clinical data were collected using the Lund-McKay staging system including its Sinus Symptom Questionnaire as well as additional data regarding mucosal health, the technical difficulty of surgery, and endoscopic data using the Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Score (LKES) and POSE scale. Data were also collected at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. A sample size of 24 was calculated to detect a clinically relevant difference between groups of 40%. Routine statistical comparisons were performed as were repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment because of the multiple comparisons performed. To address the secondary objective, data were also collected at all postoperative time points using the POSE instrument, which was designed with the intention of enhancing face validity and responsiveness to change. Comparisons were performed between the POSE and LKES, including assessment of sensitivity to change, correlation between the two scales, and correlation with symptom scores. Results: Twenty-six patients participated in the study. Operative data demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of severely inflamed sinonasal mucosa in patients not pretreated with systemic steroids, which was associated with technically more difficult surgery in the estimation of the operating surgeon. In terms of postoperative symptoms, there was no difference between treatment groups, with both placebo and prednisone significantly improved over baseline up to 4 weeks postoperatively. Endoscopic assessment of patients postoperatively demonstrated a treatment effect (P < .05), with clinically healthier cavities seen in patients treated with prednisone up to 6 months postoperatively as compared with baseline (P < .001), although the strongest effect was seen at the 2-week time point. In comparing the two endoscopic scales, the POSE and LKES correlated highly (R > 0.70; P < .001) both in terms of absolute score and change in score. There is some evidence that the POSE score may be more sensitive to change than the LKES, and the POSE scores did correlate more strongly with symptom scores than the LKES, although both endoscopic scores correlated only weakly with symptom scores. Conclusions: The data presented in this study support the practice of administering preoperative systemic steroids to patients undergoing ESS for CRSwP. Furthermore, in the practice of surgeons who provide intensive postoperative care post-ESS, including debridement and medical therapy based on the endoscopic findings, there is evidence to support administering systemic steroids in the postoperative period. The POSE scoring system compares favorably with the LKES and may confer advantages in terms of face/content validity and responsiveness to change and is worthy of further validation. [source] HP23 USE OF ANTI-REFLUX MEDICATION AFTER ANTI-REFLUX SURGERYANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 2007B. P. L. Wijnhoven Purpose It is thought that a substantial number of patients who undergo anti-reflux surgery use anti-reflux medication post operatively, despite no objective evidence of reflux. This study aims to determine the prevalence and underlying reasons for anti-reflux medication usage in patients after anti-reflux surgery. Methodology A questionnaire (13 questions) on the usage of anti-reflux medication was sent to 1016 patients from a prospective database of anti-reflux surgery patients. Results 852 patients (84%), (437 males & 415 females with a mean age 58 yrs) returned the questionnaire. Mean follow up was 5.9 yrs after surgery. A single or combination of medications was being taken by 319 patients (37%): 82% proton pump inhibitors, 9% H2-blockers and 34% antacids. 54 patients (18%) had never stopped taking medication, whereas 261 patients (82%) re-started medication at a mean of 2.4 yrs after surgery. Persistent or return of the same or different symptoms was the reason for taking medication by the vast majority (85%), whereas 15% were asymptomatic or had other reasons for medication use. A response of symptoms to the medication occurred for 30% of the patients, whereas 64% noticed some improvement. Postoperative 24-hour pH studies (while off medication) were abnormal in 17/62 patients (27%) on medication and in 5/73 patients (6%) not taking medication. Conclusions Anti-reflux medication is frequently taken by patients for symptoms after surgery, despite normal pH profiles in the majority. Strategies need to be employed to lower the inappropriate use of medications after surgery and to further evaluate the mechanisms underlying postoperative symptoms, which are non-responsive to anti-reflux medication. [source] Endoscopic stapling for pharyngeal pouch: does it make the cut?ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2004Ahmad Aly Background: Endoscopic stapling to treat pharyngeal pouch is a relatively new technique with the potential to reduce the morbidity associated with the open approach for pharyngeal pouch. Despite enthusiasm for the endoscopic approach there have been no series reported in Australia, and descriptions of outcomes and benefits are currently anecdotal. The aim of the present study was to determine the outcome associated with endoscopic stapling of pharyngeal pouch in an Australian setting. Methods: All patients admitted for endoscopic stapling for a pharyngeal pouch between 1998 and 2002 by surgeons from the Adelaide and Flinders Universities were identified, and their medical records were reviewed for clinical and operative details. All patients were interviewed by telephone using a structured questionnaire to determine symptom resolution and patient satisfaction. The Likert scale was used to assess the impact of preoperative and postoperative symptoms upon quality of life. Results: A total of 31 patients were identified. The mean age of the group was 75 years (range: 35,91 years) and half the patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score of 3 or greater. In four patients the procedure was abandoned; (for three because of inability to pass the diverticuloscope and for one because the pouch was too small). Standard open surgery was undertaken in these patients. Of the 27 procedures completed endoscopically, interview follow up was obtained in 23, at a mean follow up of 17 months (range: 2,68 months). Outcome was very good or excellent in 21 (91%), with significant symptom resolution, reduction in Likert scores and high patient satisfaction. Three patients had previously had pouch surgery and endoscopic stapling was straightforward in these patients. Recurrence of a symptomatic pouch occurred in three patients. There was no significant morbidity related to the procedure. Conclusions: The early experience of endoscopic stapling for pharyngeal pouch in Adelaide is encouraging. The procedure achieves excellent control of symptoms and can be undertaken with minimal morbidity. Recurrence may be a problem, although repeat endoscopic stapling can be undertaken without difficulty. [source] Ramus or Chin Grafts for Maxillary Sinus Inlay and Local Onlay Augmentation: Comparison of Donor Site Morbidity and ComplicationsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 3 2003Jaime Clavero DDS ABSTRACT Background: The placement of endosseous implants in edentulous areas is frequently limited by inadequate bone volume of the residual ridge. Local bone grafts from the mandible are a convenient source of autogenous bone for alveolar reconstruction prior to implant placement. Purpose: The aim of the present study was to document and compare the morbidity and the frequency of complications occurring at two intraoral donor sites: the mandibular symphysis and the mandibular ramus. Material and Methods: This study reviewed 53 consecutively treated patients:29 with autogenous bone grafts from the mandibular symphysis and 24 with mandibular ramus bone grafts. Each patient received a questionnaire 18 months after surgery regarding problems that may have occurred during the postoperative period. Results: In the patients in whom bone was harvested from the mandibular ramus, there were fewer postoperative symptoms immediately after the operation than with mandibular symphysis harvesting. Twenty-two of the 29 patients with symphysis grafts experienced decreased sensitivity in the skin innervated by the mental nerve 1 month after the operation. Five of the 24 patients with ramus grafts experienced decreased sensitivity in the vestibular mucosa corresponding to the innervation of the buccal nerve. Eighteen months after the surgery, 15 of the 29 patients in the symphysis group still had some decreased sensitivity and presented with permanent altered sensation. Only one of the patients grafted from the mandibular ramus presented with permanent altered sensation in the posterior vestibular area. No major complication occurred in the donor sites in any of the 53 patients. Conclusion: The results of this study favored the use of the ascending mandibular ramus as an intraoral donor site for bone grafting. [source] A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of coblation versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy on postoperative symptomsCLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 5 2005A. Rachmanidou [source] A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of coblation versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy on post- operative symptomsCLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 2 2005C.M. Philpott Objectives:, The aim of this study was to compare postoperative symptoms following coblation tonsillectomy with those experienced following a traditional cold dissection. Design:, A prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting:, Secondary otorhinolaryngology care. Participants:, Ninety-two adult patients with recurrent tonsillitis meriting tonsillectomy were recruited and randomly allocated into either coblation or cold dissection tonsillectomy groups. Main outcome measures:, Primary outcomes were post-operative pain, otalgia, swallowing and analgesia use at 6,8 hours, 1, 3, 7 and 14 days post-operative. Secondary outcomes were post-operative day returned to eating and returned to normal activities/work. Results:, No significant differences between the two groups (P , 0.1) were found in any of the above primary outcomes, apart from swallowing at 6,8 hrs post-operatively where the cold dissection group had less pain. This group also returned earlier to normal eating (P = 0.03). The power of the study was sufficient to show a difference in the visual analogue scores of 2 between groups. Conclusions:, The use of coblation to perform tonsillectomy does not confer any symptomatic benefits to the patient over conventional cold dissection tonsillectomy. [source] | ||||||||||