Home About us Contact | |||
Plastic Stents (plastic + stent)
Selected AbstractsENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF BILIARY STRICTURESDIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 2004Yoshitsugu Kubota ABSTRACT Endoscopic stenting, due to being less invasive, is feasible for most patients with biliary strictures; however, presumed efficacy should be balanced against the procedure-related morbidities for an individual patient. Self-expandable metallic stents have a longer patency, but are not retrievable. Therefore, the use of self-expandable metallic stents should be limited to those with unequivocal findings of unresectable malignancy. Plastic stents are indicated for strictures due to benign etiologies and equivocal malignancy. Endoscopic stenting for hilar biliary stricture is challenging. Bilateral hepatic drainage seems ideal but is often demanding to achieve with endoscopic technique, and contrast injection into undrained segments may pose a substantial risk for cholangitis and aggravate prognosis. Therefore, the extent of drainage should be balanced against the procedure-related complications. Preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography may help determine feasibility of bilateral drainage or an ,intended and selective drainage' with a single stent and might obviate the possible morbidities. [source] Current status of metal stents for managing malignant ureteric obstructionBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 8 2010Petros Sountoulides Obstruction of the ureters caused by extrinsic compression from a primary tumour or retroperitoneal lymph node masses is not unusual in the course of advanced pelvic malignancies. Most of the cases are of gynaecological or gastrointestinal origin, and the situation can be aggravated by peri-ureteric fibrosis, a long-term adverse event of previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Undoubtedly upper urinary tract decompression and maintenance of ureteric patency, even as a palliative measure, is important in managing these patients. Options for upper tract decompression include percutaneous nephrostomy, retrograde stenting and open urinary diversion. Plastic stents have long been used for managing malignant ureteric obstruction, but their overall success remains limited. Plastic stents often fail to be placed correctly, require regular exchange, and are faced with a high incidence of encrustation and migration. For these reasons plastic stents have been unsuccessful for long-term maintenance of ureteric patency. To overcome these limitations metal stents were introduced and recently developed in an effort to ensure better long-term patency of the obstructed ureter, fewer hospital admissions for stent change and better overall quality of life. In the present review the clinical applications of different types of metal stents are discussed, with a specific focus on the latest advances and the future options for managing malignant ureteric obstruction. [source] BILIARY STENTING FOR MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTIONDIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 1 2006Toshio Tsuyuguchi Management of patients with malignant biliary obstruction remains controversial. We reviewed our current status of biliary stenting for malignancy. The initial step in our management is endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, which is used not only for preoperative drainage but also to decide whether or not surgery is appropriate treatment. Although a metal stent has a longer patency time than a plastic stent, it costs up to thirty-fold more than the latter in Japan. Therefore, stent selection, metal or plastic, should be dependent on the expected prognosis of each patient with malignant biliary strictures. In the present paper, we also discuss the efficacy of the covered metal stent and stenting for malignant hilar obstruction. [source] A new endoscopic technique for suspension of esophageal prosthesis for refractory caustic esophageal stricturesDISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, Issue 3 2008E. Ancona SUMMARY., There is no clear consensus concerning the best endoscopic treatment of benign refractory esophageal strictures due to caustic ingestion. Different procedures are currently used: frequent multiple dilations, retrievable self-expanding stent, nasogastric intubation and surgery. We describe a new technique to fix a suspended esophageal silicone prosthesis to the neck in benign esophageal strictures; this permits us to avoid the frequent risk of migration of the expandable metallic or plastic stents. Under general anesthesia a rigid esophagoscope was placed in the patient's hypopharynx. Using transillumination from the optical device, the patient's neck was pierced with a needle. A n.0 monofilament surgical wire was pushed into the needle, grasped by a standard foreign body forceps through the esophagoscope and pulled out of the mouth (as in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedure). After tying the proximal end of the silicone prosthesis with the wire, it was placed through the strictures under endoscopic view. This procedure was successfully utilized in four patients suffering from benign refractory esophageal strictures due to caustic ingestion. The prosthesis and its suspension from the neck were well-tolerated until removal (mean duration 4 months). A postoperative transitory myositis was diagnosed in only one patient. One of the most frequent complications of esophageal prostheses in refractory esophageal strictures due to caustic ingestion is distal migration. Different solutions were proposed. For example the suspension of a wire coming from the nose and then fixed behind the ear. This solution is not considered optimal because of patient complaints and moreover the aesthetic aspect is compromised. The procedure we utilized in four patients utilized the setting of a silicone tube hanging from the neck in a way similar to that of endoscopic pharyngostomy. This solution is a valid alternative both for quality of life and for functional results. [source] Outcome of self-expandable metallic stents in low-grade versus advanced hilar obstructionJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 11 2008Rungsun Rerknimitr Abstract Background:, Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) are known to provide a longer patency time than plastic stents for malignant biliary obstructions including hilar obstruction. However, studies that focus on the efficacy of SEMS in low-grade and advanced hilar obstructions are still scanty. Methods:, Ninety four patients with malignant hilar obstructions were enrolled (six were later excluded). Patients were divided into two groups according to their Bismuth levels. Group A were patients with Bismuth I (n = 53). Group B were patients with Bismuth II, III and IV (n = 35). Technical success, complications, jaundice resolution, stent patency time, and patients' survival were analyzed. Results:, Our intention-to-treat analysis showed that group A had a significant lower rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) cholangitis than group B; 16.1% versus 44.7%, (P < 0.01). Four patients from group B still had persistent jaundice. Our per protocol analysis demonstrated that median stent patency time in groups A and B were not statistically different (74 vs 60 days). Median survival time in groups A and B were also not statistically different (90 vs 75 days). In both groups, those without liver metastasis had significantly better patency and survival time than those with liver metastasis (P = 0.010 and 0.027, respectively). Conclusions:, In patients with hilar obstruction, liver metastasis is one of the main factors that determine survival of the patient. Patency times of SEMS in both low-grade and advanced obstructions are comparable. However, in the advanced group, there is a significant risk of post-ERCP cholangitis. [source] Systematic review: the role of self-expanding plastic stents for benign oesophageal stricturesALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 12 2010A. REPICI Aliment Pharmacol Ther,31, 1268,1275 Summary Background, Treatment of refractory or recurrent benign oesophageal strictures is demanding and surgery may be the only available option. The role of self-expanding plastic stents (SEPS) in the treatment of these strictures is still controversial because of the conflicting results of various studies. Aim, To analyse with regard to SEPS: technical and clinical success, factors associated with outcome, and safety. Methods, Pooled-data analysis of a systematic review of the literature. Clinical success was defined as no need for further endoscopic or surgical treatment after SEPS removal. Results, Data of 10 studies with 130 treated patients were included. SEPS insertion was technically successful in 128 of 130 patients (98%, 95% CI = 96,100%). Clinical success was achieved in 68 patients (52%, 95% CI = 44,61%) and this was found to be lower in those with a cervical localization of the stricture (33% vs. 54%; P < 0.05). Early (<4 weeks) migration of the stent was reported in 19 (24%, 95% CI = 14,32%) cases, while post-insertion endoscopic re-intervention was required in 25 (21%, 95% CI = 14,28%). Major clinical complications occurred in 12 patients (9%, 95% CI = 4,14%), resulting in death of one (0.8%) patient. Conclusions, Our pooled-data analysis showed a favourable risk/benefit ratio when SEPS are applied in patients with recurrent or refractory benign oesophageal strictures. This supports the use of SEPS before referring patients to surgery, and they are a valuable alternative to repeat endoscopic dilation. [source] Current status of metal stents for managing malignant ureteric obstructionBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 8 2010Petros Sountoulides Obstruction of the ureters caused by extrinsic compression from a primary tumour or retroperitoneal lymph node masses is not unusual in the course of advanced pelvic malignancies. Most of the cases are of gynaecological or gastrointestinal origin, and the situation can be aggravated by peri-ureteric fibrosis, a long-term adverse event of previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Undoubtedly upper urinary tract decompression and maintenance of ureteric patency, even as a palliative measure, is important in managing these patients. Options for upper tract decompression include percutaneous nephrostomy, retrograde stenting and open urinary diversion. Plastic stents have long been used for managing malignant ureteric obstruction, but their overall success remains limited. Plastic stents often fail to be placed correctly, require regular exchange, and are faced with a high incidence of encrustation and migration. For these reasons plastic stents have been unsuccessful for long-term maintenance of ureteric patency. To overcome these limitations metal stents were introduced and recently developed in an effort to ensure better long-term patency of the obstructed ureter, fewer hospital admissions for stent change and better overall quality of life. In the present review the clinical applications of different types of metal stents are discussed, with a specific focus on the latest advances and the future options for managing malignant ureteric obstruction. [source] Treatment of oesophageal anastomotic leaks by temporary stenting with self-expanding plastic stentsBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 8 2009Y. Y. Dai Background: Oesophageal anastomotic leakage is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility of using temporary self-expanding plastic stents to treat postoperative oesophageal leaks. Methods: Patients with anastomotic leakage after abdominothoracic oesophagectomy treated by endoscopic insertion of self-expanding plastic stents between 2001 and 2007 were studied. Clinical outcomes were analysed, including healing of the leak, morbidity and mortality. Results: Stents were inserted successfully in all 22 patients without procedure-related complications. Ten patients also required computed tomography-guided drainage because surgical drains had been removed. Non-ventilated patients received oral nutrition a mean of 4 days after stent placement. Combined treatment with stenting and drainage resulted in resolution of the leak in 21 of 22 patients. The mean healing time (time to stent removal) was 23 days. Stent migration occurred in five of 22 patients, but endoscopic reintervention with placement of a new stent was successful in all patients. Repeat thoracotomy with intraoperative stent placement was necessary in one patient with an oesophagocolonic anastomosis. One patient died in hospital. Conclusion: In combination with effective drainage, self-expanding plastic stents are an option for the treatment of oesophageal anastomotic leaks, and may reduce leak-related morbidity and mortality. Copyright © 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] |