Plasma Proteomics (plasma + proteomic)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Plasma proteomics of lung cancer by a linkage of multi-dimensional liquid chromatography and two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis

PROTEINS: STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, Issue 13 2006
Tetsuya Okano
Abstract To investigate aberrant plasma proteins in lung cancer, we compared the proteomic profiles of serum from five lung cancer patients and from four healthy volunteers. Immuno-affinity chromatography was used to deplete highly abundant plasma proteins, and the resulting plasma samples were separated into eight fractions by anion-exchange chromatography. Quantitative protein profiles of the fractionated samples were generated by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis, in which the experimental samples and the internal control samples were labeled with different dyes and co-separated by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. This approach succeeded in resolving 3890 protein spots. For 364 of the protein spots, the expression level in lung cancer was more than twofold different from that in the healthy volunteers. These differences were statistically significant (Student's t -test, p -value less than 0.05). Mass spectrometric protein identification revealed that the 364 protein spots corresponded to 58 gene products, including the classical plasma proteins and the tissue-leakage proteins catalase, clusterin, ficolin, gelsolin, lumican, tetranectin, triosephosphate isomerase and vitronectin. The combination of multi-dimensional liquid chromatography and two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis provides a valuable tool for serum proteomics in lung cancer. [source]


Affinity prefractionation for MS-based plasma proteomics

PROTEINS: STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, Issue 6 2009
Maria Pernemalm
Abstract The plasma proteome has proven to be one of the most challenging proteomes to profile using currently available proteomics technologies. A plethora of methodologies have been used to profile human plasma in order to discover potential biomarkers for disease and for therapy optimization. Affinity-based prefractionation coupled to MS has been shown to be one of the most successful ways to dig deeper into the plasma proteome. Depletion of high abundant plasma proteins is becoming an initial method of choice in any plasma profiling project. However, several other affinity-based enrichment methods have been published in recent years. Here we review both protein and peptide affinity prefractionation methods coupled with MS-based proteomics. Analysis of the proportion of cellular and extracellular annotated proteins of publicly available MS plasma proteomics data is performed to estimate the analytical depth of various prefractionation methods. [source]


Limitation of immunoaffinity column for the removal of abundant proteins from plasma in quantitative plasma proteomics

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY, Issue 5 2009
Tomoko Ichibangase
Abstract In plasma proteomics, before a proteome analysis, it is essential to prepare protein samples without high-abundance proteins, including albumin, via specific preparation techniques, such as immunoaffinity capture. However, our preliminary experiments suggested that functional changes with use alter the ability of the immunoaffinity column. Thus, in this study, to evaluate the changes of the removal ability of abundant proteins from plasma by the immunoaffinity column, plasma proteome analysis was performed for the long-term test for the reproducibility of the affinity column using the fluorogenic derivatization,liquid chromatography,tandem mass spectrometry method combined with an IgY column. The specific adsorption for albumin decreased with an increase in the number of the column usage before its expiration date. Moreover, it was demonstrated that hydrophobic high molecular weight compounds in plasma adsorbed onto the column materials surface contributed to the functional changes from specific immunoaffinity adsorption into hydrophobic interaction. These results suggested that, in quantitative plasma proteomics studies, it is important to keep in mind the risk of not only the nonselective loss but also the changes in the adsorption ability of the immunoafinity column. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]