Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Asymptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis (asymptomatic + deep_vein_thrombosis)
Selected AbstractsAsymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in advanced cancer patients: The value of venous sonographyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, Issue 5 2010Nira Beck-Razi MD Abstract Purpose. Although guidelines for venous thromboembolism prevention are available, the implementation of anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients with advanced cancer has yet to be more clearly defined. We aim to determine the incidence of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by Doppler sonography (USD) in asymptomatic nonambulatory patients with advanced cancer. Method. In a prospective study, 44 nonambulatory cancer patients with grade 3,4 World Health Organization performance status, asymptomatic for lower extremity DVT, underwent bilateral venous USD studies of the lower extremities. Different risk factors and laboratory data were registered and correlated with the incidence of DVT. Result. Asymptomatic DVT was detected in 15 of 44 patients (34%, 95% CI, 0.21,0.49). Twenty-three percent of all patients had isolated deep calf vein thrombi and 11% of all patients had thrombi in the proximal veins. The only significant risk factor was the number of metastatic sites. DVT was found in 4 of 23 (17.4%) patients with one metastatic site as opposed to 11 of 21 (52.3%) with two or more sites (p < 0.01). Conclusion. USD of the lower extremities detected asymptomatic DVT in 34% of advanced nonambulatory cancer patients and may serve as an additional decision-making tool in the consideration of anticoagulant therapy for this specific population. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound, 2010 [source] Ultrasound screening for asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis after major orthopaedic surgery: the VENUS studyJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 7 2007S. M. SCHELLONG Summary.,Background:,Venography is currently used to assess the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in dose-finding and confirmatory trials of new antithrombotic agents. Centrally adjudicated, complete compression ultrasound (CCUS) could be a non-invasive alternative to venography. Objectives:,A substudy of two, similarly designed, phase IIb trials of a novel, oral anticoagulant for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip or knee arthroplasty was undertaken to validate CCUS against venography. Patients/Methods:,Patients received study drugs until mandatory, bilateral venography was performed 7 ± 2 days after surgery. CCUS was performed within 24 h after venography by sonographers blinded to the venography result. Sonographers were trained and certified for the standardized examination and documentation procedure. Venograms and sonograms were adjudicated centrally at different sites by two independent readers; discrepancies between readers were resolved by consensus. Results:,A total of 1104 matching pairs of evaluable venograms and sonograms were obtained from the participants of the two trials (n = 1435): 19% of venograms and 20% of sonograms were not evaluable. The observed frequency of any DVT was 18.9% with venography and 11.5% with CCUS. Sensitivity of CCUS compared with venography was 31.1% for any DVT (95% confidence interval 23.4, 38.9), 21.0% (2.7, 39.4) for proximal DVT, and 30.8% (23.1, 38.6) for distal DVT. The figures for specificity were 93.0% (91.0, 95.1), 98.7% (98.0, 99.5), and 93.3% (91.5, 95.3), respectively. Conclusions:,Based on these results, centrally adjudicated CCUS will be unable to replace venography for DVT screening early after major orthopaedic surgery in studies evaluating anticoagulant drugs. [source] Association between asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis detected by venography and symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee surgeryJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 7 2007D. J. QUINLAN Summary.,Background:,Venography is commonly used to compare the efficacy of different thromboprophylaxis strategies for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). Methods:,We explored the relation between asymptomatic DVT and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing THR or TKR treated with standard doses of enoxaparin (30 mg b.i.d. or 40 mg o.d.) by comparing the incidence of asymptomatic DVT in venographic studies with the incidence of symptomatic VTE in studies where venography was not performed. Results:,In 10 venographic studies involving 5796 patients, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT after THR was 13.2% [95% CI, 12.2,14.2%] and after TKR was 38.1% (95% CI, 35.5,40.8%). In two studies involving 3500 patients who did not undergo venography, the 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTE after THR was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.1,3.4%) and after TKR was 1.8% (95% CI, 0.9,2.7%). For every symptomatic VTE in THR studies where venography was not performed there were five asymptomatic DVTs in the venographic studies; for TKR, the ratio was 1:21. The incidence of asymptomatic DVT and the symptomatic VTE/asymptomatic DVT ratio was influenced by the venogram reading committee (Gothenburg vs. Hamilton: total DVT after THR, 19.5% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.0001; for TKR, 42.7% vs. 27.2%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions:,Comparisons across trials show a consistent relation between asymptomatic venographic DVT in patients undergoing elective THR or TKR surgery and symptomatic VTE in patients not undergoing venography. Differences exist in the strength of the relation depending on the type of surgery and the venogram reading committee. [source] Renal transplant recipients are at high risk for both symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosisJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 5 2006D. POLI Summary.,Background:,Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the thrombotic complications that can occur in patients receiving renal transplantation (RT). The prevalence of VTE in RT patients is, however, undefined. Objectives: To evaluate the rate of a first episode of VTE in a series of 538 consecutive RT recipients admitted to our institution, the timing of occurrence of the thromboembolic events after transplantation, and the rate of recurrence after thromboprophylaxis withdrawal. Risk factors for recurrence were also evaluated, particularly in relation to the type of the first event (symptomatic or asymptomatic). Results:,During follow-up, 47 of 518 patients (28 males, 19 females; 9.1%) developed a first episode of VTE at a median time of 17 months (range 1,165 months) after kidney transplantation. Cancer was associated with the occurrence of VTE (odds ratio 4.8). Seventeen of 43 patients (39.5%) with deep vein thrombosis were asymptomatic and the diagnosis was made during routine ultrasound examination. Twenty-two patients (46.8%) experienced a recurrence of VTE. A relevant rate of recurrence was documented amongst patients with a first episode of both symptomatic (53%) and asymptomatic (23.5%) VTE. Conclusion:,This study confirms that RT patients are at high risk of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE and that this risk persists even after several years. Patients who experience VTE are at high risk of recurrence after thromboprophylaxis withdrawal. [source] | ||||||||||