Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Astra Tech Implants (astra + tech_implant)
Selected AbstractsMaxillary Implants Loaded at 3 Months after Insertion: Results with Astra Tech Implants after up to 5 YearsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 3 2001Helmut Steveling DMD ABSTRACT Background: To date, clinical studies have mainly focused on early loading of mandibular implants. Recently, there has also been considerable interest in early loading of maxillary implants. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to report the outcome of maxillary implants loaded after a 3-month healing period and followed up to 5 years. Materials and Methods: Seventeen patients (11 males and 6 females) received 44 Astra Tech implants (Molndal, Sweden) for treatment of single-tooth (13 cases) and partial edentulism (9 cases). The patients were followed up to 5 years after implant placement:50% of the implants were followed for 3 years and 16% have been followed throughout the observation period. Preoperatively, bone height and width were assessed on radiographs. Marginal bone loss was recorded on intraoral radiographs annually. Results: No implant was lost during the observation period. The average marginal bone loss was 0.5 ± 0.7 mm after 1 year, 0.6 ± 0.7 mm after 3 years, and 0.9 ± 1.6 mm after 5 years. There were no soft-tissue or prosthetic failures recorded during the observation period. Conclusion: Early loading of Astra Tech implants was highly successful in maxillary partial and single-tooth cases followed up to 5 years in function. [source] Effects of Implant Design and Surface on Bone Regeneration and Implant Stability: An Experimental Study in the Dog MandibleCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2001Lars Rasmusson DMD ABSTRACT Background: Previous experimental studies have shown a higher degree of bone-implant contact for surface-enlarged implants compared with machined implants. Yet, there is insufficient evidence that such implants show higher stability and an increased survival rate. Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to study the integration and stability of grit-blasted implants with retention elements on the implant neck, with and without marginal bone defects, compared with machined implants without retention elements. Materials and Methods: After tooth extraction of the mandibular premolars in six dogs, two grit-blasted, partly microthreaded Astra Tech implants and one standard Branemark implant were bilaterally placed in each dog. On one side, 3 ± 3 mm large buccal defects were created, to expose three to four implant threads. The contralateral side served as control, and no defects were made. The animals were sacrificed after 4 months of healing. Implant stability was measured using resonance frequency analysis at implant installation and after 4 months of healing. Histologic and histomorpho-metric evaluation was made after 4 months of healing. Results: Resonance frequency analysis indicated that all implants in the test and control groups were osseointegrated after 4 months, with a tendency toward higher implant stability for the Astra Tech implants. There was a statistically significant higher increase in resonance frequency for the Astra test implants compared with their corresponding controls. Histology and histomorphometry showed well-integrated implants with varying degrees of bone repair at the defect sites. The greater bone-implant contact for the Astra implants was statistically significant. No significant difference between the implants in amount of bone filling the threads was recorded. Conclusions: The Astra Tech implants tested showed a higher degree of bone,implant contact and higher level of bone regenerated at defect sites compared with the Brånemark implants. Resonance frequency analysis demonstrated a significantly higher increase in the Astra test implants compared with their control groups than did the Brånemark test implants versus their controls. [source] A Clinical, Radiographic, and Microbiologic Comparison of Astra Tech and Brånemark Single Tooth ImplantsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2 2000Lorena Puchades-Roman BDS, M Clin Dent ABSTRACT Background: The soft tissues around single tooth implants differ fundamentally from the gingiva around natural teeth. There are very limited data comparing soft tissues around different implant systems. Aim: To assess whether the design characteristics of dental implants, particularly the implant-abutment junction, may affect the dimensions and health of the peri-implant soft tissues and radiographic bone levels. Subjects and Method: Fifteen Astra Tech and 15 Brånemark single tooth implants that had been in function for a minimum of 2 years in 30 partially dentate subjects were examined for plaque accumulation, probing depth, and bleeding on probing and compared to contralateral healthy teeth. Standardized radiographs were taken to measure the most coronal bone to implant contact on the mesial and distal surfaces. In addition, samples of subgingival plaque were taken on paper points and examined by darkfield microscopy. Results: Significantly higher mean probing depths (p < .001) and higher mean percentage of spirochetes (p= .003) were found at implants compared to teeth. In this sample, the Brånemark implants had significantly higher probing depths than the Astra Tech implants (median and interquartile range: Astra Tech 2.7 mm [2,3], Brånemark 3.3 mm [3,3.7] p= .026) and the most coronal bone to implant contact was closer to the implant,abutment junction in the Astra Tech implants (Astra Tech 0.6 mm [0.2,0.9], Brånemark 1.6 mm [1.4,2.0]. p < .001). Conclusion: Although there were statistically significant differences between the two implant systems, the clinical differences were small and probably reflect differences in the biologic width in relation to the location and design of the implant-abutment junction. [source] Patient-centered outcome of immediately loaded implants in the rehabilitation of fully edentulous jawsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 10 2009Melissa Dierens Abstract Introduction: Edentulism often involves functional, esthetic, phonetic and psychological problems. Objectives: To evaluate patient-centered outcomes of full-arch screw-retained rehabilitation on immediately loaded implants. Material and methods: Fifty patients treated with Astra TechÔ implants answered self-administered questionnaires on a visual analogue scale (VAS) 100 mm scale or with multiple-choice or open questions: at baseline, 1 week, 3 or 6 months and 1 year. Changes of VAS in time were analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures, adjusting for gender, age and jaw; comparison of cross-sectional parameters between jaws was performed with the Mann,Whitney U- or ,2 -test, all at the 0.05 significance level. Results: The median calculated general satisfaction score increased from 40.25 (mean=40.9; SD=23.82; range=0,95) at baseline to 98.25 (mean=95.3; SD=6.68; range=74,100) after 1 year. Overall comfort, eating comfort, speaking comfort and perceived esthetics improved significantly within 1 week after surgery and immediate provisionalization. This did not change significantly until the final bridge was installed after 3 months (mandible) or 6 months (maxilla), when a further significant improvement was demonstrated. The most common postoperative complication was swelling, especially in the maxilla. The importance of one-stage surgery and immediate loading was rated very high by patients before treatment, especially in the mandible. The main reason for choosing fixed prosthetics was eating comfort. Phonetics and esthetics were more important in the maxilla than in the mandible. Conclusion: Immediate full-arch rehabilitation yeilds an instant significant improvement in general patient satisfaction and self-perceived factors related to comfort, function and esthetics. Eating comfort is the main concern for the patient and shows the highest improvement. Postoperative complications are limited and patients considered immediate loading important. [source] | ||||||||||