Piezometric Head (piezometric + head)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


The hydroelectric problem of porous rocks: inversion of the position of the water table from self-potential data

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2 2004
A. Revil
SUMMARY The self-potential (SP) method is a fast and cheap reconnaissance tool sensitive to ground water flow in unconfined aquifers. A model based on the use of Green's functions for the coupled hydroelectric problem yields an integral equation relating the SP field to the distribution of the piezometric head describing the phreatic surface and to the electrical resistivity contrast through this phreatic surface. We apply this model to SP data measured on the south flank of the Piton de la Fournaise volcano, a large shield volcano located on Réunion island, Indian ocean. The phreatic surface, inverted with the help of the Simplex algorithm from the SP data, agrees well with the available information in this area [one borehole and electromagnetic (EM) data]. This interpretation scheme, which we call electrography, has many applications to the crucial problem of water supply in volcanic areas where drilling is expensive. [source]


MODFLOW 2000 Head Uncertainty, a First-Order Second Moment Method

GROUND WATER, Issue 3 2003
Harry S. Glasgow
A computationally efficient method to estimate the variance and covariance in piezometric head results computed through MODFLOW 2000 using a first-order second moment (FOSM) approach is presented. This methodology employs a first-order Taylor series expansion to combine model sensitivity with uncertainty in geologic data. MOD-FLOW 2000 is used to calculate both the ground water head and the sensitivity of head to changes in input data. From a limited number of samples, geologic data are extrapolated and their associated uncertainties are computed through a conditional probability calculation. Combining the spatially related sensitivity and input uncertainty produces the variance-covariance matrix, the diagonal of which is used to yield the standard deviation in MODFLOW 2000 head. The variance in piezometric head can be used for calibrating the model, estimating confidence intervals, directing exploration, and evaluating the reliability of a design. A case study illustrates the approach, where aquifer transmis-sivity is the spatially related uncertain geologic input data. The FOSM methodology is shown to be applicable for calculating output uncertainty for (1) spatially related input and output data, and (2) multiple input parameters (trans-missivity and recharge). [source]


A New Multilevel Ground Water Monitoring System Using Multichannel Tubing

GROUND WATER MONITORING & REMEDIATION, Issue 4 2002
Murray D. Einarson
A new multilevel ground water monitoring system has been developed that uses custom-extruded flexible 1.6-inch (4.1 cm) outside-diameter (O.D.) multichannel HOPE tubing (referred to as Continuous Multichannel Tubing or CMT) to monitor as many as seven discrete zones within a single borehole in either unconsolidated sediments or bedrock. Prior to inserting the tubing in the borehole, ports are created that allow ground water to enter six outer pie-shaped channels (nominal diameter = 0.5 inch [1.3 cm]) and a central hexagonal center channel (nominal diameter = 0.4 inch [1 cm]) at different depths, facilitating the measurement of depth-discrete piezometric heads and the collection of depth-discrete ground water samples. Sand packs and annular seals between the various monitored zones can be installed using conventional tremie methods. Alternatively, bentonite packers and prepacked sand packs have been developed that are attached to the tubing at the ground surface, facilitating precise positioning of annular seals and sand packs. Inflatable rubber packers for permanent or temporary installations in bedrock aquifers are currently undergoing site trials. Hydraulic heads are measured with conventional water-level meters or electronic pressure transducers to generate vertical profiles of hydraulic head. Ground water samples are collected using peristaltic pumps, small-diameter bailers, inertial lift pumps, or small-diameter canister samplers. For monitoring hydrophobic organic compounds, the CMT tubing is susceptible to both positive and negative biases caused by sorption, desorption, and diffusion. These biases can be minimized by: (1) purging the channels prior to sampling, (2) collecting samples from separate 0.25-inch (0.64 cm) O.D. Teflon sampling tubing inserted to the bottom of each sampling channel, or (3) collecting the samples downhole using sampling devices positioned next to the intake ports. More than 1000 CMT multilevel wells have been installed in North America and Europe to depths up to 260 feet (79 m) below ground surface. These wells have been installed in boreholes created in unconsolidated sediments and bedrock using a wide range of drilling equipment, including sonic, air rotary, diamond-bit coring, hollow-stem auger, and direct push. This paper presents a discussion of three field trials of the system, demonstrating its versatility and illustrating the type of depth-discrete data that can be collected with the system. [source]


Spectral decomposition of periodic ground water fluctuation in a coastal aquifer

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, Issue 12 2008
David Ching-Fang Shih
Abstract This research accomplished by the descriptive statistics and spectral analysis of six kinds of time series data gives a complete assessment of periodic fluctuation in significant constituents for the Huakang Shan earthquake monitoring site. Spectral analysis and bandpass filtering techniques are demonstrated to accurately analyse the significant component. Variation in relative ground water heads with a period of 12·6 h is found to be highly related to seawater level fluctuation. Time lag is estimated about 3·78 h. Based on these phenomena, the coastal aquifer formed in an unconsolidated formation can be affected by the nearby seawater body for the semi-diurnal component. Fluctuation in piezometric heads is found to correspond at a rate of 1000 m h,1. Atmospheric pressure presents the significant components at periods of 10·8 h and 7·2 h in a quite different type, compared to relative ground water head and seawater level. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]