Home About us Contact | |||
PI Controllers (pi + controllers)
Selected AbstractsAn educational tool for controlling of SRMCOMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, Issue 4 2008Tuncay Yigit Abstract This article introduces an educational tool for a switched reluctance motor (SRM) drive system. It is prepared for undergraduate and graduate level students. Classical PI and Genetic PI controllers are used in SRM drive system. The Genetic PI controller was applied to the speed loop, replacing the classical PI controller. The tool software was implemented using C++ Builder on a PC. It has flexible structure and graphical interface. The students can be easily establishing a thorough understanding of both classical PI and genetic PI controller for a SRM drive system. The education tool allowed the student to interact with the SRM drive system and it is using controllers. Then it is responses on a dynamic and instantaneous basis under different operating conditions. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Comput Appl Eng Educ 16: 268,279, 2008; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com); DOI 10.1002/cae20148 [source] Current-mode control of DC,DC power converters: a backstepping approachINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBUST AND NONLINEAR CONTROL, Issue 5 2003J. Alvarez-Ramirez Abstract Current-mode control is a robust industrial DC,DC power converter control scheme that has been successfully tested, is widely accepted, and is commonly implemented with conventional linear P and PI controllers. The need of more systematic designs with enhanced performance has motivated recent studies with linear and nonlinear advanced techniques, but the rigorous understanding and substantiation of the underlying key robust functioning capability are still lacking. In this paper, a constructive control approach is employed to study the current-mode control problem of a class of DC,DC power converters, yielding a cascade control design methodology with: a robust convergence criterion coupled with a systematic and transparent construction-tuning procedure, a rationale to explain the robust controller functioning, and a unified framework to interpret and compare the proposed controller with the existing conventional and advanced control designs. The implementation and functioning of the proposed control design is illustrated experimentally with a boost converter. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Interpolated controllers for the robust transition control of a class of reactorsAICHE JOURNAL, Issue 1 2006Guillermo Fernández-Anaya Abstract Two new theoretical results about interpolated controllers for the transition control and simultaneous stabilization of single input-single output plants with variable operating conditions are shown; recent results are generalized for interpolated controllers. On the basis of these results, an application to the closed-loop transition control of a continuous stirred-tank reactor, where a single exothermic reaction takes place, is presented. A comparison with simple PI controllers is made. © 2005 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2006 [source] A Short Note About Energy-Efficiency Performance of Thermally Coupled Distillation SequencesTHE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, Issue 1 2006Juan Gabriel Segovia-Hernández Abstract In this work, we present a comparative study of the energy-efficiency performance between conventional distillation sequences and thermally coupled distillation arrangements (TCDS) for the separation of ternary mixtures of hydrocarbons under the action of feedback control loops. The influence of the relative ease of separation of the feed mixture and its composition was analyzed. The feedback analysis was conducted through servo tests with individual changes in the set points for each of the three product streams. Standard PI controllers were used for each loop. The results show an apparent trend regarding the sequence with a better dynamic performance. Generally, TCDS options performed better for the control of the extreme components of the ternary mixture (A and C), while the conventional sequences offered a better dynamic behaviour for the control of the intermediate component (B). The only case in which there was a dominant structure for all control loops was when the feed contained low amounts of the intermediate component and the mixture had similar relative volatilities. The Petlyuk column provided the optimal choice in such case, which contradicts the general expectations regarding its control behaviour. In addition, the energy demands during the dynamic responses were significantly lower than those observed for the other distillation sequences. TCDS options, therefore, are not only more energy efficient than the conventional sequences, but there are cases in which they also offer better feedback control properties. On présente dans ce travail une étude comparative de la performance d'efficacité d'énergétique entre les séquences de distillation conventionnelles et les configurations de distillation couplées thermiquement (TCDS) pour la séparation de mélanges ternaires d'hydrocarbures sous l'action de boucles de contrôle d'asservissement. L'influence de la facilité relative de séparation du mélange d'alimentation et de sa composition est analysée. L'analyse de rétroalimentation est réalisée grâce à des tests d'asservissement avec des changements individuels dans les points de consigne pour chacun des trois courants de produits. Des contrôleurs PI standards ont été utilisés pour chaque boucle. Les résultats montrent une tendance apparente pour la séquence ayant une meilleure performance dynamique. Généralement, les options TCDS sont meilleures pour le contrôle des composantes extrêmes du mélange ternaire (A et C), tandis que les séquences conventionnelles offrent un meilleur contrôle dynamique pour le contrôle de la composante intermédiaire (B). Le seul cas où il y a une structure dominante pour toutes les boucles de contrôle, c'est lorsque l'alimentation contenant de faibles quantités de la composante intermédiaire et le mélange ont la même volatilité relative. La colonne Petlyuk est le choix optimal dans un tel cas, ce qui contredit les attentes générales concernant son comportement de contrôle. En outre, les demandes d'énergie pendant les réponses dynamiques sont significativement plus faibles que celles observées pour les autres séquences de distillation. Ainsi, non seulement les options TCDS sont plus efficaces que les séquences conventionnelles, mais il y a des cas où elles offrent également de meilleures propriétés de contrôle d'asservissement. [source] |