Home  About us  Contact
 

Photic Regulation (photic + regulation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences80%

Selected Abstracts

Photic Regulation of mt1 Melatonin Receptors in the Siberian Hamster Pars Tuberalis and Suprachiasmatic Nuclei: Involvement of the Circadian Clock and Intergeniculate Leaflet

JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, Issue 3 2000
Schuster
In the Siberian hamster suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis of the pituitary, high affinity mt1 melatonin receptors are present. We have previously shown that night applied light pulse induced an increase in mt1 mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of this species, independently of the endogenous melatonin. Here, we report the photic regulation of melatonin receptor density and mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis of pinealectomized Siberian hamsters and the implication in this control of either the circadian clock or the intergeniculate leaflet. The results show that: (1) A 1-h light pulse, delivered during the night, induces a transitory increase in mt1 mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis. After 3 h this increase has totally disappeared (suprachiasmatic nuclei) or is greatly reduced (pars tuberalis). (2) The melatonin receptor density, in the suprachiasmatic nuclei, is not affected by 1 or 3 h of light, while it is strongly increased in the pars tuberalis. (3) In hamsters kept in constant darkness, the mt1 mRNA rise is gated to the subjective night in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis. In contrast, the light-induced increase in melatonin binding is also observed in the subjective day in the pars tuberalis. (4) intergeniculate leaflet lesion totally inhibits the mt1 mRNA expression rise in the suprachiasmatic nuclei, while it has no effect on the light-induced increase in mt1 mRNA in the pars tuberalis. However, the light-induced increase in melatonin receptor density is totally prevented by the intergeniculate leaflet lesion in the pars tuberalis. These results show that: (1) the photic regulations of mt1 mRNA expression and receptor density are independent of each other in both the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis; and (2) the circadian clock and the intergeniculate leaflet are implicated in the photic regulation of melatonin receptors but their level of action differs totally between the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis. [source]

Light regulation of retinal dopamine that is independent of melanopsin phototransduction

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, Issue 4 2009
M. A. Cameron
Abstract Light-dependent release of dopamine (DA) in the retina is an important component of light-adaptation mechanisms. Melanopsin-containing inner retinal photoreceptors have been shown to make physical contacts with DA amacrine cells, and have been implicated in the regulation of the local retinal environment in both physiological and anatomical studies. Here we determined whether they contribute to photic regulation of DA in the retina as assayed by the ratio of DA with its primary metabolite, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), and by c-fos induction in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-labelled DA amacrine cells. Light treatment (,0.7 log W/m2 for 90 min) resulted in a substantial increase in DA release (as revealed by an increase in the DOPAC : DA ratio), as well as widespread induction of nuclear c-fos in DA amacrine cells in wild-type mice and in mice lacking melanopsin (Opn4,/,). Light-induced DA release was also retained in mice lacking rod phototransduction (Gnat1,/,), although the magnitude of this response was substantially reduced compared with wild-types, as was the incidence of light-dependent nuclear c-fos in DAergic amacrines. By contrast, the DAergic system of mice lacking both rods and cones (rd/rd cl) showed no detectable light response. Our data suggest that light regulation of DA, a pivotal retinal neuromodulator, originates primarily with rods and cones, and that melanopsin is neither necessary nor sufficient for this photoresponse. [source]

Photic Regulation of mt1 Melatonin Receptors in the Siberian Hamster Pars Tuberalis and Suprachiasmatic Nuclei: Involvement of the Circadian Clock and Intergeniculate Leaflet

JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, Issue 3 2000
Schuster
In the Siberian hamster suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis of the pituitary, high affinity mt1 melatonin receptors are present. We have previously shown that night applied light pulse induced an increase in mt1 mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of this species, independently of the endogenous melatonin. Here, we report the photic regulation of melatonin receptor density and mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis of pinealectomized Siberian hamsters and the implication in this control of either the circadian clock or the intergeniculate leaflet. The results show that: (1) A 1-h light pulse, delivered during the night, induces a transitory increase in mt1 mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis. After 3 h this increase has totally disappeared (suprachiasmatic nuclei) or is greatly reduced (pars tuberalis). (2) The melatonin receptor density, in the suprachiasmatic nuclei, is not affected by 1 or 3 h of light, while it is strongly increased in the pars tuberalis. (3) In hamsters kept in constant darkness, the mt1 mRNA rise is gated to the subjective night in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis. In contrast, the light-induced increase in melatonin binding is also observed in the subjective day in the pars tuberalis. (4) intergeniculate leaflet lesion totally inhibits the mt1 mRNA expression rise in the suprachiasmatic nuclei, while it has no effect on the light-induced increase in mt1 mRNA in the pars tuberalis. However, the light-induced increase in melatonin receptor density is totally prevented by the intergeniculate leaflet lesion in the pars tuberalis. These results show that: (1) the photic regulations of mt1 mRNA expression and receptor density are independent of each other in both the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis; and (2) the circadian clock and the intergeniculate leaflet are implicated in the photic regulation of melatonin receptors but their level of action differs totally between the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis. [source]

Developmental Alcohol Exposure Alters Light-Induced Phase Shifts of the Circadian Activity Rhythm in Rats

ALCOHOLISM, Issue 7 2004
Yuhua Z. Farnell
Background: Developmental alcohol (EtOH) exposure produces long-term changes in the photic regulation of rat circadian behavior. Because entrainment of circadian rhythms to 24-hr light/dark cycles is mediated by phase shifting or resetting the clock mechanism, we examined whether developmental EtOH exposure also alters the phase-shifting effects of light pulses on the rat activity rhythm. Methods: Artificially reared Sprague-Dawley rat pups were exposed to EtOH (4.5 g/kg/day) or an isocaloric milk formula (gastrostomy control; GC) on postnatal days 4 to 9. At 2 months of age, rats from the EtOH, GC, and suckle control groups were housed individually, and wheel-running behavior was continuously recorded first in a 12-hr light/12-hr dark photoperiod for 10 to 14 days and thereafter in constant darkness (DD). Once the activity rhythm was observed to stably free-run in DD for at least 14 days, animals were exposed to a 15-min light pulse at either 2 or 10 hr after the onset of activity [i.e., circadian time (CT) 14 or 22, respectively], because light exposure at these times induces maximal phase delays or advances of the rat activity rhythm. Results: EtOH-treated rats were distinguished by robust increases in their phase-shifting responses to light. In the suckle control and GC groups, light pulses shifted the activity rhythm as expected, inducing phase delays of approximately 2 hr at CT 14 and advances of similar amplitude at CT 22. In contrast, the same light stimulus produced phase delays at CT 14 and advances at CT 22 of longer than 3 hr in EtOH-treated rats. The mean phase delay at CT 14 and advance at CT 22 in EtOH rats were significantly greater (p < 0.05) than the light-induced shifts observed in control animals. Conclusions: The data indicate that developmental EtOH exposure alters the phase-shifting responses of the rat activity rhythm to light. This finding, coupled with changes in the circadian period and light/dark entrainment observed in EtOH-treated rats, suggests that developmental EtOH exposure may permanently alter the clock mechanism in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and its regulation of circadian behavior. [source]

Photic Regulation of mt1 Melatonin Receptors in the Siberian Hamster Pars Tuberalis and Suprachiasmatic Nuclei: Involvement of the Circadian Clock and Intergeniculate Leaflet

JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, Issue 3 2000
Schuster
In the Siberian hamster suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis of the pituitary, high affinity mt1 melatonin receptors are present. We have previously shown that night applied light pulse induced an increase in mt1 mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of this species, independently of the endogenous melatonin. Here, we report the photic regulation of melatonin receptor density and mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis of pinealectomized Siberian hamsters and the implication in this control of either the circadian clock or the intergeniculate leaflet. The results show that: (1) A 1-h light pulse, delivered during the night, induces a transitory increase in mt1 mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis. After 3 h this increase has totally disappeared (suprachiasmatic nuclei) or is greatly reduced (pars tuberalis). (2) The melatonin receptor density, in the suprachiasmatic nuclei, is not affected by 1 or 3 h of light, while it is strongly increased in the pars tuberalis. (3) In hamsters kept in constant darkness, the mt1 mRNA rise is gated to the subjective night in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis. In contrast, the light-induced increase in melatonin binding is also observed in the subjective day in the pars tuberalis. (4) intergeniculate leaflet lesion totally inhibits the mt1 mRNA expression rise in the suprachiasmatic nuclei, while it has no effect on the light-induced increase in mt1 mRNA in the pars tuberalis. However, the light-induced increase in melatonin receptor density is totally prevented by the intergeniculate leaflet lesion in the pars tuberalis. These results show that: (1) the photic regulations of mt1 mRNA expression and receptor density are independent of each other in both the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis; and (2) the circadian clock and the intergeniculate leaflet are implicated in the photic regulation of melatonin receptors but their level of action differs totally between the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis. [source]