Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Phase II Dose (phase + ii_dose)
Selected AbstractsPhase I study of paclitaxel with standard dose ifosfamide in children with refractory solid tumors: A Pediatric Oncology Group study (POG 9376)PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, Issue 3 2009James I. Geller MD Abstract Purpose A dose-escalation Phase I study of taxol (paclitaxel) administered in combination with standard dose ifosfamide was conducted in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors. Primary objectives were to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Patients and Methods Paclitaxel was administered as a 6-hr continuous infusion (hr 0,6), followed by intravenous ifosfamide (2 g/m2/day,×,3 days) over 1 hr at hours 6,7, 24,25, and 48,49. Patients at dose level 1 received 250 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Subsequent dose escalation proceeded using a standard 3,×,3 Phase I design. Results Fifteen patients received a combined 46 courses of therapy. The median age was 14.5 years (range, 2,19 years), and diagnoses included sarcoma (7), neuroblastoma (3), and other (5). Three patients received paclitaxel at 250 mg/m2 (10 courses), six at 325 mg/m2 (19 courses), three at 425 mg/m2 (8 courses), and three at 550 mg/m2 (9 courses). DLTs occurred in 2/3 patients at 550 mg/m2 paclitaxel during cycle 1, including grade 3 hypotension and grade 4 anaphylaxis in 1 patient each. Common non-dose-limiting toxicities included bone marrow suppression and peripheral neuropathy. Response was evaluable in 14 patients and included mixed response (3), stable disease (5), and progressive disease (6). Conclusion Paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions were dose limiting when the drug was administered as a 6-hr infusion. The MTD and recommended Phase II dose of paclitaxel administered as a 6-hr continuous intravenous infusion followed by standard dose intravenous ifosfamide is 425 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009;52:346,350. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] A phase I/II study of weekly high-dose erlotinib in previously treated patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer,CANCER, Issue 5 2006Daniel T. Milton MD Abstract BACKGROUND. Preclinical studies have suggested that erlotinib at high doses may inhibit additional sites downstream of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), resulting in greater antitumor efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine the tolerability and efficacy of high-dose erlotinib administered on a weekly schedule to patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS. The authors conducted a Phase I/II trial of weekly erlotinib in patients with progressive NSCLC who had received previous chemotherapy. In the Phase I portion, patients were enrolled in 3-patient cohorts at erlotinib dose levels of 1200 mg, 1600 mg, and 2000 mg once weekly. The Phase II portion was designed to determine the major objective response rate of the dose identified in the Phase I portion of the trial. RESULTS. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Grade 1 and 2 rash and diarrhea were the principle toxicities, and each occurred in 92% of patients. Among 21 patients who were treated at the Phase II dose of 2000 mg weekly, a single objective response was identified, yielding a response rate of 5% (95% confidence interval, 0.2,22%). For this cohort, the median survival was 9.5 months. The sole radiographic response occurred in a patient whose pretreatment tumor specimen harbored an EGFR exon 19 deletion. CONCLUSIONS. Erlotinib at a dose of 2000 mg administered weekly was tolerated well by these patients with advanced NSCLC. The 5% objective response rate did not reach the stated objective at the interim efficacy analysis, prompting the closure of the study. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society. [source] Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with refractory malignanciesCANCER, Issue 1 2003M.Sc., Tarek Mekhail M.D. Abstract BACKGROUND A Phase I study using weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine was conducted to investigate toxicity; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent; and, in a preliminary fashion, to determine the antitumor activity of the combination. METHODS Docetaxel and gemcitabine were administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The dose levels of docetaxel and gemcitabine were as follows: Level I, docetaxel 20 mg/m2and gemcitabine 400 mg/m2; Level II, docetaxel 30 mg/m2and gemcitabine 400 mg/m2; Level III, docetaxel 30 mg/m2and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2; Level IV, docetaxel 36 mg/m2and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2; and Level V, docetaxel 36 mg/m2and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2. RESULTS Thirty-three eligible patients were entered. The diagnoses were as follows: Eleven patients had nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, 3 patients had carcinoma of the bladder, 3 patients had renal carcinoma, 2 patients had adrenal carcinoma, 5 patients had unknown primary tumors, and 9 patients had miscellaneous malignancies. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median age was 62 years (range, 27,77 years), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (range, 0,1). Five patients were treated at Dose Levels I and II, 6 patients were treated at Dose Levels III and V, and 11 patients were treated at Dose Level IV. Grade 3,4 toxicities during Cycle I included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, occurred in three of six patients at Dose Level V. The combination of docetaxel 36 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 (Dose Level IV) was determined as the MTD and was the recommended Phase II dose. Two patients had a partial response: one patient with bladder carcinoma (Dose Level II) and one patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (Dose Level III). CONCLUSIONS Overall, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine were well tolerated. Further studies using this combination are planned, including a Phase II trial in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 2003;97:170,8. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10991 [source] Targeting tumor metabolism with 2-deoxyglucose in patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer and advanced malignanciesTHE PROSTATE, Issue 13 2010Mark Stein Abstract BACKGROUND A profound difference between cancer and normal tissues is the preferential utilization of glycolysis by cancer cells. To translate this paradigm in the clinic, we completed a phase I study of 2-deoxyglucose (2DG), and assessed 2DG uptake with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and the autophagy substrate p62 as a marker of 2DG resistance. METHODS Patients received 2DG orally on days 1,14 of a 21-day cycle in cohorts of three in a dose-escalating manner. Correlative assessments included PET scans at baseline and day 2 and p62 protein in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as a potential marker of 2DG resistance. RESULTS The dose of 45,mg/kg was defined as the recommended phase II dose, secondary to dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 asymptomatic QTc prolongation at a dose of 60,mg/kg. PK evaluation of 2DG revealed linear pharmacokinetics with Cmax 45,µg/ml (277,µM), 73.7,µg/ml (449,µM), and 122,µg/ml (744,µM) in dose levels 30, 45, and 60,mg/kg, respectively. Five of eight patients assessed with FDG-PET scanning demonstrated decreased FDG uptake by day 2 of therapy, suggesting competition of 2DG with FDG. Five of six patients assessed for p62 had a decrease in p62 at 24,hr. CONCLUSIONS These data support the safety of 2DG, defined 2DG PK, demonstrated the effect of 2DG on FDG-PET imaging, and demonstrated the feasibility of assessment of p62 as an autophagic resistance marker. These data support future studies of 2DG alone or in combination with approaches to abrogate autophagy. Prostate 70: 1388,1394, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||