Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (peripheral + oxygen_saturation)
Selected AbstractsDoes propofol and alfentanil-induced sedation cause periodic apnoea in chronic renal failure patients?INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 1 2010S. M. Lee Summary Aims:, There is evidence suggesting that the respiratory response to sedation is different in patients with sleep apnoea, which is common in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). This study examined the respiratory response of sedation with propofol and alfentanil, whose pharmacokinetics are not affected by the renal function, in CRF patients. Methods:, Chronic renal failure patients who underwent arteriovenous-fistular surgery (CRF group) and patients who underwent chemoport insertion (control group) were enrolled in this study. Sedation was induced by infusing propofol 1.5 ,/ml and alfentanil 0.2 ,/kg/min continuously in both groups. In the desaturation study, the respiratory rate and peripheral oxygen saturation in room air were checked. In the apnoea,hypopnoea study, the patient's sedation (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation) score, apnoea,hypopnoea index (AHI) was recorded using a portable ventilation effort recorder (microMesam) while applying 5 l/min of oxygen through a facial mask. Results:, The desaturation event was more common (21.5/h vs. 2/h, p = 0.001) in the CRF patients. Apnoea and hypopnoea (AHI: 13.0 vs. 1.6, p = 0.012, per cent of patients with an AHI > 5: 53.3% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.014) occurred more frequently in the CRF patients but the sedation score was not different. Conclusion:, Chronic renal failure patients have a higher risk of developing apnoea and hypopnoea during sedation, which highlights the need for careful monitoring and management in these patients. [source] Arterial blood gases in extraperitoneal laparoscopic urethrocystopexyINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 8 2002Hasan Kocoglu Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of extraperitoneal laparoscopy and carbon dioxide insufflation on hemodynamic parameters, arterial blood gases and complications in urethrocystopexy operations. Methods: Twenty-five female patients who underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic mesh urethrocystopexy operation for the correction of urinary incontinence were allocated to the study. Hemodynamic parameters were noted and blood gas analyzes were performed before the induction of anesthesia, 10 min after induction, 5 and 10 min after the beginning of carbon dioxide insufflation, at the end of carbon dioxide insufflation and 30 min after exsufflation. Results: There was no significant change in mean arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, arterial carbon dioxide pressure, and arterial oxygen saturation compared to preinsufflation and preinduction values. End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure did not increase above 45 mm/Hg during carbon dioxide insufflation. Arterial oxygen saturation and partial oxygen pressure did not decrease. Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and pleural effusion were not noted in any patient. Conclusion: We conclude that, extraperitoneal laparoscopic urethrocystopexy is not associated with hemodynamic and respiratory impairment. [source] Anaesthetic management of tracheobronchial rupture following blunt chest traumaACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 7 2003K. Naghibi Injuries to the tracheobronchial tree are a well-recognized sequel of massive blunt trauma to the chest, and although unusual, are life threatening. We report a 16-year-old-boy who developed complete disruption of both bronchi after a motor vehicle accident. After induction of general anaesthesia and oral intubation, ventilation could not be maintained, and oxygenation worsened abruptly with peripheral oxygen saturation values less than 60%. Jet ventilation through two intrabronchial catheters, inserted via emergency thoracotomy, raised the saturation from 60% to 100%, and surgery thereafter was straightforward. The anaesthetic management of tracheobronchial repair is discussed. [source] Propofol,ketamine vs propofol,fentanyl combinations for deep sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing burn dressing changes,PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 1 2008ZEYNEP TOSUN MD Summary Background:, The aim of this study was to compare propofol,ketamine (PK) and propofol,fentanyl (PF) combinations for deep sedation and analgesia in pediatric burn wound dressing changes. Methods:, Thirty-two ASA physical status II and III inpatients with a second degree total burn surface area ranging from 5% to 25% were studied in a randomized, double blind fashion. Heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and Ramsey sedation scores of all patients were recorded perioperatively. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either PK or PF: PK group (n = 17) received 1 mg·kg,1 ketamine + 1.2 mg·kg,1 propofol, and PF group (n = 15) received 1 ,g·kg,1 fentanyl + 1.2 mg·kg,1 propofol for induction. Additional propofol (0.5,1 mg·kg,1) was administered when the patients showed discomfort in both groups. If the patient showed discomfort and/or increase in heart rate or systolic arterial pressure, despite additional propofol dose, additional bolus of 0.5,1 mg·kg,1 ketamine or 0.5,1 ,g·kg,1 fentanyl was administered. Results:, There were no significant differences in heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and sedation scores during the procedure between the groups. Restlessness during the procedure was seen in seven (47%) patients in Group PF and one (5.9%) patient in Group PK (P = 0.013). Conclusions:, Both propofol,ketamine and propofol,fentanyl combinations provided effective sedation and analgesia during dressing changes in pediatric burn patients. But propofol,ketamine combination was superior to propofol,fentanyl combination because of more restlessness in patients given propofol,fentanyl. [source] | ||||||||||