			Home About us Contact

Pancreatic Resection (pancreatic + resection)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Liver transplantation and pancreatic resection: A single-center experience and a review of the literature

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2009
John A. Stauffer
Liver transplantation may occasionally be indicated in patients with unique clinical scenarios. Little is known regarding the outcomes of patients who have had a pancreatic resection prior to, in combination with, or after liver transplantation. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing liver transplantation from March 1998 to March 2008 identified 17 patients who also underwent pancreatic resection. An additional literature review was performed. Five underwent pancreatic resection prior to liver transplantation (1.7, 3.6, 3.8, 6.8, and 8.1 years), another 9 underwent pancreatic resection together with liver transplantation, and 3 underwent pancreatic resection after liver transplantation (2.2, 2.6, and 3.8 years). Indications for pancreatic resection included cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 5), pancreatic cancer (n = 2), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), periampullary adenocarcinoma (n = 1), duodenal adenomas (n = 1), and benign pancreatic mass (n = 1). Indications for liver transplantation were metastatic neuroendocrine tumor disease (n = 5), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 5), hepatitis C virus (n = 2), metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), Klatskin tumor (n = 1), alcohol cirrhosis (n = 1), alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (n = 1), and chemotherapy-induced cirrhosis (n = 1). One patient died intraoperatively, 7 patients died of tumor recurrence, 2 patients died from transplant complications, and 7 patients are still alive. Pancreatic resection,related complications included 4 pancreatic fistulas. A literature review confirmed liver transplantation/pancreatic resection,related complications. In conclusion, liver transplantation and pancreatic resection remain uncommon, and a good outcome can be achieved. Recurrence of malignant disease is the main factor limiting survival, and specific morbidity may be related to pancreatic resection and liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 15:1728,1737, 2009. © 2009 AASLD. [source]

A review of factors predicting perioperative death and early outcome in hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer surgery

HPB, Issue 6 2010
Chris D. Mann
Abstract Objectives:, In the context of comparisons of surgical outcomes, risk adjustment is the retrospective adjustment of a provider's or a surgeon's results for case mix and/or hospital volume. It allows accurate, meaningful inter-provider comparison. It is therefore an essential component of any audit and quality improvement process. The aim of this study was to review the literature to identify those factors known to affect prognosis in hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer surgery. Methods:, PubMed was used to identify studies assessing risk in patients undergoing resection surgery, rather than bypass surgery, for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer. Results:, In total, 63 and 68 papers, pertaining to 24 609 and 63 654 patients who underwent hepatic or pancreatic resection for malignancy, respectively, were identified. Overall, 22 generic preoperative factors predicting outcome on multivariate analysis, including demographics, blood results, preoperative biliary drainage and co-morbidities, were identified, with tumour characteristics proving disease-specific factors. Operative duration, transfusion, operative extent, vascular resection and additional intra-abdominal procedures were also found to be predictive of early outcome. Conclusions:, The development of a risk adjustment model will allow for the identification of those factors with most influence on early outcome and will thus identify potential targets for preoperative optimization and allow for the development of a multicentre risk prediction model. [source]

The case against preoperative biliary drainage with pancreatic resection

HPB, Issue 6 2006
Rurik C. Johnson
The majority of patients with periampullary malignancies currently undergo biliary drainage before pancreaticoduodenectomy. Placement of an endoprosthesis reliably ameliorates jaundice and pruritus. However, preoperative biliary drainage leads to bile colonization and increases the risk of postoperative wound infection after pancreatic resection. Preoperative biliary drainage does not appear to lower postoperative morbidity or mortality following pancreatic resection and does not lower but probably increases costs associated with pancreatic resection. Preoperative biliary drainage is frequently used with little clinical benefit and its utilization should be limited to specific clinical indications, i.e. patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, patients waiting several weeks or more for surgical evaluation and resection, patients with cholangitis. [source]

Resection of renal metastases to the pancreas: a surgical challenge

HPB, Issue 3 2003
D Zacharoulis
Background Metastasis to the pancreas from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is distinctly uncommon. Most cases are detected at an advanced stage of the disease and are thus unsuitable for resection. A solitary RCC metastasis to the head of pancreas is rarely encountered and, although it is potentially amenable to surgical resection, surgeons may be hesitant to perform pancreatoduodenectomy. Cases outlines Two patients with a solitary RCC metastasis to the head of pancreas were treated by pancreatoduodenectomy, while a third with multiple RCC metastases declined any treatment. Two of the patients were asymptomatic, and one presented with anaemia and mild abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) and angiography were used to exclude other metastases and to assess resectability of the pancreatic tumour. All three patients are still alive, those with resectable disease at 2 years and 9 years and the one with irresectable disease at 4 years. Discussion Isolated RCC metastasis to the pancreas is a rare event. Patients present either on follow-up imaging or with symptoms such as mild abdominal pain, weight loss, jaundice, anaemia or gastrointestinal bleeding (whether occult or overt). Dynamic spiral CT can visualise the tumour and exclude distant metastasis. Angiography often reveals a highly vascularised tumour and will help to assess resectability. In the absence of widespread disease, pancreatic resection can provide long-term survival in metastatic RCC, although few cases have been reported with lengthy follow-up. The prognosis is better than for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. [source]

Advances in mechanisms of postsurgical gastroparesis syndrome and its diagnosis and treatment

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, Issue 2 2006
Ke DONG
Postsurgical gastroparesis syndrome (PGS) is a complex disorder characterized by post-prandial nausea and vomiting, and gastric atony in the absence of mechanical gastric outlet obstruction, and is often caused by operation at the upper abdomen, especially by gastric or pancreatic resection, and sometimes also by operation at the lower abdomen, such as gynecological or obstetrical procedures. PGS occurs easily with oral intake of food or change in the form of food after operation. These symptoms can be disabling and often fail to be alleviated by drug therapy, and gastric reoperations usually prove unsuccessful. The cause of PGS has not been identified, nor has its mechanism quite been clarified. PGS after gastrectomy has been reported in many previous studies, with an incidence of approximately 0.4,5.0%. PGS is also a frequent complication of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD), and the complication occurs in the early postoperative period in 20,50% of patients. PGS caused by pancreatic cancer cryoablation (PCC) has been reported about in 50,70% of patients. Therefore, PGS has a complex etiology and might be caused by multiple factors and mechanisms. The frequency of this complication varies directly with the type and number of gastric operations performed. The loss of gastric parasympathetic control resulting from vagotomy contributes to PGS via several mechanisms. It has been reported that the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) may play a role in the pathogenesis of PGS. Recent studies in animal models of diabetes suggest specific molecular changes in the enteric nervous system may result in delayed gastric emptying. The absence of the duodenum, and hence gastric phase III, may be a cause of gastric stasis. It was thought that PGS after PPPD might be attributable, at least in part, to delayed recovery of gastric phase III, due to lowered concentrations of plasma motilin after resection of the duodenum. The damage to ICC might play a role in the pathogenesis of PGS after PCC, for which multiple factors are possibly responsible, including ischemic and neural injury to the antropyloric muscle and the duodenum after freezing of the pancreatoduodenal regions or reduction of circulating levels of motilin. As the treatment of gastroparesis is far from ideal, non-conventional approaches and non-standard medications might be of use. Multiple treatments are better than single treatment. This article reviews almost all the papers related to PGS from various journals published in English and Chinese in recent years in order to facilitate a better understanding of PGS. [source]

Liver transplantation and pancreatic resection: A single-center experience and a review of the literature

Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 5 2004
M. Wagner
Background: Mortality rates associated with pancreatic resection for cancer have steadily decreased with time, but improvements in long-term survival are less clear. This prospective study evaluated risk factors for survival after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Data from 366 consecutive patients recorded prospectively between November 1993 and September 2001 were analysed using univariate and multivariate models. Results: Fifty-eight patients (15·8 per cent) underwent surgical exploration only, 97 patients (26·5 per cent) underwent palliative bypass surgery and 211 patients (57·7 per cent) resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Stage I disease was present in 9·0 per cent, stage II in 18·0 per cent, stage III in 68·7 per cent and stage IV in 4·3 per cent of patients who underwent resection. Resection was curative (R0) in 75·8 per cent of patients. Procedures included pylorus-preserving Whipple resection (41·2 per cent), classical Whipple resection (37·0 per cent), left pancreatic resection (13·7 per cent) and total pancreatectomy (8·1 per cent). The in-hospital mortality and cumulative morbidity rates were 2·8 and 44·1 per cent respectively. The overall actuarial 5-year survival rate was 19·8 per cent after resection. Survival was better after curative resection (R0) (24·2 per cent) and in lymph-node negative patients (31·6 per cent). A Cox proportional hazards survival analysis indicated that curative resection was the most powerful independent predictor of long-term survival. Conclusion: Resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be performed safely. The overall survival rate is determined by the radicality of resection. Patients deemed fit for surgery who have no radiological signs of distant metastasis should undergo surgical exploration. Resection should follow if there is a reasonable likelihood that an R0 resection can be obtained. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Clinicopathological features and treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous tumour of the pancreas

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 3 2001
Dr M. Falconi
Background: The surgical strategy in patients with a pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous tumour (IPMT) is still controversial. In this study the pathological findings in a series of patients were used to rationalize surgical choice. Methods: Fifty-one patients with IPMT were observed between 1988 and 1998 and treated by pancreatic resection. Factors evaluated included symptoms, tumour site, type of operation, histological findings and resection margins, tumour stage, follow-up and survival. Results: Pancreaticoduodenectomy was the most frequent surgical treatment (33 patients; 65 per cent), followed by left pancreatectomy (ten), total pancreatectomy (five) and middle pancreatectomy (three). Histological assessment revealed the tumour to be an adenoma in 13 patients (25 per cent), a borderline tumour in ten (20 per cent) and a carcinoma in 28 (55 per cent), 19 of which were invasive. Mild to moderate dysplasia was present at the resection margin in 20 specimens (41 per cent), and carcinoma in one. Local recurrence was observed in four patients (8 per cent), all of whom underwent a second resection. The 3-year actuarial survival rate for benign and malignant disease was 94 and 69 per cent respectively (P = 0·03). Conclusion: These results suggest that resection should be the treatment for IPMT. Management of the resection margin could be crucial in avoiding tumour recurrence. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source]

Viral reactivation is not related to septic complications after major surgical resections,

APMIS, Issue 4 2008
T. VOGEL
Anastomotic leakage and septic complications are the most important determinants of postoperative outcome after major surgical resections. Malignant diseases and surgical trauma can influence immune responses and the ability to react against infectious factors, such as bacteria and viruses. Comparable immune suppression can cause viral reactivation in transplantation and trauma patients. In this prospective study, patients who underwent major surgical resections for oesophageal or pancreatic cancer were investigated for the potential involvement of viral reactivation in the development of septic complications. 86 patients (40 oesophageal resections, 27 pancreatic resections, 19 surgical explorations) were included. Viral antigens, viral DNA, antibodies against viral structures (IgG, IgM, IgA) and, in part, viral cultivation were performed for CMV, EBV, HSV1, HSV2, HZV6 and VZV in serum, urine, sputum and swabs from buccal mucosa preoperatively and at postoperative days 1, 3 and 5. Test results were compared with the postoperative outcome (30-day morbidity, in-hospital mortality) and clinical scores (SOFA, TISS). For statistical analyses Student's t -tests and Chi2 -tests were used. The overall complication rate was 19.8% (30-day morbidity) with an in-hospital mortality of 1.2% (1/86 patients). Postoperatively, anti-CMV-IgG titres were significantly reduced (p<0.05) and remained suppressed in patients with septic complications. Anti-CMV-gB-IgG were also reduced, but showed considerable interindividual differences. Anti-CMV-IgA and -IgM did not show significant alterations in the postoperative course. In addition, direct viral detection methods did not support viral reactivation in patients in any of the investigated groups. The reduction of anti-CMV antibodies is likely caused by an immune suppression, specifically by reduced B-cell counts after major surgical interventions. Viral reactivation, however, did not occur in the early postoperative period as a specific risk for septic complications. [source]