Home About us Contact | |||
Pancreas Transplantation (pancreas + transplantation)
Selected AbstractsKidney and Pancreas Transplantation in the United States, 1999,2008: The Changing Face of Living DonationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4p2 2010D. A. Axelrod The waiting list for kidney transplantation continued to grow between 1999 and 2008, from 41 177 to 76 089 candidates. However, active candidates represented the minority of this increase (36 951,50 624, a 37% change), while inactive candidates increased over 500% (4226,25 465). There were 5966 living donor (LD) and 10 551 deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants performed in 2008. The total number of pancreas transplants peaked at 1484 in 2004 and has declined to 1273. Although the number of LD transplants increased by 26% from 1999 to 2008, the total number peaked in 2004 at 6647 before declining 10% by 2008. The rate of LD transplantation continues to vary significantly as a function of demographic and geographic factors, including waiting time for DD transplant. Posttransplant survival remains excellent, and there appears to be greater use of induction agents and reduced use of corticosteroids in LD recipients. Significant changes occurred in the pediatric population, with a dramatic reduction in the use of LD organs after passage of the Share 35 rule. Many strategies have been adopted to reverse the decline in LD transplant rates for all age groups, including expansion of kidney paired donation, adoption of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and use of incompatible LD. [source] Total Duodenectomy with Enteric Duct Drainage: A Rescue Operation for Duodenal Complications Occurring after Pancreas TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2010U. Boggi Duodenal graft complications (DGC) occur frequently after pancreas transplantation but rarely cause graft loss. Graft pancreatectomy, however, may be required when DGC compromise recipient's safety. We herein report on two patients with otherwise untreatable DGC in whom the entire pancreas was salvaged by means of total duodenectomy with enteric drainage of both pancreatic ducts. The first patient developed recurrent episodes of enteric bleeding, requiring hospitalization and blood transfusions, starting 21 months after transplantation. The disease causing hemorrhage could not be defined, despite extensive investigations, but the donor duodenum was eventually identified as the site of bleeding. The second patient was referred to us with a duodenal stump leak, 5 months after transplantation. Two previous surgeries had failed to seal the leak, despite opening a diverting stoma above the duodenal graft. Thirty-nine and 16 months after total duodenectomy with dual duct drainage, respectively, both patients are insulin-independent and free from abdominal complaints. Magnetic resonance pancreatography shows normal ducts both basal and after intravenous injection of secretin. The two cases presented herein show that when DGC jeopardize pancreas function or recipient safety, total duodenectomy with enteric duct drainage may become an option. [source] Incidence of and Risk Factors for Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus after Pancreas TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2010N. Neidlinger Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) after pancreas transplantation (PTX) has not been extensively examined. This single center, retrospective analysis of 674 recipients from 1994 to 2005 examines the incidence of and risk factors for PTDM after PTX. PTDM was defined by fasting plasma glucose level ,126 mg/dL, confirmed on a subsequent measurement or treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent for ,30 days. The incidence of PTDM was 14%, 17% and 25% at 3, 5 and 10 years after PTX, respectively and was higher (p = 0.01) in solitary pancreas (PAN) versus simultaneous kidney pancreas (SPK) recipients (mean follow-up 6.5 years). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with PTDM were: older donor age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03,1.06, p < 0.001), higher recipient body mass index (HR 1.07,CI 1.01,1.13, p = 0.01), donor positive/recipient negative CMV status (HR 1.65,CI 1.03,2.6, p = 0.04), posttransplant weight gain (HR 4.7,CI 1.95,11.1, p < 0.001), pancreas rejection (HR 1.94.CI 1.3,2.9, p < 0.001) and 6 month fasting glucose (HR 1.01,CI 1.01,1.02, p < 0.001), hemoglobin A1c, (HR 1.12,CI 1.05,1.22, p = 0.002) and triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein (TG/HDL) ratio (HR 0.94,CI 0.91,0.96, p < 0.001). This study delineates the incidence and identifies risk factors for PTDM after PTX. [source] Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Following Pancreas TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2009N. Issa The incidence, risk factors and impact on patient and graft survival were evaluated for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) among 212 pancreas transplant recipients. Thirteen (6.1%) developed PTLD during 71 ± 27 months follow-up. Cumulative incidences of PTLD at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years posttransplant were 4.2%, 5.3%, 6.0% and 7.0%, respectively. Incidence of PTLD was lower for recipients of simultaneous pancreas kidney compared to pancreas after kidney transplant or pancreas transplant alone, though not significantly so. Recipient Epstein,Barr virus (EBV) seronegativity and number of doses of depleting antibody therapy administered at transplant were associated with increased risk of PTLD, while recipient age, gender, transplant type, cytomegalovirus mismatch maintenance immunosuppression type and treated acute rejection were not. All 13 cases underwent immunosuppression reduction, and 10 received anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. During follow-up, 10/13 (77%) responded to treatment with complete remission, while 3 (23%) died as a result of PTLD. Patient and graft survivals did not differ for recipients with and without PTLD. The strong association of PTLD with EBV-seronegativity requires considering this risk factor when evaluating and monitoring pancreas transplant recipients. With reduction of immunosuppression and anti-CD20 therapy, survival for pancreas transplant recipients with PTLD was substantially better than previously reported. [source] Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation in the United States, 1998,2007: Access for Patients with Diabetes and End-Stage Renal DiseaseAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4p2 2009K. P. McCullough Although the number of candidates on the kidney transplant waiting list at year-end rose from 40 825 to 76 070 (86%) between 1998 and 2007, recent growth principally reflects increases in the number of patients in inactive status. The number of active patients increased by ,only' 4510 between 2002 and 2007, from 44 263 to 48 773. There were 6037 living donor and 10 082 deceased donor kidney transplants in 2007. Patient and allograft survival was best for recipients of living donor kidneys, least for expanded criteria donor (ECD) deceased donor kidneys, and intermediate for non-ECD deceased donor kidneys. The total number of pancreas transplants peaked at 1484 in 2004 and has since declined to 1331. Among pancreas recipients, those with simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants experienced the best pancreas graft survival rates: 86% at 1 year and 53% at 10 years. Between 1998 and 2006, among diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who were under the age of 50 years, 23% of all and 62% of those waitlisted received a kidney-alone or SPK transplant. In contrast, 6% of diabetic patients aged 50,75 years with ESRD were transplanted, representing 46% of those waitlisted from this cohort. Access to kidney-alone or SPK transplantation varies widely by state. [source] Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) Is Associated with Reduced Graft Survival in Pancreas TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2009Z. A. Stewart Prior single-center studies have reported that pancreas allograft survival is not affected by preservation in histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) versus University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. To expand on these studies, we analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database of pancreas transplants from July 2004, through February 2008, to determine if preservation with HTK (N = 1081) versus UW (N = 3311) impacted graft survival. HTK preservation of pancreas allografts increased significantly in this time frame, from 15.4% in 2004 to 25.4% in 2008. After adjusting for other recipient, donor, graft and transplant center factors that impact graft survival, HTK preservation was independently associated with an increased risk of pancreas graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, p = 0.014), especially in pancreas allografts with cold ischemia time (CIT) ,12 h (HR 1.42, p = 0.017). This reduced survival with HTK preservation as compared to UW preservation was seen in both simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants and pancreas alone (PA) transplants. Furthermore, HTK preservation was also associated with a 1.54-fold higher odds of early (<30 days) pancreas graft loss as compared to UW (OR 1.54, p = 0.008). These results suggest that the increasing use of HTK for abdominal organ preservation should be re-examined. [source] Intrapyloric Injection of Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Persistent Gastroparesis Following Successful Pancreas TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2006R. Ben-Youssef Intrapyloric injection of botulinum toxin A (BoTx) successfully improved symptoms in idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis (DGP) refractory to medical treatment. Therefore, we used it in three pancreas transplant patients done in our institution during the last 18 months. They had severe, persistent DGP despite successful pancreas transplantation. They received 100 units of BoTx during the first injection. The clinical effect became evident within 2 weeks after the treatment, and lasted for an average of 29 weeks (range 14,44 weeks). The patients' subjective evaluation showed improvement of their symptoms and quality of life following BoTx. Patients 2 and 3 had recurrent symptoms at 44 and 24 weeks, respectively, after the first injection; they required a second dose of 90 and 80 units, respectively. They are doing well at 3 months follow-up. Intrapyloric injection of BoTx is safe and efficient. It should be considered for treating residual DGP following successful pancreas transplantation. [source] Evolution of pancreas transplant surgeryANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 6 2010Vincent W. T. Lam Abstract Background:, Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition often leading to disabling complications including retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular disease which can be modified by intensive treatment with insulin. Such treatment, however, is associated with a restrictive lifestyle and risk of hypoglycaemic morbidity and mortality. Methods:, This review examines the role of pancreas transplantation in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Results:, Pancreas transplantation is currently the only proven option to achieve long-term insulin independence, resulting in an improvement or stabilization of those diabetic related complications. The hazards of pancreas transplantation as a major operation are well known. Balancing the risks of a surgical procedure, with the benefits of restoring normoglycaemia remains an important task for the pancreas transplant surgeon. Pancreas transplantation is not an emergency operation to treat poorly managed and non-compliant patients with debilitating complications. It is a highly specialized procedure which has evolved both in terms of the surgical technique, patient selection and assessment. Conclusion:, Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the single most effective way to achieve normal glucose homeostasis in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. [source] Catheter-directed therapy for DVT after pancreas transplantationCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2007Harish D Mahanty Abstract:, Introduction:, Iliac vein deep venous thrombosis (DVT) ipsilateral to the pancreas transplant can lead to severe leg edema and compromise graft function. Treatment modalities for iliac vein DVT in the pancreas transplant recipient are limited. Methods:, Medical records of patients receiving pancreas transplants at a single center from November 1989 to July 2003 were reviewed retrospectively, identifying patients with iliac vein DVT. There were 287 pancreas transplants performed during this time. Pancreas transplantation in all recipients was performed in the right iliac fossa with the arterial supply consisting of a donor iliac artery Y interposition graft. Systemic venous drainage was to the iliac vein. Exocrine drainage was enteric or to the bladder. Results:, Four (1.4%) cases of iliac DVT were identified. All patients manifested lower extremity edema ipsilateral to the pancreas transplant. DVT was detected by ultrasound on days 4, 5, 13, and 60 post-transplant. In all cases, the iliac vein caudad to the pancreatic venous anastomosis was noted to be stenotic. Management involved balloon dilatation and endovascular stent placement in one patient, thrombolysis with tissue plasma antigen (t-PA) followed by stent placement in one patient, and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in two patients. All patients had improvement in leg edema and two patients continue to have good pancreatic allograft function. Conclusions:, Iliac DVT is a rare complication of pancreas transplantation that usually develops in an area of stenosis caudad to the pancreatic venous anastomosis. Catheter-based treatment modalities with use of endovascular stents for treatment of underlying stenoses can serve as an adjunct in treating these complications. [source] Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK) and University of Wisconsin solution (UW) in adult liver transplantation,LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2006Richard S. Mangus Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK) and University of Wisconsin solution (UW) have been shown to have similar outcomes in cadaveric kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation. Our institution changed from UW to HTK as the primary preservation solution for liver, kidney and pancreas transplantation. This study compares the perioperative and first year outcomes of liver transplantation using UW or HTK. Primary use of HTK began on May 1, 2003. We reviewed the records of all adult liver transplant recipients from July 1, 2002 to December 31, 2004. Recipients were compared based on organ preservation solution (UW n=204, HTK n=174). Outcomes included 1-, 6- and 12-month graft and patient survival and 1-, 7-, 14-, and 30-day liver function and serum creatinine. During the entire study period, the two groups were managed similarly in operative technique, immunosuppressive regimens, and donor liver criteria. Over 30 months, 378 adult patients underwent liver transplantation. There were no significant differences between UW and HTK in 1-, 6-, or 12-month graft or patient survival. The HTK group had a higher day 1 median AST, ALT, and total bilirubin, but the two groups were similar thereafter. An anticipated difference in infused volume between UW and HTK was demonstrated. In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first reported large case series from North America comparing HTK and UW in liver transplantation with 2- to 12-month follow-up. There were no significant differences between HTK and UW in this population when comparing 1 month graft function and first-year graft and patient survival. Liver Transpl 12:226,230, 2006. © 2006 AASLD. [source] Cotransplanted hepatic stellate cells enhance vascularization of islet allograftsMICROSURGERY, Issue 4 2007Zhenyu Yin M.D. Islet transplantation is an alternative to whole pancreas transplantation in curative therapy of diabetics. The outcome of engraftment of islet, however, remains disappointing. Rapid and adequate islet revascularization is crucial for the survival and function of transplanted islets. In this study, hepatic stellate cells (HSC) were cotransplanted with islet allografts, achieving marked prolongation of islet allografts. This was associated with enhanced revascularization within islet grafts as determined by anti-CD31 antibody staining. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 2007. [source] Donor Pretreatment with Tetrahydrobiopterin Saves Pancreatic Isografts from Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in a Mouse ModelAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2010M. Maglione Depletion of the nitric oxide synthase cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin (H4B) during ischemia and reperfusion is associated with severe graft pancreatitis. Since clinically feasible approaches to prevent ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) by H4B-substitution are missing we investigated its therapeutic potential in a murine pancreas transplantation model using different treatment regimens. Grafts were subjected to 16 h cold ischemia time (CIT) and different treatment regimens: no treatment, 160 ,M H4B to perfusion solution, H4B 50 mg/kg prior to reperfusion and H4B 50 mg/kg before recovery of organs. Nontransplanted animals served as controls. Recipient survival and endocrine graft function were assessed. Graft microcirculation was analyzed 2 h after reperfusion by intravital fluorescence microscopy. Parenchymal damage was assessed by histology and nitrotyrosine immunohistochemistry, H4B tissue levels by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Compared to nontransplanted controls prolonged CIT resulted in significant microcirculatory deterioration. Different efficacy according to route and timing of administration could be observed. Only donor pretreatment with H4B resulted in almost completely abrogated IRI-related damage showing graft microcirculation comparable to nontransplanted controls and restored intragraft H4B levels, resulting in significant reduction of parenchymal damage (p < 0.002) and improved survival and endocrine function (p = 0.0002 each). H4B donor pretreatment abrogates ischemia-induced parenchymal damage and represents a promising strategy to prevent IRI following pancreas transplantation. [source] Pancreas Allograft Biopsies with Positive C4d Staining and Anti-Donor Antibodies Related to Worse Outcome for PatientsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2010H. De Kort C4d+ antibody-mediated rejection following pancreas transplantation has not been well characterized. Therefore, we assessed the outcomes of 27 pancreas transplantation patients (28 biopsies), with both C4d staining and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) determined, from a cohort of 257 patients. The median follow-up was 50 (interquartile range [IQR] 8,118) months. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: group 1, patients with minimal or no C4d staining and no DSA (n = 13); group 2, patients with either DSA present but no C4d, diffuse C4d+ and no DSA or focal C4d+ and DSA (n = 6); group 3, patients with diffuse C4d+ staining and DSA (n = 9). Active septal inflammation, acinar inflammation and acinar cell injury/necrosis were significantly more abundant in group 3 than in group 2 (respective p-values: 0.009; 0.033; 0.025) and in group 1 (respective p-values: 0.034; 0.009; 0.002). The overall uncensored pancreas graft survival rate for groups 1, 2 and 3 were 53.3%, 66.7% and 34.6%, respectively (p = 0.044). In conclusion, recipients of pancreas transplants with no C4d or DSA had excellent long-term graft survival in comparison with patients with both C4d+ and DSA present. Hence, C4d should be used as an additional marker in combination with DSA in the evaluation of pancreas transplant biopsies. [source] Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate for Pancreas Allograft Preservation: The Indiana University ExperienceAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2010J. A. Fridell Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK) has been scrutinized for use in pancreas transplantation. A recent case series and a United Network for Organ Sharing data base review have suggested an increased incidence of allograft pancreatitis and graft loss with HTK compared to the University of Wisconsin solution (UW). Conversely, a recent randomized, controlled study failed to show any significant difference between HTK and UW for pancreas allograft preservation. This study was a retrospective review of all pancreas transplants performed at Indiana University between 2003 and 2009 comparing preservation with HTK or UW. Data included recipient and donor demographics, 7-day, 90-day and 1-year graft survival, peak 30-day serum amylase and lipase, HbA1c and C-peptide levels. Of the 308 pancreas transplants, 84% used HTK and 16% UW. There were more SPK compared to pancreas after kidney and pancreas transplant alone in the HTK group. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. There was no significant difference in 7-day, 90-day or 1-year graft survival, 30-day peak serum amylase and lipase, HbA1c or C-peptide. No clinically significant difference between HTK and UW for pancreas allograft preservation was identified. Specifically, in the context of low-to-moderate flush volume and short cold ischemia time (,10 h), no increased incidence of allograft pancreatitis or graft loss was observed. [source] Pancreatic Graft Survival Despite Partial Vascular Graft Thrombosis due to Splenocephalic AnastomosesAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2010C. Margreiter Thrombotic complications following pancreas transplantation are still the most common cause of nonimmunologic graft loss. The aim of this study was to analyze pancreatic graft function after partial arterial graft thrombosis and the investigation of the pancreatic arterial anatomy with regard to intraparenchymal anastomoses. We retrospectively analyzed the data for 175 consecutive pancreas transplants performed between January 2002 and October 2007. Selective Y-graft angiography was performed in 10 and rubber-milk injection in 5 fresh pancreas specimens. Thrombosis of one leg of the Y-graft was diagnosed in 18 (10.3%) patients. Only one of these patients with thrombosis of the splenic artery required exogenous insulin. Sufficient graft perfusion was demonstrated in all of the remaining grafts. One graft was lost due to acute rejection. In all specimens angiography showed an excellent perfusion of the pancreaticoduodenal arcade, even after selective cannulation of the splenic artery. Arterial collaterals between the gastroduodenal, splenic artery and the superior mesenteric artery were demonstrated. Our results demonstrate that global perfusion of the pancreatic graft and sufficient graft function is sustained after the thrombotic occlusion of one branch of the Y-graft by a complex system of intraparenchymal anastomoses. These anatomical findings may have consequences for resection strategies in pancreas surgery. [source] Total Duodenectomy with Enteric Duct Drainage: A Rescue Operation for Duodenal Complications Occurring after Pancreas TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2010U. Boggi Duodenal graft complications (DGC) occur frequently after pancreas transplantation but rarely cause graft loss. Graft pancreatectomy, however, may be required when DGC compromise recipient's safety. We herein report on two patients with otherwise untreatable DGC in whom the entire pancreas was salvaged by means of total duodenectomy with enteric drainage of both pancreatic ducts. The first patient developed recurrent episodes of enteric bleeding, requiring hospitalization and blood transfusions, starting 21 months after transplantation. The disease causing hemorrhage could not be defined, despite extensive investigations, but the donor duodenum was eventually identified as the site of bleeding. The second patient was referred to us with a duodenal stump leak, 5 months after transplantation. Two previous surgeries had failed to seal the leak, despite opening a diverting stoma above the duodenal graft. Thirty-nine and 16 months after total duodenectomy with dual duct drainage, respectively, both patients are insulin-independent and free from abdominal complaints. Magnetic resonance pancreatography shows normal ducts both basal and after intravenous injection of secretin. The two cases presented herein show that when DGC jeopardize pancreas function or recipient safety, total duodenectomy with enteric duct drainage may become an option. [source] Incidence of and Risk Factors for Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus after Pancreas TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2010N. Neidlinger Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) after pancreas transplantation (PTX) has not been extensively examined. This single center, retrospective analysis of 674 recipients from 1994 to 2005 examines the incidence of and risk factors for PTDM after PTX. PTDM was defined by fasting plasma glucose level ,126 mg/dL, confirmed on a subsequent measurement or treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent for ,30 days. The incidence of PTDM was 14%, 17% and 25% at 3, 5 and 10 years after PTX, respectively and was higher (p = 0.01) in solitary pancreas (PAN) versus simultaneous kidney pancreas (SPK) recipients (mean follow-up 6.5 years). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with PTDM were: older donor age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03,1.06, p < 0.001), higher recipient body mass index (HR 1.07,CI 1.01,1.13, p = 0.01), donor positive/recipient negative CMV status (HR 1.65,CI 1.03,2.6, p = 0.04), posttransplant weight gain (HR 4.7,CI 1.95,11.1, p < 0.001), pancreas rejection (HR 1.94.CI 1.3,2.9, p < 0.001) and 6 month fasting glucose (HR 1.01,CI 1.01,1.02, p < 0.001), hemoglobin A1c, (HR 1.12,CI 1.05,1.22, p = 0.002) and triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein (TG/HDL) ratio (HR 0.94,CI 0.91,0.96, p < 0.001). This study delineates the incidence and identifies risk factors for PTDM after PTX. [source] ASTS Recommended Practice Guidelines for Controlled Donation after Cardiac Death Organ Procurement and TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2009D. J. Reich The American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) champions efforts to increase organ donation. Controlled donation after cardiac death (DCD) offers the family and the patient with a hopeless prognosis the option to donate when brain death criteria will not be met. Although DCD is increasing, this endeavor is still in the midst of development. DCD protocols, recovery techniques and organ acceptance criteria vary among organ procurement organizations and transplant centers. Growing enthusiasm for DCD has been tempered by the decreased yield of transplantable organs and less favorable posttransplant outcomes compared with donation after brain death. Logistics and ethics relevant to DCD engender discussion and debate among lay and medical communities. Regulatory oversight of the mandate to increase DCD and a recent lawsuit involving professional behavior during an attempted DCD have fueled scrutiny of this activity. Within this setting, the ASTS Council sought best-practice guidelines for controlled DCD organ donation and transplantation. The proposed guidelines are evidence based when possible. They cover many aspects of DCD kidney, liver and pancreas transplantation, including donor characteristics, consent, withdrawal of ventilatory support, operative technique, ischemia times, machine perfusion, recipient considerations and biliary issues. DCD organ transplantation involves unique challenges that these recommendations seek to address. [source] Immediate Retransplantation for Pancreas Allograft ThrombosisAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2009E. F. Hollinger Early pancreas allograft failure most commonly results from thrombosis and requires immediate allograft pancreatectomy. Optimal timing for retransplantation remains undefined. Immediate retransplantation facilitates reuse of the same anatomic site before extensive adhesions have formed. Some studies suggest that early retransplantation is associated with a higher incidence of graft loss. This study is a retrospective review of immediate pancreas retransplants performed at a single center. All cases of pancreas allograft loss within 2 weeks were examined. Of 228 pancreas transplants, 12 grafts were lost within 2 weeks of surgery. Eleven of these underwent allograft pancreatectomy for thrombosis. One suffered anoxic brain injury and was not a retransplantation candidate, one was retransplanted at 3.5 months and nine patients underwent retransplantation 1,16 days following the original transplant. Of the nine early retransplants, one pancreas was lost to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, one recipient died with function at 2.9 years and the other grafts continue to function at 76,1137 days (mean 572 days). One-year graft survival for early retransplantation was 89% compared to 91% for all pancreas transplants at our center. Immediate retransplantation following pancreatic graft thrombosis restores durable allograft function with outcomes comparable to first-time pancreas transplantation. [source] Fatal Graft-Versus-Host Disease Presenting as Fever of Unknown Origin in a Pancreas-After-Kidney Transplant RecipientAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2008F. L. Weng Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication of pancreas transplantation. We describe a 54-year-old male with type 1 diabetes who received a zero-antigen mismatched pancreas-after-kidney transplant from a pancreas donor who was homozygous at the HLA-B, -Cw, -DR, and -DQ alleles. Starting on postoperative day (POD) #22, the patient developed persistent fevers. Workup was notable only for low-grade cytomegalovirus viremia, which was treated. The fevers eventually disappeared. On POD #106, the patient was noted to have a diffuse erythematous rash. A skin biopsy was consistent with GVHD. Short tandem repeat DNA analysis of both peripheral blood lymphocytes and skin demonstrated mixed chimerism, confirming the diagnosis of GHVD. Soon after diagnosis, the patient developed pancytopenia and fevers and died of multiorgan failure on POD #145. Transplant clinicians should consider GVHD as a possible, although admittedly rare, cause of fevers of unknown origin in recipients of pancreas transplants. [source] Intrapyloric Injection of Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Persistent Gastroparesis Following Successful Pancreas TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2006R. Ben-Youssef Intrapyloric injection of botulinum toxin A (BoTx) successfully improved symptoms in idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis (DGP) refractory to medical treatment. Therefore, we used it in three pancreas transplant patients done in our institution during the last 18 months. They had severe, persistent DGP despite successful pancreas transplantation. They received 100 units of BoTx during the first injection. The clinical effect became evident within 2 weeks after the treatment, and lasted for an average of 29 weeks (range 14,44 weeks). The patients' subjective evaluation showed improvement of their symptoms and quality of life following BoTx. Patients 2 and 3 had recurrent symptoms at 44 and 24 weeks, respectively, after the first injection; they required a second dose of 90 and 80 units, respectively. They are doing well at 3 months follow-up. Intrapyloric injection of BoTx is safe and efficient. It should be considered for treating residual DGP following successful pancreas transplantation. [source] Evolution of pancreas transplant surgeryANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 6 2010Vincent W. T. Lam Abstract Background:, Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition often leading to disabling complications including retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular disease which can be modified by intensive treatment with insulin. Such treatment, however, is associated with a restrictive lifestyle and risk of hypoglycaemic morbidity and mortality. Methods:, This review examines the role of pancreas transplantation in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Results:, Pancreas transplantation is currently the only proven option to achieve long-term insulin independence, resulting in an improvement or stabilization of those diabetic related complications. The hazards of pancreas transplantation as a major operation are well known. Balancing the risks of a surgical procedure, with the benefits of restoring normoglycaemia remains an important task for the pancreas transplant surgeon. Pancreas transplantation is not an emergency operation to treat poorly managed and non-compliant patients with debilitating complications. It is a highly specialized procedure which has evolved both in terms of the surgical technique, patient selection and assessment. Conclusion:, Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the single most effective way to achieve normal glucose homeostasis in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. [source] The pancreas allograft donor: current status, controversies, and challenges for the futureCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2010Jonathan A. Fridell Fridell JA, Rogers J, Stratta RJ. The pancreas allograft donor: current status, controversies, and challenges for the future. Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 433,449. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract:, The pancreas allograft is a scarce resource that is currently underutilized. The selection of appropriate deceased donors for pancreas procurement is of paramount importance for minimizing technical failure and optimizing long-term outcomes in pancreas transplantation. Despite the increasing demand for pancreas transplantation, increases in overall organ donation rates and the evolution of criteria that constitute an "acceptable" pancreas donor, the number of deceased donor pancreas transplants being performed in the United States has actually declined in recent years. Although there are many factors that must be considered during evaluation of the potential pancreas allograft donor to minimize morbidity and graft loss, it is evident that there are transplantable organs that are not used. In this review, deceased donor pancreas identification, management, selection, allocation, assessment, preservation, and the problem of pancreas underutilization will be discussed. [source] Catheter-directed therapy for DVT after pancreas transplantationCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2007Harish D Mahanty Abstract:, Introduction:, Iliac vein deep venous thrombosis (DVT) ipsilateral to the pancreas transplant can lead to severe leg edema and compromise graft function. Treatment modalities for iliac vein DVT in the pancreas transplant recipient are limited. Methods:, Medical records of patients receiving pancreas transplants at a single center from November 1989 to July 2003 were reviewed retrospectively, identifying patients with iliac vein DVT. There were 287 pancreas transplants performed during this time. Pancreas transplantation in all recipients was performed in the right iliac fossa with the arterial supply consisting of a donor iliac artery Y interposition graft. Systemic venous drainage was to the iliac vein. Exocrine drainage was enteric or to the bladder. Results:, Four (1.4%) cases of iliac DVT were identified. All patients manifested lower extremity edema ipsilateral to the pancreas transplant. DVT was detected by ultrasound on days 4, 5, 13, and 60 post-transplant. In all cases, the iliac vein caudad to the pancreatic venous anastomosis was noted to be stenotic. Management involved balloon dilatation and endovascular stent placement in one patient, thrombolysis with tissue plasma antigen (t-PA) followed by stent placement in one patient, and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in two patients. All patients had improvement in leg edema and two patients continue to have good pancreatic allograft function. Conclusions:, Iliac DVT is a rare complication of pancreas transplantation that usually develops in an area of stenosis caudad to the pancreatic venous anastomosis. Catheter-based treatment modalities with use of endovascular stents for treatment of underlying stenoses can serve as an adjunct in treating these complications. [source] The utility of the C-peptide in the phenotyping of patients candidates for pancreas transplantationCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2007Enric Esmatjes Abstract:, It is not unusual for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) to be performed in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), clinically classified as having type 1 diabetes (T1D). C-peptide determination is useful to identify these patients. We describe the prevalence and characteristics of patients with C-peptide levels >3 ng/mL, classified with T2D in 172 patients referred for SPK from 1998,2006. Nine patients (5.2%) fulfilled this criteria (mean free C-peptide 9.08 ng/mL) and were older at diabetes onset (23.5 vs. 12 yr, p < 0.001) and at assessment (42.2 vs. 37.6 yr, p = 0.047) with shorter time between diabetes onset and renal failure (17.8 vs. 22.7 yr, p = 0.3) compared with T1D patients (mean free C-peptide 0.24 ng/mL). In our experience the prevalence of T2D in candidates for SPK is not negligible. Despite some clinical differences with T1D these T2D patients can phenotypically be confounded with T1D in the absence of C-peptide determination. [source] Validation of a screening protocol for identifying low-risk candidates with type 1 diabetes mellitus for kidney with or without pancreas transplantationCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2006Irene W.Y. Ma Abstract: Background: Certain clinical risk factors are associated with significant coronary artery disease in kidney transplant candidates with diabetes mellitus. We sought to validate the use of a clinical algorithm in predicting post-transplantation mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes. We also examined the prevalence of significant coronary lesions in high-risk transplant candidates. Methods: All patients with type 1 diabetes evaluated between 1991 and 2001 for kidney with/without pancreas transplantation were classified as high-risk based on the presence of any of the following risk factors: age ,45 yr, smoking history ,5 pack years, diabetes duration ,25 yr or any ST,T segment abnormalities on electrocardiogram. Remaining patients were considered low risk. All high-risk candidates were advised to undergo coronary angiography. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality post-transplantation. Results: Eighty-four high-risk and 42 low-risk patients were identified. Significant coronary artery stenosis was detected in 31 high-risk candidates. Mean arterial pressure was a significant predictor of coronary stenosis (odds ratio 1.68; 95% confidence interval 1.14,2.46), adjusted for age, sex and duration of diabetes. In 75 candidates who underwent transplantation with median follow-up of 47 months, the use of clinical risk factors predicted all eight deaths. No deaths occurred in low-risk patients. A significant mortality difference was noted between the two risk groups (p=0.03). Conclusions: This clinical algorithm can identify patients with type 1 diabetes at risk for mortality after kidney with/without pancreas transplant. Patients without clinical risk factors can safely undergo transplantation without further cardiac evaluation. [source] Heel ultrasonography is not a good screening tool for bone loss after kidney and pancreas transplantationCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2004Lynn R Mack-Shipman Abstract:, Background:, Solid organ transplant recipients, particularly simultaneous pancreas kidney recipients, are at high fracture risk. We tested whether quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) of the heel predicts bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in solid organ transplant recipients. Methods:, Thirty-eight transplant recipients (22 Female/16 Male) were studied. Spine and hip BMD was measured with a Hologic DXA scanner. ,Stiffness' of the heel was measured with a Lunar Ultrasound densitometer and compared with BMD by DXA. Contributing factors to bone loss were also assessed. Results:, Mean age was 43.1 ± 1.3 yr. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney, kidney, and pancreas alone transplant recipients were assessed. Mean time post-transplantation was 3.0 ± 0.6 yr. Mean DXA spine T-score was ,1.15 ± 0.22 (mean ± SEM) and hip T-score was ,1.22 ± 0.20. There was no difference in mean T-score between women and men at the hip or spine. Mean right heel stiffness T-score was ,0.97 ± 0.25. There was no correlation between QUS and DXA at either the hip or spine in women or men. QUS had a false negative rate for identifying osteopenia or osteoporosis of 17% compared with DXA. The false positive rate for identifying osteopenia was 61%. Conclusions:, The QUS is an unacceptable tool for identifying those at risk for bone loss after kidney or pancreas transplantation. [source] Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir in kidney, pancreas,kidney, and pancreas transplantationCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2004Gaetano Ciancio Abstract:, Cytomegalovirus, seen in more than 50% of solid organ transplant recipients, is responsible for numerous direct and indirect consequences, including infection with opportunistic pathogens and allograft rejection. Prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir has been the gold standard for prevention; however, intravenous treatment is expensive and carries risks of its own. Oral ganciclovir, to be effective, must be given in large, divided doses. Valganciclovir, the valine ester of ganciclovir, at 900 mg/day, provides oral bioavailability equivalent to that of intravenous ganciclovir and superior to that of oral ganciclovir. This retrospective study assessed the efficacy of 3 months prophylaxis with valganciclovir in kidney, simultaneous pancreas,kidney, and pancreas transplantation. Of 161 patients, all of whom received potent immunosuppressive regimens and were followed for a mean of 440 days, only one developed cytomegalovirus infection, at 120 days post-transplantation. Two patients died, and two others lost their grafts. There were seven incidents of acute rejection. Only seven patients discontinued treatment early, five because of leukopenia. These results suggest that prophylaxis with 900 mg/day of valganciclovir for at least 3 months safely and effectively prevents cytomegalovirus infection in kidney, simultaneous pancreas,kidney and pancreas transplant recipients on highly potent immunosuppression. [source] Hypoglycaemia after pancreas transplantation: usefulness of a continuous glucose monitoring systemCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2003Enric Esmatjes Abstract: Background: After pancreas transplantation (PTx) some patients report occasional symptoms of hypoglycaemia and at times, serious hypoglycaemia. Continuous blood glucose monitoring (CBGM) allows determination of the daily glucose profile and detection of unrecognized hypoglycaemia. The aims of our study were to determine the incidence of hypoglycaemia in PTx and evaluate whether the use of CBGM helps to detect unrecognized nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Patients and methods: We studied 12 patients (six males) with normal functioning PTx and kidney transplantation for more than 3 yr, with systemic drainage of endocrine secretion and stable immunosuppression. A 24-h CBGM using a microdialysis technique (GlucoDay, A. Menarini Diagnostics, Florence, Italy) was performed in all the patients. Results: Three patients had asymptomatic recorded glucose levels below 3.3 nmol/L during the nocturnal period (01:00,07:00 hours) with the glucose levels during these episodes being 2.6, 2.5 and 2.5 nmol/L, and the duration of nocturnal hypoglycaemia being 27, 62 and 93 min, respectively, rising spontaneously without intervention. Patients with hypoglycaemia presented lower glycosylated haemoglobin levels when compared with those not presenting hypoglycaemic episodes, although basal glucose and insulin levels and insulin antibody titres were similar. In one of the three patients presenting hypoglycaemia CBGM was re-evaluated after including an extra snack at bedtime, with subsequent normalization of the blood glucose profile being observed. Conclusion: Unrecognized nocturnal hypoglycaemia is relatively frequent in patients with PTx and 24-h CBMG may be useful to detect these episodes. [source] Management of complications of simultaneous kidney,pancreas transplantation with temporary venting jejunostomyCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2003Kevin N Boykin Abstract:,Background/Aims: The majority of simultaneous kidney,pancreas (SPK) transplants are being performed with portal-enteric drainage, which does not allow easy access to the donor pancreas. By adding a temporary venting jejunostomy (TVJ) we have been able to closely monitor patients for bleeding, anastomotic leak and rejection. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 29 patients undergoing SPK with PE drainage from December 1996 to December 2001. Results: Median follow-up was 32 months. Patient, kidney and pancreas graft survival were 93%, 90% and 93%, respectively. The most common early complications were wound infections and bleeding. No patient suffered vessel thrombosis. The most common late (greater than 3 months post-transplant) complication was gastro-intestinal bleeding. Adequate tissue was obtained for biopsy in 100% of patients with suspected pancreatic rejection. The TVJ allowed one patient to undergo donor pancreas ERCP that demonstrated the site of a pancreatic duct leak. Duodenal stump leak and anastomotic bleeding were diagnosed in one patient each via the TVJ. The median time to takedown of the TVJ was 14 months. Conclusion: TVJ allows patients an easy method of graft surveillance, is well tolerated, and has an acceptable complication rate. The TVJ allows access to diagnose anastomotic leak, cauterize bleeding mucosa, perform ERCP and biopsy the pancreas allograft. [source] |