Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Palliative Resection (palliative + resection)
Selected AbstractsValue of palliative resection in gastric cancerBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 11 2002Dr H. H. Hartgrink Background: Western patients with gastric cancer often present with incurable disease. The role of palliative surgical resection is still debatable. Non-curatively treated patients from the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial were studied to define more accurately which patients might benefit from palliative resection. Methods: In the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial 285 (26 per cent) of the randomized patients were found to have incurable tumours at laparotomy. Four signs of incurability were noted: irresectable tumour (T+), hepatic metastasis (H+), peritoneal metastasis (P+) and distant lymph node metastasis (N4+). Patients had either an explorative laparotomy, a gastroenterostomy, or a resection (partial or total). In the analysis, particular attention was paid to the prognostic factors of age, number of metastatic features, and a combination of these. Results: Overall survival time was greater if a resection was performed (8·1 versus 5·4 months; P < 0·001). For patients aged over 70 years there was still a survival advantage of about 3 months if resection was carried out. Morbidity and perioperative mortality rates in this older age group were, however, high (50 and 20 per cent respectively). For patients with one metastatic site a resection was of significant benefit (survival 10·5 versus 6·7 months; P = 0·034). For patients with two or more metastatic sites resection had no significant survival advantage (5·7 versus 4·6 months; P = 0·084). Combination of these factors indicates that patients aged less than 70 years with one metastatic site will benefit significantly from a palliative resection, in contrast to other combinations of factors. Conclusion: Age as well as the number of metastatic sites should be taken into account when a palliative resection is considered. Palliative resection may be beneficial for patients under 70 years of age if the tumour load is restricted to one metastatic site. © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] Guidelines for palliative surgery of cholangiocarcinomaHPB, Issue 3 2008H. Witzigmann Abstract The aims of the guidelines are to help assess the evidence for palliation surgery in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). The guidelines are classified in accordance with the location of the primary lesion, i.e. intrahepatic, hilar, and distal. They are based on comprehensive literature surveys, including results from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis, and cohort, prospective, and retrospective studies. Intrahepatic CCA, i.e. resection of lymph-node-positive tumors and R1/R2 resections have not been shown to provide survival benefit: Evidence levels: 2b, 4; Recommendation grade C. Hilar CCA: R1 resection is justified as a very efficient palliation. Non-surgical biliary stenting is the first choice of palliative biliary drainage. Distal CCA: Resection of lymph-node-positive tumours and R1/R2 resections should be performed. Non-surgical stenting is regarded as the first choice of palliation for patients with short life expectancy. For patients with longer projected survival, surgical bypass should be considered. Palliative resections have a relevant beneficial impact on the outcome of patients with distal and hilar CCA. Non-surgical stenting is the first choice of palliative biliary drainage for patients with hilar CCA and for those with distal CCA and short life expectancy. For patients with distal CCA and longer projected survival, surgical bypass should be considered. [source] Targets and elective colorectal cancer: outcome and symptom delay at surgical resectionCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 2 2005S. Bharucha Abstract Objective To determine, for elective patients with colorectal cancer, if associations exist between the length of symptom history at surgical resection and Dukes stage, completeness of the surgical procedure and patient survival. Patients and methods A prospective cohort study was undertaken. Five hundred and eighty-two patients with colorectal cancer, admitted for surgical resection after outpatient consultation, divided into four equal quartiles according to length of symptom history (short: n = 131, 0,103 days; medium: n = 136, 104,177 days; long: n = 136, 178,318 days; very long: n = 137, 319,1997 days). The main outcome measures used were the Extent of tumour (Dukes stage) at resection, completeness of resectional surgery (curative vs palliative), patient survival after resection. Results For patients undergoing elective surgical resection of colorectal cancer we did not find an association between Dukes stage and duration of patient history (Dukes stage C tumours were seen in 37% (CI: 26.2%-48.0%) of patients with a short symptomatic history as opposed to 34% (CI: 32%-62%) with a very long symptomatic history). Elective curative resection was not associated with a significantly different symptom duration than elective palliative resection (Palliative resections were performed in 24% (CI: 11.7%-36.4%) of patients with a short symptomatic history as opposed to 16% (CI: 2.4%-29.9%) with a very long symptomatic history). The median survival time for the four elective colorectal patient groups defined by length of symptomatic history was not significantly different , (short: n = 131, 4.3 years; medium: n = 136, 5.9 years; long: n = 136, 7.1 years; very long: n = 137, 5.0 years). Conclusion Tumour extent, completeness of resection and patient outcome after elective colorectal cancer resection was not found to have an association with length of patient history at the time of surgery. [source] A case of small-cell gastric carcinoma with an adenocarcinoma component and hepatic metastases: treatment with systemic and intra-hepatic chemotherapyEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, Issue 5 2007T. CIOPPA md Primary small-cell carcinoma (SmCC) of the stomach is a rare neoplasm with a poor prognosis and unclear histogenesis: to date, only 50 cases, including ours, have been reported in the literature. In the World Health Organization gastrointestinal tumours' classification, SmCC of the stomach has been recognized as an ,independent entity affecting the stomach'. In this paper, the authors present a clinical case and the surgical treatment of an adult with a SmCC of the stomach associated with gastric adenocarcinoma. After laparotomy, a large neoplasm with locoregional extension and multiple liver metastases were found. A palliative resection, subtotal gastrectomy, was performed, followed by systemic and intra-hepatic chemotherapy: computed tomography scan demonstrated a marked response, but the patient died 15 months after the operation. A review of the literature showed that the diagnosis of gastric SmCC is based on immunohistochemical findings. Our experience confirmed the high aggressiveness of this neoplasm, which is generally diagnosed in advanced stage and is unresponsive to chemotherapy, but the combined use of systemic and intra-hepatic chemotherapy shows an acceptable result in a palliative care perspective. [source] Refining indications for contemporary surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the pancreasHPB, Issue 2 2009Aram N. Demirjian Abstract Background:, The pancreas is a rare location for metastatic disease, with only 2,11% of all pancreatic tumours being of non-primary origin. It is also uncommon for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to metastasize to the pancreas (1,3% of cases) and, when it does, it typically occurs substantially after index nephrectomy. It is not known whether all pancreatic metastases need be resected because today's chemo- and biological therapies are increasingly effective in controlling advanced disease. Methods:, Six patients with a variety of symptoms are discussed. Four patients presented with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, ranging from occult to life-threatening in severity. Results:, The four patients with gastrointestinal bleeding had RCC metastases that had eroded into the duodenum and were successfully controlled by palliative pancreaticoduodenectomy or completion pancreatectomy. The other two patients were treated using different chemotherapeutic or biological agents. Conclusions:, Renal cell carcinoma metastases to the pancreas typically occur long after index nephrectomy. Although clinical presentation is variable, palliative resection should be reserved for those who develop complications, such as upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and, in other series, obstructive jaundice. Routine debulking resections do not appear to be indicated because current biological therapies effectively and reliably control disease over long periods. [source] Is palliative resection of the primary tumour, in the presence of advanced rectal cancer, a safe and useful technique for symptom control?ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 4 2004Nasser Al-Sanea Introduction: At some time, every general surgeon will be faced with the task of trying to decide what to do with a patient who presents with rectal cancer and unresectable distant metastases. How safe is resectional surgery? What sort of palliation may be expected following resection of the primary tumour? In an attempt to answer these questions, the management and outcomes of all patients with rectal cancer and distant metastases, who were primarily referred to the colorectal unit at King Faisal Specialist Hospital were examined. Methods: All patients who underwent primary surgery for rectal cancer in the presence of metastatic disease were identified. The charts of these patients were examined and their morbidity, mortality and survival were determined. Results: Over an 8-year period 22 patients (average age 54 years) underwent rectal resectional surgery in the presence of metastatic disease. There were 13 men and nine women. The commonest complaint was rectal bleeding. All patients had chest radiographs. Pulmonary metastases were identified in four patients. Nineteen abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans were performed and eight showed evidence of metastases. Skeletal radiographs in two patients showed evidence of bone metastasis. At operation, intraperitoneal metastases were found in 18 patients. Nine of these were not identified preoperatively. Six patients underwent abdomino-perineal resection, nine anterior resection and seven a Hartmann's procedure. Eight patients developed a significant postoperative complication and one died 42 days after surgery. The mean length of hospital stay was 18.6 days. Nine patients received preoperative radiotherapy. Four patients had palliative radiotherapy, two for bony, one for liver and one for peritoneal metastases. Patients were followed up for a mean of 1.1 years. During follow up, 11 returned to the emergency room on 24 occasions. Two patients required readmission. No patient had further rectal bleeding. The mean survival was 1.3 years. Conclusion: Patients with rectal cancer and unresectable distant metastases can be successfully palliated by resection of the primary tumour with low morbidity and mortality. The early involvement of a palliative care team facilitates patient management and helps patients enjoy what remains of the rest of their lives at home, in comfort and with good symptom control. [source] Value of palliative resection in gastric cancerBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 11 2002Dr H. H. Hartgrink Background: Western patients with gastric cancer often present with incurable disease. The role of palliative surgical resection is still debatable. Non-curatively treated patients from the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial were studied to define more accurately which patients might benefit from palliative resection. Methods: In the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial 285 (26 per cent) of the randomized patients were found to have incurable tumours at laparotomy. Four signs of incurability were noted: irresectable tumour (T+), hepatic metastasis (H+), peritoneal metastasis (P+) and distant lymph node metastasis (N4+). Patients had either an explorative laparotomy, a gastroenterostomy, or a resection (partial or total). In the analysis, particular attention was paid to the prognostic factors of age, number of metastatic features, and a combination of these. Results: Overall survival time was greater if a resection was performed (8·1 versus 5·4 months; P < 0·001). For patients aged over 70 years there was still a survival advantage of about 3 months if resection was carried out. Morbidity and perioperative mortality rates in this older age group were, however, high (50 and 20 per cent respectively). For patients with one metastatic site a resection was of significant benefit (survival 10·5 versus 6·7 months; P = 0·034). For patients with two or more metastatic sites resection had no significant survival advantage (5·7 versus 4·6 months; P = 0·084). Combination of these factors indicates that patients aged less than 70 years with one metastatic site will benefit significantly from a palliative resection, in contrast to other combinations of factors. Conclusion: Age as well as the number of metastatic sites should be taken into account when a palliative resection is considered. Palliative resection may be beneficial for patients under 70 years of age if the tumour load is restricted to one metastatic site. © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] Targets and elective colorectal cancer: outcome and symptom delay at surgical resectionCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 2 2005S. Bharucha Abstract Objective To determine, for elective patients with colorectal cancer, if associations exist between the length of symptom history at surgical resection and Dukes stage, completeness of the surgical procedure and patient survival. Patients and methods A prospective cohort study was undertaken. Five hundred and eighty-two patients with colorectal cancer, admitted for surgical resection after outpatient consultation, divided into four equal quartiles according to length of symptom history (short: n = 131, 0,103 days; medium: n = 136, 104,177 days; long: n = 136, 178,318 days; very long: n = 137, 319,1997 days). The main outcome measures used were the Extent of tumour (Dukes stage) at resection, completeness of resectional surgery (curative vs palliative), patient survival after resection. Results For patients undergoing elective surgical resection of colorectal cancer we did not find an association between Dukes stage and duration of patient history (Dukes stage C tumours were seen in 37% (CI: 26.2%-48.0%) of patients with a short symptomatic history as opposed to 34% (CI: 32%-62%) with a very long symptomatic history). Elective curative resection was not associated with a significantly different symptom duration than elective palliative resection (Palliative resections were performed in 24% (CI: 11.7%-36.4%) of patients with a short symptomatic history as opposed to 16% (CI: 2.4%-29.9%) with a very long symptomatic history). The median survival time for the four elective colorectal patient groups defined by length of symptomatic history was not significantly different , (short: n = 131, 4.3 years; medium: n = 136, 5.9 years; long: n = 136, 7.1 years; very long: n = 137, 5.0 years). Conclusion Tumour extent, completeness of resection and patient outcome after elective colorectal cancer resection was not found to have an association with length of patient history at the time of surgery. [source] Colorectal cancer in the young: a 12-year review of patients 30 years or lessCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 3 2004M. H. Kam Abstract Objectives As the incidence of young colorectal cancer is rising, a review of the characteristics of such malignancy in those under 30 years of age is timely at this stage. Patients and methods Thirty-nine patients (21 M, 18 F) were operated upon over a 12-year period in a single centre. The mean age was 25 years and median follow-up was 20 months. Results Rectal bleeding, change in bowel habit and abdominal pain were the commonest symptoms. Six patients had a positive family history, while four others were diagnosed as index cases of familial adenomatous polyposis. Rectal tumours made up 43% of all colorectal cancers diagnosed. Seventy percent of patients presented at an advanced stage, but curative resection was attempted for 29 patients. Eight underwent palliative resections, 1 had an ileostomy while another underwent a bypass procedure. Eleven patients have died, 14 had no evidence of recurrent disease while 3 were still alive with recurrent disease. Conclusion Age does not affect survival, and early endoscopy is recommended for all with persistent symptoms. Early diagnosis, radical resection and adjuvant therapy still form the cornerstone in management of colorectal cancer in this age group. [source] | ||||||||||