			Home About us Contact

Pain Tolerance Threshold (pain + tolerance_threshold)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

(613) Radiculopathy Treatment Assessment Using Pain Tolerance Test

PAIN MEDICINE, Issue 2 2000
Article first published online: 25 DEC 200
Authors: Y. Eugene Mironer, Carolinas Center for Advanced Management of Pain; Judson J. Somerville, The Pain Management Clinic of Laredo Current measurements of the outcomes of chronic radiculopathy treatment are limited to subjective criteria: level of pain, range of motion, etc. Our previous study showed that nerve conductivity does not correlate well with the intensity of pain after treatment of radiculopathy (1). In the current study we looked at the Pain Tolerance Threshold (PTT) as a possible measurement of the results of radiculopathy treatment. Twenty patients with chronic radiculopathy (13 lumbar and 7 cervical) underwent epidural steroid injections at the level of involvement. Before, and approximately one week after the procedure, we measured PTT in both the involved and contralateral extremity at 3 different frequencies (5Hz, 250Hz, and 2000 Hz) using Neurometer. Level of pain was also assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Initial PTT results showed great interpersonal variability. Nearly half of the patients did not show significant differences in PTT between affected and unaffected sides. Of interest, the majority experienced intolerable pain at 2000 Hz stimulation at lower than maximal intensity output, which contradicts previous findings (2). Dynamics of the PTT measurements after treatment did not directly correlate with changes in the level of pain. Nevertheless, in 7 out of 8 patients with low PTT (relative to the unaffected side) it increased significantly, with noticeable decrease of VAS score. Similar results were not found in patients with either normal initial PTT score or minimal improvement of pain. 1. Mironer YE, Somerville JJ The current perception threshold evaluation in radiculopathy: efficacy in diagnosis and assessment of treatment results. Pain Digest 1998;8:37,38. 2. Liu SS, Gerancher JC, Bainton BG, et al. The effects of electrical stimulation at different frequencies on perception and pain in human volunteers: epidural versus intravenous administration of fentanyl. Anesth Analg 1996;82:98,102. [source]

Association of human ,-opioid receptor gene polymorphism A118G with fentanyl analgesia consumption in Chinese gynaecological patients

ANAESTHESIA, Issue 2 2010
W. Zhang
Summary One hundred and seventy-four Chinese gynaecology patients were studied for the impact of A118G polymorphism in the ,-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) on pain sensitivity and postoperative fentanyl consumption. Pre-operatively, the pain threshold and pain tolerance threshold were measured using electrical stimulation. A118G polymorphism was genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction,restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia provided postoperative pain management, assessed using a visual analogue scale and fentanyl consumed in the first 24 h after surgery was noted. We found the prevalence of G118 allele was 31.3%. The A118G polymorphism had a gene-dose-dependent effect on electrical pain tolerance threshold. Fentanyl consumption was also significantly different in patients with different OPRM1 genotypes (homozygotes for 118G consumed more than did heterozygotes or homozygotes for 118A). Fentanyl consumption increased in accordance with the number of 118G alleles. We conclude that OPRM1 gene analysis may help predict individual opioid sensitivity and so optimise postoperative pain control. [source]

The Role of Central Hypersensitivity in the Determination of Intradiscal Mechanical Hyperalgesia in Discogenic Pain

PAIN MEDICINE, Issue 5 2010
Juerg Schliessbach PhD
Abstract Objective., The primary aim of the present study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between central hypersensitivity (assessed by pressure pain thresholds of uninjured tissues) and intradiscal pain threshold during discography. The secondary aim was to test the hypothesis that peripheral noxious stimulation dynamically modulates central hypersensitivity. Patients., Twenty-four patients with positive provocation discography were tested for central hypersensitivity by pressure algometry before and after the intervention with assessments of pressure pain detection and tolerance thresholds. Intradiscal pain threshold was assessed by measuring intradiscal pressure at the moment of pain provocation during discography. Correlation analyses between intradiscal pain threshold and pressure algometry were made. For the secondary aim, pressure algometry data before and after discography were compared. Results., Significant correlation with intradiscal pain threshold was found for pressure pain detection threshold at the toe (regression coefficient: 0.03, P = 0.05) and pressure pain tolerance thresholds at the nonpainful point at the back (0.02, P = 0.024). Tolerance threshold at the toe was a significant predictor for intradiscal pain threshold only in multiple linear regression (0.036, P = 0.027). Detection as well as tolerance thresholds significantly decreased after discography at the painful and the nonpainful point at the back, but not at the toe. Conclusions., Central hypersensitivity may influence intradiscal pain threshold, but with a modest quantitative impact. The diagnostic value of provocation discography is therefore not substantially impaired. Regional, but not generalized central hypersensitivity is dynamically modulated by ongoing peripheral nociceptive input. [source]