Home About us Contact | |||
Paediatric Assessment (paediatric + assessment)
Selected AbstractsIs paediatric assessment of motor development of very preterm and low-birthweight children appropriate?ACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 10 2006Martin J. K. DE Kleine Abstract Aim: To determine whether paediatricians that examine, in regular clinical practice, very preterm and very-low-birthweight children at 5 y of age detect neurological impairments and functional motor problems in these children. Methods: We compared a paediatric judgement, a standardized neurological examination (Touwen examination) and a screening of motor development (Denver Developmental Screening Test; DDST) with the Movement ABC in 396 5-y-old very preterm and low-birthweight children. Results: The Movement ABC detected clinically important motor disorders in 20.5% and borderline disturbances in 22.5% of the children. Compared to the Movement ABC, the sensitivity of the paediatric judgement was 0.19, Touwen examination 0.62 and DDST 0.52; the negative predictive values were 0.61, 0.74 and 0.69, respectively. Conclusion: Paediatric assessment of motor development in 5-y-old very preterm and low-birthweight children generally is not sensitive enough to detect functional motor problems. The Movement ABC should be added to the assessment of the motor development of very preterm and low-birthweight children at 5 y of age. [source] Reliability reconsidered: Cronbach's alpha and paediatric assessment in occupational therapyAUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, Issue 3 2009Georgia Spiliotopoulou Background/aim:,Using reliable outcome measures is a necessity for the occupational therapy profession in enabling valid assessments of clients. Although Cronbach's alpha is the most widely applied index of internal consistency reliability, there are misconceptions about its use and interpretation. This paper aims to guide assessment developers in paediatric occupational therapy, as well as practitioners who are evaluating outcome measures in using and interpreting the Cronbach's alpha estimates appropriately. This will enable them to decide on the tools' clinical value and incorporate them into their practice with children. Method:,Previously published papers reporting on internal consistency issues of outcome measures in paediatric occupational therapy were searched through the Allied and Complementary Medicine database. These papers were used as a basis to discuss possible reasons for reporting of low internal consistency. Results:,The analysis demonstrates that Cronbach's alpha reports are not always interpreted in a sound way. The paper emphasises that one should be cautious about judging estimates of internal consistency. Low size of the coefficient alpha might not always indicate problems with the construction of the tool; whereas large sizes do not always suggest adequate reliability. Instead, these reports might be related to the data characteristics of the construct. Conclusion:,In judging an outcome measure's internal consistency, researchers and practitioners in occupational therapy should report and consider the nature of data, the scale's length and width, the linearity and the normality of response distribution, the central response tendency, the sample response variability and the sample size. [source] Outcome for children born after in utero laser ablation therapy for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndromeBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 12 2001A.G. Sutcliffe Objective To examine the postnatal development of a group of children born after in utero laser ablation therapy for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Design Retrospective cohort outcome study involving assessment of neurodevelopment and physical well being. Setting Harris Birthright Centre, King's College Hospital, London. Participants Twins and singleton survivors treated via laser ablation therapy for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome over a four-year period. Methods Of 54 families contacted to participate in the study, who had been treated for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome during a four-year period, 24 families attended for paediatric assessment; 12 pairs of twins and 12 singleton survivors were assessed for perinatal, neurological and neurodevelopmental outcome using the Griffiths scales of mental development. A further 20 families were assessed via a proforma after contact with their general practitioner. A comparison of these groups showed no significant differences in sociodemographic factors or severity of disease between responders (44 families, 81.5%) and non-responders (10 families). Results The group of children assessed by a paediatrician had low birthweight (1619g donor, 1814g recipient, 1877g singleton) and had been born preterm (33 weeks twins, 31.2 weeks singleton) with attendant increased resuscitation, neonatal unit admission (mean 40 days) and instrumental delivery. Mean Griffiths scores were within the normal range of ability (91.2 donor vs 97.7 recipient and 101.6 singletons) with the only significant difference being in the locomotor subscale where donor (82.6) and recipient (85.3) were less than singletons: -99.1 (P<0.05). There was no cerebral palsy in the singleton survivors, but there were five cases in the twin group. All except one affected child (with quadriplegia) had mean Griffiths scores in the normal range. In the GP proforma group there was one case, in a twin, of cerebral palsy. Conclusion The overall cerebral palsy rate was 9%: 0% in the singleton survivors group and 13.3% in the twin survivors group. This pilot data highlights the need for careful long term follow up of children affected by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. [source] Is paediatric assessment of motor development of very preterm and low-birthweight children appropriate?ACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 10 2006Martin J. K. DE Kleine Abstract Aim: To determine whether paediatricians that examine, in regular clinical practice, very preterm and very-low-birthweight children at 5 y of age detect neurological impairments and functional motor problems in these children. Methods: We compared a paediatric judgement, a standardized neurological examination (Touwen examination) and a screening of motor development (Denver Developmental Screening Test; DDST) with the Movement ABC in 396 5-y-old very preterm and low-birthweight children. Results: The Movement ABC detected clinically important motor disorders in 20.5% and borderline disturbances in 22.5% of the children. Compared to the Movement ABC, the sensitivity of the paediatric judgement was 0.19, Touwen examination 0.62 and DDST 0.52; the negative predictive values were 0.61, 0.74 and 0.69, respectively. Conclusion: Paediatric assessment of motor development in 5-y-old very preterm and low-birthweight children generally is not sensitive enough to detect functional motor problems. The Movement ABC should be added to the assessment of the motor development of very preterm and low-birthweight children at 5 y of age. [source] |