			Home About us Contact

Pacing Thresholds (pacing + threshold)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	95%

Selected Abstracts

Underestimation of Pacing Threshold as Determined by an Automatic Ventricular Threshold Testing Algorithm

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2006
WILLIAM H. SAUER
In this case report, we describe markedly different pacing thresholds determined by a manual threshold test and the automatic Ventricular Capture Management algorithm. The discrepancy in pacing threshold values reported was due to the difference in the AV intervals used with the different testing methods. We propose that the differences in right ventricular dimensions with altered diastolic filling periods affected the threshold in this patient with a new passive fixation lead in the right ventricular apex. [source]

Moricizine Induced Increase in Pacing Threshold

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1p1 2003
JOHN P. GIROD
GIROD, J.P., et al.: Moricizine Induced Increase in Pacing Threshold. A 72-year-old woman who was experiencing incessant ventricular tachycardia and recurrent automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) firing despite amiodarone therapy was referred to the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Myocardial ischemia and infarction were ruled out by standard means. Several antiarrhythmic medications were tried previously without success. Moricizine, 200 mg three times daily, was initiated and controlled the ventricular tachycardia. However, after the dose of moricizine was titrated upward, the patient became symptomatically bradycardic and the ECG exhibited 2:1 block of her paced rhythm and an increased ventricular pacing threshold. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:110,111) [source]

Programmable Multiple Pacing Configurations Help to Overcome High Left Ventricular Pacing Thresholds and Avoid Phrenic Nerve Stimulation

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2005
OSNAT GUREVITZ
Background: High left ventricular pacing (LVP) thresholds and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) are common problems with cardiac resynchronization (CRT). Newer systems capable of multiple LVP configurations may help overcome these problems without the need for reoperation. Methods: CRT systems capable of multiple LVP configurations (Guidant models H155 and H145) were implanted in 43 patients (study group). An additional 49 patients (control group) received CRT systems (Guidant, Medtronic, Biotronik, St. Jude Medical, various models) lacking this feature. Results: Overall, acute high (,2.5 V/0.5 ms) LVP thresholds were encountered in 13 (30%) of the study group, and 25 (50%) of control group patients (P = 0.03). PNS was encountered in 5 (12%) of the study group and 12 (24%) of control group patients (P = 0.13). All cases of high LVP thresholds and PNS in the study group were managed by switching to a different LVP configuration, while high thresholds remained in control group patients, and PNS was managed by replacing the lead. The CS lead was successfully placed in a lateral branch in 95% of study group, compared to only 77% of control group patients (P = 0.004). Conclusions: Multiple LVP configurations were clinically useful in a significant number of patients undergoing CRT system implantation by helping to overcome high LVP thresholds and PNS, and by providing more flexibility in placing the LV lead. [source]

Long-term Stability of Endocardial Left Ventricular Pacing Leads Placed via the Coronary Sinus

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2009
GRACE LIN M.D.
Background: Left ventricular endocardial pacing leads placed via the coronary sinus (CS) are increasingly implanted to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); however, the long-term stability of these leads is unknown. We sought to determine the implant success and long-term stability of CS leads in our single center experience. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent CRT via implantation of the CS lead between January 1999 and December 2005 were included. Pacing thresholds at implant and during long-term follow-up were reviewed and the rate of acute (within 24 hours of implant) and chronic (>24 hours) lead failure was determined. Results: A total of 512 patients (mean age 68 ± 12 years; 409 [80%] male) underwent CRT device implantation and were included. The CS lead implantation was successful on the initial implantation in 487 patients (95%) and subsequently successful in six patients (24%) in whom initial attempts were unsuccessful. Acute lead failure occurred in 25 patients (5.1%) and was most commonly due to persistent extra-cardiac stimulation. The rate of chronic lead failure was 4% in the first year and remained stable during long-term follow-up. The CS lead pacing thresholds remained stable with only minimal increase (1.42 ± 0.85 V/0.42 ± 0.25 ms vs 1.51 ± 1.05 V/0.47 ± 0.29 ms; P = 0.04). Conclusions: Placement of a left ventricular pacing lead via the CS is feasible and safe in the vast majority of patients. Once placed, the CS leads remain stable with excellent pacing thresholds over the longer term. [source]

Excitation of the Intrinsic Conduction System Through His and Interventricular Septal Pacing

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2006
TIMOTHY G LASKE
Background: Direct His bundle pacing results in rapid synchronous ventricular activation. However, clinical experiences with such pacing have been associated with long procedure times and compromised pacing and sensing performance. Methods: We evaluated myocardial activation sequences (AS) for pacing of the His bundle and peri-His region and assessed acute pacing performance using custom-designed plunge electrodes. Unipolar pacing was performed in isolated swine hearts (n = 10) using four quadripolar stimulation/sensing electrodes implanted into the interventricular septum and equally spaced between the membranous septum and the coronary sinus ostium (zones 1,4, respectively; electrode depth (ED) 1 = most distal, ED 4 = most proximal). Optimal pacing sites were defined as: pacing thresholds ,1.5 V, a P-R ratio of ,0.5, and ,50% occurrence of an intrinsic midseptal left ventricular (LV) endocardial electrical breakout (BO) and activation pattern. Results: Pacing thresholds improved with greater depth of electrode location within the septum (ED 1: 1.51 ± 0.8 V vs ED 4: 5.2 ± 3.8 V, P < 0.001), as did the P-R ratio (0.34 ± 0.6 vs 0.78 ± 1.0, P < 0.05). His potentials were only observed in zone 1 and 2 electrodes (0.12 and 0.02 mV, respectively). Only electrodes in zones 1 and 2 produced LV endocardial electrical BOs in the midseptal region that demonstrated an intrinsic-like endocardial AS. Depth 1 and 2 electrodes (11.75 and 8.75 mm, respectively) in zone 1 satisfied all three optimal pacing site requirements. Conclusions: This study has shown that LV activation patterns similar to sinus rhythm may be achieved without direct activation of the His bundle, while maintaining acceptable pacing and sensing performance. These data indicate that pacing systems designed to stimulate the tissues below the point at which the His bundle penetrates the central fibrous body may provide improved system efficiency and LV performance in comparison to both direct His bundle pacing and traditional pacing sites. [source]

Pacing During Ventricular Fibrillation: Factors Influencing the Ability to Capture

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2001
JONATHAN C. NEWTON M.S.
Pacing During Ventricular Fibrillation.Introduction: Recent studies showed that pacing atrial and ventricular fibrillation (VF) is possible. The studies presented here determined which parameters influence the efficacy of a pacing train to capture fibrillating ventricular myocardium. Electrode type, current strength, order of pacing trains, polarity, and VF morphology preceding the pacing trains were investigated. Methods and Results: A 504-electrode recording plaque sutured to the right ventricle of pig hearts was used to record the activations of VF and those resulting from the pacing stimulation. Capture of VF by pacing was determined by observing an animated display of the first temporal derivative of the electrograms. A series of electrodes in a line captured the heart more frequently during VF than did a point electrode. Increasing the current strength to 10× diastolic pacing threshold increased the incidence of capture, but increasing this strength further did not. The second or third train of 40 stimuli had greater capture rates than did the first train during the same VF episode. Anodal and cathodal unipolar, and bipolar stimulation were equally efficacious in capturing VF. VF activation during the 1-second interval preceding pacing was more organized for pacing trains that captured than those that did not. The highest incidence of capture, 46% to 61% of pacing trains, occurred with a line of electrodes at 10× diastolic pacing threshold delivered by the second or third train. Conclusion: The probability of a pacing train capturing fibrillating myocardium can be influenced by the pacing protocol parameters. [source]

Achieving Permanent Left Ventricular Pacing,Options and Choice

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2009
ERNEST W. LAU M.D.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires permanent left ventricular (LV) pacing. Coronary sinus (CS) lead placement is the first line clinical approach but can be difficult or impossible; may suffer from a high LV pacing threshold, phrenic nerve stimulation, and dislodgement; and produces epicardial LV pacing, which is less physiological and hemodynamically effective and potentially more proarrhythmic than endocardial LV pacing. CS leads can usually be extracted with direct traction but may require use of extraction sheaths. Half of CS side branches previously used for lead placement may be unusable for the same purpose after successful lead extraction, and 30% of CS lead reimplantation attempts may fail due to exhaustion of side branches. Surgical epicardial LV lead placement is the more invasive second line approach, produces epicardial LV pacing, and has a lead failure rate of ,15% in 5 years. Transseptal endocardial LV lead placement is the third line approach, can be difficult to achieve, but produces endocardial LV pacing. The major concern with transseptal endocardial LV leads is systemic thromboembolism, but the risk is unknown and oral anticoagulation is advised. Among the new CRT recipients in the United States and Western Europe between 2003 and 2007, 22,798 patients may require CS lead revisions, 9,119 patients may have no usable side branches for CS lead replacement, and 1,800 patients may require surgical epicardial LV lead revision in the next 5 years. The CRT community should actively explore and develop alternative approaches to LV pacing to meet this anticipated clinical demand. [source]

Evaluation of Fractal-Coated Temporary Pacing Leads in the Early Postoperative Course

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2008
FRITZ MELLERT M.D.
Background:The performance of temporary pacing wires is still limited by capture and sensing problems. Fractal coating can enhance electrical properties and reliability. We therefore investigated fractal-laminated wires in comparison with conventional wires. Methods:In 21 patients two unipolar, fractal-coated pacing wires (fe) and one conventional bipolar electrode (se) were implanted in ventricular position. Afterward pacing threshold (V), R-wave sensing (mV), lead impedance (ohm), and slew-rate (mV/s) were measured. Loss of capture or sensing and dislocation was documented. fe wires were examined with energy dispersive x-ray diffraction (EDX)-analysis and scanning electrode microscopy (SEM). Results:Failure in pacing was less frequent in fe wires. Also fe leads had lower pacing thresholds at implantation (0.76 ± 0.15 V vs 1.51 ± 0.95 V, P< 0.0001) and afterward. Furthermore fe wires showed lower increase of pacing threshold/time (0.25 V/day vs 0.42 V/day). R-wave sensing and slew-rate values in the fe group on day of operation (5.81 ± 4.80 mV; 0.63 ± 0.71 V/s) were lower than in the se group (10.37 ± 6.89 mV; 1.85 ± 1.71 V/s P< 0.0001) and afterward. Nevertheless, decrease of amplitude/time was lower in fe wires (0.17mV/day vs 0.46 mV/day). fe wires always had lower impedance values. Conclusions:Lower pacing threshold and increase of threshold/time in fe wires indicate more reliable function. Initial lower sensitivity values are still not understandable and must be investigated. However, fe wires, constancy of sensing and impedance values was more stable, so fe epicardial wires can be recommended for safe and feasible use. [source]

Percutaneous Lead Implantation Connected to an External Device in Stimulation-Dependent Patients with Systemic Infection,A Prospective and Controlled Study

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2006
MARTIN U. BRAUN
Background: Permanent pacemaker implantation usually is contraindicated in patients with systemic infection. The aim of the present study was to compare two different techniques of transvenous temporary pacing to bridge the infectious situation until permanent pacemaker implantation under infection-free conditions is possible. Methods and Results: Forty-nine patients with systemic infection and hemodynamic-relevant bradyarrhythmia/asystole were temporarily paced using either a conventional pacing wire/catheter (n = 26, reference group) or a permanent bipolar active pacing lead, which was placed transcutaneously in the right ventricle and connected to an external pacing generator (n = 23, external lead group). In both groups, there were no significant differences in patient characteristics. Whereas the sensing values were almost identical, the median pacing threshold was significantly higher in the reference group (1.0 V vs 0.6 V, P < 0.05). Within comparable duration of pacing (median: 8.2 vs 7.7 days), there were 24 pacing-related adverse events (including dislocation, resuscitation due to severe bradycardia, or local infection) in the reference group as compared to one event in the external lead group (P < 0.01). None of these complications resulted in cardiac death. Conclusion: Thus, transvenous pacing with active fixation is safe and associated with a significantly lower rate of pacing-related adverse events as compared to the standard technique of transvenous pacing using a passive external pacing catheter. [source]

Compatibility of Automatic Threshold Tracking Pacemakers with Previously Implanted Pacing Leads in Children

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2002
OSMAN KUCUKOSMANOGLU
KUCUKOSMANOGLU, O., et al.: Compatibility of Automatic Threshold Tracking Pacemakers with Previously Implanted Pacing Leads in Children. The Autocapture function controls and optimizes the amplitude of the pacing pulse and saves energy. The manufacturer recommends using a special low polarization, low threshold bipolar Pacesetter lead for the Autocapture function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the compatibility of Autocapture with previously implanted pacing leads. The study included 15 patients (mean age 13.6 ± 3.4 years) who needed pulse generator replacement and received the VVIR pacemaker Regency SR+ or the DDDR pacemakers Affinity DR or Integrity DR with the Autocapture function. The new pulse generators connected to previously implanted ventricular leads. At the time of implantation the pacing threshold was 1.0 ± 0.35 V at 0.5 ms, the lead impedance was 580 ± 80 ,, and the spontaneous R wave amplitude was 7.89 ± 4.89 mV. The polarization signal (PS) was 3.8 ± 3.04 mV, and evoked response (ER) was 8.15 ± 4.57 mV at the predischarge testing. Follow-up telemetry was done at months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18. The follow-up duration was 9.4 ± 5 months (range 1,18 months). If the results of PS and ER measurements were acceptable for Autocapture, it turned on at the 1-month visit. In six (40%) patients the results were found acceptable for Autocapture function. Age, lead impedance, pacing threshold, intrinsic R wave measurement, lead age, fixation mechanism, and ER measurements were not statistically different in Autocapture suitable and not suitable groups. The main reason not to activate Autocapture had been increased PS. Any significant fluctuations were not observed in pacing threshold, lead impedance, ER, and PS during follow-up. In conclusion, previously implanted pacing leads may be compatible with the Autocapture function. [source]

Mapping the Coronary Sinus and Great Cardiac Vein

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2002
MICHAEL GIUDICI
GIUDICI, M., et al.: Mapping the Coronary Sinus and Great Cardiac Vein. The purpose of this study was to develop a better understanding of the pacing and sensing characteristics of electrodes placed in the proximal cardiac veins. A detailed mapping of the coronary sinus (CS) and great cardiac vein (GCV) was done on 25 patients with normal sinus rhythm using a deflectable electrophysiological catheter. Intrinsic bipolar electrograms and atrial and ventricular pacing voltage thresholds were measured. For measurement purposes, the GCV and the CS were each subdivided into distal (D), middle (M), and proximal (P) regions, for a total of six test locations. Within the CS and GCV, the average atrial pacing threshold was always lower (P < 0.05) than the ventricle with an average ventricular to atrial ratio > 5, except for the GCV-D. The average atrial threshold in the CS and GCV ranged from 0.2, to 1.0-V higher than in the atrial appendage. Diaphragmatic pacing was observed in three patients. Atrial signal amplitude was greatest in the CS-M, CS-D, and GCV-P and smaller in the CS-P, GCV-M, and GCV-D. Electrode spacing did not significantly affect P wave amplitude, while narrower electrode spacing attenuated R wave amplitude. The average P:R ratio was highest with 5-mm-spaced electrodes compared to wider spaced pairs. The P:R ratio in the CS was higher (P < 0.05) than in all positions of the GVC. It is possible to pace the atrium independent of the ventricle at reasonably low thresholds and to detect atrial depolarization without undue cross-talk or noise using closely spaced bipolar electrode pairs. The areas of the proximal, middle, and distal CS produced the best combination of pacing and sensing parameters. [source]

Unexpected Loss of Bipolar Pacing With Implanted Dual Chamber Pacemakers

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2000
G. BIH-FANG GUO
Bipolar leads are most commonly used in the current practice of pacemaker therapy. In our study of 124 patients implanted with Guidant/Cardiac Pacemakers (CPI) Vigor dual chamber pacemakers, 5 patients had unexpectedly abrupt increases in bipolar lead impedance and pacing threshold 2 weeks to 18 months postimplantation without changes in sensing function. With the lead configuration reprogrammed to unipolar, the lead impedance and pacing threshold were restored to appropriate ranges. The changes in bipolar lead parameters can be caused by the CPI's "Quick Connect" (QC1) header lead system incorporated in these pacemakers. [source]

Electrophysiological determinants of hypokalaemia-induced arrhythmogenicity in the guinea-pig heart

ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, Issue 4 2009
O. E. Osadchii
Abstract Aim:, Hypokalaemia is an independent risk factor contributing to arrhythmic death in cardiac patients. In the present study, we explored the mechanisms of hypokalaemia-induced tachyarrhythmias by measuring ventricular refractoriness, spatial repolarization gradients, and ventricular conduction time in isolated, perfused guinea-pig heart preparations. Methods:, Epicardial and endocardial monophasic action potentials from distinct left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) recording sites were monitored simultaneously with volume-conducted electrocardiogram (ECG) during steady-state pacing and following a premature extrastimulus application at progressively reducing coupling stimulation intervals in normokalaemic and hypokalaemic conditions. Results:, Hypokalaemic perfusion (2.5 mm K+ for 30 min) markedly increased the inducibility of tachyarrhythmias by programmed ventricular stimulation and rapid pacing, prolonged ventricular repolarization and shortened LV epicardial and endocardial effective refractory periods, thereby increasing the critical interval for LV re-excitation. Hypokalaemia increased the RV-to-LV transepicardial repolarization gradients but had no effect on transmural dispersion of APD90 and refractoriness across the LV wall. As determined by local activation time recordings, the LV-to-RV transepicardial conduction and the LV transmural (epicardial-to-endocardial) conduction were slowed in hypokalaemic heart preparations. This change was attributed to depressed diastolic excitability as evidenced by increased ventricular pacing thresholds. Conclusion:, These findings suggest that hypokalaemia-induced arrhythmogenicity is attributed to shortened LV refractoriness, increased critical intervals for LV re-excitation, amplified RV-to-LV transepicardial repolarization gradients and slowed ventricular conduction in the guinea-pig heart. [source]

Long-term Stability of Endocardial Left Ventricular Pacing Leads Placed via the Coronary Sinus

Atrial Lead Dysfunction: An Unusual Feature of Hypothyroidism

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2008
KRISTEN K. PATTON M.D.
Hypothyroidism is known to have a multitude of cardiac electrophysiologic effects, including bradycardia, atrioventricular block, prolonged QT interval, and elevated ventricular pacing thresholds. We report the case of a 36-year-old woman who presented with isolated dysfunction of her atrial pacemaker lead, which reversed with thyroid hormone replacement. [source]

Evaluation of Fractal-Coated Temporary Pacing Leads in the Early Postoperative Course

Use of an Intracardiac Electrogram Eliminates the Need for a Surface ECG during Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-Up

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2007
KEVIN A. MICHAEL M.B.Ch.B.
Background:A surface electrocardiogram (SECG) for pacing threshold measurements during routine implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) follow-up can be cumbersome. This study evaluated the use of an intrathoracic far-field electrogram (EGM) derived between the Can and superior vena cava (SVC) electrode,the Leadless electrocardiogram (LLECG), in dual chamber ICDs in performing pacing threshold tests. Methods:The LLECG was evaluated prospectively during atrial and ventricular pacing threshold testing as a substudy of the Comparison of Empiric to Physician-Tailored Programming of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators trial (EMPIRIC) in which dual chamber ICDs were implanted in 888 patients. Threshold tests were conducted at 1 volt by decrementing the pulse width. Follow-up at three months compared pacing thresholds measured using LLECG with those using Lead I of the surface ECG (SECG). The timesaving afforded by LLECG was assessed by a questionnaire. Results:The median threshold difference between LLECG and SECG measurements for both atrial (0.00 ms, P = 0.90) and ventricular (0.00 ms, P = 0.34) threshold tests were not significant. Ninety percent of atrial and ventricular threshold differences were bounded by ± 0.10 ms and ,0.10 to +0.04 ms, respectively. We found that 99% of atrial and ventricular thresholds tests at six and 12 months attempted using LLECG were successfully completed. The questionnaire indicated that 65% of healthcare professionals found LLECG to afford at least some timesaving during device follow-ups. Conclusion:Routine follow-up can be performed reliably and expeditiously in dual chamber Medtronic (Minneapolis, MN, USA) ICDs using LLECG alone, resulting in overall timesaving. [source]

Pseudo Crosstalk Behavior in a Patient with Atrio-ventricular Block and Implanted Biventricular Defibrillator

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2007
REGINALD T. HO M.D.
We present a 59-year-old man with a dilated cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction = 20%), congestive heart failure and atrio-ventricular (AV) block who underwent implantation of a biventricular defibrillator (BiV ICD). While undergoing cardiac transplant evaluation for drug-refractory ventricular fibrillation, his telemetry recorded findings resembling crosstalk inhibition. Device interrogation was normal. All episodes occurred at 1:00 a.m. suggesting a routine device operation. Left ventricular capture management, a new feature that automatically measures left ventricular pacing thresholds at 1:00 a.m., had been programmed to Monitor. Understanding this sophisticated pacing algorithm might avoid confusion when operative in patients with AV block. [source]

Noncatheter-Based Delivery of a Single-Chamber Lumenless Pacing Lead in Small Children

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2007
DAMIEN KENNY M.B.Ch.B., M.R.C.P.C.H.
Objectives:The model 3830 lead (SelectSecureÔ Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) is a bipolar, fixed-screw, 4.1-F pacing lead designed for site-selective pacing. Implantation is usually performed using an 8-F deflectable catheter system. This catheter is not ideal for smaller children because of both the sheath size and the relatively large deflected curves. We describe a simpler noncatheter-based delivery system in seven children. Methods:A 4.1-F SelectSecure lead was introduced via a 5-F SafeSheath (Thomas Medical, Malvern, PA, USA) placed in the left subclavian vein. The SelectSecure lead was passed into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and a loop created, which was then withdrawn into the right atrium. Once in position, the lead was screwed into the myocardium, the SafeSheath was peeled off, and the lead connected to the generator. Results:From March 2005 until September 2006, five right atrial leads and two right ventricular leads were implanted in seven patients (six female) with a median weight of 15 kg (8.1,19.4). All leads were successfully placed with excellent pacing thresholds. The median screening time was 7.1 minutes (4.8,11.4) with a median radiation dose of 83 cGy cm2. There were no procedural complications and no lead displacements seen on a median follow-up of 10 months. Conclusions:Delivery of the 4.1-F SelectSecure pacing lead to the right heart is possible using a noncatheter-based delivery system. This is effective and safe and does not require the use of a larger delivery system. This allows these thin isodiametric pacing leads to be used advantageously in small children. [source]

Feasibility Of Temporary Biventricular Pacing In Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2007
FRANK EBERHARDT M.D.
Background and Methods: Biventricular pacing improves hemodynamics after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with severely reduced left ventricular (LV) function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We examined the feasibility of temporary biventricular pacing for 96 hours postoperatively. Unipolar epicardial wires were placed on the roof of the right atrium (RA), the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract, and the LV free lateral wall and connected to an external pacing device in 51 patients (mean LV ejection fraction 35 ± 4%). Pacing and sensing thresholds, lead survival and incidence of pacemaker dysfunction were determined. Results: Atrial and RV pacing thresholds increased significantly by the 4th postoperative day, from 1.6 ± 0.2 to 2.5 ± 0.3 V at 0.5 ms (P = 0.03) at the RA, 1.4 ± 0.3 V to 2.7 ± 0.4 mV (P = 0.01) at the RV, and 1.9 ± 0.6 V to 2.9 ± 0.7 mV (P = 0.3) at the LV, while sensing thresholds decreased from 2.0 ± 0.2 to 1.7 ± 0.2 mV (P = 0.18) at the RA, 7.2 ± 0.8 to 5.1 ± 0.7 mV (P = 0.05) at the RV, and 9.4 ± 1.3 to 5.5 ± 1.1 mV (P = 0.02) at the LV. The cumulative overall incidence of lead failure was 24% by the 4th postoperative day, and was similar at the RV and LV. We observed no ventricular proarrhythmia due to pacing or temporary pacemaker malfunction. Conclusions: Biventricular pacing after CABG using a standard external pacing system was feasible and safe. [source]

Underestimation of Pacing Threshold as Determined by an Automatic Ventricular Threshold Testing Algorithm

Excitation of the Intrinsic Conduction System Through His and Interventricular Septal Pacing

Safety of Pacemaker Implantation Prior to Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrioventricular Junction in a Single Session Procedure

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2000
ALESSANDRO PROCLEMER
RF current delivery may cause acute and chronic dysfunction of previously implanted pacemakers. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the effects of RF energy on Thera I and Kappa pacemakers in 70 consecutive patients (mean age 70 ± 11 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 48 ± 15%) who underwent RF ablation of the AV junction for antiarrhythmic drug refractory atrial fibrillation (permanent in 42 patients, paroxysmal in 28). These pacing systems incorporate protection elements to avoid electromagnetic interference. The pacemakers (Thera DR 7960 I in 20 patients, Thera SR 8960 1 in 30, Kappa DR 600,601 in 8, Kappa SR 700,701 in 12) were implanted prior to RF ablation in a single session procedure and were transiently programmed to VVI mode at a rate of 30 beats/min. Capsure SP and Z unibipolar leads were used. During RF application there was continuous monitoring of three ECG leads, endocavitary electrograms, and event markers. Complete AV block was achieved in all cases after 3.6 ± 2.9 RF pulses and 100 ± 75 seconds of RF energy delivery. The mean time of pacemaker implantation and RF ablation was 60 ± 20 minutes. Transient or permanent pacemaker dysfunction including under/oversensing, reversion to a "noise-mode" pacing, pacing inhibition, reprogramming, or recycling were not observed. Leads impedance, sensing, and pacing thresholds remained in the normal range in the acute and long-term phase (average follow-up 18 ± 12 months). In conclusion, Thera I and Kappa pacemakers exhibit excellent protection against interference produced by RF current. The functional integrity of the pacemakers and Capsure leads was observed in the acute and chronic phases. Thus, the implantation of these pacing systems prior to RF ablation of the AV junction can be recommended. [source]