Home About us Contact | |||
Pacing Systems (pacing + system)
Selected AbstractsSafety of Deferring the Reimplantation of Pacing Systems After Their Removal for Infectious Complications in Selected Patients: A 1-Year Follow-Up StudyJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2010ELOI MARIJON M.D. Introduction: Recent expert consensus guidelines mention that one of the principles for infected device replacement following removal is to "reevaluate carefully if there is a continued need for a new cardiac device replacement." This is a Class I recommendation, which nevertheless suffers from a very low level of evidence (level of evidence C), since no study has revisited the systematic practice of reimplanting the same device based on a meticulous clinical reassessment. In the present paper, we examined the safety of withholding the implantation of pacing systems in selected patients. Methods and Results: Between January 2005 and December 2007, 188 consecutive patients underwent extractions of infected pacing systems at 2 medical centers. "Low-risk" patients were identified by (1) a spontaneous heart rate >45 bpm, (2) no symptomatic asystole during monitoring, (3) QRS duration <120 ms when history of AV block was noted, (4) no high-degree AV block during continuous monitoring. They remained device-free, unless an adverse clinical event occurred mandating the reimplantation. The primary study endpoint was rate of sudden death and syncope after a 12-month follow-up. Among the 74 (39.4%) "low-risk" patients, a single patient suffered a bradycardia-related syncopal event corresponding to a 1.3% (95% CI, 0.0,3.9) rate of primary endpoint. Pacing systems were also reimplanted in 24 patients (32.4%) for syncope (n = 1), nonsevere bradycardia-reated symptoms (n = 17), cardiac resynchronization (n = 2), and for reassurance in 4 asymptomatic patients. Conclusion: After removal of infected pacing systems, these preliminary data demonstrated that a strategy of nonsystematic device reimplantation associated with close surveillance was safe in "low-risk" patients, allowing the administration of antimicrobials in a device-free state. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 540-544, May 2010) [source] Addition of a Left Ventricular Lead to Conventional Pacing Systems in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Feasibility, Safety, and Early Results in 60 Consecutive PatientsPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2002CINDY M. BAKER BAKER, C.M., et al.: Addition of a Left Ventricular Lead to Conventional Pacing Systems in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Feasibility, Safety, and Early Results in 60 Consecutive Patients. Left bundle branch block worsens congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients with LV dysfunction. Asynchronous LV activation produced by RV apical pacing leads to paradoxical septal motion and inefficient ventricular contraction. Recent studies show improvement in LV function and patient symptoms with biventricular pacing in patients with CHF. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, acute efficacy, and early effect on symptoms of the upgrade of a chronically implanted RV pacing system to a biventricular system. Sixty patients with NYHA Class III and IV underwent the upgrade procedure using commercially available leads and adapters. The procedure succeeded in 54 (90%) of 60 patients. Acute LV stimulation thresholds obtained from leads placed along the lateral LV wall via the coronary sinus compare favorably to those reported in current biventricular pacing trials. The complication rate was low (5/60, 8.3%): lead dislodgement (n = 1), pocket hematoma (n = 1), and wound infections (n = 3). During 18 months of follow-up (16.7%) of 60 patients died. Two patients that died failed the initial upgrade attempt. At 3-month follow-up, quality of life scores improved 31 ± 28 points (n = 29), P < 0.0001). NYHA Class improved from 3.4 ± 0.5 to 2.4 ± 0.7 (P = < 0.0001) and ejection fraction increased from 0.23 ± 0.8 to 0.29 ± 0.11 (P = 0.0003). Modification of RV pacing to a biventricular system using commercially available leads and adapters can be performed effectively and safely. The early results of this study suggest patients may benefit from this procedure with improved functional status and quality of life. [source] Safety of Deferring the Reimplantation of Pacing Systems After Their Removal for Infectious Complications in Selected Patients: A 1-Year Follow-Up StudyJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2010ELOI MARIJON M.D. Introduction: Recent expert consensus guidelines mention that one of the principles for infected device replacement following removal is to "reevaluate carefully if there is a continued need for a new cardiac device replacement." This is a Class I recommendation, which nevertheless suffers from a very low level of evidence (level of evidence C), since no study has revisited the systematic practice of reimplanting the same device based on a meticulous clinical reassessment. In the present paper, we examined the safety of withholding the implantation of pacing systems in selected patients. Methods and Results: Between January 2005 and December 2007, 188 consecutive patients underwent extractions of infected pacing systems at 2 medical centers. "Low-risk" patients were identified by (1) a spontaneous heart rate >45 bpm, (2) no symptomatic asystole during monitoring, (3) QRS duration <120 ms when history of AV block was noted, (4) no high-degree AV block during continuous monitoring. They remained device-free, unless an adverse clinical event occurred mandating the reimplantation. The primary study endpoint was rate of sudden death and syncope after a 12-month follow-up. Among the 74 (39.4%) "low-risk" patients, a single patient suffered a bradycardia-related syncopal event corresponding to a 1.3% (95% CI, 0.0,3.9) rate of primary endpoint. Pacing systems were also reimplanted in 24 patients (32.4%) for syncope (n = 1), nonsevere bradycardia-reated symptoms (n = 17), cardiac resynchronization (n = 2), and for reassurance in 4 asymptomatic patients. Conclusion: After removal of infected pacing systems, these preliminary data demonstrated that a strategy of nonsystematic device reimplantation associated with close surveillance was safe in "low-risk" patients, allowing the administration of antimicrobials in a device-free state. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 540-544, May 2010) [source] Feasibility Of Temporary Biventricular Pacing In Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function After Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2007FRANK EBERHARDT M.D. Background and Methods: Biventricular pacing improves hemodynamics after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with severely reduced left ventricular (LV) function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We examined the feasibility of temporary biventricular pacing for 96 hours postoperatively. Unipolar epicardial wires were placed on the roof of the right atrium (RA), the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract, and the LV free lateral wall and connected to an external pacing device in 51 patients (mean LV ejection fraction 35 ± 4%). Pacing and sensing thresholds, lead survival and incidence of pacemaker dysfunction were determined. Results: Atrial and RV pacing thresholds increased significantly by the 4th postoperative day, from 1.6 ± 0.2 to 2.5 ± 0.3 V at 0.5 ms (P = 0.03) at the RA, 1.4 ± 0.3 V to 2.7 ± 0.4 mV (P = 0.01) at the RV, and 1.9 ± 0.6 V to 2.9 ± 0.7 mV (P = 0.3) at the LV, while sensing thresholds decreased from 2.0 ± 0.2 to 1.7 ± 0.2 mV (P = 0.18) at the RA, 7.2 ± 0.8 to 5.1 ± 0.7 mV (P = 0.05) at the RV, and 9.4 ± 1.3 to 5.5 ± 1.1 mV (P = 0.02) at the LV. The cumulative overall incidence of lead failure was 24% by the 4th postoperative day, and was similar at the RV and LV. We observed no ventricular proarrhythmia due to pacing or temporary pacemaker malfunction. Conclusions: Biventricular pacing after CABG using a standard external pacing system was feasible and safe. [source] Successful Implantation of a Coronary Sinus Lead After Stenting of a Coronary Vein StenosisPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2003BERRY M. VAN GELDER Dislodgment of the coronary sinus lead was observed in a 79-year-old patient 8 months after implantation of a biventricular pacing system. A severe stenosis in the posterolateral branch, in which the lead was previously positioned, prohibited reinsertion of the lead. Because no other branches with adequate anatomy for lead insertion were available in the targeted area, the stenosis was dilated and stented. Subsequently, the left ventricular lead could be reimplanted in the same vessel. (PACE 2003; 26:1904,1906) [source] Addition of a Left Ventricular Lead to Conventional Pacing Systems in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Feasibility, Safety, and Early Results in 60 Consecutive PatientsPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2002CINDY M. BAKER BAKER, C.M., et al.: Addition of a Left Ventricular Lead to Conventional Pacing Systems in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Feasibility, Safety, and Early Results in 60 Consecutive Patients. Left bundle branch block worsens congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients with LV dysfunction. Asynchronous LV activation produced by RV apical pacing leads to paradoxical septal motion and inefficient ventricular contraction. Recent studies show improvement in LV function and patient symptoms with biventricular pacing in patients with CHF. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, acute efficacy, and early effect on symptoms of the upgrade of a chronically implanted RV pacing system to a biventricular system. Sixty patients with NYHA Class III and IV underwent the upgrade procedure using commercially available leads and adapters. The procedure succeeded in 54 (90%) of 60 patients. Acute LV stimulation thresholds obtained from leads placed along the lateral LV wall via the coronary sinus compare favorably to those reported in current biventricular pacing trials. The complication rate was low (5/60, 8.3%): lead dislodgement (n = 1), pocket hematoma (n = 1), and wound infections (n = 3). During 18 months of follow-up (16.7%) of 60 patients died. Two patients that died failed the initial upgrade attempt. At 3-month follow-up, quality of life scores improved 31 ± 28 points (n = 29), P < 0.0001). NYHA Class improved from 3.4 ± 0.5 to 2.4 ± 0.7 (P = < 0.0001) and ejection fraction increased from 0.23 ± 0.8 to 0.29 ± 0.11 (P = 0.0003). Modification of RV pacing to a biventricular system using commercially available leads and adapters can be performed effectively and safely. The early results of this study suggest patients may benefit from this procedure with improved functional status and quality of life. [source] Laparoscopic insertion of a diaphragmatic pacing system in patients with non-spinal injury-related neurological respiratory failure: the first reported UK casesANAESTHESIA, Issue 1 2010A. Philips No abstract is available for this article. [source] Individualized management of bacteraemia in patients with a permanent endocardial pacemakerCLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, Issue 3 2010B. Sopeña Clin Microbiol Infect 2010; 16: 274,280 Abstract Fifty-five episodes of bacteraemia arising in patients with a permanent endocardial pacemaker (PEP), from May 1987 to March 2006, were reviewed to determine whether clinical and microbiological data might assist in individual clinical management. Episodes of PEP-related bacteraemia were divided into early-onset bacteraemia, occurring within 6 months after device implantation or manipulation, and late-onset bacteraemia, occurring thereafter. Episodes with a source different from the PEP were classified as out-of-system bacteraemia. The PEP was the source of infection in 27 (49%) patients. Among patients with early-onset PEP-related bacteraemia (n = 16), Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 87.5% (14/16) of cases; 81% of them (13/16) had local signs of infection at the PEP pocket and 25% (4/16) died. Conversely, patients with late-onset PEP-related bacteraemia (n = 11) had a protracted clinical course; local signs of infection were infrequently observed (18%); a coagulase-negative staphylococcus was isolated in 91% of cases, and no death-related infection was registered. In patients with out-of-system bacteraemia (n = 28), the device became colonized and required explantation in 56% (5/9) of patients with S. aureus infection; the remaining 19 patients with out-of system bacteraemia caused by a microorganism other than S. aureus were successfully managed with medical treatment. Early-onset and late-onset PEP-related bacteraemia differ regarding the microorganism involved, the clinical presentation, and the prognosis. When the pacing system is involved, a complete explantation of the device is necessary to cure the infection. However, most episodes of bacteraemia arising outside the PEP, mainly those not caused by S. aureus, can be conservatively managed. [source] Echocardiographic Features of Patients With Heart Failure Who May Benefit From Biventricular PacingECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 3 2003Amgad N. Makaryus Background: Recent studies suggest that cardiac resynchronization therapy through biventricular pacing (BVP) may be a promising new treatment for patients with advanced congestive heart failure (CHF). This method involves implantation of pacer leads into the right atrium (RA), right ventricle (RV), and coronary sinus (CS) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony as evidenced by a bundle branch block pattern on electrocardiogram (ECG). Clinical trials are enrolling stable patients with ejection fractions (EF) , 35%, left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (LVIDd) , 54 mm, and QRS duration ,140 msec. We compared echocardiography features of these patients (group 1) with other patients with EF , 35%, LVIDd , 54 mm, and QRS < 140 msec (group 2 = presumably no dyssynchrony). Methods: Nine hundred fifty-one patients with CHF, LVID 54 mm, EF 35% by echocardiography were retrospectively evaluated. One hundred forty-five patients remained after those with primary valvular disease, prior pacing systems, or chronic atrial arrhythmias were excluded. From this group of 145 patients, a subset of 50 randomly selected patients were further studied (25 patients [7 females, 18 males] from group 1, and 25 patients [7 females, 18 males] from group 2). Mean age group 1 = 75 years old, mean age group 2 = 67 years old. Mean QRS group 1 = 161 msec, mean QRS group 2 = 110 msec. Each group was compared for presence of paradoxical septal motion, atrial and ventricular chamber sizes, LV mass, LVEF, and RV systolic function. Results: Of the initial group of 951 patients, 145 (15%) met inclusion criteria. In the substudy, 20/25 (80%) of group l and 7/25 (28%) of group 2 subjects had paradoxical septal motion on echo (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.0005). The t-tests performed on the other echocardiography variables demonstrated no differences in chamber size, function, or LV mass. Conclusions: Cardiac resynchronization therapy with BVP appears to target a relatively small population of our advanced CHF patients (15% or less). Although increasing QRS duration on ECG is associated with more frequent paradoxical septal motion on echo, it is not entirely predictive. Paradoxical septal motion on echo may therefore be more sensitive at identifying patients who respond to BVP. Further prospective studies are needed. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Volume 20, April 2003) [source] Safety of Deferring the Reimplantation of Pacing Systems After Their Removal for Infectious Complications in Selected Patients: A 1-Year Follow-Up StudyJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2010ELOI MARIJON M.D. Introduction: Recent expert consensus guidelines mention that one of the principles for infected device replacement following removal is to "reevaluate carefully if there is a continued need for a new cardiac device replacement." This is a Class I recommendation, which nevertheless suffers from a very low level of evidence (level of evidence C), since no study has revisited the systematic practice of reimplanting the same device based on a meticulous clinical reassessment. In the present paper, we examined the safety of withholding the implantation of pacing systems in selected patients. Methods and Results: Between January 2005 and December 2007, 188 consecutive patients underwent extractions of infected pacing systems at 2 medical centers. "Low-risk" patients were identified by (1) a spontaneous heart rate >45 bpm, (2) no symptomatic asystole during monitoring, (3) QRS duration <120 ms when history of AV block was noted, (4) no high-degree AV block during continuous monitoring. They remained device-free, unless an adverse clinical event occurred mandating the reimplantation. The primary study endpoint was rate of sudden death and syncope after a 12-month follow-up. Among the 74 (39.4%) "low-risk" patients, a single patient suffered a bradycardia-related syncopal event corresponding to a 1.3% (95% CI, 0.0,3.9) rate of primary endpoint. Pacing systems were also reimplanted in 24 patients (32.4%) for syncope (n = 1), nonsevere bradycardia-reated symptoms (n = 17), cardiac resynchronization (n = 2), and for reassurance in 4 asymptomatic patients. Conclusion: After removal of infected pacing systems, these preliminary data demonstrated that a strategy of nonsystematic device reimplantation associated with close surveillance was safe in "low-risk" patients, allowing the administration of antimicrobials in a device-free state. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 540-544, May 2010) [source] Use of Radiofrequency Perforation for Lead Placement in Biventricular or Conventional Endocardial Pacing after Mustard or Senning Operations for D-Transposition of the Great ArteriesPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2009SANTABHANU CHAKRABARTI M.D. Background: Endocardial pacemaker lead placement can be challenging after Mustard and Senning operations for transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA), if there is atresia of the systemic venous pathways and because the coronary sinus cannot be used for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Radiofrequency (RF)-assisted perforation techniques have been used in congenital heart disease but have not been reported for use in pacemaker implantation. Methods and Results: We describe RF perforation of an atretic superior systemic venous pathway and systemic venous baffles in three patients after Senning and Mustard operations to implant endocardial pacing systems to achieve conventional or biventricular pacing. Conclusions: RF-energy-assisted perforation is feasible and effective tool to facilitate endocardial lead placement during dual-chamber and biventricular pacemaker implantation in patients with Mustard or Senning operations for D-TGA. [source] Excitation of the Intrinsic Conduction System Through His and Interventricular Septal PacingPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2006TIMOTHY G LASKE Background: Direct His bundle pacing results in rapid synchronous ventricular activation. However, clinical experiences with such pacing have been associated with long procedure times and compromised pacing and sensing performance. Methods: We evaluated myocardial activation sequences (AS) for pacing of the His bundle and peri-His region and assessed acute pacing performance using custom-designed plunge electrodes. Unipolar pacing was performed in isolated swine hearts (n = 10) using four quadripolar stimulation/sensing electrodes implanted into the interventricular septum and equally spaced between the membranous septum and the coronary sinus ostium (zones 1,4, respectively; electrode depth (ED) 1 = most distal, ED 4 = most proximal). Optimal pacing sites were defined as: pacing thresholds ,1.5 V, a P-R ratio of ,0.5, and ,50% occurrence of an intrinsic midseptal left ventricular (LV) endocardial electrical breakout (BO) and activation pattern. Results: Pacing thresholds improved with greater depth of electrode location within the septum (ED 1: 1.51 ± 0.8 V vs ED 4: 5.2 ± 3.8 V, P < 0.001), as did the P-R ratio (0.34 ± 0.6 vs 0.78 ± 1.0, P < 0.05). His potentials were only observed in zone 1 and 2 electrodes (0.12 and 0.02 mV, respectively). Only electrodes in zones 1 and 2 produced LV endocardial electrical BOs in the midseptal region that demonstrated an intrinsic-like endocardial AS. Depth 1 and 2 electrodes (11.75 and 8.75 mm, respectively) in zone 1 satisfied all three optimal pacing site requirements. Conclusions: This study has shown that LV activation patterns similar to sinus rhythm may be achieved without direct activation of the His bundle, while maintaining acceptable pacing and sensing performance. These data indicate that pacing systems designed to stimulate the tissues below the point at which the His bundle penetrates the central fibrous body may provide improved system efficiency and LV performance in comparison to both direct His bundle pacing and traditional pacing sites. [source] Programming Optimal Atrioventricular Delay in Dual Chamber Pacing Using Peak Endocardial Acceleration: Comparison with a Standard Echocardiographic ProcedurePACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1p2 2003JEAN-MARC DUPUIS DUPUIS, J.-M.,et al.: Programming Optimal Atrioventricular Delay in Dual Chamber Pacing Using Peak Endocardial Acceleration: Comparison with a Standard Echocardiographic Procedure.Optimization of programmed atrioventricular delay in dual chamber pacing is essential to the hemodynamic efficiency of the heart. Automatic AV delay optimization in an implanted pacemaker is highly desirable. Variations of peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) with AV delay at rest correlate well with echocardiography derived observations, particularly with end-diastolic filling and mitral valve closure timings. This suggests the possibility of devising a procedure for the automatic determination of the optimal AV delay. The aim of this study was to compare a proposed algorithm for optimal AV delay determination with an accepted echocardiographic method. Fifteen patients with high degree AV block received BEST-Living pacing systems. Automatic AV delay scans were performed at rest (60,300 ms in 20-ms steps with 60 beats per step) in DDD at 90 ppm, while simultaneously recording cycle-by-cycle PEA values, which were averaged for each AV delay to obtain a PEA versus AV delay curve. Nonlinear regression analysis based on a Boltzmann sigmoid curve was performed, and the optimal AV delay (OAVD) was chosen as the sigmoid inflection point of the regression curve. The OAVD was also evaluated for each patient using the Ritter echocardiographic method. Good sigmoid fit was obtained in 13 of 15 patients. The mean OAVD obtained by the PEA sigmoid algorithm was146.9 ± 32.1 ms, and the corresponding result obtained by echocardiography was156.4 ± 34.3 ms(range 31.8,39.7 ms). Correlation analysis yielded r = 0.79, P = 0.0012. In conclusion, OAVD estimates obtained by PEA analysis during automatic AV delay scanning are consistent with those obtained by echocardiography. The proposed algorithm can be used for automatic OAVD determination in an implanted pacemaker pulse generator. (PACE 2003; 26:[Pt. II]:210,213) [source] DDD Pacemaker Implantation After Fontan-Type OperationsPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1p2 2003MARKUS K. HEINEMANN HEINEMANN, M.K., et al.: DDD Pacemaker Implantation After Fontan-Type Operations.Bradyarrhythmias developing after Fontan-type operations impair the function of the univentricular heart causing fatigue, headaches, ascites, and protein-losing enteropathy (PLE). Transvenous inaccessibility, requiring epicardial implantation, accounts for the reluctance to implant a pacemaker (PM). Between 1997 and 2000, 24 patients (mean age 9.5 years, range 6 months to 19 years) with Fontan-type operations received DDD pacing systems with atrial steroid-eluting stitch-on electrodes (mean capture threshold 1.9 V/0.5 ms, range 0.4,3.5 V) and ventricular screw-in electrodes (mean capture threshold 1.7 V/0.5 ms, range 0.1,3 V). The systems were implanted at the time of conversion from atrio- to cavopulmonary connections in 5 patients, at the time of a total cavopulmonary Fontan operation in 6, and 1,50 months thereafter (mean = 18) in 13 patients. A right ventricular anatomy was present in 13 (54%) of 24 of PM recipients, versus 35% of the overall population. After a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, the PM were functioning in DDD mode in 23 of the 24 patients. Length of hospital stay in the ten patients who underwent repeat sternotomy was 5 days, without procedure related complications. In three children a repeat sternotomy was avoided by implanting the atrial electrodes during the Fontan operation. All patients improved clinically, including resolution of PLE in four patients. Bradyarrhythmias may lead to significant morbidity after Fontan-type operations. Electrophysiological evaluation is advised at follow-up. The indication for implantation of a DDD pacemaker system should be liberal. Placing atrial electrodes during the Fontan operation, especially in the presence of a right ventricular anatomy, avoids repeat sternotomy. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:492,495) [source] Clinical Use of Intracardiac Impedance: Current Applications and Future PerspectivesPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2001WAYNE ARTHUR ARTHUR, W., et al.: Clinical Use of Intracardiac Impedance: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. For over 40 years the measurement of intracardiac impedance has been proposed as a method of assessing the contractile state of the heart muscle. This technique requires the positioning of one or more intracavitary electrodes and the generation of an electric field from an alternating current source. Variations in the calculated impedance signal reflect changes in the ventricular blood pool volume adjacent to the electrodes. Intracardiac impedance measurement has been successfully developed as a research tool to assess myocardial contractility, and from this, clinical uses have evolved. Commercial rate responsive pacing systems use intracardiac impedance to assess the inotropic state of the heart. Further development of this technology might allow hemodynamic discrimination of cardiac arrhythmias. [source] Transvenous Pacemaker Insertion Ipsilateral to Chronic Subclavian Vein Obstruction: An Operative Technique for Children and AdultsPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2000MARC OVADIA OVADIA, M., et al.: Transvenous Pacemaker Insertion Ipsilateral to Chronic Subclavian Vein Obstruction: An Operative Technique for Children and Adults. Subclavian vein occlusion limits insertion of pacing electrodes in children and adults. The concern is greatest in children with a long-term need for pacing systems necessitating use of the contralateral vein and potential bilateral loss of access in the future. We describe an operative technique to provide ipsilateral access in chronic subclavian vein occlusion in five consecutive pediatric (n = 4, mean age 6.5 years) and adult (n = 1, age 70 with bilateral subclavian vein occlusion) patients in whom this condition was noted at the time of pacemaker or ICD implant. Occlusion was documented by venography. Pediatric cardiac diagnoses included complete heart block in all patients, tetralogy of Fallot in three, and L-transposition of the great vessels in one. Percutaneous brachiocephalic (innominate) or deep subclavian venous access was achieved by a supraclavicular approach using an 18-gauge Deseret angiocath, a Terumo Glidewire, and dilation to permit one or two 9,11 Fr sheaths. Electrode(s) were positioned in the heart and tunneled (pre, or retroclavicularly) to a pre, or retropectoral pocket. Pacemaker and ICD implants were successful in all without any complication of pneumothorax, arterial or nerve injury, or need for transfusion. Inadvertent arterial access did not occur as compared with prior infraclavicular attempts. One preclavicularly tunneled electrode dislodged with extreme exertion and was revised. Ipsilateral transvenous access for pacemaker or ICD is possible via a deep supraclavicular percutaneous approach when the subclavian venous obstruction is discovered at the time of implant. In children, it avoids the use of the contralateral vein that may be needed for future pacing systems in adulthood. This venous approach provides access large enough to allow even dual chamber pacing in children and can be accomplished safely. [source] Safety of Pacemaker Implantation Prior to Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrioventricular Junction in a Single Session ProcedurePACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2000ALESSANDRO PROCLEMER RF current delivery may cause acute and chronic dysfunction of previously implanted pacemakers. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the effects of RF energy on Thera I and Kappa pacemakers in 70 consecutive patients (mean age 70 ± 11 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 48 ± 15%) who underwent RF ablation of the AV junction for antiarrhythmic drug refractory atrial fibrillation (permanent in 42 patients, paroxysmal in 28). These pacing systems incorporate protection elements to avoid electromagnetic interference. The pacemakers (Thera DR 7960 I in 20 patients, Thera SR 8960 1 in 30, Kappa DR 600,601 in 8, Kappa SR 700,701 in 12) were implanted prior to RF ablation in a single session procedure and were transiently programmed to VVI mode at a rate of 30 beats/min. Capsure SP and Z unibipolar leads were used. During RF application there was continuous monitoring of three ECG leads, endocavitary electrograms, and event markers. Complete AV block was achieved in all cases after 3.6 ± 2.9 RF pulses and 100 ± 75 seconds of RF energy delivery. The mean time of pacemaker implantation and RF ablation was 60 ± 20 minutes. Transient or permanent pacemaker dysfunction including under/oversensing, reversion to a "noise-mode" pacing, pacing inhibition, reprogramming, or recycling were not observed. Leads impedance, sensing, and pacing thresholds remained in the normal range in the acute and long-term phase (average follow-up 18 ± 12 months). In conclusion, Thera I and Kappa pacemakers exhibit excellent protection against interference produced by RF current. The functional integrity of the pacemakers and Capsure leads was observed in the acute and chronic phases. Thus, the implantation of these pacing systems prior to RF ablation of the AV junction can be recommended. [source] |