			Home About us Contact

Pacemaker Lead (pacemaker + lead)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Tricuspid Valve Malfunction and Ventricular Pacemaker Lead: Case Report and Review of the Literature

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 8 2006
Said B. Iskandar M.D.
Pacemaker implantation can be associated with several complications, including myocardial perforation with or without pericardial effusion, venous thrombosis, vegetations of the tricuspid valve (TV) or pacing lead, and tricuspid regurgitation (TR). The TR is thought to be derived from deformity or perforation of the TV by the pacing lead or secondary to atrioventricular discordance with asynchronous ventricular pacing. Severe TR can be deleterious to the patient because it raises the central venous pressure by increasing the right sided preload. Chronically, the increase in right sided blood volume can result in an increase in the right atrial pressure leading to a decrease in venous return and low cardiac output. Severe TR from leaflet adhesion to the pacemaker lead has not been reported before. With the aging of the population and the expanding use of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) in clinical practice, this complication may be seen more frequently. We present a patient diagnosed with severe TR, years after his pacemaker implantation. His TR was thought to be caused by adhesion of the tricuspid valve to his pacemaker lead. [source]

Extraction of the Inner Coil of a Pacemaker Lead Slid into the Pulmonary Artery

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2007
F.E.S.C., PIER GIORGIO GOLZIO M.D.
A patient required lead extraction for chronic draining sinus, due to abandoned leads. Preoperatively, the chest film showed a filament in the right pulmonary artery: it was the inner coil of an old atrial lead that, while remaining anchored to the auricle, slid outside the outer coil. By right subclavian approach, the old ventricular lead and the outer coil of the atrial lead were removed. Then, by right jugular approach, the freely floating end of theinner atrial coil was grasped by a pig-tail catheter, drawn back into the superior vena cava, exteriorized by a Lasso catheter, and finally extracted. [source]

Inadvertent Positioning of Pacemaker Leads in the Pericardium

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2003
KAMBEEZ BERENJI
A patient had a dual chamber pacemaker with endocardial leads implanted chronically. The lead position on chest X ray and the ECG pattern indicated lead malposition, but a CT scan and transesophageal echocardiography were nondiagnostic. Venography indicated that both leads were in the mediastinal and pericardial space. (PACE 2003; 26:2039,2041) [source]

Complications Due to Abandoned Noninfected Pacemaker Leads

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2001
ÁDÁM BÖHM
BÖHM, Á., et al.: Complications Due to Abandoned Noninfected Pacemaker Leads. Noninfected unwanted pacemaker leads are usually abandoned since the reported complication rate related to them is low. We followed 60 patients with noninfected retained leads, and complication was observed in 12 (20%) of them. Lead migration occurred in 5 patients, skin erosion in 3 patients, venous thrombosis in 2 patients, and muscle stimulation in 2 patients. Management of the complications was a surgical procedure in seven patients, including two cases of open heart surgery, while chronic medical treatment was necessary in the other five patients. The results of this study suggest that complications due to noninfected abandoned leads may not be as rare as it was previously thought and may present a significant morbidity and cost burden. With the lead extraction technique available, the issue of the removal of all unwanted pacemaker leads should be addressed. [source]

Persistence of Left Supracardinal Vein in an Adult Patient with Heart,Hand Syndrome and Cardiac Pacemaker

CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE, Issue 3 2008
Jan Nemec MD
ABSTRACT A patient with a sporadic heart,hand syndrome, which includes thumb hypoplasia, septum primum atrial septal defect, and cleft mitral valve is described. During attempted placement of a pacemaker lead, persistence of left superior and inferior vena cava was found in addition to the right-sided caval veins. This corresponds to persistence of left-sided supracardinal vein present during fetal development. [source]

Tricuspid Valve Malfunction and Ventricular Pacemaker Lead: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Does Bipolar Pacemaker Current Activate Blood Platelets?

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2009
GRUNDE GJESDAL M.D.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether bipolar pacemaker current lead can activate blood platelets. The null hypothesis was that 1 minute of electrical stimulation of platelets would not influence their subsequent reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Background: Both platelets and muscle cells contain actin and myosin filaments, and both cells are activated following calcium influx. Muscle cells open their calcium channels and contract when exposed to an electric current. Current through a bipolar pacemaker lead will expose a small volume of blood, including platelets, to the depolarizing current. Platelet activation may ensue, resulting in aggregation, release reaction, and contraction. In contrast, a unipolar pacemaker system will not depolarize blood, but transmit current directly into the myocardium, and the current afterward passes through other tissues before returning to the pacemaker can. Methods: Platelet-rich plasma was prepared from two healthy subjects. Platelet reactivity to the agonist ADP was tested in paired samples in an aggregometer in a case/control setup. Results: Eighteen of 46 tested pairs of platelet-rich plasma showed increased reactivity in the paced sample; 26 were unchanged while two showed decreased reactivity in the paced sample. Using a two-sided sign test, the null hypothesis was rejected (P = 0.0004). Conclusions: The study demonstrates increased reactivity to ADP in platelets exposed in vitro to stimulation by pacemaker current. The clinical relevance of these findings remains to be investigated. [source]

Atrial Lead Dysfunction: An Unusual Feature of Hypothyroidism

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2008
KRISTEN K. PATTON M.D.
Hypothyroidism is known to have a multitude of cardiac electrophysiologic effects, including bradycardia, atrioventricular block, prolonged QT interval, and elevated ventricular pacing thresholds. We report the case of a 36-year-old woman who presented with isolated dysfunction of her atrial pacemaker lead, which reversed with thyroid hormone replacement. [source]

Atrial Lead Placement During Atrial Fibrillation.

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2000
Is Restitution of Sinus Rhythm Required for Proper Lead Function?
Unexpected atrial fibrillation (AF) during implantation of an atrial pacemaker lead is sometimes encountered. Infra-operative cardioversion may lengthen and complicate the implantation process. This study prospectively investigates the performance of atrial leads implanted during AF (group A) and compares atrial sensing and pacing properties to an age- and sex-matched control group in which sinus rhythm had been restored before atrial lead placement (group B). Patient groups consisted of 32 patients each. All patients received DDDE pacemakers and bipolar, steroid-elating, active fixation atrial leads. In patients with AF at the time of implantation (group A), a minimal intracardiac fibrillatory amplitude of at least 1.0 mV was required for acceptable atrial lead placement. In patients with restored sinus rhythm (group B). a voltage threshold < 1.5 V at 0.5 ms and a minimal atrial potential amplitude > 1.5 mV was required. Patients of group A in whom spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm did not occur within 4 weeks after implantation underwent electrical cardioversion to sinus rhythm. Pacemaker interrogations were performed 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. In group A, implantation time was significantly shorter as compared to group B (58.7 ± 8.6 minutes vs 73.0 ± 17.3 minutes, P < 0.001). Mean atrial potential amplitude during AF was correlated with the telemetered atrial potential during sinus rhythm (r = 0.49, P < 0.001), but not with the atrial stimulation threshold. Twelve months after implantation, sensing thresholds (1.74 ± 0.52 mV vs 1.78 ± 0.69 mV, P = 0.98) and stimulation thresholds (1.09 ± 0.42 V vs 1.01 ± 0.31 V.P = 0.66) did not differ between groups A and B. However, in three, patients of group A, chronic atrial sensing threshold was , 1 mV requiring atria) sensitivities of at least 0.35 mV to achieve reliable atrial sensing. Atrial lead placement during AF is feasible and reduces implantation time. However, bipolar atrial leads and the option to program high atrial sensitivities are required. [source]

Prolonged low-dose thrombolytic therapy: A novel adjunctive strategy in the management of an infected right atrial thrombus

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 7 2002
Sheila Chuang M.D.
Abstract An 81-year-old man presented with a large, infected right atrial thrombus that was refractory to anticoagulants and several courses of antibiotics. The risk of surgical removal of the thrombus, which was associated with a pacemaker electrode, was considered prohibitive. The patient was treated for 7 days with low-dose (40 mg/day) tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA). Hemostatic monitoring during infusion revealed (1) aplasma t-PA antigen that was approximately 5% of that achieved during short-course t-PA for acute myocardial infarction, (2) biochemical evidence of prolonged clot lysis, and (3) no significant depletion of fibrinogen or plas-minogen. Nearly complete dissolution of the thrombus was observed. His bacteremia was eradicated by intravenous penicillin despite the presence of the pacemaker lead. This case highlights the benefits of combined antibiotic and thrombolytic therapy and documents for the first time the response of the human hemostatic system to prolonged t-PA infusion and the plasma t-PA levels attained when thrombolytic therapy is administered in this manner. Prolonged courses of fibrinolytic agents may be a good alternative to surgical intervention in selected patients with infected, right-sided intracardiac thrombi. [source]

Pacemaker Lead Prolapse through the Pulmonary Valve in Children

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2007
CHARLES I. BERUL M.D.
Background:Transvenous pacemaker leads in children are often placed with redundant lead length to allow for anticipated patient growth. This excess lead may rarely prolapse into the pulmonary artery and potentially interfere with valve function. We sought to determine the response to lead repositioning on pulmonary valve insufficiency. Methods:Retrospective reviews of demographics, lead type, implant duration, and radiography and echocardiography. Results:A total of 11 pediatric patients were identified with lead prolapse through the pulmonary valve, of which nine patients underwent procedures to retract and reposition the lead (age at implant 9 ± 4 years, age at revision 13 ± 4 years). The implant duration prior to revision was 4 ± 3 years. Two leads required radiofrequency extraction sheaths for removal, two pulled back using a snare, while five leads were simply retracted and repositioned. Tricuspid regurgitation was none/trivial (three), mild (four), or moderate (two) and only two improved with repositioning or replacement. Pulmonary regurgitation preoperatively was mild (three), mild-moderate (two), or moderate (four) compared with trivial (three), mild (four), and moderate (two) after revision. Patients with longer-term implanted leads had less improvement in pulmonary insufficiency. Two patients had mild pulmonary stenosis from lead-related obstruction. Conclusions:Prolapse of transvenous pacing leads into the pulmonary artery can occur when excess slack is left for growth. Leads can often be repositioned, but may require extraction and replacement, particularly if chronically implanted and adherent to valve apparatus. Lead revision does not always resolve pulmonary insufficiency, potentially leaving permanent valve damage. [source]

Complications Due to Abandoned Noninfected Pacemaker Leads

Ancillary Tools in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Lead Extraction Using a Novel Lead Removal System

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2001
ANTONIS S. MANOLIS
MANOLIS, A.S., et al.: Ancillary Tools in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Lead Extraction Using a Novel Lead Removal System. A previous report described our preliminary experience with a highly successful pacing lead removal system (VascoExtor). Extending this experience, we found it necessary to use additional tools to enhance the success of percutaneous lead extraction with this system. In the present series, we used the standard locking stylets (S and K), and recently, one newer type of stylet (Magic) over the last 3 years in 34 patients to extract 48 pacemaker leads in 31 patients and 3 defibrillator (ICD) leads in 3 patients. Lead extraction was carried out in 23 men and 11 women (aged 64 ± 17 years) because of pacemaker infection (n = 21), pacemaker (n = 8) or ICD (n = 3) lead malfunction, or prior to ICD implant (n = 2). Leads were in place for 3.5 ± 3.7 years. Infections, involving pocket and lead(s), were due to S. epidermidis (n = 13), S. aureus (n = 6), S. aureus plus E. coli (n = 1), or fungi (n = 1). Of the 48 pacing leads, 31 were ventricular, 15 atrial, and 2 were VDD leads. The ICD leads were two double-coil leads (CPI) and one single-coil lead (Telectronics). Using the S (n = 12), K (n = 8), or Magic (n = 3) stylets, all pacing leads in 23 patients and the ICD leads in 2 patients were successfully removed from a subclavian approach using the locking stylets. However, in nine (26.5%) patients ancillary tools were required. In four patients, lead fragments were captured with use of a noose catheter, a pigtail catheter, and a bioptome from a right femoral approach. In two patients, locking could not be effected and a noose catheter from the right femoral vein was used, aided by a pigtail and an Amplatz catheter and a bioptome to remove three leads. In a patient with an ICD lead, a combined subclavian (stylet S) and right femoral approach (noose catheter) was required. In a patient with a dysfunctional ventricular lead 12 years old, a motor drive unit was used to facilitate the exchange of locking stylets, but extraction failed. In another patient, a fragment of a dysfunctional ventricular lead remained intravascularly despite resorting to a femoral approach. Finally, lead removal was completely (32/34, 94%) or partially (1/34, 3%) successful in 33 (97%) of 34 patients for 50 (98%) of 51 leads without complications. In conclusion, to enhance the success of pacing or ICD lead extraction with use of the VascoExtor locking stylets, an array of ancillary tools were required in more than one fourth of patients. [source]