			Home About us Contact

Pneumatic Dilatation (pneumatic + dilatation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Injection of botulinum toxin before pneumatic dilatation in achalasia treatment: a randomized-controlled trial

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 6 2006
J. MIKAELI
Summary Background Pneumatic dilatation is the first line therapy in achalasia, but half of patients relapse within 5 years of therapy and require further dilatations. Aim To assess whether botulinum toxin injection before pneumatic dilatation is superior to pneumatic dilatation alone in achalasia patients. Methods Newly diagnosed achalasia patients were randomly assigned to receive botulinum toxin 1 month before pneumatic dilatation (botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group: 27 patients with median age of 38) or to undergo pneumatic dilatation alone (pneumatic dilatation group: 27 patients with median age of 30). Response to therapy was assessed by clinical and objective methods at various intervals. Results One-year remission rate of patients in botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group was 77% compared with 62% in pneumatic dilatation group (P = 0.1). In pneumatic dilatation group, the oesophageal barium volume significantly (P < 0.001) decreased at 1 month, but this reduction did not persist over 1-year follow-up. Botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group showed a significant (P < 0.001) reduction in barium volume at the various times intervals post-treatment. In the botulinum toxin-pneumatic dilatation group, 10/11 (91%) patients over 40 were in remission at 1 year, comparing with only five of nine (55%) cases in pneumatic dilatation group (P = 0.07). Conclusion Injection of botulinum toxin before pneumatic dilatation does not significantly enhance the efficacy of pneumatic dilatation. [source]

Combined treatment of achalasia , botulinum toxin injection followed by pneumatic dilatation: long-term results

DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, Issue 2 2010
R. Kroupa
SUMMARY Injection of botulinum toxin (BT) and pneumatic dilatation are available methods in nonsurgical treatment of achalasia. Authors anticipate beneficial effect of prior BT injection on the success of pneumatic dilatation and duration of its effect. There are no long-term data available to assess efficacy of combined treatment. From 1998 to 2007, 51 consecutive patients (20 men and 31 women, age 24,83) with achalasia were included and prospectively followed up. Each patient received injection of 200 IU of BT into the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) during endoscopy and 8 days later pneumatic dilatation (PD) under X-ray control was performed. The follow-up was established every 3 months first year and then annually. The efficacy was evaluated by a questionnaire concerning patient's symptoms and manometry. Results were compared with 40 historical controls (16 men and 24 women, age 26,80) treated by PD alone using the same method and follow-up. Fifty-one patients underwent combined treatment. Four patients failed in follow-up and were not included for analysis. The mean duration of follow-up was 48 months with range 12,96 months. Thirty-four of forty-seven (72%) patients were satisfied with results with none or very rare and mild troubles at the time of the last visit. Forty-one patients were followed up more than 2 years. Effect of therapy lasted in 75% (31/41) of them. In 17 patients, more than 5 years after treatment, effect lasted in 12 (70%). Mean tonus of LES before therapy was 29 mm Hg (10,80), 3 months after therapy decreased to 14 mmHg (5,26). The cumulative 5 years remission rate (±95% CI) in combined treated patients 69% ± 8% was higher than in controls 50% ± 9%; however it, was not statistically significant (P= 0.07). In control group 1, case of perforation (2.5%) occurred. Eight patients (17%) with relapse of dysphagia were referred to laparoscopic Heller myotomy with no surgical complication. The main adverse effect was heartburn that appeared in 17 patients (36%). Initial injection of BT followed by PD seems to be effective for long-term results with fewer complications. But the combined therapy is not significantly superior to PD alone. [source]

Randomized controlled trial of intrasphincteric botulinum toxin A injection versus balloon dilatation in treatment of achalasia cardia

DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, Issue 3-4 2001
U. C. Ghoshal
As the few randomized controlled trials available in the literature comparing botulinum toxin (BT) injection with established endoscopic treatment of achalasia cardia, i.e. pneumatic dilatation, showed conflicting results, we conducted a prospective randomized trial. Seventeen consecutive patients with achalasia cardia diagnosed during a period between December 1997 and February 2000 were randomized into two treatment groups [pneumatic dilatation by Rigiflex dilator (n=10), BT injection by sclerotherapy needle into four quadrants of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (n=7) 80 units in five cases, 60 units in two cases] after dysphagia grading, endoscopy, barium esophagogram, and manometry, all of which were repeated 1 week after treatment. Patients were followed up clinically for 35.2 ± 14 weeks. Chi-squares, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Kaplan,Meier method and log-rank tests were used for statistical analysis. After 1 week, 6/7 (86%) BT-treated vs. 8/10 (80%) dilatation-treated patients improved (P=NS). There was no difference in LES pressure and maximum esophageal diameter in the barium esophagogram in the two groups before therapy. Both therapies resulted in significant reduction in LES pressure. The cumulative dysphagia-free state using the Kaplan,Meier method decreased progressively in BT-treated compared with dilatation-treated patients (P=0.027). Two patients with tortuous megaesophagus, one of whom had failed dilatation complicated by perforation previously, improved after BT. One other patient in whom pneumatic dilatation had previously failed improved in a similar manner. BT is as good as pneumatic dilatation in achieving an initial improvement in dysphagia of achalasia cardia. It is also effective in patients with tortuous megaesophagus and previous failed pneumatic dilatation. However, dysphagia often recurs during 1-year follow up. [source]

Systematic review: endoscopic dilatation in Crohn's disease

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 11-12 2007
C. HASSAN
Summary Background, Endoscopic dilatation for Crohn's disease has been evaluated only in some small and heterogeneous studies. Aim, To evaluate any association between the main clinical variables and endoscopic variables and the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilatation in Crohn's disease. Methods, A Medline search regarding pneumatic dilatation in Crohn's disease was performed. Several technical and clinical variables were extracted from each study to build up a descriptive, pool-data analysis. Data on individual patients were extracted from suitable studies to create a simulated population upon which a multivariate statistical analysis was performed. Results, Thirteen studies enrolling 347 Crohn's disease patients were reviewed. Endoscopic dilatation was mainly applied to postsurgical strictures, being technically successful in 86% of the cases. Long-term clinical efficacy was achieved in 58% of the patients. Mean follow-up was as long as 33 months, corresponding to 800 patient years of follow-up. Major complication rate was 2%, being higher than 10% in two series. At multivariate analysis, a stricture length ,4 cm was associated with a surgery-free outcome (OR: 4.01; 95% CI: 1.16,13.8; P < 0.028). Conclusions, Endoscopic dilatation is an effective and safe treatment for short strictures caused by Crohn's disease, impacting substantially on the natural history of these patients. [source]