			Home About us Contact

Pfannenstiel Incision (pfannenstiel + incision)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia?

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 5 2010
A topical review
The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a newly described peripheral block involving the nerves of the anterior abdominal wall. The block has been developed for post-operative pain control after gynaecologic and abdominal surgery. The initial technique described the lumbar triangle of Petit as the landmark used to access the TAP in order to facilitate the deposition of local anaesthetic solution in the neurovascular plane. Other techniques include ultrasound-guided access to the neurovascular plane via the mid-axillary line between the iliac crest and the costal margin, and a subcostal access termed the ,oblique subcostal' access. A systematic search of the literature identified a total of seven randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of TAP block on post-operative pain, including a total of 364 patients, of whom 180 received TAP blockade. The surgical procedures included large bowel resection with a midline abdominal incision, caesarean delivery via the Pfannenstiel incision, abdominal hysterectomy via a transverse lower abdominal wall incision, open appendectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Overall, the results are encouraging and most studies have demonstrated clinically significant reductions of post-operative opioid requirements and pain, as well as some effects on opioid-related side effects (sedation and post-operative nausea and vomiting). Further studies are warranted to support the findings of the primary published trials and to establish general recommendations for the use of a TAP block. [source]

Complete robotic-assistance during laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies: An evaluation of 38 procedures at a single site

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 11 2007
Jacques Hubert
Objective: To evaluate our initial experience with entirely robot-assisted laparoscopic live donor (RALD) nephrectomies. Methods: From January 2002 to April 2006, we carried out 38 RALD nephrectomies at our institution, using four ports (three for the robotic arms and one for the assistant). The collateral veins were ligated, and the renal arteries and veins clipped, after completion of ureteral and renal dissection. The kidney was removed via a suprapubic Pfannenstiel incision. A complementary running suture was carried out on the arterial stump to secure the hemostasis. Results: Mean donor age was 43 years. All nephrectomies were carried out entirely laparoscopically, without complications and with minimal blood loss. Mean surgery time was 181 min. Average warm ischemia and cold ischemia times were 5.84 min and 180 min, respectively. Average donor hospital stay was 5.5 days. None of the transplant recipients had delayed graft function. Conclusions: Robot-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy can be safely carried out. Robotics enhances the laparoscopist's skills, enables the surgeon to dissect meticulously and to prevent problematic bleeding more easily. Donor morbidity and hospitalization are reduced by the laparoscopic approach and the use of robotics allows the surgeon to work under better ergonomic conditions. [source]

Radical retropubic prostatectomy through a minimal incision with portless endoscopy: Our initial experience

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 1 2006
HIDEO KIYOKAWA
Abstract, Twenty-one patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy through a single 5-cm midline or Pfannenstiel incision. A 30° laparoscope was usually positioned around the edge of the incision to facilitate the procedure. The mean operating time was 255 min. The mean blood loss was 859 mL, and no patient required an allogenic blood transfusion. Postoperative pain was noticeably reduced, especially in the Pfannenstiel incision group. Endoscope-assisted minilaparotomy did not involve a learning curve, and could be useful for most urologic surgeons as minimally invasive surgery. [source]

Retroperitoneoscopic heminephroureterectomy for children with duplex anomaly: Initial experience

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 1 2004
AKIHIRO KAWAUCHI
Abstract Objectives:, To evaluate the feasibility of retroperitoneoscopic heminephroureterectomy for children with duplex anomaly. Methods:, Retroperitoneoscopic heminephroureterectomy was performed in five children (four girls and one boy) with complete duplication of the ureter, of whom four (age range 1,5 years; mean age 3.3 years) had upper pole ectopic megaureters and one (3 years old) had an upper pole megaureter with ureterocele. In the patient with ureterocele, distal ureterectomy and ureterocelectomy were performed by Pfannenstiel incision. Results:, The mean operation time was 346 min (range 270,450 min) in the four patients with ectopic megaureter and 420 min (330 min for heminephroureterectomy) in the patient with ureterocele. The mean estimated blood loss was 43 mL (range 5,100 mL) in the four patients with ectopic megaureter and 40 mL in the patient with ureterocele. No postoperative complications were observed. Postoperative intravenous pyelography showed normal pyelogram and renal function of the preserved lower pole in all cases. Conclusions:, Retroperitoneoscopic heminephroureterectomy for children is feasible, safe and has good postoperative results, including cosmetic results. However, the operation time needs to be reduced. [source]

Laparoscopic emergency and elective surgery for ulcerative colitis

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 4 2008
L. Fowkes
Abstract Objective, To analyse surgical outcomes of fulminate and medically resistant ulcerative colitis (UC) carried out laparoscopically. Method, A prospective database identified 69 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for UC under the senior author over a 5-year period to April 2006. Results, Thirty-two patients (18 male patients), median BMI 26, underwent laparoscopic subtotal colectomy (LSTC): 22 acute emergencies, 10 refractory to medical therapy and unfit for restorative proctocolectomy. All were receiving iv steroids; azathioprine (7), cyclosporin (5). The median operation time was 135 min (65,280). There was one conversion. Twenty-nine patients have subsequently undergone completion proctectomy and W-pouch formation [24 patients were performed laparoscopically , laparoscopic completion proctectomy (LCP)]; widespread adhesions precluded in five patients. Twenty-six patients underwent restorative laparoscopic proctocolectomy (LRP) , one conversion. Twenty patients underwent W-pouch reconstruction via a Pfannenstiel incision. Six J-pouches were constructed and returned via the ileostomy site. Three underwent a laparoscopic pan-proctocolectomy (LPPC); one conversion. Eight patients underwent open STC. The median time to normal diet was 48 h (1,7 days) for LSTC/LCP and 36 h (1,5 days) for LRP. There were two major complications following LRP, two following LSTC, one following LCP, one following LPPC and five following open surgery. Median hospital stay was 8 days (6,72) for LSTC, 7 days (6,9) for LCP and 5 days (3,45) for LRP. There were six 30-day readmissions following laparoscopic surgery (DVT, reactive depression, ileostomy hold up (2), abdominal pain and high output ileostomy). Conclusion, Laparoscopic subtotal and restorative proctocolectomies in fulminate and medically resistant UC are feasible, safe and largely predictable operations that allow for early hospital discharge. Laparoscopic colectomy facilitates subsequent proctectomy and pouch construction. [source]