Other Metrics (other + metric)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Can taxonomic distinctness assess anthropogenic impacts in inland waters?

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, Issue 9 2006
A case study from a Mediterranean river basin
Summary 1. It is increasingly recognised that adequate measures of biodiversity should include information on the ,relatedness' of species within ecological assemblages, or the phylogenetic levels at which diversity is expressed. Taxonomic distinctness measures provide a series of indices to achieve this, which are independent of sample size. Taxonomic distinctness has been employed widely in marine systems, where it has been suggested that this index can provide a reliable measure of anthropogenic impact. 2. We tested the behaviour of three related taxonomic distinctiveness indices (Average Taxonomic Distinctness, ,+; Variation in Taxonomic Distinctness, ,+; and Total Taxonomic Distinctness, s,+) in relation to putative levels of anthropogenic impact in inland waters and their potential utility in environmental monitoring, using an extensive data set for aquatic beetles from the south-east of the Iberian Peninsula. 3. Taxonomic distinctness measures were not able to identify human disturbance effects and there were no clear relationships between these new biodiversity measures and the disturbance level recorded at individual localities. Furthermore, the taxonomic distinctness measures used were apparently less sensitive to the effects of anthropogenic impact than other diversity metrics, such as species richness and rarity. 4. We conclude that taxonomic distinctness indices may not always perform as well as other metrics in the assessment of environmental quality. In addition, taxonomic distinctness measure should be interpreted with caution, as their performance and ability to detect anthropogenic disturbance may depend on the phylogenetic structure of sampled taxa within a region, and their evolutionary and ecological history. [source]


Measuring sexual size dimorphism in birds

IBIS, Issue 3 2003
Julian G. Greenwood
Numerous studies have examined sexual size dimorphism in birds and speculated upon the reasons for its existence. Whilst most studies have focused on individual species or groups of related species, a few have attempted to disentangle the various hypotheses that have been put forward to explain its occurrence. Typical of the latter studies is that by Jehl and Murray (1986), in which they argued that sexual size dimorphism was primarily the result of sexual selection (see also Bennett & Owens 2002). Although some studies have looked at patterns in sexual size dimorphism without calculating a figure to represent the difference (e.g. Amadon 1959), most have examined measurements of birds and used these to calculate such a figure. Traditionally in such studies, measurements used have included wing-length, culmen-length, tarsus-length and mass, although McGillivray (1989) took the sum of 18 skeletal measurements and used their male and female means to determine sexual size dimorphism. Wing-length has commonly been used to determine sexual size dimorphism, although lack of repeatability of measurements may render it less useful than skeletal measurements like tarsus-length as in studies of Dunlin Calidris alpina (Blomqvist et al. 1997) and Savannah Sparrows Passerculus sandwichensis (Rising & Somers 1989); however, Gosler et al. (1998) found wing-length measurements to be more repeatable than other metrics in a group of 27 passerines. [source]


Diffusion tensor MRI in rat models of invasive and well-demarcated brain tumors

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, Issue 3 2008
Sungheon Kim
Abstract Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and its metrics, such as mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA), have been used to detect the extent of brain tumors and understand tumor growth and its influence on the surrounding tissue. However, there are conflicting reports on how DTI metrics can be used for tumor diagnosis. The physiological interpretation of these metrics in terms of tumor growth is also not clear. The objective of this study was to investigate the DTI parameters in two rat brain tumor models (9L and F98) with different patterns of aggressiveness by longitudinal monitoring of tumor growth and comparing the DTI parameters of these two tumor models. In addition to the standard DTI metrics, MD and FA, we measured other metrics representing diffusion tensor shape, such as linear and planar anisotropy coefficients (CL and CP), and orientational coherence measured by lattice index (LI), to characterize the two tumor models. The 9L tumor had higher FA, CL, and LI than the F98 tumor. F98 had a larger difference in anisotropies between tumor and peritumor regions than 9L. From the eigenvalues, it was found that the increase in CL and trace of the 9L tumor was due to an increase in the primary eigenvalue, whereas the increase in CP in the peritumor region was due to an increase in both primary and secondary eigenvalues and a decrease in tertiary eigenvalue. Our results indicate that shape-oriented anisotropy measures, such as CL and CP, and orientational coherence measures, such as LI, can provide useful information in differentiating these two tumor models and also differentiating tumor from peritumoral regions. Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]


The Role of Short-Termism in Financial Market Crises

AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, Issue 4 2009
John Nesbitt
The purpose of this paper is to examine the contribution short-termist behaviours have had in various financial market crises. The early warning signs and drivers of short-termism are investigated, as well as ways to mitigate short-termist behaviour and consequences in the future. Short-termism as defined for the purposes of this paper is the excessive focus on short-term performance, earnings and other metrics at the expense of attention being given to the development of a long-term strategy that promotes sustainable long-term value creation. [source]


Residual serum monoclonal protein predicts progression-free survival in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma

CANCER, Issue 3 2010
Eric W. Schaefer MS
Abstract BACKGROUND: Currently used treatment response criteria in multiple myeloma (MM) are based in part on serum monoclonal protein (M-protein) measurements. A drawback of these criteria is that response is determined solely by the best level of M-protein reduction, without considering the serial trend. The authors hypothesized that metrics incorporating the serial trend of M-protein would be better predictors of progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: Fifty-five patients with measurable disease at baseline (M-protein ,1 g/dL) who received ,4 cycles of treatment from 2 clinical trials in previously untreated MM were included. Three metrics based on the percentage of M-protein remaining relative to baseline (residual M-protein) were considered: metrics based on the number of times residual M-protein fell within prespecified thresholds, metrics based on area under the residual M-protein curve, and metrics based on the average residual M-protein reduction between Cycles 1 and 4. The predictive value of these metrics was assessed in Cox models using landmark analysis. RESULTS: The average residual M-protein reduction was found to be significantly predictive of PFS (P = .02; hazard ratio, 0.37), in which a patient with a 10% lower average residual M-protein reduction from Cycle 1 to 4 was estimated to be at least 2.7 more likely to develop disease progression or die early. None of the other metrics was predictive of PFS. The concordance index for the average residual M-protein reduction was 0.63, compared with 0.56 for best response. CONCLUSIONS: The average residual M-protein reduction metric is promising and needs further validation. This exploratory analysis is the first step in the search for treatment-based trend metrics predictive of outcomes in MM. Cancer 2010. 2009 American Cancer Society. [source]