Organ Protection (organ + protection)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Systematic Organ Protection in Coronary Artery Surgery With or Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 6 2002
Ph.D., Song Wan M.D.
Off-pump coronary surgery has been shown to attenuate the inflammatory injury compared to the conventional approach, thereby reducing the incidence of postoperative cardiopulmonary, renal, or neurological dysfunction. It is believed that off-pump experience may greatly impact on improving the outcome of coronary surgery in certain high-risk patients. Moreover, a better understanding of the underlying mechanism would also help to improve our current CPB management. Accumulating evidence to date indicates that a balance between pro- and antiinflammatory responses is crucial in limiting the extent of such systemic inflammatory injury following surgical myocardial revascularization. [source]


Clinical and Experimental Aspects of Olmesartan Medoxomil, a New Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist

CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, Issue 4 2004
Kazunori Yoshida
ABSTRACT Olmesartan medoxomil is a new orally active angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor antagonist. It is a prodrug and is rapidly de-esterified during absorption to form olmesartan, the active metabolite. Olmesartan is a potent, competitive and selective Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist. Olmesartan is not metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 and has a dual route of elimination, by kidneys and liver. In patients with essential hypertension olmesartan medoxomil administered once daily at doses of 10,80 mg dose-dependently reduced diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Troughto-peak ratios for both DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were above 50%. At the recommended once-daily starting doses, olmesartan medoxomil (20 mg) was more effective than losartan (50 mg), valsartan (80 mg) or irbesartan (150 mg) in reducing cuff DBP in patients with essential hypertension. The results of cuff SBP and mean 24-h DBP and SBP were similar to those of cuff DBP measurement. In mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients the recommended starting dose of olmesartan medoxomil was as effective as that of amlodipine besylate (5 mg/day) in reducing both cuff and 24-h blood pressure. In lowering DBP olmesartan medoxomil, at 10,20 mg/day, was as effective as atenolol at 50,100 mg/day. In mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients, olmesartan medoxomil, at 5,20 mg once daily, was more effective than captopril at 12.5,50 mg twice daily. At 20,40 mg once daily olmesartan medoxomil was as effective as felodipine, at 5,10 mg once daily. Olmesartan medoxomil has minimal adverse effects with no clinically important drug interactions. Animal studies have shown that olmesartan medoxomil provides a wide range of organ protection. Olmesartan medoxomil ameliorated atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic animals and ameliorated cardiac remodeling and improved survival in rats with myocardial infarction. Olmesartan medoxomil has renoprotective effects in a remnant kidney model and type 2 diabetes models. Future investigation should reveal whether these beneficial effects of olmesartan medoxomil are applicable to human diseases. [source]


Getting to goal in complex patients

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue S2 2003
C. Venkata
Abstract Traditionally, the term complex hypertension has been applied to patients who have clinical evidence of target organ damage. However, this definition can be expanded to include many hypertensive patients who either present without manifest disease but harbor silent concomitant organ damage, or belong to a high-risk group and are likely to develop such damage. Thus, the number of patients who deserve special consideration as complex patients is considerable. Various factors may contribute toward classifying a patient as having complex hypertension. These include severe hypertension; concomitant conditions such as diabetes, chronic renal insufficiency, coronary artery disease, or congestive heart failure; and high-risk populations such as the elderly and African Americans. Recent evidence demonstrates that aggressive goal blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapy is the key toward halting the progression of vascular disease. Although the choice of initial therapy seems less important than achieving goal B P, the drug selected must impart efficacy, organ protection, and tolerability. Combination therapy consisting of calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors seems to achieve these desirable effects. Several clinical trials have demonstrated these agents to have favorable effects on BP and organ protection even in complex hypertension, particularly when used in combination. [source]


End organ protection by calcium-channel blockers

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2001
Dan Tzivoni M.D.
Abstract In recent years, much attention has been given to end organ protection by antihypertensive, anti-heart failure, and anti-ischemic medications. This review describes the available information on end organ protection by calcium-channel blockers (CCBs). In normotensive patients and patients with hypertension treated with long-acting dihydropyridines, medial thickness was thinner than in patients treated with atenolol or in untreated hypertensive patients. Long-term treatment was associated with significant reduction in left ventricular mass. Calcium-channel blockers also improved endothelial-dependent relaxation and reversed the vasoconstrictive response to nitric oxide inhibitors. In diabetic patients. CCBs were effective in preserving kidney function and microalbuminurea. The combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and CCBs was more effective than ACE inhibitors alone in preserving kidney function. In animal experiments, CCBs prevented development of coronary atheroschlerosis; however, in humans only limited data are available on their antiatherogenic effect. Some studies suggest that CCBs exert antiplatelets properties and may therefore be beneficial in patients with coronary artery disease. [source]