Orthogonal Contrasts (orthogonal + contrast)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Use of a Mini-Dome Bioassay and Grafting to Study Resistance of Chickpea to Ascochyta Blight

JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 10 2005
W. Chen
Abstract A mini-dome bioassay was developed to study pathogenicity of Ascochyta rabiei and relative resistance of chickpea (Cicer arietanium). It was determined that the best condition for assaying pathogenicity of A. rabiei was to use 2 × 105 spores/ml as inoculum and to maintain a leaf wetness period of 24 h under mini-domes at a temperature between 16 and 22°C. This mini-dome pathogenicity assay was used to determine relative resistance of six chickpea cultivars (cvs) to isolates of two pathotypes of A. rabiei. Grafting was employed to detect any translocated factors produced in the chickpea plant that mediate disease response, which could help elucidate possible resistance mechanisms to Ascochyta blight. The six chickpea cv. were grafted in all possible scion,rootstock combinations, and then inoculated with isolates of two pathotypes of A. rabiei using the mini-dome technique. Results showed that self-grafted-resistant plants remained resistant and self-grafted-susceptible plants stayed susceptible, indicating the grafting procedure did not alter host response to infection by A. rabiei. Susceptible scions always exhibited high and similar levels of disease severity regardless of rootstock genotypes, and resistant scions always showed low and similar levels of disease severity when they were grafted onto any of the six rootstock genotypes. Orthogonal contrasts showed that scion genotypes determined disease phenotype, and that rootstock genotypes had no contribution to disease phenotype of the scions. The pathogenicity assay did not detect any translocated disease-mediating agents responsible for susceptibility or resistance in chickpea. Disease phenotypes of Ascochyta blight of chickpea were conditioned locally by scion genotypes. [source]


Replacement of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) meal by lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) seed meal in diet for juvenile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus×O. aureus) reared indoors

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH, Issue 14 2003
Y H Chien
Abstract An 8-week trial was conducted to assess the feasibility of replacing soybean meal (SBM) by lupin seed meal (LSM) in simulated commercial diets for juvenile tilapia starting at 0.3 g. Of the dietary protein (26% crude protein), 3.45% was from fishmeal and the rest came from the vegetable protein sources. The protein source of the control (C) diet came mainly from SBM and none (0%) from LSM. For the other diets, 33%, 67%, or 100% of the SBM protein was replaced by protein from either whole or dehulled LSM. One further diet was used: AW100, where alkaloid of the whole lupin seed was reduced. Survival, growth, and feed performance were compared among seven orthogonal contrasts to determine the effects of replacing SBM with whole LSM or dehulled LSM, and of reducing the alkaloid content. No differences in survival were found among all contrasts. No differences in fish growth and feed performance were found between feeding diet C and the other six diets ((whole, dehulled) × (33, 67, and 100)). Dehulled LSM diets resulted in better growth and feed performance than the whole LSM diets. Partial replacement of SBM by either dehulled LSM or whole LSM in diets obtained better growth and feed performance than total replacement. The AW100 diet resulted in equal fish growth but better feed performance than the W100 diet. This study concluded that partial, but not total, replacement of soybean protein with lupin seed protein in juvenile tilapia diets resulted in better, or at least equal, growth and feed performance. Dehulling further enhanced the growth and performance of LSM. Alkaloid removal improved feed performance but not the growth. [source]


Model identification in presence of incomplete information by generalized principal component analysis: Application to the common and differential responses of Escherichia coli to multiple pulse perturbations in continuous, high-biomass density culture

BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOENGINEERING, Issue 4 2009
Daniel V. Guebel
Abstract In a previous report we described a multivariate approach to discriminate between the different response mechanisms operating in Escherichia coli when a steady, continuous culture of these bacteria was perturbed by a glycerol pulse (Guebel et al., 2009, Biotechnol Bioeng 102: 910,922). Herein, we present a procedure to extend this analysis when multiple, spaced pulse perturbations (glycerol, fumarate, acetate, crotonobetaine, hypersaline plus high-glycerol basal medium and crotonobetaine plus hypersaline basal medium) are being assessed. The proposed method allows us to identify not only the common responses among different perturbation conditions, but to recognize the specific response for a given stimulus even when the dynamics of the perturbation is unknown. Components common to all conditions are determined first by Generalized Principal Components Analysis (GPCA) upon a set of covariance matrices. A metrics is then built to quantify the similitude distance. This is based on the degree of variance extraction achieved for each variable along the GPCA deflation processes by the common factors. This permits a cluster analysis, which recognizes several compact sub-sets containing only the most closely related responsive groups. The GPCA is then run again but is restricted to the groups in each sub-set. Finally, after the data have been exhaustively deflated by the common sub-set factors, the resulting residual matrices are used to determine the specific response factors by classical principal component analysis (PCA). The proposed method was validated by comparing its predictions with those obtained when the dynamics of the perturbation was determined. In addition, it showed to have a better performance than the obtained with other multivariate alternatives (e.g., orthogonal contrasts based on direct GPCA, Tucker-3 model, PARAFAC, etc.). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009; 104: 785,795 © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source]


An in vitro study of non-axial forces upon the retention of an O-ring attachment

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 12 2009
Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the retention force of an O-ring attachment system in different inclinations to the ideal path of insertion, using devices to compensate angulations. Material and methods: Two implants were inserted into an aluminum base, and ball attachments were screwed to implants. Cylinders with O-rings were placed on ball attachments and connected to the test device using positioners to compensate implant angulations (0°, 7°, and 14°). Plexiglass bases were used to simulate implant angulations. The base and the test device were positioned in a testing apparatus, which simulated insertion/removal of an overdenture. A total of 2900 cycles, simulating 2 years of overdenture use, were performed and 36 O-rings were tested. The force required for each cycle was recorded with computer software. Longitudinal sections of ball attachment,positioner,cylinder with O-rings of each angulation were obtained to analyze the relationship among them, and O-ring sections tested in each angulation were compared with an unused counterpart. A mixed linear model was used to analyze the data, and the comparison was performed by orthogonal contrasts (,=0.05). Results: At 0°, the retention force decreased significantly over time, and the retention force was significantly different in all comparisons, except from 12 to 18 months. When the implants were positioned at 7°, the retention force was statistically different at 0 and 24 months. At 14°, significant differences were found from 6 and 12 to 24 months. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that O-rings for implant/attachments perpendicular to the occlusal plane were adequately retentive over the first year and that the retentive capacity of O-ring was affected by implant inclinations despite the proposed positioners. [source]