			Home About us Contact

Oral Sildenafil (oral + sildenafil)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Efficacy of sildenafil on erectile dysfunction of newly-weds

ANDROLOGIA, Issue 6 2009
Q. He
Summary To explore the efficacy of sildenafil on erectile dysfunction (ED) of newly-weds, the author studied 60 outpatients within a month of marriage, who suffered from sexual intercourse (SI) failure caused by ED and showed no improvement after receiving sex education and psychological consultation. The patients were given oral sildenafil, 100 mg for the first and second times, 50 mg for the third and fourth times, no more than once every day, with a 1- to 3-day break between every two times. Four times of sildenafil administration formed one course of treatment. Sildenafil was taken 1 h before SI and was aided with adequate sexual stimulation. The rates of successful SI due to improved erection during and after a course of sildenafil treatment were 93.3% (56/60) and 85% (51/60), both P > 0.05. In the groups with one and more than one SI failure the successful SI rates after a sildenafil treatment course were 93.1% (27/29) and 77.4% (24/31), both P > 0.05. Oral sildenafil with psychological therapy in the treatment of ED of newly-weds proves to be effective in restoring the patients' sexual function and relieving their mental pressure or stress. [source]

Sildenafil influences lower urinary tract symptoms

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 9 2002
K. Sairam
Objective ,To assess the possible relationship between erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men, and whether treatment of their ED with sildenafil influences their LUTS. Patients and methods ,In all, 112 men with ED attending the andrology outpatient clinic were offered oral sildenafil and reviewed 1 and 3 months after treatment. They completed the International Index of Erectile Function and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaires at baseline and each review. Scores were designated to indicate the visit number and differences between the visits calculated. Results ,A third of the men had an initial IPSS of >,7; there was no relationship between baseline urinary and sexual function scores. After treatment with sildenafil, the urinary scores at 3 months correlated strongly with the sexual function scores. There was a significant inverse relationship between the baseline IPSS and sexual function scores after treatment. The overall trend in the IPSS was towards improvement after treatment with sildenafil. Conclusions ,In men with ED there is no relationship between sexual function scores and urinary symptom scores before treating ED. Treatment with sildenafil appears to improve urinary symptom scores. A lower IPSS at baseline appears to predict a better response to ED therapy with sildenafil. [source]

Results from different patient populations using combined therapy with alprostadil and sildenafil: predictors of satisfaction

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2000
J.H. Mydlo
Objective To evaluate the outcome of combined therapy (using intraurethral alprostadil and oral sildenafil) in private and clinic patients with erectile dysfunction, and thus assess predictors of satisfaction. Patients and methods In all, 360 men were treated for erectile dysfunction using single and/or combined therapy, comprising 214 private-practice and 166 clinic patients. Responses were evaluated using the International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire before and after treatment. Serum testosterone levels, education and socio-economic status were also assessed. Group 1a consisted of 33 private patients and Group 1b of 24 clinic patients who tried the maximum dose of intraurethral alprostadil monotherapy initially, followed by the maximum dose of sildenafil monotherapy, and remained dissatisfied. Group 2a consisted of 32 private patients and group 2b of 31 clinic patients who tried the maximum dose of sildenafil monotherapy initially, followed by the maximum dose of alprostadil monotherapy, and were also dissatisfied. These two groups of 65 private and 55 clinic patients then underwent combined therapy. Results The mean ( sd) score for erectile function was 24.1 (2) for combined therapy (a 123% improvement), and 19.8 (1.8) (83% improvement) and 15.2 (1.6) (41% improvement) for sildenafil and alprostadil monotherapies (P < 0.05 for both patient groups). The men also reported an improvement in their satisfaction with intercourse. However, at 18 months, 60 of the 65 private patients but only 40 of the 55 clinic patients continued with combined therapy; thus, the discontinuation rate was three times greater among clinic than among private patients. Furthermore, the private patients had an overall improvement in the satisfaction score of 128%, compared with 51% for the clinic patients. Conclusion Although there were no significant differences in erectile function improvement within the two satisfied combined therapy groups, the differences in overall satisfaction and long-term withdrawal rates suggests that other factors beside motivation must be involved for success, e.g. education, persistence, realistic expectations, and certain psychological factors. Combined therapy should be considered for those patients who have a suboptimal response to monotherapy and refuse or are not candidates for surgical options. Generally, those patients with a higher education, greater persistence and more realistic expectations were more satisfied with combined therapy. [source]