Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Operator Error (operator + error)
Selected AbstractsModifications to improve the accuracy of a four-ball test apparatusLUBRICATION SCIENCE, Issue 1 2000P. I. Lacey Abstract The four-ball wear test machine is one of the most widely used tribological tools in both research and industry. In general, the test geometry is self-aligning and minimises the opportunity for random variation. Nonetheless, accurate control of the test parameters remains vital to repeatability and reproducibility. The present paper details a number of modifications to a commercially available test apparatus that have been found to improve accuracy. The applied load on some apparatus was found to vary from the correct value, probably due to frictional drag in the loading system. A feedback control loop was designed and fitted to the applied load mechanism, which resulted in significantly improved accuracy. Finally, the apparatus was fully automated, with complete computer control of all test parameters. Under this, following cleaning and assembly of the test specimens, the required test procedure could be selected from a menu of standard methods, and the computer program then adjusted the test parameters according to the method selected, greatly reducing the possibility of operator error. [source] Simultaneous state estimation and attenuation correction for thunderstorms with radar data using an ensemble Kalman filter: tests with simulated dataTHE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, Issue 643 2009Ming Xue Abstract A new approach to dealing with attenuated radar reflectivity data in the data assimilation process is proposed and tested with simulated data using the ensemble square-root Kalman filter. This approach differs from the traditional method where attenuation is corrected in observation space first before observations are assimilated into numerical models. We build attenuation correction into the data assimilation system by calculating the expected attenuation within the forward observation operators using the estimated atmospheric state. Such a procedure does not require prior assumption about the types of hydrometeor species along the radar beams, and allows us to take advantage of knowledge about the hydrometeors obtained through data assimilation and state estimation. Being based on optimal estimation theory, error and uncertainty information on the observations and prior estimate can be effectively utilized, and additional observed parameters, such as those from polarimetric radar, can potentially be incorporated into the system. Tests with simulated reflectivity data of an X-band 3 cm wavelength radar for a supercell storm show that the attenuation correction procedure is very effective,the analyses obtained using attenuated data are almost as good as those obtained using unattenuated data. The procedure is also robust in the presence of moderate dropsize-distribution-related observation operator error and when systematic radar calibration error exists. The analysis errors are very large if no attenuation correction is applied. The effect of attenuation and its correction when radial velocity data are also assimilated is discussed as well. In general, attenuation correction is equally important when quality radial velocity data are also assimilated. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society [source] Automaticity and operator errorANAESTHESIA, Issue 12 2008I. R. Fletcher No abstract is available for this article. [source] Experience with the Cardiva Boomerang CatalystÔ system in pediatric cardiac catheterization,CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2009Sharon Seltzer MD Abstract Objectives: We studied the safety and efficacy of the Cardiva Boomerang CatalystÔ vascular closure system in pediatric patients after cardiac catheterization with access in femoral and internal jugular vessels. Background: Recurrent catheterization and advances in pediatric interventions increase the need for easy hemostasis without a residual foreign body that may prevent re-accessing the vessel. The Boomerang can be deployed in sheaths as small as 4Fr without residual foreign body, with minimal orientation needed, and few complications reported. Methods: In a two-month period, all patients between 18 months and 21 years old catheterized with 4,8Fr sheaths less than 15 cm long were eligible for Boomerang placement. These were compared retrospectively with control patients with manual hemostasis. Anthropomorphic measurements, procedure type, activated clotting time, and sheath size as well as total times of cases, intubation, hemostasis, and extubation were compared between the two groups. Results: Forty-six Boomerangs were deployed in 31 patients and compared with 40 patients with manual hemostasis. Boomerangs were deployed in femoral vessels and the internal jugular vein. Device success with hemostasis was achieved in 39 patients (85%). There were no significant differences in time to hemostasis or extubation between the two groups. No major complications or operator error occurred, including hematoma, transfusion, retroperitoneal bleed, infection, vessel occlusion, or need for surgery. Conclusions: The Boomerang is a safe and easy means of achieving hemostasis in the pediatric population, in femoral vessels as well as internal jugular veins. Its times to hemostasis and extubation were not significantly different from manual hold. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Outcomes of the International Union of Crystallography Commission on Powder Diffraction Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis: samples 1a to 1hJOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, Issue 4 2001Ian C. Madsen The International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) Commission on Powder Diffraction (CPD) has sponsored a round robin on the determination of quantitative phase abundance from diffraction data. Specifically, the aims of the round robin were (i) to document the methods and strategies commonly employed in quantitative phase analysis (QPA), especially those involving powder diffraction, (ii) to assess levels of accuracy, precision and lower limits of detection, (iii) to identify specific problem areas and develop practical solutions, (iv) to formulate recommended procedures for QPA using diffraction data, and (v) to create a standard set of samples for future reference. Some of the analytical issues which have been addressed include (a) the type of analysis (integrated intensities or full-profile, Rietveld or full-profile, database of observed patterns) and (b) the type of instrument used, including geometry and radiation (X-ray, neutron or synchrotron). While the samples used in the round robin covered a wide range of analytical complexity, this paper reports the results for only the sample 1 mixtures. Sample 1 is a simple three-phase system prepared with eight different compositions covering a wide range of abundance for each phase. The component phases were chosen to minimize sample-related problems, such as the degree of crystallinity, preferred orientation and microabsorption. However, these were still issues that needed to be addressed by the analysts. The results returned indicate a great deal of variation in the ability of the participating laboratories to perform QPA of this simple three-component system. These differences result from such problems as (i) use of unsuitable reference intensity ratios, (ii) errors in whole-pattern refinement software operation and in interpretation of results, (iii) operator errors in the use of the Rietveld method, often arising from a lack of crystallographic understanding, and (iv) application of excessive microabsorption correction. Another major area for concern is the calculation of errors in phase abundance determination, with wide variations in reported values between participants. Few details of methodology used to derive these errors were supplied and many participants provided no measure of error at all. [source] | ||||||||||