Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Opioid Treatment (opioid + treatment)
Selected AbstractsNormalization of Serum Cortisol Concentration With Opioid Treatment of Severe Chronic PainPAIN MEDICINE, Issue 2 2002Forest Tennant MD Serum cortisol concentrations may be altered in severe, chronic pain due to excess stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Among 40 consecutive patients with severe, chronic pain 26 (65.0%) demonstrated abnormal serum cortisol concentration. After 90 days of treatment, only 7 (17.5%; p<0.01) continued to show abnormal serum cortisol concentration indicating that serum cortisol and other serologic abnormalities may serve as biologic markers of severe, chronic pain. [source] Exposure to opioid maintenance treatment reduces long-term mortalityADDICTION, Issue 3 2008Amy Gibson ABSTRACT Aims To (i) examine the predictors of mortality in a randomized study of methadone versus buprenorphine maintenance treatment; (ii) compare the survival experience of the randomized subject groups; and (iii) describe the causes of death. Design Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of mortality among participants in a randomized trial of methadone versus buprenorphine maintenance treatment. Setting Recruitment through three clinics for a randomized trial of buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance. Participants A total of 405 heroin-dependent (DSM-IV) participants aged 18 years and above who consented to participate in original study. Measurements Baseline data from original randomized study; dates and causes of death through data linkage with Births, Deaths and Marriages registries; and longitudinal treatment exposure via State health departments. Predictors of mortality examined through survival analysis. Findings There was an overall mortality rate of 8.84 deaths per 1000 person-years of follow-up and causes of death were comparable with the literature. Increased exposure to episodes of opioid treatment longer than 7 days reduced the risk of mortality; there was no differential mortality among methadone versus buprenorphine participants. More dependent, heavier users of heroin at baseline had a lower risk of death, and also higher exposure to opioid treatment. Older participants randomized to buprenorphine treatment had significantly improved survival. Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander participants had a higher risk of death. Conclusions Increased exposure to opioid maintenance treatment reduces the risk of death in opioid-dependent people. There was no differential reduction between buprenorphine and methadone. Previous studies suggesting differential effects may have been affected by biases in patient selection. [source] The physical and psychosocial consequences of opioid addiction: An overview of changes in opioid treatmentINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, Issue 2 2000Ron Brown [source] Treating Pain Patients at Risk: Evaluation of a Screening Tool in Opioid-Treated Pain Patients With and Without AddictionPAIN MEDICINE, Issue 2 2003FACP, Robert Friedman MD ABSTRACT Patients receiving opioid treatment for chronic pain, many of whom were hospitalized with medical complications of substance abuse, were asked to complete a screening questionnaire to help validate a simple self-administered survey. Questions relating to tobacco abuse and prior treatment for drug and alcohol abuse distinguished patients with addiction and pain from opioid-treated chronic pain patients. [source] PHYSIOLOGIC ABNORMALITIES AS BIOLOGIC MARKERS IN SEVERE, INTRACTABLE PAINPAIN MEDICINE, Issue 2 2002Article first published online: 4 JUL 200 Forest Tennant, MD, Dr PH; Laura Herman RN BSN FNP Veract Intractable Pain Centers, 338 S. Glendora Ave., West Covina, CA 91790 It is recognized that biologic markers of severe, intractable pain (SIP) can help distinguish degrees of pain and assist in monitoring treatment effectiveness. Fifty (50.0%) adult ambulatory SIP patients, at the time of referral described their pain as constant, excruciating, produced a bed or house-bound state, and was uncontrolled by non-opioid medications and low dosages of the weak opioids, hydrocodone or codeine. Patients were treated with a long-acting opioid preparation consisting of methadone, oxycodone, morphine, or transdermal fentanyl in addition to a short-acting opioid for breakthrough pain. These patients were screened before treatment and after three months of opioid treatment by: (1) blood pressure; (2) pulse rate; (3) morning cortisol and pregnenolone serum concentrations; and (4) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The percentage of patients with physiologic abnormalities before and after three months of treatment were as follows: (1) hypertension above 140/90 mm/Hg; 28 (56.0%) vrs 14 (28.0%); (2) tachycardia above 84/minute; 21 (42.0%) vrs 9 (18.0%); (3) elevated serum cortisol concentration; 12 (24.0%) vrs 2 (4.0%); (4) low serum cortisol serum concentration; 7 (14.0% vrs 1 (2.0%); (5) low pregnenolone serum concentration; 18 (36.0%) vrs 3 (6.0%); and (6) elevated ESR; 10 (20.0%) vrs 3 (6.0%) (p<.05). Mean blood pressure, pulse rate, ESR, and serum concentrations of cortisol and pregnenolone in patients who demonstrated a physiologic abnormality all positively and significantly (p<.05) altered these markers toward normal. This study indicates that some physiologic abnormalities, particularly those related to pituitary-adrenal over-stimulation with excess output of catecholamines and glucocorticoids, may serve as biologic markers which can help to identify SIP and monitor treatment effectiveness. [source] (229) Serum Cortisol Concentrations and Adrenal Reserve May Be Altered by Severe Chronic PainPAIN MEDICINE, Issue 3 2001Forest Tennant It has been postulated that chronic pain over-stimulates the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis to produce an extended stress response. If this assumption is true, patients with severe, chronic pain should demonstrate abnormalities of the pituitary-adrenal axis. To evaluate this premise, we screened 40 adult, chronic pain patients in the first week of treatment with serum cortisol concentrations taken between 8:00 and 10:00 AM. Criteria for inclusion in this study required that pain be present for at least one year and be constant, incurable, interfere with sleep, and cause the patient to be bed or house-bound without opioid treatment. Sixteen (16) of the subjects were challenged with cosyntropin, 0.25mg, given intramuscularly immediately after blood was drawn for determination of baseline serum cortisol concentration. Normal serum cortisol concentrations was considered to range from 5.0 to 25.0 ug/dl at baseline, and normal cortisol reserve was considered to be at least a doubling of the baseline concentration determined one hour after cosyntropin administration. Ten (25%) of the patients had evaluated serum cortisol concentrations above 25ug/dl with the highest being 54.4 ug/dl. Nine (20%) demonstrated low serum cortisol concentrations under 5 ug/dl, and 5 of 16 (31.25%) given cosyntropin challenge demonstrated inadequate adrenal reserve by failing to double their baseline cortisol concentration. All patients with high or low serum cortisol concentration demonstrated a normal cortisol concentration following pain control with a long-acting opioid including methadone, extended-length morphine or oxycodone, or transdermal fentanyl. This study suggests that severe, chronic pain may produce profound abnormalities of serum cortisol and cortisol reserve, and normalization of these alterations may require pain treatment with long-acting opioids. [source] Opioids and the Management of Chronic Severe Pain in the Elderly: Consensus Statement of an International Expert Panel with Focus on the Six Clinically Most Often Used World Health Organization step III Opioids (Buprenorphine, Fentanyl, Hydromorphone, Methadone, Morphine, Oxycodone)PAIN PRACTICE, Issue 4 2008Joseph Pergolizzi MD ,,Abstract Summary of consensus: 1.,The use of opioids in cancer pain:, The criteria for selecting analgesics for pain treatment in the elderly include, but are not limited to, overall efficacy, overall side-effect profile, onset of action, drug interactions, abuse potential, and practical issues, such as cost and availability of the drug, as well as the severity and type of pain (nociceptive, acute/chronic, etc.). At any given time, the order of choice in the decision-making process can change. This consensus is based on evidence-based literature (extended data are not included and chronic, extended-release opioids are not covered). There are various driving factors relating to prescribing medication, including availability of the compound and cost, which may, at times, be the main driving factor. The transdermal formulation of buprenorphine is available in most European countries, particularly those with high opioid usage, with the exception of France; however, the availability of the sublingual formulation of buprenorphine in Europe is limited, as it is marketed in only a few countries, including Germany and Belgium. The opioid patch is experimental at present in U.S.A. and the sublingual formulation has dispensing restrictions, therefore, its use is limited. It is evident that the population pyramid is upturned. Globally, there is going to be an older population that needs to be cared for in the future. This older population has expectations in life, in that a retiree is no longer an individual who decreases their lifestyle activities. The "baby-boomers" in their 60s and 70s are "baby zoomers"; they want to have a functional active lifestyle. They are willing to make trade-offs regarding treatment choices and understand that they may experience pain, providing that can have increased quality of life and functionality. Therefore, comorbidities,including cancer and noncancer pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and postherpetic neuralgia,and patient functional status need to be taken carefully into account when addressing pain in the elderly. World Health Organization step III opioids are the mainstay of pain treatment for cancer patients and morphine has been the most commonly used for decades. In general, high level evidence data (Ib or IIb) exist, although many studies have included only few patients. Based on these studies, all opioids are considered effective in cancer pain management (although parts of cancer pain are not or only partially opioid sensitive), but no well-designed specific studies in the elderly cancer patient are available. Of the 2 opioids that are available in transdermal formulation,fentanyl and buprenorphine,fentanyl is the most investigated, but based on the published data both seem to be effective, with low toxicity and good tolerability profiles, especially at low doses. 2.,The use of opioids in noncancer-related pain:, Evidence is growing that opioids are efficacious in noncancer pain (treatment data mostly level Ib or IIb), but need individual dose titration and consideration of the respective tolerability profiles. Again no specific studies in the elderly have been performed, but it can be concluded that opioids have shown efficacy in noncancer pain, which is often due to diseases typical for an elderly population. When it is not clear which drugs and which regimes are superior in terms of maintaining analgesic efficacy, the appropriate drug should be chosen based on safety and tolerability considerations. Evidence-based medicine, which has been incorporated into best clinical practice guidelines, should serve as a foundation for the decision-making processes in patient care; however, in practice, the art of medicine is realized when we individualize care to the patient. This strikes a balance between the evidence-based medicine and anecdotal experience. Factual recommendations and expert opinion both have a value when applying guidelines in clinical practice. 3.,The use of opioids in neuropathic pain:, The role of opioids in neuropathic pain has been under debate in the past but is nowadays more and more accepted; however, higher opioid doses are often needed for neuropathic pain than for nociceptive pain. Most of the treatment data are level II or III, and suggest that incorporation of opioids earlier on might be beneficial. Buprenorphine shows a distinct benefit in improving neuropathic pain symptoms, which is considered a result of its specific pharmacological profile. 4.,The use of opioids in elderly patients with impaired hepatic and renal function:, Functional impairment of excretory organs is common in the elderly, especially with respect to renal function. For all opioids except buprenorphine, half-life of the active drug and metabolites is increased in the elderly and in patients with renal dysfunction. It is, therefore, recommended that,except for buprenorphine,doses be reduced, a longer time interval be used between doses, and creatinine clearance be monitored. Thus, buprenorphine appears to be the top-line choice for opioid treatment in the elderly. 5.,Opioids and respiratory depression:, Respiratory depression is a significant threat for opioid-treated patients with underlying pulmonary condition or receiving concomitant central nervous system (CNS) drugs associated with hypoventilation. Not all opioids show equal effects on respiratory depression: buprenorphine is the only opioid demonstrating a ceiling for respiratory depression when used without other CNS depressants. The different features of opioids regarding respiratory effects should be considered when treating patients at risk for respiratory problems, therefore careful dosing must be maintained. 6.,Opioids and immunosuppression:, Age is related to a gradual decline in the immune system: immunosenescence, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, and cancer, and decreased efficacy of immunotherapy, such as vaccination. The clinical relevance of the immunosuppressant effects of opioids in the elderly is not fully understood, and pain itself may also cause immunosuppression. Providing adequate analgesia can be achieved without significant adverse events, opioids with minimal immunosuppressive characteristics should be used in the elderly. The immunosuppressive effects of most opioids are poorly described and this is one of the problems in assessing true effect of the opioid spectrum, but there is some indication that higher doses of opioids correlate with increased immunosuppressant effects. Taking into consideration all the very limited available evidence from preclinical and clinical work, buprenorphine can be recommended, while morphine and fentanyl cannot. 7.,Safety and tolerability profile of opioids:, The adverse event profile varies greatly between opioids. As the consequences of adverse events in the elderly can be serious, agents should be used that have a good tolerability profile (especially regarding CNS and gastrointestinal effects) and that are as safe as possible in overdose especially regarding effects on respiration. Slow dose titration helps to reduce the incidence of typical initial adverse events such as nausea and vomiting. Sustained release preparations, including transdermal formulations, increase patient compliance.,, [source] Effect of oral naloxone hydrochloride on gastrointestinal transit in premature infants treated with morphineACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 3 2009Ranaa Akkawi Abstract Background: Opioids are common drugs for pain treatment in preterm newborn infants, in spite of several adverse effects. Constipation is a frequent problem when opioids are used in both adults and neonates. Although several studies indicate that the oral administration of naloxone hydrochloride (NH) improves intestinal motility during opioid therapy, there is still a lack of evidence in newborns. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of NH against reduced intestinal motility during opioid treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. We analysed the medical records of fifteen infants (Group 1) treated with continuous morphine (MO) infusion and fourteen infants (Group 2) treated with both oral NH (3 ,g/kg 4 times daily) and MO. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the total MO dose. Infants treated both with NH and MO had a tendency to improve their mean stool frequency/day. A statistically significant improvement was observed in the mean total food intake (mL/kg/day) of the infants treated with NH (p = 0.014). No difference in the mean food retention between the two groups was observed. Conclusion: Orally administrated NH seems to improve intestinal motility resulting in increased food intake/day and improved stool frequency/day in premature newborn infants treated with MO. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings. [source] | ||||||||||